[001]
Marioguy128
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Seriously, there was no need to put that trope on the page. If aversions could be listed without abandon, every page would be filled with tons of tropes that are \
to:
Seriously, there was no need to put that trope on the page. If aversions could be listed without abandon, every page would be filled with tons of tropes that are \\\"aversions.\\\" Aversions are not to be listed unless the work somehow set up an expectation for that trope. Which this one didn\\\'t. Otherwise, it becomes the same thing as shoehorning in tropes on works they don\\\'t belong in.
