"It's not simple if you can't use ANY of the existing trope which in this case you can't."
The first sentence isn't part of the existing trope? That is just false. And don't give me "it's a minor part", because you wrote "ANY", in all-caps, implying an absolute.
This new definition wouldn't lose an examples. It would simply removing the complaining aspect, which is what we are doing. So keeping the examples also means that some of the existing trope remains.
The only thing that would be lost would be the subjective reaction.
And so far, you haven't proven anything. You just keep insisting that this would be entirely new, without showing a single bit of the description, definition, or examples to show that this would be the case.
"Actually it is exactly Rummage Sale Reject not What The Hell, Costuming Department?."
No. That will have to be put on TRS eventually, but that trope means an outfit that is made to be hard to cosplay. It's right there in the definition, and was affirmed in some thread discussions a while badk.
edited 14th Jan '12 3:29:14 PM by DragonQuestZ
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.