Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Per the site owner, AI generated images are allowed on TV Tropes and will be treated just like regular images.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by kory on May 2nd 2024 at 11:16:14 AM

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#826: Jul 9th 2014 at 7:43:20 AM

Is it just the effect of 8 hours straight page moving, or is J. K. Rowling's image way too fanservice-y?

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
MarqFJA The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer from Deserts of the Middle East (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
#827: Jul 9th 2014 at 7:57:26 AM

It's probably those 8 hours taking their toll on you.

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#828: Jul 9th 2014 at 7:59:12 AM

There's not really a reason to have her in a fancy dress, but that's not what I'd consider fanservicey at all.

Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#829: Jul 12th 2014 at 5:08:39 PM

It's not inappropriate, but it doesn't make much sense either. I wouldn't mind swapping the pic for something more orthodox.

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
MarqFJA The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer from Deserts of the Middle East (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
#830: Jul 16th 2014 at 9:03:40 AM

Pick your "poison", then. Personally, I'm partial for this one.

edited 16th Jul '14 9:04:24 AM by MarqFJA

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#831: Jul 28th 2014 at 2:34:44 AM

MacGuffin has a "Leave the image alone, please. — Admin request" note.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#832: Jul 30th 2014 at 5:24:18 AM

I am writing this post to argue against the new approval system. In short, it causes more trouble than it's worth, and I am in favor of abolishing it entirely, though I can think of a few alternate solutions. The new approval system drastically slows down the Image Pickin' process in some instances because moderators cannot be around 24/7 to open them, and in many cases, they are forgotten about. I made this point on the Brain Uploading thread, which had been sitting around for a while before getting clocked. Had it not been for this system, I or someone else would have commented on it when it opened.

Although I understand the need to discourage against threads that are just a waste of everyone's time, the new process wastes more time than it saves. When an IP thread is made, I read the post, and it is fresh in my mind. But now I have to wait for it to be opened, which may happen while I'm asleep or at work or forgotten about it. Now, this ordeal is pointlessly frustrating, and I'm sure that I'm not the only one this happens to for sure.

But the thing is, I have no idea when it will open. It could be tomorrow. It could be in three weeks, like this one. But I have no way of knowing if it's open unless I click on it, or the number of replies is greater than one.

Plus, pointless threads were not a major problem in IP. Unlike TRS, IP didn't have a problem with too many threads. Moderators could still close threads that were pointless. And most threads are created by seasoned veterans who know what they are doing. It seems that only a handful of them get declined to open.

So, although I would favor getting rid of this system entirely for IP, I would at the least settle for an alternate solution that may make things easier. Unopened threads shouldn't appear in the same place as all the others. What is the point of being able to read a post that I can't reply to? This wastes my time and everyone else's. New posts either should be made somewhere else and moved to IP when they open, or they could be distinguished from opened threads by clear markup (E.G. bold or a clear indicator symbol). This would help tropers from wasting their time with an unopened thread, as well as moderators finding a thread that needs to be opened. The current system does not allow for that.

And threads should not just be opened without comment. They should move back to the top at the least, else they will fall to obscurity before getting clocked.

The approval system was a solution to a problem that wasn't really a problem, and it in of itself is a far greater problem than the one that it tried to address. It either needs to be reformed so that unopened threads are distinguished from opened ones, or removed entirely, back to how it was before.

edited 30th Jul '14 5:39:40 AM by Rethkir

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#833: Jul 30th 2014 at 7:19:00 AM

I've been saying for a while now that unopened threads need to be auto-pinging us every few days. It would also be nice to have these threads have some kind of icon in the list to let us know they're there, as I don't always go to Hollers before I go to IP. As far as opening without comment, I try to leave a comment whenever I open a thread but sometimes I'm not where I can look at the proffered example(s)...in the future, if I have to do this I'll just announce that the thread's open.

In general, I don't think the system is a complete failure, but it has some definite flaws that need to be addressed.

edited 30th Jul '14 7:27:38 AM by Willbyr

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#834: Jul 30th 2014 at 8:11:35 AM

I think the issue is that the thread approval mechanism requires a decision to be made Here and Now, since otherwise the "this thread needs processing" flag will be drowned out by other hollers.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#835: Jul 30th 2014 at 10:39:53 AM

I agree with Rethkir.

There may be a point to the approval mechanism on TRS, but IP didn't have TRS's issues in the first place, and as a result the system is creating more work rather than less.

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
rexpensive Since: Feb, 2014
#836: Jul 30th 2014 at 12:11:05 PM

I agree that it seems unnecessary for IP. I like it's use for TRS.

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#837: Jul 30th 2014 at 12:11:20 PM

Solution that maintains current system: all threads auto-open in X days. (IMO it should be a small number, like 3.)

Solution that scraps current system: go back to the old "hard cap" system for IP, or don't use any kind of cap in IP at all.

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#838: Jul 30th 2014 at 12:29:45 PM

If we went back to not having the forums be capped, I would argue for a very tight cap rather than no cap; half the reason so many threads in both forums take being clocked to get resolution is because we have too damn many threads going at any one time and nothing gets done.

edited 30th Jul '14 12:29:58 PM by Willbyr

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#839: Jul 30th 2014 at 12:31:12 PM

Not at all suggesting the TRS system be changed. Not familiar enough with that forum to know what's best; I assume the current system is better than the old one, there.

The "auto-open in X days" solution has the advantage of being able to be applied consistently to both workshops, instead of having them work differently. Not sure how big an advantage that is, though.

edited 30th Jul '14 12:33:05 PM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#840: Jul 30th 2014 at 12:33:10 PM

I think the approval system works reasonably well in TRS to be kept around (although the frequency of clockable threads is worrying).

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#841: Jul 30th 2014 at 12:40:51 PM

Let the TRS people decide how to proceed with TRS; the point is that IP was working fine with the thread cap of 100 (and in fact was usually around 70-80 open threads anyway).

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#842: Jul 30th 2014 at 5:20:58 PM

The idea makes sense for TRS, since they had trouble staying under limit. The long duration time of threads is the cause. But I never understood why this system was implemented in IP as well, which never needed it and was better without it. However, TRS may stand to benefit from one of the alternate proposals such as icons for unopened threads, or having a separate place for unopened threads, like the opposite of a morgue: a nursery. Though, that is a matter for TRS.

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
lexicon Since: May, 2012
#843: Jul 30th 2014 at 10:18:34 PM

I also say the current system isn't working. Auto open would be preferable but anything to open the threads sooner would be better.

FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#844: Jul 31st 2014 at 4:11:34 AM

My sense of it is that there are still a lot of threads being started in both workshops which are not worth opening. I would recast the issue as one of needing a faster/clearer rejection method, rather than an opening one.

Just leaving the un-opened ones to die on the vine is what creates the sense of a backlog.

edited 31st Jul '14 4:12:35 AM by FastEddie

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#845: Jul 31st 2014 at 10:20:09 AM

Please consider addressing both.

edited 31st Jul '14 10:21:10 AM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#846: Jul 31st 2014 at 11:05:39 AM

The current approval method is the fastest possible method to screen new threads and reject unworthwhile ones. Eddie is looking for a method to reduce the tendency of people to create unworthile topics.

That is going to be hard to do on first-time or very occasional users, but easier on regular 'shops users. Also, I see that at least two threads that were judged un-worthy were started by people that I had pointed to the workshops from the discussion tabs, so I'll have to do some commenting already in the discussion tab.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#847: Jul 31st 2014 at 5:59:27 PM

Threads should open by default, but if a thread is just a waste of time or is opened without a valid reason, then regular users should be vigilant of this and say so on the thread, then holler a mod to take care of it. I think that's something we should be able to handle. When creating a new thread, a message should still notify the OP of the current policy. This will keep the deterrence while not stifling the IP process.

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#848: Aug 1st 2014 at 11:34:15 AM

[up]So, basically, what you're suggesting is an optimistic system, where a thread is considered acceptable until deemed unacceptable and can then be closed by a mod?

And for better or worse, that can allow a thread to pick up steam before a mod has a chance to look it over. Considering that IP has had in my opinion relatively small problems with it, I think that can work.

The downside would be that the useless threads will take up more time, and there may be more opposition to closing them early, rather than waiting for them to clock out to close them. Not sure how that will be in comparison to the complaining about threads that are just never opened currently, but it will be more visible.

With that system, I think a thread that doesn't have an acceptable opening post, and no posts following that pick up the slack, would be subject to the same instant rejection as non-opened threads currently. That would allow people to start working on it immediately, while at the same time maintaining the standard of the reason for opening the thread in the first place. If someone posts to say they may have a better suggestion in a little while, that's probably a good reason to wait for at least that, but if that doesn't happen, even if the thread has just been open for an hour, anyone who would have such a suggestion could just as well make a separate thread for it. Or alternatively, holler and ask for the thread to be reopened, whichever is preferable.

Personally I just don't read threads that aren't opened, simply because there's no point to it, so I don't really have a problem with the current system. If it's not opened and there's no post button, I can just ignore it until it's opened, maybe get it in the back of my mind to see if any suggestions come to mind.

Check out my fanfiction!
rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#849: Aug 1st 2014 at 12:08:00 PM

The thread about the change is 238 posts long, and they're almost all about TRS.

Several or many IP regulars have said (both before and after the change was implemented) either "there was no issue with backlog in IP" or "backlog in IP was not an issue" and that changing the hard cap should not be done at all there; on the IP forum, it is a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. I am frustrated that this common sentiment has (as far as I know) received no response.

edited 2nd Aug '14 2:49:47 PM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#850: Aug 3rd 2014 at 12:31:36 PM

I don't think it's a good idea to base a new system purely on a "gut feeling" (and in particular, basing a system for IP on a gut feeling about TRS). Perhaps we can have some data here? It should be pretty straightforward to count, from the database, how many threads are opened each day in IP and TRS respectively, and how many of those are rejected.

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!

Total posts: 9,741
Top