Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / InAndOut

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The fact that being gay means being attracted to someone of the same gender is also never brought up, confusingly

to:

** The fact that being gay means being attracted to someone of the same gender is also never brought up, confusinglyup verbally, confusingly, though the fact that the straw that broke the camel's back was being kissed by a man, after years of kissed women, might speak for itself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Given that the screenwriter [[NWordPrivileges is openly gay himself]], this could just be RuleOfFunny.

to:

** Given that the screenwriter [[NWordPrivileges [[OffendingTheCreatorsOwn is openly gay himself]], this could just be RuleOfFunny.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Given that the screenwriter is openly gay himself, this could just be RuleOfFunny.

to:

** Given that the screenwriter [[NWordPrivileges is openly gay himself, himself]], this could just be RuleOfFunny.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Adding to the page

Added DiffLines:

** The fact that being gay means being attracted to someone of the same gender is also never brought up, confusingly
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Society Marches On has been renamed; cleaning out misuse and moving examples


** Also, the idea of gay marriage is never brought up (understandably, since it was made in 1997). However, marriage equality has become more and more widespread as SocietyMarchesOn, so the idea that Howard could still get married someday is not out of the question.

to:

** Also, the idea of gay marriage is never brought up (understandably, since it was made in 1997). However, marriage equality has become more and more widespread as SocietyMarchesOn, widespread, so the idea that Howard could still get married someday is not out of the question.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* UnintentionalPeriodPiece:
** It may seem strange to some latter-day viewers when the entire town freaks out over the possibility that the high school English teacher is gay. Even if one assumes such a thing could still happen in a small town, [[spoiler: it's odd to see the principal be so blunt about firing Howard on the basis of his sexual orientation.]]
** Also, the idea of gay marriage is never brought up (understandably, since it was made in 1997). However, marriage equality has become more and more widespread as SocietyMarchesOn, so the idea that Howard could still get married someday is not out of the question.
*** Considering the [[WeddingBellsForSomeoneElse brief fakeout]] in the ending with the 'unusual couple', it's not exactly ''never'' brought up. Ceremonies that were effectively gay marriages without the more straightforwardly-applied legal bond were becoming fairly common by the mid-late nineties.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixing a mistake, as Macho Man was only played during the Dance Party Ending and not the first scene.


* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: The movie's use of "Macho Man" is quite catchy, during both during the scene where Howard tests his reaction to it and the DancePartyEnding.

to:

* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: The movie's use of "Macho Man" is quite catchy, catchy during both during the scene where Howard tests his reaction to it and the DancePartyEnding.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: The movie's use of "Macho Man" is quite catchy, during both during the scene where Howard tests his reaction to it and the DancePartyEnding.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved "Inspiration for the Work" to Trivia tab.


* InspirationForTheWork: The film was inspired by Creator/TomHanks' tearful speech when he won the Best Actor Oscar for ''Film/{{Philadelphia}}'' in 1994 in which he credited his high school drama teacher Rawley Farnsworth and a former classmate John Gilkerson as "two of the finest gay Americans, two wonderful men that I had the good fortune to be associated with." Farnsworth was closeted about his sexuality throughout his life right up until that point.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccidentalAesop: "It is wrong to fire someone based on their sexual orientation," after the board of education fired Howard after coming out (although they denied the cause as Howard's sexual orientation, it was obvious that was the real reason). The only reason this is an accidental Aesop instead of an intentional one, was this was in the '90s when people still thought it was illegal to terminate employment based on sexuality, although nowadays it's all too painfully obvious this is not the case (in reality, Indiana was and still is one of the 29 states where it is perfectly legal to fire someone for being gay). This also gives the movie a new relevance to issues concerning gay rights in today's society.

to:

* AccidentalAesop: "It is wrong to fire someone based on their sexual orientation," after the board of education fired Howard after coming out (although they denied the cause as Howard's sexual orientation, it was obvious that was the real reason). The only reason this is an accidental Aesop instead of an intentional one, was this was in the '90s when people still thought it was illegal to terminate employment based on sexuality, although nowadays it's all too painfully obvious this is not the case (in reality, Indiana was and still is one of the 29 states where it is perfectly legal to fire someone for being gay). This also gives the movie a new relevance to issues concerning gay rights in today's society. It also becomes HilariousInHindsight in the case of ''[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostock_v._Clayton_County Bostock v. Clayton County]]'' (June 15, 2020), in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it is indeed wrong to fire someone based on their sexual orientation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* InspirationForTheWork: The film was inspired by Creator/TomHanks' tearful speech when he won the Best Actor Oscar for ''Film/{{Philadelphia}}'' in 1994 in which he credited his high school drama teacher Rawley Farnsworth and a former classmate John Gilkerson as "two of the finest gay Americans, two wonderful men that I had the good fortune to be associated with." Farnsworth was closeted about his sexuality throughout his life right up until that point.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FairForItsDay: Despite some of the ValuesDissonance around gay stereotypes in the movie, the kiss between Kevin Kline and Tom Selleck [[https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2017/09/in-and-out-movie-anniversary-kevin-kline-paul-rudnick-barbra-streisand genuinely shocked many audiences]] at the time of the movie's release. In fact, according to the screenwriter, many audiences expected the twist to be that Kevin Kline's character was actually ''straight'', and were surprised by the twist that it was actually a ComingOutStory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: Is Hollywood star Cameron Drake really an honest supporter of gay rights, or is he just using gay equality as a platform to increase his own recognition? What really calls this into question was his acceptance speech, where after he thanks his former teacher for inspiring him, he deliberately blurts out "... and he's gay!" When you look at the speech alone the closer is so awkward that it comes off more as a desperate attempt for attention, instead of as giving credit to someone who inspired you.

to:

* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: Is Hollywood star Cameron Drake really an honest supporter of gay rights, or is he just using gay equality as a platform to increase his own recognition? What really calls this into question was his acceptance speech, where after he thanks his former teacher for inspiring him, he deliberately blurts out "... and he's gay!" When you look at the speech alone the closer is so awkward that it comes off more as a desperate attempt for attention, instead of as giving credit to someone who inspired you. Of course, he spends the entire rest of the movie trying to make up for his gaffe once he's realized it, so the movie clearly intends him to be a fairly moral and considerate sort of person who just screwed up.

Added: 4

Changed: 55

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* CrowningMomentOfFunny:

to:

* CrowningMomentOfFunny: SugarWiki/FunnyMoments:



* CrowningMomentOfHeartwarming: [[spoiler: When Cameron tells poor, insecure Emily she was BeautifulAllAlong.]]

to:

* CrowningMomentOfHeartwarming: SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments: [[spoiler: When Cameron tells poor, insecure Emily she was BeautifulAllAlong.]]



** It may be closer to HarsherInHindsight than ValuesDissonance, as 20 years later, ''many'' of the stereotypes parodied have yet to fade from public consciousness.

to:

** It may be closer to HarsherInHindsight than ValuesDissonance, as 20 years later, ''many'' of the stereotypes parodied have yet to fade from public consciousness.consciousness.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccidentalAesop: "It is wrong to fire someone based on their sexual orientation," after the board of education fired Howard after coming out (although they denied the cause as Howard's sexual orientation, it was obvious that was the real reason). The only reason this is an accidental Aesop instead of an intentional one, was this was in the 90's where people still thought it was illegal to terminate employment based on sexuality, although nowadays it's all too painfully obvious this is not the case (in reality, Indiana was and still is one of the 29 states where it is perfectly legal to fire someone for being gay). This also gives the movie a new relevance to issues concerning gay rights in today's society.

to:

* AccidentalAesop: "It is wrong to fire someone based on their sexual orientation," after the board of education fired Howard after coming out (although they denied the cause as Howard's sexual orientation, it was obvious that was the real reason). The only reason this is an accidental Aesop instead of an intentional one, was this was in the 90's where '90s when people still thought it was illegal to terminate employment based on sexuality, although nowadays it's all too painfully obvious this is not the case (in reality, Indiana was and still is one of the 29 states where it is perfectly legal to fire someone for being gay). This also gives the movie a new relevance to issues concerning gay rights in today's society.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HilariousInHindsight: One of the Best Actor nominees Cameron is up against is none other than Creator/ClintEastwood, for a film called ''Codger''. While intended to be a TakeThat at Eastwood's advanced age, ''Film/GranTorino'' essentially brought the idea to life 11 years later.

Added: 32

Changed: 155

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CrowningMomentOfFunny: "Volume One: '[[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8YKAp7o53E Get a Grip!]]'."
** "Fuck BarbraStreisand!"

to:

* CrowningMomentOfFunny: CrowningMomentOfFunny:
**
"Volume One: '[[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8YKAp7o53E Get a Grip!]]'."
** "Fuck BarbraStreisand!"Music/BarbraStreisand!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesDissonance: The film has an unfortunate tendency to reinforce stereotypes about what types of personal traits, interests, tastes, etc. are inherently "gay", even as it mocks its characters' espousal of those same stereotypes.

to:

* ValuesDissonance: The film has an unfortunate tendency to reinforce stereotypes assumptions about what types of personal traits, interests, tastes, etc. are inherently "gay", even as it mocks its characters' espousal of those same stereotypes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It may be closer to HarsherInHindsight than ValuesDissonance, as 15 years later, ''many'' of the stereotypes parodied have yet to fade from public consciousness.

to:

** It may be closer to HarsherInHindsight than ValuesDissonance, as 15 20 years later, ''many'' of the stereotypes parodied have yet to fade from public consciousness.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not YMMV trope(s). Moving to main page.


* NeverTrustATrailer: The trailer made this look like a lighthearted comedy of errors in which a [[CampStraight heterosexual man with some stereotypically gay mannerisms]] gets [[MistakenForGay accidentally outed]] at the Oscars by a former student who is now a successful actor, and must spend the rest of the film repairing his reputation when the whole world decides he must be gay just due to the way he walks or his impeccably stylish clothes. Of course, the actual point of the film is that Howard is [[TransparentCloset deeply closeted]] and won't even admit his sexuality to himself until forced to confront it. It also gets pretty serious near the middle when Howard's sexual orientation gets him fired and has the entire town turning against him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Given that the screenwriter is openly gay, this could just be RuleOfFunny.

to:

** Given that the screenwriter is openly gay, gay himself, this could just be RuleOfFunny.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* NeverTrustATrailer: The trailer made this look like a lighthearted comedy of errors in which a [[CampStraight heterosexual man with some stereotypically gay mannerisms]] gets [[MistakenForGay accidentally outed]] at the Oscars by a former student who is now a successful actor, and must spend the rest of the film repairing his reputation when the whole world decides he must be gay just due to the way he walks or his impeccably stylish clothes. Of course, the actual point of the film is that Howard is [[TransparentCloset deeply closeted]] and won't even admit his sexuality to himself until forced to confront it. It also gets pretty serious near the middle when Howard's sexual orientation gets him fired and has the entire town turning against him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccidentalAesop: The fact that it is wrong to fire someone just because of their sexual orientation, after the board of education fired Howard after coming out (although they denied the cause as Howard's sexual orientation, it was obvious that was the real reason). The only reason this is an accidental Aesop instead of an intentional one, was this was in the 90's where people still thought it was illegal to terminate employment based on sexuality, although nowadays it's all too painfully obvious this is not the case (in reality, Indiana was and still is one of the 29 states where it is perfectly legal to fire someone for being gay). This also gives the movie a new relevance to issues concerning gay rights in today's society.

to:

* AccidentalAesop: The fact that it "It is wrong to fire someone just because of based on their sexual orientation, orientation," after the board of education fired Howard after coming out (although they denied the cause as Howard's sexual orientation, it was obvious that was the real reason). The only reason this is an accidental Aesop instead of an intentional one, was this was in the 90's where people still thought it was illegal to terminate employment based on sexuality, although nowadays it's all too painfully obvious this is not the case (in reality, Indiana was and still is one of the 29 states where it is perfectly legal to fire someone for being gay). This also gives the movie a new relevance to issues concerning gay rights in today's society.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: Is Hollywood star Cameron Drake really an honest supporter of gay rights, or is he just using gay equality as a platform to increase his own recognition? What really calls this into question was his acceptance speech, where after he thanks his former teacher for inspiring him, he deliberately blurts out "... and he's gay!" When you look at the speech alone the closer is so awkward that it comes off more as a desperate attempt for attention, instead of as giving credit to someone who inspired you.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AccidentalAesop: The fact that it is wrong to fire someone just because of their sexual orientation, after the board of education fired Howard after coming out (although they denied the cause as Howard's sexual orientation, it was obvious that was the real reason). The only reason this is an accidental Aesop instead of an intentional one, was this was in the 90's where people still thought it was illegal to terminate employment based on sexuality, although nowadays it's all too painfully obvious this is not the case (in reality, Indiana was and still is one of the 29 states where it is perfectly legal to fire someone for being gay). This also gives the movie a new relevance to issues concerning gay rights in today's society.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It may be closer to HarsherInHindsight than ValuesDissonance, as 15 years later, ''many'' of the stereotypes parodied have yet to fade from public consciousness.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**"Fuck BarbraStreisand!"

Added: 77

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesDissonance: The film has an unfortunate tendency to reinforce stereotypes about what types of personal traits, interests, tastes, etc. are inherently "gay", even as it mocks its characters' espousal of those same stereotypes.

to:

* ValuesDissonance: The film has an unfortunate tendency to reinforce stereotypes about what types of personal traits, interests, tastes, etc. are inherently "gay", even as it mocks its characters' espousal of those same stereotypes. stereotypes.
** Given that the screenwriter is openly gay, this could just be RuleOfFunny.

Top