[002]
Raidouthe21st
Current Version
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Off Model: Well, I suppose that \
to:
Off Model: Well, I suppose that \\\"off model\\\" does imply consistency...Ok, I\\\'ll replace it with a better suited trope if there is one. Any suggestions?
Retcon: Okay. I\\\'ll see what I can do.
Rouge Angels of Satin: Done.
Schedule Slip: Oh, if you must.
Self Depreciation: The jokes are focused on Comic!Chris (much like the rest of the comic). I\\\'ll clarify that.
Show Dont Tell: What\\\'s the the trope that show\\\'s the inverse of Show Don\\\'t Tell? It really is in there, and it really is very cumbersome to read, so I\\\'d say that it is somewhat integral to the comic experience.
http://archive.cogsdev.org/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Issue_9/Page_93
But I can fix it, if it really is in the way.
So Bad Its Horrible: Fine.
Stylistic Suck, Super Empowering: Yep. I\\\'ll clarify that.
Wall of Text: Sorry. There used to be examples there. Rough cut-and-paste job, after all. I can summarize it if you want.
Example: http://archive.cogsdev.org/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Issue_10/Page_66
Wham Episode: Fine. Changing it to \\\"The end of issue 10\\\"
Wouldn\\\'t Hit A Girl: I\\\'ll see if there\\\'s a straight (hehe) example of that. If not, chopping block.
\\\"10 C-Quarters make up 1 W-Quarter, and 10 W-Quarters make up 10 C-Quarters. \\\" Not a typo. That\\\'s how it\\\'s portrayed in the comic. Yes, It\\\'s confusing as hell. And yes, Chris got the concept of a quarter wrong.
http://archive.cogsdev.org/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Issue_9/Page_13
Like I said, this comic is saturated in tropes. Well, is that all the criticism for now?
Retcon: Okay. I\\\'ll see what I can do.
Rouge Angels of Satin: Done.
Schedule Slip: Oh, if you must.
Self Depreciation: The jokes are focused on Comic!Chris (much like the rest of the comic). I\\\'ll clarify that.
Show Dont Tell: What\\\'s the the trope that show\\\'s the inverse of Show Don\\\'t Tell? It really is in there, and it really is very cumbersome to read, so I\\\'d say that it is somewhat integral to the comic experience.
http://archive.cogsdev.org/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Issue_9/Page_93
But I can fix it, if it really is in the way.
So Bad Its Horrible: Fine.
Stylistic Suck, Super Empowering: Yep. I\\\'ll clarify that.
Wall of Text: Sorry. There used to be examples there. Rough cut-and-paste job, after all. I can summarize it if you want.
Example: http://archive.cogsdev.org/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Issue_10/Page_66
Wham Episode: Fine. Changing it to \\\"The end of issue 10\\\"
Wouldn\\\'t Hit A Girl: I\\\'ll see if there\\\'s a straight (hehe) example of that. If not, chopping block.
\\\"10 C-Quarters make up 1 W-Quarter, and 10 W-Quarters make up 10 C-Quarters. \\\" Not a typo. That\\\'s how it\\\'s portrayed in the comic. Yes, It\\\'s confusing as hell. And yes, Chris got the concept of a quarter wrong.
http://archive.cogsdev.org/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Issue_9/Page_13
Like I said, this comic is saturated in tropes. Well, is that all the criticism for now?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Off Model: Well, I suppose that \
to:
Off Model: Well, I suppose that \\\"off model\\\" does imply consistency...Ok, I\\\'ll replace it with a better suited trope if there is one. Any suggestions?
Retcon: Okay. I\\\'ll see what I can do.
Rouge Angels of Satin: Done.
Schedule Slip: Oh, if you must.
Self Depreciation: The jokes are focused on Comic!Chris (much like the rest of the comic). I\\\'ll clarify that.
Show Dont Tell: What\\\'s the the trope that show\\\'s the inverse of Show Don\\\'t Tell? It really is in there, and it really is very cumbersome to read, so I\\\'d say that it is somewhat integral to the comic experience.
http://archive.cogsdev.org/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Issue_9/Page_93
But I can fix it, if it really is in the way.
So Bad Its Horrible: Fine.
Stylistic Suck: No. It\\\'s where he takes characters from the Asperchu series and shows his contempt for the \\\"simplistic\\\" drawing by making it look cheap and blocky. It\\\'s as odd as it sounds.
http://archive.cogsdev.org/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Issue_10/Page_57
Super Empowering: Exactly.
Wall of Text: Sorry. There used to be examples there. Rough cut-and-paste job, after all. I can summarize it if you want.
Example: http://archive.cogsdev.org/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Issue_10/Page_66
Wham Episode: Fine. Changing it to \\\"The end of issue 10\\\"
Wouldn\\\'t Hit A Girl: I\\\'ll see if there\\\'s a straight (hehe) example of that. If not, chopping block.
\\\"10 C-Quarters make up 1 W-Quarter, and 10 W-Quarters make up 10 C-Quarters. \\\" Not a typo. That\\\'s how it\\\'s portrayed in the comic. Yes, It\\\'s confusing as hell. And yes, Chris got the concept of a quarter wrong.
http://archive.cogsdev.org/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Issue_9/Page_13
Like I said, this comic is saturated in tropes. Well, is that all the criticism for now?
Retcon: Okay. I\\\'ll see what I can do.
Rouge Angels of Satin: Done.
Schedule Slip: Oh, if you must.
Self Depreciation: The jokes are focused on Comic!Chris (much like the rest of the comic). I\\\'ll clarify that.
Show Dont Tell: What\\\'s the the trope that show\\\'s the inverse of Show Don\\\'t Tell? It really is in there, and it really is very cumbersome to read, so I\\\'d say that it is somewhat integral to the comic experience.
http://archive.cogsdev.org/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Issue_9/Page_93
But I can fix it, if it really is in the way.
So Bad Its Horrible: Fine.
Stylistic Suck: No. It\\\'s where he takes characters from the Asperchu series and shows his contempt for the \\\"simplistic\\\" drawing by making it look cheap and blocky. It\\\'s as odd as it sounds.
http://archive.cogsdev.org/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Issue_10/Page_57
Super Empowering: Exactly.
Wall of Text: Sorry. There used to be examples there. Rough cut-and-paste job, after all. I can summarize it if you want.
Example: http://archive.cogsdev.org/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Issue_10/Page_66
Wham Episode: Fine. Changing it to \\\"The end of issue 10\\\"
Wouldn\\\'t Hit A Girl: I\\\'ll see if there\\\'s a straight (hehe) example of that. If not, chopping block.
\\\"10 C-Quarters make up 1 W-Quarter, and 10 W-Quarters make up 10 C-Quarters. \\\" Not a typo. That\\\'s how it\\\'s portrayed in the comic. Yes, It\\\'s confusing as hell. And yes, Chris got the concept of a quarter wrong.
http://archive.cogsdev.org/cwcipedia/index.php?title=Issue_9/Page_13
Like I said, this comic is saturated in tropes. Well, is that all the criticism for now?
