Main Rage Against The Author Discussion

Discussion Main / RageAgainstTheAuthor

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion

davidbofinger Since: Oct, 2013

Nov 11th 2021 at 9:14:33 AM •••

I don't think The Gamers qualifies. The characters kill their creators but the characters don't know their victims are their creators when they do it.

hawthorn Crime Against Fabulosity Since: Jan, 2001

Crime Against Fabulosity

Jun 4th 2015 at 5:14:52 AM •••

I'm all for jokes and Self Demonstrating Articles, but I literally have no clue what this trope is from the description, which doesn't help to "demonstrate" it at all. This should be rewritten.

Edited by hawthorn Hide / Show Replies

SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)

Jun 4th 2015 at 6:14:45 AM •••

Oh wow. This one sucks hardcore. Bring it up here please.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

Micah Since: Jan, 2001

Mar 24th 2011 at 1:15:58 PM •••

An X Just X example; can someone elaborate?

The Dutch film Waiter.

132 is the rudest number.

Citizen Since: Jan, 2001

Jun 14th 2010 at 6:57:39 PM •••

Can I Rage Against the Author of the trope description, and rewrite it into something that doesn't require having to read a stupid roleplay? At some point, self-demonstrating becomes just cancerous.

Hide / Show Replies

Micah Since: Jan, 2001

Jun 14th 2010 at 8:41:46 PM •••

Fine by me. I've never been much of a fan of it, but I wrote the description it replaced and I didn't want to edit-war...

132 is the rudest number.

Popette Since: Dec, 1969

Aug 24th 2010 at 2:50:58 PM •••

I kind of like it that way, really. It adds some flavour. Plus, it's not written terribly.

Archived Discussion


Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known. If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page. The next one might be easier to see.

Discussion Main / RageAgainstTheAuthor