95.72.97.84
Since: Dec, 1969
Aug 27th 2010 at 4:39:15 AM
•••
How about this version pf laconic: "Pocahontas remake sponsored by Greenpeace."
Hide / Show Replies
72.244.104.170
Since: Dec, 1969
Aug 31st 2010 at 6:21:17 AM
•••
Like above: Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgement. Make a laconic that doesn't aggravate anyone but is still accurate.
billybobfred
[[VideoGame/PuyoPuyo Cosine!]]
Since: Jan, 2001
Apr 13th 2010 at 6:24:10 AM
•••
"Giant Space Chinchilla: seems to violate the Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgment"
Then fix it, dear Henry. I think it's fine, myself, but if you're offended, perhaps you could write a less controversial laconic. Just don't cutlist it.
she her hers hOI!!! i'm tempe Hide / Show Replies
WascallyWabbit
Since: Jan, 2001
SomeSortOfTroper
Since: Jan, 2001
Apr 13th 2010 at 8:34:18 AM
•••
Either of you tried looking at the main page? Yeah, well, sucks to be James Cameron but I'd rather the trope or concept get the page.
Is it possible to make a laconic that doesn't refer to some other movie? I've surfed through a few movie/TV/literature laconics and none of them have to make an allusion to some other work.