Follow TV Tropes

Following

History ZergRush / RealLife

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's also important to remember that throughout history right up until WorldWarII more soldiers were lost to disease then battle. The longer the war drags on without resolution, the more soldiers you lose. Therefore, a zerg rush might wind up losing less men because it gets the battle over, rather than spending weeks fighting and losing more to disease.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This is largely a myth that came about by Grant having the largest army in the war and fighting a lot of battles without stopping. He had a far lower casualty rate than RE Lee whenever you run the numbers Lee's casualty rate is somewhere between 19-23% depending on whose numbers you are using while Grant's is somewhere between 11-15%. Lee's bled the AONV white with his overaggressive tactics.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Non intentional use: Could you imagine this tactic with ''fangirls'' yelling and going {{Squee}} out of the blue? Well, this was actually the reason why TheBeatles stopped giving concerts in 1965...

to:

* Non intentional use: Could you imagine this tactic with ''fangirls'' yelling and going {{Squee}} out of the blue? Well, this was actually the reason why TheBeatles stopped giving concerts in 1965...1966...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Bacteria. The UrExample of [[AWorldwidePunomenon ''"divide and conquer"'']]....

to:

* Bacteria. The UrExample of [[AWorldwidePunomenon ''"divide ''[[AWorldwidePunomenon "divide and conquer"'']]....conquer"]]''....
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Soldiers of the Japanese 3rd Army in the battle and siege of Port Arthur during the Russo-Japanese War. Japanese soldiers hurled themselves against stout fortress defenses, dying by the thousand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The same business occurred in the [[UsefulNotes/MiddleEastUprising2011 Arab Revolutions of 2011]]; the governments of UsefulNotes/{{Tunisia}} and [[UsefulNotes/ModernEgypt Egypt]] fell more or less because their militaries refused to fire on protesters, and other techniques were useless because of the sheer number of protesters. Libya turned into a CivilWar and Syria and Bahrain turned into bloodbaths because the government forces were willing to fire on the people; however, we should note that because the Libyan and Syrian militaries/security forces had similar demographics to the general public, defections to the protesting side kept the situation protracted, while the fact that the Bahraini forces (and the [[SummonBiggerFish Saudi and Emirati forces they called in to help]]) were primarily Sunni and the protesters primarily Shia made defections less of an issue, and the uprising was crushed as a result. On the other hand, ever-GenreSavvy Morocco explicitly ordered its security forces not to fire on protesters no matter what they did, which is why the protests there never got that big and why the regime was able to get away with moderate reforms.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Bacteria. The UrExample of [[AWorldwidePunomenon ''"divide and conquer"'']]....
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* This is the main reason why EverythingIsWorseWithWolves.

to:

* This is the main reason why EverythingIsWorseWithWolves.EverythingsWorseWithWolves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One African species of ant actually invades the major orifices of its prey and bite at once, inside and out: [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOe5Lmyyxiw& witness this BBC documentary]] of a raiding party defeating [[GiantEnemyCrab a freshwater crab]] by ''[[DidYouJustPunchOutCthulhu crawling inside its mouth]] [[NightmareFuel and eating it alive]]''.

to:

** One African species of ant actually invades the major orifices of its prey and bite at once, inside and out: [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOe5Lmyyxiw& witness this BBC documentary]] of a raiding party defeating [[GiantEnemyCrab a freshwater crab]] by ''[[DidYouJustPunchOutCthulhu crawling inside its mouth]] [[NightmareFuel wounds]] [[HighOctaneNightmareFuel and eating it alive]]''.

Changed: 1217

Removed: 292

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The very point of Zerg Rush was to deny your opponent a possibility to mount an effective defence. Which was exactly what happened, as you yourself described.


*** Which is why Norman Davies notes that a better term for the European theater of World War II would be Soviet-Third Reich War, because the scale of the Eastern Front absolutely dwarfs anything undertaken by the Western Allies, by several magnitudes (and screwed over the countries the two totalitarian regimes battled across).

to:

*** Which is why Norman Davies notes that a better term for the European theater of World War II would be Soviet-Third Reich War, because the scale of the Eastern Front absolutely dwarfs anything undertaken by the Western Allies, by several magnitudes (and screwed over the countries the two totalitarian regimes battled war was waged across).



** Not true. While Blitzkrieg did work out in the end, it was more due to the problems in organizing a coherent, effective defence (the Polish Army was stretched too thin) and the Soviet Army invading from the East. Furthermore, the Third Reich didn't have nearly as great a technological advantage one might think: much of the Wehrmacht used horses or even moved on foot to get from place to place and much of its armored corps were relatively weak early Panzer Is and IIs. Not to mention the fact that enough of the army survived to form the largest, most effective underground resistance movement in World War II (or rather, an entire underground state complete with an Army).
** Russia made very poor use of this tactic in their invasion of Finland, where guerrilla tactics inflicted severe damage on the Red Army. In particular, their tanks subscribed heavily to this tactic, but in doing so, they were often exposed to unconventional weapons, like Molotov cocktails.

to:

** Not true. While Blitzkrieg did work out in the end, it was more due to the problems in organizing a coherent, effective defence (the Polish Army was stretched too thin) and the Soviet Army invading from the East. Furthermore, the Third Reich didn't have nearly as great a technological advantage one might think: much of the Wehrmacht used horses or even moved on foot to get from place to place and much of its armored corps were relatively weak early Panzer Is and IIs. Not to mention the fact that enough of the army survived to form the largest, most effective underground resistance movement in World War II (or rather, an entire underground state complete with an Army).
** Russia made very poor use of this tactic in their invasion of Finland, where guerrilla tactics inflicted severe damage on the Red Army. In particular, their tanks subscribed heavily to this tactic, but in doing so, they were often exposed to unconventional weapons, like Molotov cocktails. Then the distinguished but incompetent in modern warfare Civil War Era generals were dismissed and replaced by the younger, more relevant leaders, the tactics were adjusted, and in two months the Red Army rolled Finns flat.



*** During many of the Communist collapses of the late 80's (Romania and the USSR are particularly notable for this effect) the regime collapsed precisely because the military ultimately refused to slaughter the rebelling populace (largely because they no longer believed in the regime). This almost happened during the Tienanmen Square protests, but the Chinese government found a military force that was willing to slaughter the protesters, and held on to power.

to:

*** During many of the Communist collapses of the late 80's (Romania and the USSR are is particularly notable for this effect) the regime collapsed precisely because the military ultimately refused to slaughter the rebelling populace (largely because they no longer believed in the regime). This almost happened during the Tienanmen Square protests, but the Chinese government found a military force that was willing to slaughter the protesters, and held on to power. Similar situation happened in the USSR too, but there (unlike Romania, which was led by a real hardcase) even the leadership itself was reluctant to use force, and calling our for the army was more of a kneejerk reaction rather that the real intent, so everything just kinda petered out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Which is not good for this very wiki.

to:

*** Which is [[WikiWalk not good good]] for this very wiki.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**Not true. While Blitzkrieg did work out in the end, it was more due to the problems in organizing a coherent, effective defence (the Polish Army was stretched too thin) and the Soviet Army invading from the East. Furthermore, the Third Reich didn't have nearly as great a technological advantage one might think: much of the Wehrmacht used horses or even moved on foot to get from place to place and much of its armored corps were relatively weak early Panzer Is and IIs. Not to mention the fact that enough of the army survived to form the largest, most effective underground resistance movement in World War II (or rather, an entire underground state complete with an Army).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***Which is why Norman Davies notes that a better term for the European theater of World War II would be Soviet-Third Reich War, because the scale of the Eastern Front absolutely dwarfs anything undertaken by the Western Allies, by several magnitudes (and screwed over the countries the two totalitarian regimes battled across).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** In 1944 and 1956 this was certainly true, but in 1848/9 the Hungarian Republic possessed an uncannily strong and well-balanced regular army, and the Honved did actually manage to defeat the Habsburg armies arraigned against them and pushed them almost all the way to Vienna before the Russians came in from the East and the Habsburgs came in from the West and effectively squashed them flat.

Added: 145

Removed: 145

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Relocated a misplaced paragraph on the Zulu Wars to the right place.


* As a general rule the Zerg Rush does not work against a well-fortified position and concentrated fire. See Zulu Wars; Pickett's Charge; WW I...



* As a general rule the Zerg Rush does not work against a well-fortified position and concentrated fire. See Zulu Wars; Pickett's Charge; WW I...

Added: 1260

Removed: 424

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* During World War II, the German military made effective use of this tactic, which they called the Blitzkrieg (Lightning War). When they invaded Poland, France, and Russia, they used fast moving vehicles to rush the enemy and bypass areas of strong resistance while simultaneously separating enemy army components, and using their air force to bomb critical enemy logistics and military structure. After disrupting the enemies rear lines and throwing them into chaos, the regular Army sweeps in and destroys pockets of resistance in piecemeal.
** Russia made very poor use of this tactic in their invasion of Finland, where guerrilla tactics inflicted severe damage on the Red Army. In particular, their tanks subscribed heavily to this tactic, but in doing so, they were often exposed to unconventional weapons, like Molotov cocktails.



** Though in the case of the Zulu, the Rush (in a slightly more complex form) was in fact a fairly new and effective tactic by which the Zulu had come to dominate the region, the work of a military genius who was unfortunately dead by the time the Zulu met the British. Had someone like him been around at the time, the Zulu might've fared better, as shown on one occasion when they did manage to get hold of some artillery.



** Though in the case of the Zulu, the Rush (in a slightly more complex form) was in fact a fairly new and effective tactic by which the Zulu had come to dominate the region, the work of a military genius who was unfortunately dead by the time the Zulu met the British. Had someone like him been around at the time, the Zulu might've fared better, as shown on one occasion when they did manage to get hold of some artillery.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* World War I was particularly famous for the trench warfare of the Western front, a fighting style which both sides were totally unaccustomed to. Throughout the war, hundreds of thousands of men died as both sides tried to repeatedly use mass wave attacks to achieve a "breakthrough" of the other side's defensive line, despite the fact of continued failure. Because both sides had created such a long trench line, neither could outflank the other, forcing attacks to be frontal assaults, which were made woefully ineffective with the introduction of the machine gun.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* It may be surprising, but the more soldiers there are in a unit, the less likely they are to be killed. There's a reason for the saying "strength in numbers:" Lanchester's Square Law means that marginally larger units can have dramatically improved survival rates in battle. The larger group ''inflicts'' more casualties, which makes it even larger comparatively, which means it causes even more casualties compared to the enemy, and so on. Larger units can also back each other up with cover fire and assist in taking down targets faster, possibly even denying the enemy a chance to retaliate. Seriously, when you're already facing someone with a machine gun, chances are you're not gonna notice the second guy aiming for you, or the third or fourth. And if you do notice, you're probably going to panic and shoot badly.

to:

* It may be surprising, but the more soldiers there are in a unit, the less likely they are to be killed. There's a reason for the saying "strength in numbers:" Lanchester's Square Law means that even marginally larger units can have dramatically improved survival rates in battle. The larger group ''inflicts'' more casualties, which makes it even larger comparatively, which means it causes even more casualties compared to the enemy, and so on. Larger units can also back each other up with cover fire and assist in taking down targets faster, possibly even denying the enemy a chance to retaliate. Seriously, when you're already facing someone with a machine gun, chances are you're not gonna notice the second guy aiming for you, or the third or fourth. And if you do notice, you're probably going to panic and shoot badly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Do note though, many of that those not KIA died later from infections gained from the most advanced medical equipment of the era being a some leather they have you bite on while the doctor saws off your leg to silence the screaming.

to:

*** Do note though, many of that those not KIA died later from infections gained from the the dirty instruments used in surgery, and the fact most advanced medical equipment of "surgery" was chopping off the era being a some leather they have you bite on while the doctor saws off your leg to silence the screaming.wounded limb.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Do note though, many of that those not KIA died later from infections gained from the most advanced medical equipment of the era being a some leather they have you bite on while the doctor saws off your leg to silence the screaming.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The use of Zerg rushes mas mostly because of periods when an offensive was absolutely essential, but there simply wasn't enough resources to adequately arm all the required soldiers. There were a few incidents where only the lead troops had guns, and those behind had to grab the guns from their fallen comrades when they got to them. As bad as WWII in Europe was for the Western Allies, it was NOTHING compared to how brutal it was on the Russian Front.

to:

*** The use of Zerg rushes mas was mostly because of periods when an offensive was absolutely essential, but there simply wasn't enough resources to adequately arm all the required soldiers. There were a few incidents where only the lead forward-most troops had guns, and those behind had to grab the guns from their fallen comrades when they got to them. As bad as WWII in Europe was for the Western Allies, it was NOTHING compared to how brutal it was on the Russian Front.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The use of Zerg rushes mas mostly because of periods when an offensive was absolutely essential, but there simply wasn't enough resources to adequately arm all the required soldiers. There were a few incidents where only the lead troops had guns, and those behind had to grab the guns from their fallen comrades when they got to them. As bad as WWII in Europe was for the Western Allies, it was NOTHING compared to how brutal it was on the Russian Front.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** During many of the Communist collapses of the late 80's (Romania and the USSR are particularly notable for this effect) the regime collapsed precisely because the military ultimately refused to slaughter the rebelling populace *largely because they no longer believed in the regime). This almost happened during the Tienanmen Square protests, but the Chinese government found a military force that was willing to slaughter the protesters, and held on to power.

to:

*** During many of the Communist collapses of the late 80's (Romania and the USSR are particularly notable for this effect) the regime collapsed precisely because the military ultimately refused to slaughter the rebelling populace *largely (largely because they no longer believed in the regime). This almost happened during the Tienanmen Square protests, but the Chinese government found a military force that was willing to slaughter the protesters, and held on to power.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** During many of the Communist collapses of the late 80's (Romania and the USSR are particularly notable for this effect) the regime collapsed precisely because the military ultimately refused to slaughter the rebelling populace *largely because they no longer believed in the regime). This almost happened during the Tienanmen Square protests, but the Chinese government found a military force that was willing to slaughter the protesters, and held on to power.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One African species of ant actually invades the major orifices of its prey and bite at once, inside and out: [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOe5Lmyyxiw& witness this BBC documentary]] of a raiding party defeating [[GiantEnemyCrab a freshwater crab]] by ''[[DidYouJustEatCthulhu crawling inside its mouth]] [[NightmareFuel and eating it alive]]''.

to:

** One African species of ant actually invades the major orifices of its prey and bite at once, inside and out: [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOe5Lmyyxiw& witness this BBC documentary]] of a raiding party defeating [[GiantEnemyCrab a freshwater crab]] by ''[[DidYouJustEatCthulhu ''[[DidYouJustPunchOutCthulhu crawling inside its mouth]] [[NightmareFuel and eating it alive]]''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** ScienceMarchesOn back the way it came, however! There's at least one fossil trackway evidently made by deinonychosaurs that clearly demonstrates cooperative travelling, which means that the theory of pack-hunting raptors is still plausible. [[http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2011/mar/29/dinosaurs-behaviour-raptors-pack-hunters This article]] explains it all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The internet. Want to get quick results when someone stole your artwork? Got an conflict issue that you want to spread out quick and get support? Post somewhere prolific, with substantial proof. Now sit back and watch as the internet zerg rushes someone's mailbox/account...
** A Zerg Rush is the core element of less organized, 'invasion'-style Denial-of-service attacks: If you can ram enough people's packet requests into a system, it can't dispatch answers fast enough and crashes.

to:

* The internet. Want to get quick results when someone stole your artwork? Got an a conflict issue that you want to spread out quick and get support? Post somewhere prolific, with substantial proof. Now sit back and watch as the internet zerg rushes Internet Zerg Rushes someone's mailbox/account...
** A Zerg Rush is the core element of less organized, 'invasion'-style Denial-of-service denial-of-service attacks: If you can ram enough people's packet requests into a system, it can't dispatch answers fast enough and crashes.

Added: 258

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** In both cases it was a well-equipped and trained regular army against mostly RagtagBunchOfMisfits rebels. There were no ''[[CurbStompBattle need]]'' to use human-wave tactics, so Hungarians version of the story is most probably simply a feel-better tale.



** Other Wiki says "US Army historian Roy Edgar Appleman observed that the term "human wave" was a metaphor used by journalists and military officials to convey the idea that the American soldiers were assaulted by overwhelming numbers of enemies, but it had no relation to the real Chinese infantry tactics of the same period." However, Western Allied as well as Chinese combat records idicate that several times (Chosin, Spring Offensive, Hamburger Hill), the Chinese and their North Korean allies ''were'' forced to have everyone charge headlong into the Allied lines. This wasn't their preferred way of attacking (just as absolutely nobody on Omaha Beach wanted to HAVE to charge headfirst into a sea of German MG rounds), as this usually happened when they were caught out in the open by a spotter or a flare while planning a more traditional attack, when they were ordered to capture an objective at any cost, or when they were pressed on to attack by something even worse hammering them where they were (namely heavy support aircraft and artillery). However, while the Chinese were far savvier than most give them credit for, it's pretty much indisputable that the Chinese leadership were far more accepting of this sort of tactic than they should have been given its dismal results.

to:

** Other Wiki says "US Army historian Roy Edgar Appleman observed that the term "human wave" was a metaphor used by journalists and military officials to convey the idea that the American soldiers were assaulted by overwhelming numbers of enemies, but it had no relation to the real Chinese infantry tactics of the same period." However, Western Allied as well as Chinese combat records idicate indicate that several times (Chosin, Spring Offensive, Hamburger Hill), the Chinese and their North Korean allies ''were'' forced to have everyone charge headlong into the Allied lines. This wasn't their preferred way of attacking (just as absolutely nobody on Omaha Beach wanted to HAVE to charge headfirst into a sea of German MG rounds), as this usually happened when they were caught out in the open by a spotter or a flare while planning a more traditional attack, when they were ordered to capture an objective at any cost, or when they were pressed on to attack by something even worse hammering them where they were (namely heavy support aircraft and artillery). However, while the Chinese were far savvier than most give them credit for, it's pretty much indisputable that the Chinese leadership were far more accepting of this sort of tactic than they should have been given its dismal results.



** The Federals also had a higher population density then the Confederates. Thus Federal units could be recruited as needed, while Confederate units were mostly local military fraternities. The Federals also made extensive use of the Scorched Earth doctrine, using their quickly assembled units to smash Confederate economy and thus fufill the RTS definition of a ZergRush (though it's worth noting that the South did plenty of the scorching themselves, to prevent supplies from falling into the North's hands). However, while the Union did suffer (roughly) 60% more casualties, the KIA excess was only 10%. Considering that the Confederates usually enjoyed the defending position (in the later years of the war, at any rate), and that the Civil War constituted the early days of trench warfare, with the known results during World War I, the numbers don't exactly point to rash tactics and disregard of one's own troops. Politicians lobbying against Grant had more to do with politicking after they decided the war was as good as won, using casualties as a pretext, than concern for the troops or about the general conduct of the war.

to:

** The Federals also had a higher population density then the Confederates. Thus Federal units could be recruited as needed, while Confederate units were mostly local military fraternities. The Federals also made extensive use of the Scorched Earth doctrine, using their quickly assembled units to smash Confederate economy and thus fufill fulfill the RTS definition of a ZergRush (though it's worth noting that the South did plenty of the scorching themselves, to prevent supplies from falling into the North's hands). However, while the Union did suffer (roughly) 60% more casualties, the KIA excess was only 10%. Considering that the Confederates usually enjoyed the defending position (in the later years of the war, at any rate), and that the Civil War constituted the early days of trench warfare, with the known results during World War I, the numbers don't exactly point to rash tactics and disregard of one's own troops. Politicians lobbying against Grant had more to do with politicking after they decided the war was as good as won, using casualties as a pretext, than concern for the troops or about the general conduct of the war.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
It did not happen a year ago


* About a year ago, a massive ten square-mile pack of jellyfish swarmed a salmon farm, [[http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSL2241858320071122 killing its entire population of about one hundred thousand fish.]] The water was so thick with jellyfish that the farm's boats could hardly even move, preventing the personnel from saving any of their salmon.

to:

* About a year ago, In 2007, a massive ten square-mile pack of jellyfish swarmed a salmon farm, [[http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSL2241858320071122 killing its entire population of about one hundred thousand fish.]] The water was so thick with jellyfish that the farm's boats could hardly even move, preventing the personnel from saving any of their salmon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Dromaeosaurs (or more commonly known as "[[RaptorAttack raptors]]"), but especially ''Deinonychus'', became famous for their hunting strategy which is extremely similar to that of wolves, and almost every depiction of these dinsoaurs shows them savagely mobbing and overwhelming huge plant-eaters. But ScienceMarchesOn, and after people have realized this whole theory had been based on more wishful thinking than actual fossil evidence, it has gradually lost its credibility. [[HereWeGoAgain Then someone claimed to have found support for the idea of pack-hunting among giant theropods, like tyrannosaurids...]]

to:

* Dromaeosaurs (or more commonly known as "[[RaptorAttack raptors]]"), but especially ''Deinonychus'', became famous for their hunting strategy which is extremely similar to that of wolves, and almost every depiction of these dinsoaurs dinosaurs shows them savagely mobbing and overwhelming huge plant-eaters. But ScienceMarchesOn, and after people have realized this whole theory had been based on more wishful thinking than actual fossil evidence, it has gradually lost its credibility. [[HereWeGoAgain Then someone claimed to have found support for the idea of pack-hunting among giant theropods, like tyrannosaurids...]]

Top