[004]
Ether101Prime
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Why isn\'t there a entry dedicated to MetalGearSoild4 cast wide derailment?
to:
Why isn\\\'t there a entry dedicated to MetalGearSolid4 cast wide derailment?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Why isn\'t there a entry dedicated to [[MetalGearSoild4]] cast wide derailment?
to:
Why isn\\\'t there a entry dedicated to MetalGearSoild4 cast wide derailment?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"BizarroHulk\\\" of Dunfermline Scottland, like several others who have attempted to remove the MarvelUniverse column, had no editing history whatsoever beyond removing it, and did not handle it on the Talk page. Hence, given the context it is reasonably to assume that he \\\'\\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\'\\\' came here to censor it, whether for personal reasons, or being associated to the media producer itself.
Regarding his point about a YMMV: No taking everything into account, the setting easily by far leaves H.P.Lovecraft in the dust, and it has been far more neverending story addiction-inducing/matter-of-fact mentally damaging for a large part of the audience.
Regarding his CompletelyMissingThePoint that it is simply a TakeThat: No, it is not remotely that simple to brush off. It is \\\'\\\'\\\'mostly\\\'\\\'\\\' a matter-of-fact schematic evaluation and \\\'\\\'\\\'partially\\\'\\\'\\\' a \\\'\\\'\\\'reaction\\\'\\\'\\\' to a seemingly neverending stream of ridiculously extreme DisproportionateRetribution / WhatDoYouMeanItsNotHeinous / AccentuateTheNegative / AcceptableHardLuckTargets / ThePowerOfHate / ColdBloodedTorture mishmashes of TakeThat towards pretty much anybody, while giving genuine calculated supremacist evil of staggering proportions by far preferential treatment in comparison to anybody who is simply broken from too much damage, which turns into reverse-morality.
Oh, and plenty of them have oozed HorribleHollywood-style OneLiner derogatory contempt towards their own audience, but that\\\'s comparatively trivial in comparison to stating that anybody with serious mental handicaps is a casually mass-murdering abomination who should be strangled at birth by his/her own parents, or shot in the face by any righteous passersby, or similar ridiculous sheer scale of AccentuateTheNegative severely misleading SadistSHow extremism.
This? This is just noticing it out loud, which I\\\'ve heard some people scream \\\"heresy!\\\" about yes, but it seems to be the honest matter-of-fact truth nevertheless.
However, I looked at the previous working and it did in fact give the UnfortunateImplications that somehow \\\'\\\'all\\\'\\\' writers were \\\"in on something\\\", which wasn\\\'t the intended point at all. This kind of thing tends to be culturally/memetically/individual overlap influenced, and just because something is common doesn\\\'t mean that there aren\\\'t plenty of decent people out there as well. J.M.Dematteis and Christos Gage just to name a few. I have attempted to rectify this to make it fair.
On the other hand there is the legitimate WallOfText issue, and I\\\'m not good at summaries... defintiely not with the narrow timespan right now. Help with compression while maintaining the relevant points, would obviously be appreciated, but I\\\'ll try to give it a shot if nobody else does in a while. Thank you.
Regarding his point about a YMMV: No taking everything into account, the setting easily by far leaves H.P.Lovecraft in the dust, and it has been far more neverending story addiction-inducing/matter-of-fact mentally damaging for a large part of the audience.
Regarding his CompletelyMissingThePoint that it is simply a TakeThat: No, it is not remotely that simple to brush off. It is \\\'\\\'\\\'mostly\\\'\\\'\\\' a matter-of-fact schematic evaluation and \\\'\\\'\\\'partially\\\'\\\'\\\' a \\\'\\\'\\\'reaction\\\'\\\'\\\' to a seemingly neverending stream of ridiculously extreme DisproportionateRetribution / WhatDoYouMeanItsNotHeinous / AccentuateTheNegative / AcceptableHardLuckTargets / ThePowerOfHate / ColdBloodedTorture mishmashes of TakeThat towards pretty much anybody, while giving genuine calculated supremacist evil of staggering proportions by far preferential treatment in comparison to anybody who is simply broken from too much damage, which turns into reverse-morality.
Oh, and plenty of them have oozed HorribleHollywood-style OneLiner derogatory contempt towards their own audience, but that\\\'s comparatively trivial in comparison to stating that anybody with serious mental handicaps is a casually mass-murdering abomination who should be strangled at birth by his/her own parents, or shot in the face by any righteous passersby, or similar ridiculous sheer scale of AccentuateTheNegative severely misleading SadistSHow extremism.
This? This is just noticing it out loud, which I\\\'ve heard some people scream \\\"heresy!\\\" about yes, but it seems to be the honest matter-of-fact truth nevertheless.
However, I looked at the previous working and it did in fact give the UnfortunateImplications that somehow \\\'\\\'all\\\'\\\' writers were \\\"in on something\\\", which wasn\\\'t the intended point at all. This kind of thing tends to be culturally/memetically/individual overlap influenced, and just because something is common doesn\\\'t mean that there aren\\\'t plenty of decent people out there as well. J.M.Dematteis and Christos Gage just to name a few. I have attempted to rectify this to make it fair.
On the other hand there is the legitimate WallOfText issue, and I\\\'m not good at summaries... defintiely not with the narrow timespan right now. Help with compression while maintaining the relevant points, would obviously be appreciated, but I\\\'ll try to give it a shot if nobody else does in a while. Thank you.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"BizarroHulk\\\" of Glasgow Scottland, like several others who have attempted to remove the MarvelUniverse column, had no editing history whatsoever beyond removing it, and did not handle it on the Talk page. Hence, given the context it is reasonably to assume that he \\\'\\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\'\\\' came here to censor it, whether for personal reasons, or being associated to the media producer itself.
Regarding his point about a YMMV: No taking everything into account, the setting easily by far leaves H.P.Lovecraft in the dust, and it has been far more neverending story addiction-inducing/matter-of-fact mentally damaging for a large part of the audience.
Regarding his CompletelyMissingThePoint that it is simply a TakeThat: No, it is not remotely that simple to brush off. It is \\\'\\\'\\\'mostly\\\'\\\'\\\' a matter-of-fact schematic evaluation and \\\'\\\'\\\'partially\\\'\\\'\\\' a \\\'\\\'\\\'reaction\\\'\\\'\\\' to a seemingly neverending stream of ridiculously extreme DisproportionateRetribution / WhatDoYouMeanItsNotHeinous / AccentuateTheNegative / AcceptableHardLuckTargets / ThePowerOfHate / ColdBloodedTorture mishmashes of TakeThat towards pretty much anybody, while giving genuine calculated supremacist evil of staggering proportions by far preferential treatment in comparison to anybody who is simply broken from too much damage, which turns into reverse-morality.
Oh, and plenty of them have oozed HorribleHollywood-style OneLiner derogatory contempt towards their own audience, but that\\\'s comparatively trivial in comparison to stating that anybody with serious mental handicaps is a casually mass-murdering abomination who should be strangled at birth by his/her own parents, or shot in the face by any righteous passersby, or similar ridiculous sheer scale of AccentuateTheNegative severely misleading SadistSHow extremism.
This? This is just noticing it out loud, which I\\\'ve heard some people scream \\\"heresy!\\\" about yes, but it seems to be the honest matter-of-fact truth nevertheless.
However, I looked at the previous working and it did in fact give the UnfortunateImplications that somehow \\\'\\\'all\\\'\\\' writers were \\\"in on something\\\", which wasn\\\'t the intended point at all. This kind of thing tends to be culturally/memetically/individual overlap influenced, and just because something is common doesn\\\'t mean that there aren\\\'t plenty of decent people out there as well. J.M.Dematteis and Christos Gage just to name a few. I have attempted to rectify this to make it fair.
On the other hand there is the legitimate WallOfText issue, and I\\\'m not good at summaries... defintiely not with the narrow timespan right now. Help with compression while maintaining the relevant points, would obviously be appreciated, but I\\\'ll try to give it a shot if nobody else does in a while. Thank you.
Regarding his point about a YMMV: No taking everything into account, the setting easily by far leaves H.P.Lovecraft in the dust, and it has been far more neverending story addiction-inducing/matter-of-fact mentally damaging for a large part of the audience.
Regarding his CompletelyMissingThePoint that it is simply a TakeThat: No, it is not remotely that simple to brush off. It is \\\'\\\'\\\'mostly\\\'\\\'\\\' a matter-of-fact schematic evaluation and \\\'\\\'\\\'partially\\\'\\\'\\\' a \\\'\\\'\\\'reaction\\\'\\\'\\\' to a seemingly neverending stream of ridiculously extreme DisproportionateRetribution / WhatDoYouMeanItsNotHeinous / AccentuateTheNegative / AcceptableHardLuckTargets / ThePowerOfHate / ColdBloodedTorture mishmashes of TakeThat towards pretty much anybody, while giving genuine calculated supremacist evil of staggering proportions by far preferential treatment in comparison to anybody who is simply broken from too much damage, which turns into reverse-morality.
Oh, and plenty of them have oozed HorribleHollywood-style OneLiner derogatory contempt towards their own audience, but that\\\'s comparatively trivial in comparison to stating that anybody with serious mental handicaps is a casually mass-murdering abomination who should be strangled at birth by his/her own parents, or shot in the face by any righteous passersby, or similar ridiculous sheer scale of AccentuateTheNegative severely misleading SadistSHow extremism.
This? This is just noticing it out loud, which I\\\'ve heard some people scream \\\"heresy!\\\" about yes, but it seems to be the honest matter-of-fact truth nevertheless.
However, I looked at the previous working and it did in fact give the UnfortunateImplications that somehow \\\'\\\'all\\\'\\\' writers were \\\"in on something\\\", which wasn\\\'t the intended point at all. This kind of thing tends to be culturally/memetically/individual overlap influenced, and just because something is common doesn\\\'t mean that there aren\\\'t plenty of decent people out there as well. J.M.Dematteis and Christos Gage just to name a few. I have attempted to rectify this to make it fair.
On the other hand there is the legitimate WallOfText issue, and I\\\'m not good at summaries... defintiely not with the narrow timespan right now. Help with compression while maintaining the relevant points, would obviously be appreciated, but I\\\'ll try to give it a shot if nobody else does in a while. Thank you.
