Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / Unhinged2020

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EsotericHappyEnding: Although the films seems to end on a happy note with Rachel finally killing the Man and getting word that her brother is alive, it ignores the fact the man sent all her money to her ex -- meaning she is now completely penniless, still without a job, both her friend/divorce lawyer and her brother’s fiancée are dead and she is now worse off than she was at the beginning.

to:

* EsotericHappyEnding: Although the films seems to end on a happy note with Rachel finally killing the Man and getting word that her brother is alive, it ignores the fact the man sent all her money to her ex -- meaning she is now completely penniless, still without a job, both her friend/divorce lawyer and her brother’s fiancée are dead and she is now is worse off than she was at the beginning.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EsotericHappyEnding: Although the films seems to end on a happy note with Rachel finally killing the Man and getting word that her brother is alive, it ignores the fact the man sent all her money to her Ex -- meaning she is now completely penniless, still without a job, both her friend/divorce lawyer and her brother’s fiancée are dead and she is now worse off than she was at the beginning.

to:

* EsotericHappyEnding: Although the films seems to end on a happy note with Rachel finally killing the Man and getting word that her brother is alive, it ignores the fact the man sent all her money to her Ex ex -- meaning she is now completely penniless, still without a job, both her friend/divorce lawyer and her brother’s fiancée are dead and she is now worse off than she was at the beginning.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EsotericHappyEnding: Although the films seems to end on a happy note with Rachel finally killing the Man and getting word that her brother is alive, it ignores the fact the man sent all her money to her Ex -- meaning she is now completely penniless, still without a job and both her friend/divorce lawyer and her brother’s fiancée are dead.

to:

* EsotericHappyEnding: Although the films seems to end on a happy note with Rachel finally killing the Man and getting word that her brother is alive, it ignores the fact the man sent all her money to her Ex -- meaning she is now completely penniless, still without a job and job, both her friend/divorce lawyer and her brother’s fiancée are dead.dead and she is now worse off than she was at the beginning.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EsotericHappyEnding: Although the films seems to end on a happy note with Rachel finally killing the Man and getting word that her brother is alive, it ignores the fact the man sent all her money to her Ex -- meaning she now completely penniless, still without a job and both her friend/divorce lawyer and her brother’s fiancée are dead.

to:

* EsotericHappyEnding: Although the films seems to end on a happy note with Rachel finally killing the Man and getting word that her brother is alive, it ignores the fact the man sent all her money to her Ex -- meaning she is now completely penniless, still without a job and both her friend/divorce lawyer and her brother’s fiancée are dead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EsotericHappyEnding: Although the films seems to end on a happy note with Rachel finally killing the Man and getting word that her brother is alive, it ignores the fact the man sent all her money to her Ex -- meaning she now completely penniless, still without a job, both her friend/divorce lawyer and her brother’s fiancée are dead.

to:

* EsotericHappyEnding: Although the films seems to end on a happy note with Rachel finally killing the Man and getting word that her brother is alive, it ignores the fact the man sent all her money to her Ex -- meaning she now completely penniless, still without a job, job and both her friend/divorce lawyer and her brother’s fiancée are dead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EsotericHappyEnding: Although the films seems to end on a happy note with Rachel finally killing the Man and getting word that her brother is alive, it ignores the fact the man sent all her money to her Ex -- meaning she now completely penniless, still without a job, both her friend/divorce lawyer and her brother’s fiancée are dead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAesop: The film’s moral appears to be that you should be careful and considerate towards other drivers who might be having a bad day, however because the beginning establishes that the man is a murderous psycho rather than introduce him at the traffic lights without a backstory, it breaks that moral and puts everything he says about teaching Rachel a lesson into question because he might have simply been looking for if not deliberately trying to provoke someone to target ForTheEvulz, making the moral that you should never honk at or confront other drivers because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make you their next target]].

to:

* BrokenAesop: The film’s moral appears to be that you should be careful and considerate towards other drivers who might be having a bad day, however because the beginning establishes that the man is a murderous psycho rather than introduce him at the traffic lights without a backstory, it breaks that moral and puts everything he says about teaching Rachel a lesson into question because he might have simply been looking for if not deliberately trying to provoke someone to target ForTheEvulz, making the moral that you should never honk at or confront other drivers no matter what they do because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make you their next target]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAesop: The film’s moral appears to be that you should be careful and considerate towards other drivers who might be having a bad day, however because the film opens by establishing that the man is a murderous psycho rather than introduce him at the traffic lights without a backstory, it breaks that moral and puts everything he says about teaching Rachel a lesson into question because he might have simply been looking for (if not deliberately trying to provoke) someone to target ForTheEvulz, turning the moral into you should never honk at or confront other drivers because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make you their next target]].

to:

* BrokenAesop: The film’s moral appears to be that you should be careful and considerate towards other drivers who might be having a bad day, however because the film opens by establishing beginning establishes that the man is a murderous psycho rather than introduce him at the traffic lights without a backstory, it breaks that moral and puts everything he says about teaching Rachel a lesson into question because he might have simply been looking for (if if not deliberately trying to provoke) provoke someone to target ForTheEvulz, turning making the moral into that you should never honk at or confront other drivers because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make you their next target]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAesop: The film’s moral appears to be that you should be careful and considerate towards other drivers who might be having a bad day, however because the film opens by establishing that the man is a murderous psycho rather than introduce him at the traffic lights without a backstory, it breaks that moral and puts everything he says about teaching Rachel a lesson into question because he might have simply been looking for (if not deliberately trying to provoke) someone to target ForTheEvulz, turning the moral into you should never honk at or confront other drivers because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make ''you'' their next target]].

to:

* BrokenAesop: The film’s moral appears to be that you should be careful and considerate towards other drivers who might be having a bad day, however because the film opens by establishing that the man is a murderous psycho rather than introduce him at the traffic lights without a backstory, it breaks that moral and puts everything he says about teaching Rachel a lesson into question because he might have simply been looking for (if not deliberately trying to provoke) someone to target ForTheEvulz, turning the moral into you should never honk at or confront other drivers because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make ''you'' you their next target]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAesop: The film’s moral appears to be that you should be careful and considerate towards other drivers who might be having a bad day, however because the film opens by establishing that the man is a murderous psycho rather than introduce him at the traffic lights without a backstory, it breaks that moral and puts everything he says about teaching Rachel a lesson into question because he might have simply been looking for (if not deliberately trying to provoke) someone to target ForTheEvulz reason, turning the moral into you should never honk at or confront other drivers because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make ''you'' their next target]].

to:

* BrokenAesop: The film’s moral appears to be that you should be careful and considerate towards other drivers who might be having a bad day, however because the film opens by establishing that the man is a murderous psycho rather than introduce him at the traffic lights without a backstory, it breaks that moral and puts everything he says about teaching Rachel a lesson into question because he might have simply been looking for (if not deliberately trying to provoke) someone to target ForTheEvulz reason, ForTheEvulz, turning the moral into you should never honk at or confront other drivers because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make ''you'' their next target]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAesop: The film’s moral appears to be that you should be careful and considerate towards other drivers who might be having a bad day, however because the film opens by establishing that the man is a murderous psycho rather than introduce him at the traffic lights without a backstory, it breaks that moral and puts everything he says about teaching Rachel a lesson into question because he might have simply been looking for (if not deliberately trying to provoke) someone to target [[ForTheEvulz for no good reason]], turning the moral into you should never honk your horn or confront other drivers because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make ''you'' their next target]].

to:

* BrokenAesop: The film’s moral appears to be that you should be careful and considerate towards other drivers who might be having a bad day, however because the film opens by establishing that the man is a murderous psycho rather than introduce him at the traffic lights without a backstory, it breaks that moral and puts everything he says about teaching Rachel a lesson into question because he might have simply been looking for (if not deliberately trying to provoke) someone to target [[ForTheEvulz for no good reason]], ForTheEvulz reason, turning the moral into you should never honk your horn at or confront other drivers because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make ''you'' their next target]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAesop: The film’s moral appears to be that you should be careful and considerate towards other drivers who might be having a bad day, however because the film opens by establishing that the man is a murderous psycho rather than introduce him at the traffic lights it breaks that moral and puts everything he says about teaching Rachel a lesson into question because he might have simply been looking for (if not deliberately trying to provoke) someone to target [[ForTheEvulz for no good reason]], turning the moral into you should never honk your horn or confront other drivers because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make ''you'' their next target]].

to:

* BrokenAesop: The film’s moral appears to be that you should be careful and considerate towards other drivers who might be having a bad day, however because the film opens by establishing that the man is a murderous psycho rather than introduce him at the traffic lights without a backstory, it breaks that moral and puts everything he says about teaching Rachel a lesson into question because he might have simply been looking for (if not deliberately trying to provoke) someone to target [[ForTheEvulz for no good reason]], turning the moral into you should never honk your horn or confront other drivers because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make ''you'' their next target]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAesop: The film’s moral appears to be that you should be careful and considerate towards other drivers who might be having a bad day, however because the film opens by establishing that the man is a murderous psycho puts everything he says about teaching Rachel a lesson into question because he might have been looking for (if not deliberately trying to provoke) someone to target, making the moral that you should never honk your horn or confront other drivers because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make ''you'' their next target]].

to:

* BrokenAesop: The film’s moral appears to be that you should be careful and considerate towards other drivers who might be having a bad day, however because the film opens by establishing that the man is a murderous psycho rather than introduce him at the traffic lights it breaks that moral and puts everything he says about teaching Rachel a lesson into question because he might have simply been looking for (if not deliberately trying to provoke) someone to target, making target [[ForTheEvulz for no good reason]], turning the moral that into you should never honk your horn or confront other drivers because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make ''you'' their next target]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BrokenAesop: The film’s moral appears to be that you should be careful and considerate towards other drivers who might be having a bad day, however because the film opens by establishing that the man is a murderous psycho puts everything he says about teaching Rachel a lesson into question because he might have been looking for (if not deliberately trying to provoke) someone to target, making the moral that you should never honk your horn or confront other drivers because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make ''you'' their next target]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not example if it doesn't explain how it's contradicted by the work.


%% * BrokenAesop: You should never honk your horn at other drivers or confront anyone because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make you their next target]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Nothing in this entry indicates how it is a Broken Aesop; it might be a Space Whale Aesop, but it needs to be in its proper entry.


* BrokenAesop: You should never honk your horn at other drivers or confront anyone because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make you their next target]].

to:

%% * BrokenAesop: You should never honk your horn at other drivers or confront anyone because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} a dangerous psychopath who will make you their next target]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAesop: You should never honk your horn at other drivers or confront anyone because they [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} might be a dangerous psychopath who will make you their next target]].

to:

* BrokenAesop: You should never honk your horn at other drivers or confront anyone because they might be [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} might be a dangerous psychopath who will make you their next target]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAesop: You should never honk your horn at other drivers or confront anyone about anything because they [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} might be a dangerous psychopath who will make you their next target]].

to:

* BrokenAesop: You should never honk your horn at other drivers or confront anyone about anything because they [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} might be a dangerous psychopath who will make you their next target]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAesop: You should never honk your horn at other drivers or confront anyone about anything because they [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} might be a dangerous psychopath]].

to:

* BrokenAesop: You should never honk your horn at other drivers or confront anyone about anything because they [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} might be a dangerous psychopath]]. psychopath who will make you their next target]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BrokenAesop: You should never honk your horn at other drivers or confront anyone about anything because they [[{{SpaceWhaleAesop}} might be a dangerous psychopath]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: It's hard to say exactly just what the Man's motivation even is. One would think that he is motivated by Rachel learning to apologize and make it sincere, however, on the other hand, it's implied that the Man is simply [[NotSoWellIntentionedExtremist looking for an excuse to kill people]] and that nothing Rachel says would've changed a thing, even if she sincerely apologized.

to:

* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: It's hard to say exactly just what the Man's motivation even is. One would think that he is motivated by Rachel learning to apologize and make it sincere, however, on the other hand, it's implied that the Man is simply [[NotSoWellIntentionedExtremist looking for an excuse to kill people]] and that nothing Rachel says would've changed a thing, even if she sincerely apologized.apologized, or if she had even honked her horn or not in the first place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed ROCEJ pothole


* RootingForTheEmpire: As seen in the Website/YouTube comments of the trailers, many viewers root for the Man even as he stalks Rachel, assaults and kills many innocent people [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking and]] generally acts like a {{Jerkass}} simply [[DisproportionateRetribution because]] Rachel honked at him at a traffic stop. It could be due to the viewers disliking Rachel's "Karen" personality, preferring Russell Crowe's acting, or a MisaimedFandom of increasingly misogynistic undertones that are [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment better off not discussed here]].

to:

* RootingForTheEmpire: As seen in the Website/YouTube comments of the trailers, many viewers root for the Man even as he stalks Rachel, assaults and kills many innocent people [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking and]] generally acts like a {{Jerkass}} simply [[DisproportionateRetribution because]] Rachel honked at him at a traffic stop. It could be due to the viewers disliking Rachel's "Karen" personality, preferring Russell Crowe's acting, or a MisaimedFandom of increasingly misogynistic undertones that are [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment better off not discussed here]].undertones.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** well many “Karen” haters use this new meme as justification for their misogyny, so it’s probably a combination of both.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** they’re called misogynists
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** well many “Karen” haters use this new meme as justification for their misogyny, so it’s probably a combination of both.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** they’re called misogynists
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAesop: The movie’s moral falls down because of the opening scene, we see the man break into a house and murder two people and he becomes a murderous wild card who’s motivation we can’t trust, and the moral goes from “Be careful who you get into a confrontation with” to “You should be afraid to confront anyone no matter what they do because they might be a psychotic murderer and they might choose to target you no matter what you do or don’t do”.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAesop: The movie’s moral falls down because of the opening scene, we see the man break into a house and murder two people and he becomes a murderous wild card who’s motivation we can’t trust, if he had been introduced during the encounter with Rachel at the traffic light his character would a mystery and the moral would have worked. However because of the opening scene the moral goes from “Be careful who you get into a confrontation with” to “You should be afraid to confront anyone no matter what they do because they might be a psychotic murderer and they might choose to target you no matter what you do or don’t do”.

to:

* BrokenAesop: The movie’s moral falls down because of the opening scene, we see the man break into a house and murder two people and he becomes a murderous wild card who’s motivation we can’t trust, if he had been introduced during the encounter with Rachel at the traffic light his character would a mystery and the moral would have worked. However because of the opening scene the moral goes from “Be careful who you get into a confrontation with” to “You should be afraid to confront anyone no matter what they do because they might be a psychotic murderer and they might choose to target you no matter what you do or don’t do”.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAesop: The movie’s moral falls down because of the opening scene, we see the man break into a house and murder two people and he becomes a murderous wild card who’s motivation we can’t trust, if he had been introduced during the encounter with Rachel at the traffic light his character had remained a mystery and the moral would have worked. However because of the opening scene the moral goes from “Be careful who you get into a confrontation with” to “You should be afraid to confront anyone no matter what they do because they might be a psychotic murderer and they might choose to target you no matter what you do or don’t do”.

to:

* BrokenAesop: The movie’s moral falls down because of the opening scene, we see the man break into a house and murder two people and he becomes a murderous wild card who’s motivation we can’t trust, if he had been introduced during the encounter with Rachel at the traffic light his character had remained would a mystery and the moral would have worked. However because of the opening scene the moral goes from “Be careful who you get into a confrontation with” to “You should be afraid to confront anyone no matter what they do because they might be a psychotic murderer and they might choose to target you no matter what you do or don’t do”.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAesop: The movie’s moral falls down because of the opening scene, we see the man break into a house and murder two people and he becomes murderous a wild card who’s motivation we can’t trust, if he had been introduced during the encounter with Rachel at the traffic light his character had remained a mystery and the moral would have worked. However because of the opening scene the moral goes from “Be careful who you get into a confrontation with” to “You should be afraid to confront anyone no matter what they do because they might be a psychotic murderer and they might choose to target you no matter what you do or don’t do”.

to:

* BrokenAesop: The movie’s moral falls down because of the opening scene, we see the man break into a house and murder two people and he becomes a murderous a wild card who’s motivation we can’t trust, if he had been introduced during the encounter with Rachel at the traffic light his character had remained a mystery and the moral would have worked. However because of the opening scene the moral goes from “Be careful who you get into a confrontation with” to “You should be afraid to confront anyone no matter what they do because they might be a psychotic murderer and they might choose to target you no matter what you do or don’t do”.

Top