[003]
KingZeal
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
That does nothing to change Larkmarn's statement that our
to:
That does nothing to change Larkmarn\'s statement that our \"Control situation\" is a Female Rook that is NOT invited \'\'\'during the Heart-to-Heart\'\'\'. Other examples of Irina going out for drinks is irrelevant. The Heart-to-Heart is specifically about \"guys are creeps when they ask women out for drinks--except you, heck I\'d ask you out myself\" and ONLY male Rook gets that offer.
You are trying to make a false equivalence argument (ie., this thing is always this thing and context means nothing), which doesn\'t work. If [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFXfpi6VvIY this is the scene you\'re talking about]], the context isn\'t even REMOTELY the same.
And actually, now that I\'ve read the entire converstaion, Irina was \'\'SPECIFICALLY\'\' talking about asking Rook out for drinks in the context of dating, because the entire point was that he agreed with her that \'\'another guy\'\' who\'d asked her out, and then asked out several OTHER women, was a sleazeball.
You are trying to make a false equivalence argument (ie., this thing is always this thing and context means nothing), which doesn\'t work. If [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFXfpi6VvIY this is the scene you\'re talking about]], the context isn\'t even REMOTELY the same.
And actually, now that I\'ve read the entire converstaion, Irina was \'\'SPECIFICALLY\'\' talking about asking Rook out for drinks in the context of dating, because the entire point was that he agreed with her that \'\'another guy\'\' who\'d asked her out, and then asked out several OTHER women, was a sleazeball.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
That does nothing to change Larkmarn's statement that our
to:
That does nothing to change Larkmarn\'s statement that our \"Control situation\" is a Female Rook that is NOT invited \'\'\'during the Heart-to-Heart\'\'\'. Other examples of Irina going out for drinks is irrelevant. The Heart-to-Heart is specifically a \"this character really considers you a good friend\" thing, and ONLY male Rook gets that offer.
You are trying to make a false equivalence argument (ie., this thing is always this thing and context means nothing), which doesn\'t work. If [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFXfpi6VvIY this is the scene you\'re talking about]], the context isn\'t even REMOTELY the same.
And actually, now that I\'ve read the entire converstaion, Irina was \'\'SPECIFICALLY\'\' talking about asking Rook out for drinks in the context of dating, because the entire point was that he agreed with her that \'\'another guy\'\' who\'d asked her out, and then asked out several OTHER women, was a sleazeball.
You are trying to make a false equivalence argument (ie., this thing is always this thing and context means nothing), which doesn\'t work. If [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFXfpi6VvIY this is the scene you\'re talking about]], the context isn\'t even REMOTELY the same.
And actually, now that I\'ve read the entire converstaion, Irina was \'\'SPECIFICALLY\'\' talking about asking Rook out for drinks in the context of dating, because the entire point was that he agreed with her that \'\'another guy\'\' who\'d asked her out, and then asked out several OTHER women, was a sleazeball.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The Rook and Murderess going out for drinks thing is, again, irrelevant to Female Rook not being invited during the Heart-to-Heart.
to:
The Rook and Murderess thing is, again, irrelevant to Female Rook not being invited during the Heart-to-Heart.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
That does nothing to change Larkmarn's statement that our
to:
That does nothing to change Larkmarn\'s statement that our \"Control situation\" is a Female Rook that is NOT invited \'\'\'during the Heart-to-Heart\'\'\'. Other examples of Irina going out for drinks is irrelevant. The Heart-to-Heart is specifically a \"this character really considers you a good friend\" thing, and ONLY male Rook gets that offer.
You are trying to make a false equivalence argument (ie., this thing is always this thing and context means nothing), which doesn\'t work. If [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFXfpi6VvIY this is the scene you\'re talking about]], the context is even REMOTELY the same.
You are trying to make a false equivalence argument (ie., this thing is always this thing and context means nothing), which doesn\'t work. If [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFXfpi6VvIY this is the scene you\'re talking about]], the context is even REMOTELY the same.
