[002]
Dirtyblue929
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I mean, to be totally fair, Sara Ryder at the very least looks very little like the (very attractive) person she was modeled after. Whether the look is unattractive or not is subjective (IMO it's not terrible, but definitely lands in the UncannyValley), but you can't deny that the differences are much more stark than in Scott Ryder's face, which looks more-or-less identical to his (''ruggedly'') handsome model.
to:
I mean, to be totally fair, Sara Ryder at the very least looks very little like the (\'\'very\'\' attractive) person she was modeled after. Whether the look is unattractive or not is subjective (IMO it\'s not terrible, but definitely lands in the UncannyValley), but you can\'t deny that the differences are much more stark than in Scott Ryder\'s face, which looks more-or-less identical to his (\'\'ruggedly\'\' handsome) model.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I mean, to be totally fair, Sara Ryder at the very least looks very little like the person she was modeled after. Whether the look is unattractive or not is subjective (IMO it's not terrible, but definitely lands in the UncannyValley), but you can't deny that the differences are much more stark than in Scott Ryder's face, which looks more-or-less identical to his (''ruggedly'') handsome model.
to:
I mean, to be totally fair, Sara Ryder at the very least looks very little like the (very attractive) person she was modeled after. Whether the look is unattractive or not is subjective (IMO it\'s not terrible, but definitely lands in the UncannyValley), but you can\'t deny that the differences are much more stark than in Scott Ryder\'s face, which looks more-or-less identical to his (\'\'ruggedly\'\') handsome model.
