[002]
Edgar81539
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
After reading most fo the article, it seems to me that most of the \
to:
After reading most fo the article, it seems to me that most of the \\\"neutral\\\" PO Vs seem to be some sort of \\\"le enlightened centrist who comes to solve this ages old argument with his all-knowledgeable insight\\\". It doesn\\\'t help that most of the \\\"neutral\\\" entries have \\\"deep\\\" and extended insights that the other entries lack, making off both the casual and the competitive views into laughable strawmen, or when the \\\"neutral\\\" entry starts arguing with itself, of which there\\\'s some examples.
Either just remove the \\\"examples\\\" and leave the page as definition-only, or stop (and sorry if I\\\'m being rude, but holy shit, the holier-than-thou attitude got on my nerves) putting the opinion of the tropers that made these entries in a pedestal as if they\\\'re the sole recipients of the truth in these arguments.
Either just remove the \\\"examples\\\" and leave the page as definition-only, or stop (and sorry if I\\\'m being rude, but holy shit, the holier-than-thou attitude got on my nerves) putting the opinion of the tropers that made these entries in a pedestal as if they\\\'re the sole recipients of the truth in these arguments.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
After reading most fo the article, it seems to me that most of the \
to:
After reading most fo the article, it seems to me that most of the \\\"neutral\\\" PO Vs seem to be some sort of \\\"le enlightened centrist who comes to solve this ages old argument with his all-knowledgeable insight\\\". It doesn\\\'t help that most of the \\\"neutral\\\" entries have \\\"deep\\\" and extended insights that the other entries lack, making off both the casual and the competitive views into laughable strawmen, or when the \\\"neutral\\\" entry starts arguing with itself, of which there\\\'s some examples.
Either just remove the \\\"examples\\\" and leave the page as definition-only, or stop (and sorry if I\\\'m being rude, but holy shit, the holier-than-thou attitude got on my nerves) putting the opinion of the tropers that made these entries in a pedestal as if they\\\'re the sole recipients of the truth in these arguments.
Either just remove the \\\"examples\\\" and leave the page as definition-only, or stop (and sorry if I\\\'m being rude, but holy shit, the holier-than-thou attitude got on my nerves) putting the opinion of the tropers that made these entries in a pedestal as if they\\\'re the sole recipients of the truth in these arguments.
