Loser
#2: Sep 2nd 2011 at 1:16:55 PM
I edited out the first paragraph for now. I agree that it is pretty unnecessary and given how long The Chessmaster's description is, I think it is better for it to start off by getting right to the point. I welcome arguments for keeping it there though even if right now I do not think they would likely be very convincing.
I wonder if the part about what to do when faced with a chessmaster opponent should also be cut since it describes how other characters react to a character type rather than the character type itself.
edited 2nd Sep '11 1:17:35 PM by LouieW
"irhgT nm0w tehre might b ea lotof th1nmgs i dont udarstannd, ubt oim ujst goinjg to keepfollowing this pazth i belieove iN !!!!!1 d
I see the Awesomeness.
#3: Sep 2nd 2011 at 9:22:34 PM
We could move it to the Analysis.
Fight smart, not fair.
Spark9
Gentleman Troper!
from Castle Wulfenbach
Since: Nov, 2010
Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#4: Oct 12th 2011 at 4:04:38 PM
Bump. Does this need further debate?
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#5: Oct 17th 2011 at 8:12:20 AM
Seems done to me.
Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
Total posts: 5
First, I'd like to move the entire first paragraph off the page. It's just one big Example as a Thesis type of thing.
Fight smart, not fair.