Follow TV Tropes

Reviews WesternAnimation / The Powerpuff Girls 2016

Go To

PhantomHeartless5 Since: Sep, 2012
08/29/2020 08:58:43 •••

Not Bad

I remember hearing about this reboot a few months back. I watched Pieguyrulz's video titled "5 Reasons Why The Powerpuff Girls Reboot Will Likely Suck". He gave some pretty convincing reasons, but he also said he'd wait until the show aired and judge it on its own merits. Likewise, I decided to do the same. And now that I've seen some of the shorts and the first two episodes, I've found the show to be surprisingly good. It's definitely not the Powerpuff Girls we grew up with, but that's not entirely a bad thing.

Pros:

  • The opening theme and intro is fun to listen to and awesome to look at and it provides an interesting twist to the original intro.
  • The setting being more modernized (The girls are in elementary, the PPG hotline is a cell phone, etc) kinda gives the feeling that the show is growing up in a way.
  • Despite it being a reboot, the original cast is still around, and I'm curious to see some of the new villains that will be introduced.
    • Likewise, the show's original formula is still around. The girls fight monsters and go to school and save the world and stuff, the interactive narrator is still here.
  • The animation is pretty okay.
  • The show can be pretty funny at times.

Cons:

  • About the only real flaw with this show so far is that the original voice actors for the girls have been replaced. The new actors aren't bad by any means, but the thing is that the girls sound completely identical to one another and there isn't much differences in their voices. This is even more jarring with the fact that Tara Strong volunteered to reprise her role as Bubbles (Bubbles was her favorite role) and was turned down.

Overall, like I said, the show is definitely not the Powerpuff Girls we grew up with and the girls' voice actors will take some getting used to, but so far the show is turning out to be good and it's worth a watch if you're curious.

wrongpassword Since: Aug, 2015
04/10/2016 00:00:00

WTH?! Tara Strong was rejected? If she was sick or had other things to do I would understand but this is just messed up. I didn\'t care for the new girls in general either. Blossom was alright but Buttercup and Bubbles just sounded off. At times way off. It also feels like they aren\'t using the narrator enough. It makes me wonder how much was lost when William Hanna and Joseph Barbera passed away.

PhantomHeartless5 Since: Sep, 2012
04/11/2016 00:00:00

Yeah. Cartoon Network didn\'t even contact Tara to see if she wanted to reprise her role as Bubbles. She said it felt like \"a stab in the heart.\"

Kijin Since: Oct, 2015
04/18/2016 00:00:00

Yes, Cartoon Network wanted to give other voice actresses a chance to make a name for themselves, so they had to replace the girls\' original voice actors...

A simple girl who likes Lobotomy Corporation, Youkai Watch and Pop'n Music.
Classicalfan626 Since: Nov, 2014
08/29/2020 00:00:00

@Kijin - The voices of Blossom and Buttercup need not have been replaced. Bubbles on the other hand, maybe. Anyway, Tara Strong wasn't the original voice actress for Bubbles; Kath Soucie was (she voiced Bubbles in the two What-A-Cartoon! shorts).

Kristen Li was surely a poor choice to replace Mrs. Strong. I think Strong should've been replaced by Nikky Smedley (of Teletubbies fame), due to Smedley having a higher-pitched and sweeter voice. (Smedley played Laa-Laa, one of the Teletubbies, and I'm pretty sure she must have provided the voice for Laa-Laa as well.)

And if I were making a remake or reboot of the original show, I also would drastically change the articles of clothing they wear. I didn't like the idea of the girls wearing exactly the same thing but in colors that matched those of their eyes. For instance, I can't accept the idea of Buttercup wearing a dress since she's a tomboy.


Leave a Comment:

Top