[001]
69.47.43.173
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Uh, why are all the examples negative or deemed \
to:
Uh, why are all the examples negative or deemed \\\"[[NotASubversion subversion]]\\\" if not attacking the readers? I\\\'m all for calling people on what they do dumbly, I can even see some pleasure in where a dumb person is put in their place, but is back biting criticism really the only thing we care about documenting? To the point \\\"yeah, that was bad, this is why\\\" or even, gasp \\\"I\\\'m sorry!\\\" are somehow atypical?
