Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / ShortRangeShotgun

Go To

Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Team RWBY doesn\'t fit the FourTemperamentEnsemble without shoe-horning the characters to do so. Given the trope description of each section, the characters only slightly fit some of them, often only some of the time, and often fit multiple (again, some of the time).
to:
Team RWBY doesn\\\'t fit the FourTemperamentEnsemble without shoe-horning the characters to do so. Given the trope description of each section, the characters only slightly fit some of them, often only some of the time, and often fit multiple (again, often only some of the time). Not every four-man(woman) team is going to fit a four-team trope.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
On another note, Team RWBY doesn\'t fit the FourTemperamentEnsemble without shoe-horning the characters to do so. Given the trope description of each section, the characters only slightly fit some of them, often only some of the time, and often fit multiple (again, some of the time).
to:
Team RWBY doesn\\\'t fit the FourTemperamentEnsemble without shoe-horning the characters to do so. Given the trope description of each section, the characters only slightly fit some of them, often only some of the time, and often fit multiple (again, some of the time).
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
On another note, Team RWBY doesn\'t fit the FourTemperamentEnsemble without shoe-horning the characters to do so. Given the trope description of each section, the characters only slightly fit some of them, often only some of the time, and often fit multiple (again, some of the time) - which means they don\'t fit the trope well at all.
to:
On another note, Team RWBY doesn\\\'t fit the FourTemperamentEnsemble without shoe-horning the characters to do so. Given the trope description of each section, the characters only slightly fit some of them, often only some of the time, and often fit multiple (again, some of the time).
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'ve never yet seen a convincing reason for creating group tropes on character pages. All it does is clutter up pages, make navigation and layout worse, and very often causes tropes to be pointlessly repeated in multiple places. Trope work pages already do the job of gathering tropes that apply to setting, story and groups of people. While I know some works use group sections on character pages, I\'ve also seen other works keep them away from characters pages for all these stated reasons.
to:
I\\\'ve never yet seen a convincing reason for creating group tropes on character pages. All it does is clutter up pages, make navigation and layout worse, and very often causes tropes to be pointlessly repeated in multiple places. Trope work pages already do the job of gathering tropes that apply to setting, story and groups of people, doubling up can end up being space-wasting. While I know some works use group sections on character pages, I\\\'ve also seen other works keep them away from characters pages for all these stated reasons.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'ve never yet seen a convincing reason for creating group tropes on character pages. All it does is clutter up pages, make navigation and layout worse, and very often causes tropes to be pointlessly repeated in multiple places. Trope work pages already do the job of gathering tropes that apply to setting, story and groups of people. While I know some works use them, I\'ve also seen other works keep them away from characters pages for all these reasons.
to:
I\\\'ve never yet seen a convincing reason for creating group tropes on character pages. All it does is clutter up pages, make navigation and layout worse, and very often causes tropes to be pointlessly repeated in multiple places. Trope work pages already do the job of gathering tropes that apply to setting, story and groups of people. While I know some works use group sections on character pages, I\\\'ve also seen other works keep them away from characters pages for all these stated reasons.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don\'t see the point. Tropes that apply to setting, story and groups of people are already found on the RWBY tropes page. The character pages are already more than long enough (and keep getting longer) just by having the team and their weapons separated out by individual (and I really don\'t think it\'s a good idea to separate out the weapons, but I\'m probably in the minority there).
to:
I\\\'ve never yet seen a convincing reason for creating group tropes on character pages. All it does is clutter up pages, make navigation and layout worse, and very often causes tropes to be pointlessly repeated in multiple places. Trope work pages already do the job of gathering tropes that apply to setting, story and groups of people. While I know some works use them, I\\\'ve also seen other works keep them away from characters pages for all these reasons.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I\'ve never yet seen a convincing reason for creating group tropes on character pages. All it does is clutter up pages, make navigation and layout worse, and very often causes tropes to be pointlessly repeated in multiple places. While I know some works use them, I\'ve also seen other works keep them away from characters pages for these reasons.
to:
RWBY already puts both individuals and separated weapons tropes for each individuals on their character pages. The pages are already long, and getting longer. This will just add to the mess.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I\'ve never yet seen a convincing reason for creating group tropes on character pages. All it does is clutter up pages, make navigation and layout worse, and very often causes tropes to be pointlessly repeated in multiple places.
to:
I\\\'ve never yet seen a convincing reason for creating group tropes on character pages. All it does is clutter up pages, make navigation and layout worse, and very often causes tropes to be pointlessly repeated in multiple places. While I know some works use them, I\\\'ve also seen other works keep them away from characters pages for these reasons.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
On another note, Team RWBY doesn\'t fit the FourTemperamentEnsemble without shoe-horning the characters to do so. Given the trope description of each section, the characters only slightly fit some of them and often fit multiple - which means they don\'t fit the trope well at all.
to:
On another note, Team RWBY doesn\\\'t fit the FourTemperamentEnsemble without shoe-horning the characters to do so. Given the trope description of each section, the characters only slightly fit some of them, often only some of the time, and often fit multiple (again, some of the time) - which means they don\\\'t fit the trope well at all.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
On another note, Team RWBY don\'t fit the FourTemperamentEnsemble without shoe-horning the characters to do so. Given the trope description of each section, the characters only slightly fit some of them and often fit multiple - which means they don\'t fit the trope well at all.
to:
On another note, Team RWBY doesn\\\'t fit the FourTemperamentEnsemble without shoe-horning the characters to do so. Given the trope description of each section, the characters only slightly fit some of them and often fit multiple - which means they don\\\'t fit the trope well at all.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don\'t see the point. Tropes that apply to setting, story and groups of people are already found on the RWBY tropes page. The character pages are already more than long enough (and keep getting longer) just by having the team and their weapons - and, personally, I already think it\'s silly having the weapons separated out, but I know I\'m in the minority there.
to:
I don\\\'t see the point. Tropes that apply to setting, story and groups of people are already found on the RWBY tropes page. The character pages are already more than long enough (and keep getting longer) just by having the team and their weapons separated out by individual (and I really don\\\'t think it\\\'s a good idea to separate out the weapons, but I\\\'m probably in the minority there).
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I\'ve never seen a convincing reason for creating group tropes on character pages. All it does is clutter up pages, make navigation worse, and very often causes tropes to be pointlessly repeated in multiple places.
to:
I\\\'ve never yet seen a convincing reason for creating group tropes on character pages. All it does is clutter up pages, make navigation and layout worse, and very often causes tropes to be pointlessly repeated in multiple places.
Top