Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* JerkassWoobie: This is the closest thing there is to a sympathetic portrayal of Freddy. His childhood was far worse than it was in the original canon. But he's still a mean, unrepentant monster, so the "woobie" part may not be applicable any longer.
to:
* JerkassWoobie: This is the closest thing there is to a sympathetic portrayal of Freddy. His childhood was far worse than it was in the original canon.canon (even though some bits of that are kept in this film). But he's still a mean, unrepentant monster, so the "woobie" part may not be applicable any longer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Reverting ban evader edits.
Changed line(s) 2,5 (click to see context) from:
* MoralEventHorizon:
** Freddy's torture of animals in his youth was certainly heinous, but didn't necessarily place him beyond redemption. And burning down Underwood's place was forgivable, because he deserved it. However, when he willingly took the life of an innocent child in a drunken rage, there was no more going back for him.
** Underwood crossed it by beating and cutting Freddy and pimping him out to his friends. The chief of police, who was one of the abusers, also crossed it to the point that Freddy states that the chief was worse than Underwood.
** Freddy's torture of animals in his youth was certainly heinous, but didn't necessarily place him beyond redemption. And burning down Underwood's place was forgivable, because he deserved it. However, when he willingly took the life of an innocent child in a drunken rage, there was no more going back for him.
** Underwood crossed it by beating and cutting Freddy and pimping him out to his friends. The chief of police, who was one of the abusers, also crossed it to the point that Freddy states that the chief was worse than Underwood.
to:
* MoralEventHorizon:
**MoralEventHorizon: Freddy's torture of animals in his youth was certainly heinous, but didn't necessarily place him beyond redemption. And burning down Underwood's place was forgivable, because he deserved it. However, when he willingly took the life of an innocent child in a drunken rage, there was no more going back for him.
** Underwood crossed it by beating and cutting Freddy and pimping him out to his friends. The chief of police, who was one of the abusers, also crossed it to the point that Freddy states that the chief was worse than Underwood.
him.
**
** Underwood crossed it by beating and cutting Freddy and pimping him out to his friends. The chief of police, who was one of the abusers, also crossed it to the point that Freddy states that the chief was worse than Underwood.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
* MoralEventHorizon: Freddy's torture of animals in his youth was certainly heinous, but didn't necessarily place him beyond redemption. And burning down Underwood's place was forgivable, because he deserved it. However, when he willingly took the life of an innocent child in a drunken rage, there was no more going back for him.
to:
* MoralEventHorizon: MoralEventHorizon:
** Freddy's torture of animals in his youth was certainly heinous, but didn't necessarily place him beyond redemption. And burning down Underwood's place was forgivable, because he deserved it. However, when he willingly took the life of an innocent child in a drunken rage, there was no more going back for him.
** Underwood crossed it by beating and cutting Freddy and pimping him out to his friends. The chief of police, who was one of the abusers, also crossed it to the point that Freddy states that the chief was worse than Underwood.
** Freddy's torture of animals in his youth was certainly heinous, but didn't necessarily place him beyond redemption. And burning down Underwood's place was forgivable, because he deserved it. However, when he willingly took the life of an innocent child in a drunken rage, there was no more going back for him.
** Underwood crossed it by beating and cutting Freddy and pimping him out to his friends. The chief of police, who was one of the abusers, also crossed it to the point that Freddy states that the chief was worse than Underwood.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* MoralEventHorizon: Freddy's torture of animals in his youth was certainly heinous, but didn't necessarily place him beyond redemption. And burning down Underwood's place was forgivable, because he deserved it. However, when he willingly took the life of an innocent child in a drunken rage, there was no more going back for him.
to:
* MoralEventHorizon: Freddy's torture of animals in his youth was certainly heinous, but didn't necessarily place him beyond redemption. And burning down Underwood's place was forgivable, because he deserved it. However, when he willingly took the life of an innocent child in a drunken rage, there was no more going back for him.him.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* JerkassWoobie: This is the closest thing there is to a sympathetic portrayal of Freddy. His childhood was far worse than it was in the original canon. But he's still a mean, unrepentant monster, so the "woobie" part may not be applicable any longer.
to:
* JerkassWoobie: This is the closest thing there is to a sympathetic portrayal of Freddy. His childhood was far worse than it was in the original canon. But he's still a mean, unrepentant monster, so the "woobie" part may not be applicable any longer.longer.
* MoralEventHorizon: Freddy's torture of animals in his youth was certainly heinous, but didn't necessarily place him beyond redemption. And burning down Underwood's place was forgivable, because he deserved it. However, when he willingly took the life of an innocent child in a drunken rage, there was no more going back for him.
* MoralEventHorizon: Freddy's torture of animals in his youth was certainly heinous, but didn't necessarily place him beyond redemption. And burning down Underwood's place was forgivable, because he deserved it. However, when he willingly took the life of an innocent child in a drunken rage, there was no more going back for him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* JerkassWoobie: Freddy's life here is even worse than it was in the original ''Nightmare'' canon. However, he's still a mean, unrepentant monster, so the "woobie" part may not be applicable any longer.
to:
* JerkassWoobie: Freddy's life here This is even the closest thing there is to a sympathetic portrayal of Freddy. His childhood was far worse than it was in the original ''Nightmare'' canon. However, But he's still a mean, unrepentant monster, so the "woobie" part may not be applicable any longer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* JerkassWoobie: Freddy's life here is even worse than it was in the original ''Nightmare'' canon. However, he's still a mean, unrepentant monster, so the "woobie" part may not be applicable any longer.
