Follow TV Tropes

Following

The General US Politics Thread

Go To

Nov 2023 Mod notice:


There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.

If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines before posting here.

Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.

If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules when posting here.


In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.

Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM

PresidentStalkeyes The Best Worst Psychonaut from United Kingdom of England-land Since: Feb, 2016 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
The Best Worst Psychonaut
#329176: Sep 26th 2020 at 2:53:26 PM

Apologies if this has already been addressed, but is there any data on the popular opinion towards the Supreme Court? It's already been established that a majority of Americans want to abolish the Electoral College, so maybe if the SCOTUS isn't that respected either, there could be calls to ignore them once they start making unpopular decisions later down the line.

"If you think like a child, you will do a child's work."
RainehDaze Figure of Hourai from Scotland (Ten years in the joint) Relationship Status: Serial head-patter
Figure of Hourai
#329177: Sep 26th 2020 at 2:55:51 PM

The Supreme Court has generally been the most respected of the three branches, but that's pretty much down the toilet now because of the Trump administration.

Avatar Source
ShinyCottonCandy Industrious Incisors from Sinnoh (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Industrious Incisors
#329178: Sep 26th 2020 at 2:56:06 PM

[up][up]I don't think that the Supreme Court has, until recently, been seen by the general public as in position to do damage. That said, in conservative areas, who's going to stop, say, anti-LGBT discrimination if not them?

Edited by ShinyCottonCandy on Sep 26th 2020 at 5:56:15 AM

SoundCloud
PresidentStalkeyes The Best Worst Psychonaut from United Kingdom of England-land Since: Feb, 2016 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
The Best Worst Psychonaut
#329179: Sep 26th 2020 at 3:01:14 PM

I'm not getting into a debate over whether or not the SCOTUS is good or necessary, I was just speculating what I think could happen to them as a result of all this.

"If you think like a child, you will do a child's work."
CrimsonZephyr Would that it were so simple. from Massachusetts Since: Aug, 2010 Relationship Status: It's complicated
Would that it were so simple.
#329180: Sep 26th 2020 at 3:21:10 PM

The SCOTUS has been more or less the most respected branch because the myth of "four liberals, four conservatives, one swing" gives it an air of respectability and impartiality neither of the other two branches can ever hope to match. It made even odious decisions like Citizens United and Hobby Lobby look the product of an institution devoted to merit and fair play, with conservatives edging out liberals on the strength of the argument.

With 6-3 in the conservatives' favor, striking down legislation and prior opinions in a manner that looks blatantly partisan and sets up the court for a legitimacy crisis.

"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."
RainehDaze Figure of Hourai from Scotland (Ten years in the joint) Relationship Status: Serial head-patter
Figure of Hourai
#329181: Sep 26th 2020 at 3:21:52 PM

Its credibility is shot because they're forcing a massive conservative majority after denying Obama a pick for nearly a year and not just picking someone else when Kavanaugh was accused of rape. Now they're trying to force a confirmation less than a month from election day.

Roberts has tried to keep the court a veneer of respectability and impartiality, but that's hopeless now.

Avatar Source
CharlesPhipps Since: Jan, 2001
#329182: Sep 26th 2020 at 3:25:18 PM

I learned of the Supreme Court primarily through the Trail of Tears (where they tried to do something and couldn't because of a strong evil President) and the Dred Scott Decision (which made clear that Southerners could/would pack the courts to support slavery).

So I've always known its not actually impartial or necessarily all powerful.

Indeed, it wasn't until gay marriage that I actually started to respect it at all.

Roberts has tried to keep the court a veneer of respectability and impartiality, but that's hopeless now.

No respect could survive Trump's To Kill a Mockingbird-esque in reverse miscarriage of justice acquittal.

Edited by CharlesPhipps on Sep 26th 2020 at 3:26:11 AM

Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.
Forenperser Foreign Troper from Germany Since: Mar, 2012
Foreign Troper
#329183: Sep 26th 2020 at 3:33:25 PM

I mean at least the members of the Court are not bound by party loyalty and can actually go against the person who voted them in without consequences.

Certified: 48.0% West Asian, 6.5% South Asian, 15.8% North/West European, 15.7% English, 7.4% Balkan, 6.6% Scandinavian
CrimsonZephyr Would that it were so simple. from Massachusetts Since: Aug, 2010 Relationship Status: It's complicated
Would that it were so simple.
#329184: Sep 26th 2020 at 3:36:49 PM

That's actually a known phenomenon with Republican appointed Justices: Earl Warren, Harry Blackmun, David Souter — all conservatives at start, ended their careers as liberals.

Edited by CrimsonZephyr on Sep 26th 2020 at 6:37:08 AM

"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."
CharlesPhipps Since: Jan, 2001
#329185: Sep 26th 2020 at 3:37:04 PM

https://www.newsweek.com/over-860000-americans-have-already-voted-compared-fewer-10000-this-point-2016-1534452

Almost a million people have voted by mail already. This is notable because only 10K had by now in 2016.

Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.
PresidentStalkeyes The Best Worst Psychonaut from United Kingdom of England-land Since: Feb, 2016 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
The Best Worst Psychonaut
#329186: Sep 26th 2020 at 3:41:10 PM

Just to clarify, these votes are only recorded as having been sent, right? That is, as opposed to 'sent and received'.

Edited by PresidentStalkeyes on Sep 26th 2020 at 11:41:35 AM

"If you think like a child, you will do a child's work."
RainehDaze Figure of Hourai from Scotland (Ten years in the joint) Relationship Status: Serial head-patter
Figure of Hourai
#329187: Sep 26th 2020 at 3:42:16 PM

The number is based on 25 states whose early voting data is available, meaning it does not convey the entire picture.

Presumably received, unless these states are psychic and can tell when you've posted something but it hasn't been received.

Avatar Source
Lennik That's right, boys. Mondo cool. Since: Dec, 2011
That's right, boys. Mondo cool.
#329188: Sep 26th 2020 at 3:43:59 PM

One has to wonder what the GOP's policy goals will become if the Affordable Care Act is struck down and Roe v Wade and same-sex marriage rights are overturned. Once that happens, I suppose from that point on they'll have to run on other things, but they'll be left to answer for the results. Whatever practical difference it will make is a matter of opinion and guesswork, however.

Edited by Lennik on Sep 26th 2020 at 6:44:37 AM

CharlesPhipps Since: Jan, 2001
#329189: Sep 26th 2020 at 3:44:06 PM

Yes.

Now I'm fully expecting some places where they're being held to catch fire.

One has to wonder what the GOP's policy goals will become if the Affordable Care Act is struck down and Roe v Wade and same-sex marriage rights are overturned. Once that happens, I suppose from that point on they'll have to run on other things, but they'll be left to answer for the results. I suppose whatever practical difference it will make is a matter of opinion, however.

I imagine they'll move on to more overtly racist rhetoric and corruption. But by then we'll all be dead from global warming so it won't be too long of a problem.

Edited by CharlesPhipps on Sep 26th 2020 at 3:45:01 AM

Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.
HailMuffins Since: May, 2016 Relationship Status: Shipping fictional characters
#329190: Sep 26th 2020 at 3:59:30 PM

Can the SCOTUS just up and overturn those the disicions wily-nily like that?

I don't want to imply things aren't serious, they are, but it isn't just a matter of the new Justice getting appointed and the next day they undo all those things, is it?

Ultimatum Disasturbator from Second Star to the left (Old as dirt) Relationship Status: Wishfully thinking
Disasturbator
#329191: Sep 26th 2020 at 4:00:26 PM

Like with a executive order?

Maybe

New theme music also a box
DingoWalley1 Asgore Adopts Noelle Since: Feb, 2014 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
Asgore Adopts Noelle
#329192: Sep 26th 2020 at 4:02:25 PM

[up]x2 Theoretically, yes they can so long as they can find some excuse to do so. In practicality, not without causing serious problems. Usually, when Justices overturn previous rulings, those rulings had been on the books for at least 50-ish years and people have seen if they've been successful or not (for instance, Brown v. Board overturned Plessy v. Ferguson which had stood for 50-ish years).

Edited by DingoWalley1 on Sep 26th 2020 at 7:02:39 AM

HailMuffins Since: May, 2016 Relationship Status: Shipping fictional characters
#329193: Sep 26th 2020 at 4:05:25 PM

[up][up]Isn't that exclusive to the President and other administrative figures?

Ultimatum Disasturbator from Second Star to the left (Old as dirt) Relationship Status: Wishfully thinking
Disasturbator
#329194: Sep 26th 2020 at 4:07:32 PM

Whoops,my bad,my brain is used to POTUS not SCOTUS

New theme music also a box
Rationalinsanity from Halifax, Canada Since: Aug, 2010 Relationship Status: It's complicated
#329195: Sep 26th 2020 at 4:09:28 PM

The 538 model has Biden's chances of winning up to 76.7%, and they estimate he takes in a whopping 352 Electoral Votes! That's far too big of a gap for the GOP to realistically overcome through their standard tactics.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-09-25/biden-now-predicted-to-win-352-electoral-votes-fivethirtyeight

While we can't get complacent, all the trends are against Trump right now. And as 538 has constantly pointed out, the longer it goes without shifts, the more likely Trump is to lose. He needs time to sway the election towards him.

Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.
HailMuffins Since: May, 2016 Relationship Status: Shipping fictional characters
#329196: Sep 26th 2020 at 4:11:15 PM

Because I know someone is gonna bring that up: at this time last year, what were Hilary's chances of winning?

nova92 Since: Apr, 2020
#329197: Sep 26th 2020 at 4:12:48 PM

https://web.archive.org/web/20160927093526/http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/

On September 27, Hillary Clinton's chances of winning were 54.8%.

Edit:

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/

This period was one of her lowest points in 2016 according to their model.

Edited by nova92 on Sep 26th 2020 at 4:13:56 AM

Parable Since: Aug, 2009
#329198: Sep 26th 2020 at 4:14:16 PM

70%-ish, I think.

Welp. What do I know.

Edited by Parable on Sep 26th 2020 at 4:15:11 AM

Draghinazzo (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: I get a feeling so complicated...
#329199: Sep 26th 2020 at 4:16:47 PM

While we can't get complacent, all the trends are against Trump right now. And as 538 has constantly pointed out, the longer it goes without shifts, the more likely Trump is to lose. He needs time to sway the election towards him.

He only has little over a month left. I don't think there's too much he can do at this point.

HailMuffins Since: May, 2016 Relationship Status: Shipping fictional characters
#329200: Sep 26th 2020 at 4:18:38 PM

My problem isn't really what he can do, but what might happen.


Total posts: 417,856
Top