Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Series / LostInSpace2018

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
yanqui9 Since: Mar, 2010
Apr 22nd 2018 at 10:15:39 AM •••

I'm going to put spoiler tags in the entries for All for Nothing and Jerkass Has a Point. The death of Evan and the fuel situation, while not integral to the plot, are spoilery enough IMHO to be spoiler tagged. You can beat me with a wet noodle if you disagree.

Hide / Show Replies
Fighteer MOD (Time Abyss)
Jun 11th 2018 at 1:57:19 PM •••

You can spoiler-tag the major bits, but the article had way more tagging than was necessary and I cleaned up a lot of it.

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
romxxii Since: Nov, 2010
Apr 14th 2018 at 4:41:33 AM •••

  • Adaptational Villainy - is this even necessary? Wikis for the original Lost in Space already describe Dr. Smith as a villainous character, someone who intended to sabotage Jupiter 2 and who was working for the space Russians.

Hide / Show Replies
AzureOwl Since: May, 2009
Apr 14th 2018 at 5:30:58 AM •••

The description in the trope page indicates that it applies to characters that were villainous in the source material but become even worse in the adaptations:

“This trope can take several forms, depending on the adaptation and the character. The True Neutral figure is actively villainous instead of simply not caring or choosing not to get involved. An imposing and potentially dangerous, but ultimately helpful, ally may become an enemy instead. The Anti-Villain and Tragic Villain will probably lose most or all of their sympathetic side and have fewer, if any, nicer moments. The Jerkass companion who is merely contemptible (but still entitled to the same protection as any other non-villain) in the source material will start committing acts in the adaptation that make them an actual enemy. The dangerous but tragic Woobie, Destroyer of Worlds will lose any sympathetic parts of their characterization or backstory, and the Noble Demon will lack most or all of their code of honor. Meanwhile, the Well-Intentioned Extremist's belief that they are doing the right thing is gone, and they do evil things just For the Evulz, even saying so. Sometimes it can be as simple as ignoring a reformed character's Heel–Face Turn or The Atoner's remorse over their past bad behavior. An Unintentionally Sympathetic character or a Designated Villain in the source material may also be given a Kick the Dog moment or two to make the character more obviously vicious and prevent the audience from feeling too sorry for them.”

This fits Dr. Smith / June Harris in the reboot, as she is a whole order of magnitude more dangerous and nasty than her original counterpart.

lalalei2001 Since: Oct, 2009
Apr 14th 2018 at 5:33:55 AM •••

The original series WAS dark and serious for the first 5 episodes, and had Smith reprogram the Robot to kill everybody several times as well as threatening Will. The main reason it became comedic was because of the popularity of Batman, and Dr. Smith's actor said if he stayed as evil as he was they'd just kill him.

The Protomen enhanced my life.
AzureOwl Since: May, 2009
Apr 14th 2018 at 6:29:15 AM •••

Nevertheless, for the overwhelming majority of the original series' run, Dr. Smith villainy was more of a nuisance than a threat.

June remains a lethal threat throughout the first season. So the Adaptational Villainy does apply.

Top