Gah, forgot about this. I can do the pothole-swapping for the 36 wicks just fine on my own, but I may require some assistance with cleaning up any shoehorning and whether any Zero Context Examples are actually valid or not.
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.If in doubt, give it the axe (but mention it here for anyone else who knows what to do with it).
An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.Or throw it into the discussion page.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanWick-swapping is done. There's still two wicks left, one on a locked page, and another that appears to be a phantom wick.
Surprisingly, I only found two Zero-Context Examples in my wick swapping: On the Bonnie and Clyde and Tank Girl articles.
Okay, I guess we can continue the rest on the Discussion Page.
edited 22nd Nov '12 11:33:18 AM by MarqFJA
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.Thanks. I fixed the locked page. Locking this thread up. Nice work.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Crown Description:
- The description is bare bones and isn't quite clear on the minimum requirements beyond "weapons having phallic symbolism".
- The title seems more fitting as a complement for Or Are You Happy To See Me.
- There are only barely above 30 wicks and 40 inbounds, most of the wicks themselves don't fit the title itself even when they fit the "weapons of phallic symbolism" concept.
- The on-article examples aren't that much better — Xena Warrior Princess's Gender Inverted Trope example ("yonic" instead of "phallic"), in particular, is pure speculation.
How is the rename and cleaning coming along?
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick