Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / CharacterClassSystem

Go To

[003] mightymewtron Current Version

1st Jun '18 at 05:37:08 PM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

I was coming in to say the same thing. I don't think we can add it based on politics alone, but it's also gotten criticism for awful dialogue and the way it just completely butchered the point of the original. IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes have it pretty low (4.1/10 and 33%) but IDK if it's ''abysmally'' low by those standards.

to:

I was coming in to say the same thing. I don\'t think we can add it based on politics alone, but it\'s also gotten criticism for awful dialogue and the way it just completely butchered the point of the original. IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes have it pretty low (4.1/10 and 33%) but IDK if it\'s \'\'abysmally\'\' low by those standards.

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

However, now that it's been cancelled and I don't really see anybody complaining about it, it may be safe to say it qualifies.

to:

However, now that it\'s been cancelled (though it may be restored via ChannelHop) and I don\'t really see anybody complaining about it, it may be safe to say it qualifies.

[002] mightymewtron

1st Jun '18 at 05:25:57 PM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

I was coming in to say the same thing. i don't think we can add it based on politics alone, but it's also gotten criticism for awful dialogue and the way it just completely butchered the point of the original. IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes have it pretty low (4.1/10 and 33%) but IDK if it's ''abysmally'' low by those standards.

to:

I was coming in to say the same thing. I don\'t think we can add it based on politics alone, but it\'s also gotten criticism for awful dialogue and the way it just completely butchered the point of the original. IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes have it pretty low (4.1/10 and 33%) but IDK if it\'s \'\'abysmally\'\' low by those standards.

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

However, now that it's been cancelled and I don't really see anybody complaining about it, it may be safe to say it qualifies.

to:

However, now that it\'s been cancelled and I don\'t really see anybody complaining about it, it may be safe to say it qualifies.

[001] mightymewtron

1st Jun '18 at 05:25:21 PM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

i was coming in to say the same thing. i don't think we can add it based on politics alone, but it's also gotten criticism for awful dialogue and the way it just completely butchered the point of the original. imdb and rotten tomatoes have it pretty low (4.1/10 and 33%) but idk if it's ''abysmally'' low by those standards.

to:

I was coming in to say the same thing. i don\'t think we can add it based on politics alone, but it\'s also gotten criticism for awful dialogue and the way it just completely butchered the point of the original. IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes have it pretty low (4.1/10 and 33%) but IDK if it\'s \'\'abysmally\'\' low by those standards.

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

however, now that it's been cancelled and i don't really see anybody complaining about it, it may be safe to say it qualifies.

to:

However, now that it\'s been cancelled and I don\'t really see anybody complaining about it, it may be safe to say it qualifies.

Top