Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History VideoGame / Overwatch

Go To

[001] ChrisX Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I think the trope is meant for a setting where there are two major factions: Order and Chaos. And both of them goes to the extreme that none looked any better that you're not gonna look super good if you pick any, though it's alleviated with an occasional third option: Pick none, give middle finger to the two. And usually, Order and Chaos have been fighting against each other to see which one will be the dominant ones in the world, and then manipulating others that might not want to get involved to join their cause.
to:
I think the trope is meant for a setting where there are two major factions: Order and Chaos. And both of them goes to the extreme that none looked any better that you\'re not gonna look super good if you pick any, though it\'s alleviated with an occasional third option: Pick none, give middle finger to the two. And usually, Order and Chaos have been fighting against each other to see which one will be the dominant ones in the world, and then manipulating others that might not want to get involved to join their cause.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
What I see here is mentioning: 'Talon is Chaos and bad, and Vishkar is Order and bad too.' I'm not gonna defend Vishkar but... that's not how the trope works? I think that if the trope is going to work properly, then Talon must've been fighting Vishkar to see who's more dominant, but as it turned out, they minded their own businesses, not even once clashing. And the explanation seemed to be more about 'We have a villain based on Order and a villain based on Chaos.' I don't think that's what the trope is about.
to:
What I see here is mentioning: \'Talon is Chaos and bad, and Vishkar is Order and bad too.\' I\'m not gonna defend Vishkar but... that\'s not how the trope works? I think that if the trope is going to work properly, then Talon must\'ve been fighting Vishkar to see who\'s more dominant, but as it turned out, they minded their own businesses, not even once clashing. And the explanation seemed to be more about \'We have a villain based on Order and a villain based on Chaos.\' I don\'t think that\'s what the trope is about. You look at the trope page and see if what I\'m talking about makes sense or not.
Top