Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Series / Succession

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
EDIT: Apparently there is no way to post links in discussion pages. I\'ll leave my original post as-was, so if anyone\'s interested in the evidence, they can follow the links and remove the extraneous bits of the URL in their browser.
to:
EDIT: Apparently there is no way to post links in discussion pages. I’ll leave my original post as-was, so if anyone’s interested in the evidence, they can follow the links and remove the extraneous bits of the URL in their browser.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Also, since it\'s part of the example I\'m removing, [[http://www.j-archive.com/wageringcalculator.php?a=26600&b=23400&c=11000&player_a=Emma&player_b=James&player_c=Jay here]] is the link to the optimal wager calculator showing that James bet the right amount. And a [[https://waitbutwhy.com/2019/06/did-james-make-the-right-final-jeopardy-bet.html visual walkthrough]] of the math behind it.
to:
Also, since it’s part of the example I’m removing, [[http://www.j-archive.com/wageringcalculator.php?a=26600&b=23400&c=11000&player_a=Emma&player_b=James&player_c=Jay here]] is the link to the optimal wager calculator showing that James bet the right amount. And here’s a [[https://waitbutwhy.com/2019/06/did-james-make-the-right-final-jeopardy-bet.html visual walkthrough]] of the math behind it.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m removing the AlternativeCharacterInterpretation example because there \'\'is\'\' no room for interpretation here: James lost fair and square. He\'s made various tweets in response to this idea, and other notable champions have stepped in to say how stupid -- and disrespectful -- it is to believe that a player lost on purpose.
to:
EDIT: Apparently there is no way to post links in discussion pages. I\\\'ll leave my original post as-was, so if anyone\\\'s interested in the evidence, they can follow the links and remove the extraneous bits of the URL in their browser.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Links incoming once I figure out how discussion page formatting works, because apparently it\'s different.
to:
I’m removing the AlternativeCharacterInterpretation example because there \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' no room for interpretation here: James lost fair and square. He’s made various tweets in response to this idea, and other notable champions have stepped in to say how stupid -- and disrespectful -- it is to believe that a player lost on purpose. Here’s one from [[https://twitter.com/James_Holzhauer/status/1135732196830982145 James]], one from [[https://twitter.com/whoisalexjacob/status/1135950314178134016 Alex Jacob]], and one from [[https://twitter.com/KenJennings/status/1136320162875895809 Ken Jennings]], backing up a video where Austin Rogers and Monica Thieu say the same thing. Many of the replies to these tweets also emphasize it very well, with [[https://twitter.com/CycloneSteel/status/1136032125138849793 one person claiming]] “I was at the taping. James didn’t throw squat. Emma was just a boss.” I’m not going to go through everyone’s Twitter accounts and link to every single relevant tweet and reply, but James losing on purpose is not an interpretation so much as a [[https://twitter.com/James_Holzhauer/status/1135780342319669248 conspiracy theory]]. (And in case anyone’s going to say it, [[https://www.reddit.com/r/Jeopardy/comments/c3r88p/ken_jennings_must_lose_a_bit_more_of_his_soul/ersu3yd/ Ken didn’t lose on purpose either]].)

Also, since it\\\'s part of the example I\\\'m removing, [[http://www.j-archive.com/wageringcalculator.php?a=26600&b=23400&c=11000&player_a=Emma&player_b=James&player_c=Jay here]] is the link to the optimal wager calculator showing that James bet the right amount. And a [[https://waitbutwhy.com/2019/06/did-james-make-the-right-final-jeopardy-bet.html visual walkthrough]] of the math behind it.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Stand by while I edit this for formatting.
to:
I\\\'m removing the AlternativeCharacterInterpretation example because there \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' no room for interpretation here: James lost fair and square. He\\\'s made various tweets in response to this idea, and other notable champions have stepped in to say how stupid -- and disrespectful -- it is to believe that a player lost on purpose.

Links incoming once I figure out how discussion page formatting works, because apparently it\\\'s different.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m removing the AlternativeCharacterInterpretation example because there \'\'is\'\' no room for interpretation here: James lost fair and square. He\'s made various tweets in response to this idea, and other notable champions have stepped in to say how stupid -- and disrespectful -- it is to believe that a player lost on purpose. Here\'s one from [[https://twitter.com/James_Holzhauer/status/1135732196830982145 James]], one from [[https://twitter.com/whoisalexjacob/status/1135950314178134016 Alex Jacob]], and one from [[https://twitter.com/KenJennings/status/1136320162875895809 Ken Jennings]], backing up a video where Austin Rogers and Monica Thieu say the same thing. Many of the replies to these tweets also emphasize the same thing, with [[https://twitter.com/CycloneSteel/status/1136032125138849793 one person claiming]] \
to:
Stand by while I edit this for formatting.
Top