Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / DearNegativeReader

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
Peteman Since: Jan, 2001
Jan 15th 2015 at 5:39:58 PM •••

Regarding the whole "attack video" thing on Traviss, I actually managed to track one of them down via wayback machine, but I'm not sure I can link it, since it involves a guy killing people in effigy.

IndirectActiveTransport You Give Me Fever Since: Nov, 2010
You Give Me Fever
Aug 18th 2014 at 3:05:28 PM •••

Uh, why are all the examples negative or deemed "subversion" if not attacking the readers? I'm all for calling people on what they do dumbly, I can even see some pleasure in where a dumb person is put in their place, but is back biting criticism really the only thing we care about documenting? To the point "yeah, that was bad, this is why" or even, gasp "I'm sorry!" are somehow atypical?

Edited by 69.47.43.173 That's why he wants you to have the money. Not so you can buy 14 Cadillacs but so you can help build up the wastes
BooleanEarth And a happy new year. Since: Jul, 2011
And a happy new year.
Aug 14th 2011 at 8:16:40 PM •••

I organized all of the examples. The system for adding new examples is clearly outlined in hidden comments on the page itself. If someone wants to change the system, they're welcome to and can ask me for help in doing so, but they would still have to re-categorize every example. And there are a bloody lot of them. Ugh.

"In the land of the insecure, the one-balled man is king." - Haven
ShayGuy Since: Jan, 2001
Jul 13th 2011 at 6:53:29 AM •••

Does the first section of this blog post count as a subversion?

dracosummoner Since: Oct, 2009
Micah Since: Jan, 2001
Jan 3rd 2011 at 5:55:45 PM •••

Fixed, I think.

132 is the rudest number.
94.2.216.3 Since: Dec, 1969
Apr 30th 2010 at 8:05:32 AM •••

So, did Buckley take his message down, or what? Or is this an outdated 2-year-old assumption?

Edited by 94.2.216.3
Top