...How did this one get through anyway? (I said porn since pedo pandering sounds like I'm somehow accusing people of molesting kids... but maybe not? )
It didn't. "After Sex" was closed very fast. We could make webpages of -almost- anything at the time.
The new version, "With Onions" was considered okay, since it wasn't related to sex.
Quest 64 threadAh. I'm... honestly not sure how we survived so long to do... half of the plots I had launched in it, let alone all of them. I'm...
I can't deny it, there's stuff I really enjoyed in the RP(some of it was hilarious, some of it was cool and action-filled and stuff). There's other stuff in it I... just feel ashamed to have been in.
It's a weird thing, that's to be sure, and that's kind of why I'm not sure how I really feel about the RP itself.
"Oh, dear. The toad, the monkey, and the dog have all screwed up."Wait, all the stuff we are talking here were of the After Sex thread only? This thread got locked in less than 10 days and lasted "only" 203 pages pages*. The Snuggling with Onions is still going since December 2010 and it is almost 7000 pages now.
If all the problematic content is from the previous thread, than we should be able to clean and rename the page, to reflect the current thread only.
edited 16th Jun '12 10:00:12 PM by Heatth
I never participated in the original. I'm discussing the second thread, which is the one I participated in. The works page is for both threads.
"Oh, dear. The toad, the monkey, and the dog have all screwed up."@Heatth: looking at the work page, both seem to have problematic content. Anno, would I be correct?
"Polite life will fill you full of cancer." - Iggy Pop "I've seen the future, brother, it is murder." -Leonard CohenIrene implied the only the original thread had problematic content. Guess it is not the case, then.
I think you just got ninja'd. To be fair, you ninja'd me too.
edited 16th Jun '12 10:04:29 PM by Heatth
Ah. Well, yes, we're referring to the stuff from the first thread being a problem.
Is there an issue with the second thread? And that's why I suggested that we could remove everything from the first thread(After Sex) and only keep the second thread(With Onions) on the page. There's only two threads, correct?
Quest 64 threadYou would, yes.
It's kind of a shame, without the problematic content I'd have nothing but fond memories of the thread and the works page would be a monument to weird silliness and surprisingly serious and developed plots. As it stands, there's problematic content.
edited 16th Jun '12 10:06:06 PM by AnnoR
"Oh, dear. The toad, the monkey, and the dog have all screwed up."Can you cite examples, please? Even if it means the roleplay needs to be shut down, (and hey, another one can be made), the content is just not allowed.
Any players from the first game that you could PM to come here, Anno or anyone?
Quest 64 threadI could... try and find examples, I suppose. It's sort of uncomfortable for me to delve into the parts of the thread that it would require, though, given that they're the parts I decidedly don't remember fondly. Also, given how big the thread is I'd probably have some difficulty finding them.
Um... not that I know of, no. The few I know are still around staunchly refuse to participate in this entire section of the forums.
edited 16th Jun '12 10:19:44 PM by AnnoR
"Oh, dear. The toad, the monkey, and the dog have all screwed up."Ah, okay.
Because we do need to get the full story before anything. But the examples would be good enough. Thanks, Anno R.
Quest 64 threadSomeone please just kill this with fire.
I'll hide your name inside a word and paint your eyes with false perception.When you think about it, it would actually be comparatively easy to see whether this is pedo-pandering; just ask the participants whether that was their goal (to any degree).
Then again though, many participants would likely be long-gone by now... Hrm. Maybe not so easy. But it works in theory, right?
I gave it the final devilhead. Now, what should I put down for its disposition?
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.If it's paedo stuff, "cut" would be my idea.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanDisposition: Replace Home Page with this. :P
(Uhh... Cut, I guess. Maybe stub under the Onions title with a redirect, but I dunno.)
I have taken a look at that, and the only thing I can say is...
Destroy that thing. Burn it to ashes, then throw the ashes down the mouth of oblivion, then salt the earth so that nothing like that can ever be created again!
Holy cow, how creepy can those loli-maniacs get? They put a bad image on people like me, who mean no harm to anyone. ;_;
"Suffer a vicious person and you will fear vice. Suffer a virtuous one and you will soon loathe virtue itself." Tony DuvertOkay, "Cut," it is.
Unless you guys want to talk about what to do with its "sequel," we're pretty much done here.
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.Is the Onions sequel safe? If so then to you move the page to that name and take out stuff on the original one. If not, then you cut it and should keep an eye on the role-playing being done here.
Uh, if the sequel is safe (which is not totally clear right now), than the page shouldn't be cut. The page it is as much about the sequel as it is of the original thread. If it is not more about the sequel. The second thread is over 20 times longer, after all. If the sequel is deemed safe, than the page should just be cleaned and renamed.
Yeah, just remove any mentions to the inappropriate stuff. Lots of roleplay threads have their own page, when they get big enough.
Read my stories!On a related side note, this definitely needs to be cut too. For those who don't want to click the link, it's a troper page created for one of the more problematic (read:Kodomo No Jikan character) sockpuppets involved with the early stages of the RP.
edited 17th Jun '12 5:07:42 PM by TotemicHero
Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)In my opinion we should not have works pages for any of our forum R Ps. They are of absolutely no interest except to the participants, no matter how innocent, and is frightfully self-absorbed of us besides.
A brighter future for a darker age.
I'm very glad that people aren't allowed to write porn R Ps on the forums, eh-heh. That would just be awkward.
edited 16th Jun '12 9:50:42 PM by AnnoR
"Oh, dear. The toad, the monkey, and the dog have all screwed up."