[001]
MathsAngelicVersion
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'d like to object to the claim that DarknessInducedAudienceApathy requires the work to fail because of its excessively brutal tone. The trope description is \
to:
I\\\'d like to object to the claim that DarknessInducedAudienceApathy requires the work to fail because of its excessively brutal tone. The trope description is \\\"the audience feels that the conflict in the story is meaningless\\\" and doesn\\\'t mention that the work had to fail. I don\\\'t think adding that requirement makes sense either -- you may not know a work causes DIAA until you\\\'ve actually consumed it, and as the Analysis subpage points out, it\\\'s possible to enjoy a work even if you get DIAA. We have AngstAversion for when people avoid a work because (they hear) it\\\'s too dark -- adding a \\\"the work must fail\\\" requirement to \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' makes way more sense.
On a more positive note, I like the idea of giving StylisticSuck a Administrivia/TropeTransplant -- the old name makes more sense for \\\"a work, or a part of a work, is bad on purpose\\\", and we could use something like WoefulFictionalWork for the old meaning.
On a more positive note, I like the idea of giving StylisticSuck a Administrivia/TropeTransplant -- the old name makes more sense for \\\"a work, or a part of a work, is bad on purpose\\\", and we could use something like WoefulFictionalWork for the old meaning.
