[011]
jormis29
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It has nothing to do with the shooting and smacks of pushing an agenda of censoring games like they did in the 90s. It should just talk about the shows of support for the victims rather then attack what people create.
to:
It has nothing to do with the shooting and smacks of pushing an agenda of censoring games like they did in the 90s. It should just talk about the shows of support for the victims rather then complain about what people create.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It has nothing to do with the shooting and smacks of pushing an agenda of censoring games like they did in the 90s. It should just Some notes of sympathy for the victims.
to:
It has nothing to do with the shooting and smacks of pushing an agenda of censoring games like they did in the 90s. It should just talk about the shows of support for the victims rather then attack what people create.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It has nothing to do with the shooting and smacks of pushing an agenda of censoring games like they did in the 90s
to:
It has nothing to do with the shooting and smacks of pushing an agenda of censoring games like they did in the 90s. It should just Some notes of sympathy for the victims.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Jesus, you\'re in a pissy mood... which means now I am; great. It wasn\'t vandalism, I gave valid reasons - I didn\'t go into great detail, but hey, here we go.
to:
Jesus, you\\\'re in a pissy mood... which means now I am; great. It wasn\\\'t vandalism, I gave valid reasons that you evidently didn\\\'t read - I didn\\\'t go into great detail, but hey, here we go.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
\'\'\'My original edit summary:\'\'\' \'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\'My original edit summary:\\\'\\\'\\\' \\\'\\\'\\\"Lots of things going on here. First, this \\\"Peace / Order / Freedom Ending\\\" stuff is unofficial, subjective, and only here because the guy who originally wrote this included some bizarre ideological analysis. Second, none of these \\\"hybrid\\\" endings are different from the others; you can get this supposed \\\"super-tricky peace\\\" ending by just siding with the minutemen and not aggroing the Railroad or Brotherhood. Third, the \\\"nuclear ending\\\" isn\\\'t an ending, it\\\'s a NonStandardGameOver.\\\"\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'More detail:\\\'\\\'\\\' The supposed \\\"alliance\\\" endings are bullshit. \\\"Minutemen/Railroad alliance\\\"? Literally doesn\\\'t exist; you pick one or the other. The only possible difference is if the Minutemen don\\\'t exist by the time you reach the Railroad ending. \\\"Three-way Armstice\\\"? This isn\\\'t any different from the basic Minutemen ending -- just retake the castle before going to the institute, build the teleporter for Preston, and aggro the Institute at any point without going too far down the Brotherhood or Railroad stories. Bam, you can get the \\\"nobody dies\\\" ending. And the supposed \\\"joke ending\\\"? You are literally making shit up in your revert. The credits don\\\'t roll afterwards, you get a loading screen and it dumps you back in your house. There is no \\\"debate\\\" or \\\"fan consensus,\\\" it\\\'s objectively not an ending.
\\\'\\\'\\\'More detail:\\\'\\\'\\\' The supposed \\\"alliance\\\" endings are bullshit. \\\"Minutemen/Railroad alliance\\\"? Literally doesn\\\'t exist; you pick one or the other. The only possible difference is if the Minutemen don\\\'t exist by the time you reach the Railroad ending. \\\"Three-way Armstice\\\"? This isn\\\'t any different from the basic Minutemen ending -- just retake the castle before going to the institute, build the teleporter for Preston, and aggro the Institute at any point without going too far down the Brotherhood or Railroad stories. Bam, you can get the \\\"nobody dies\\\" ending. And the supposed \\\"joke ending\\\"? You are literally making shit up in your revert. The credits don\\\'t roll afterwards, you get a loading screen and it dumps you back in your house. There is no \\\"debate\\\" or \\\"fan consensus,\\\" it\\\'s objectively not an ending.
