Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / IRobot

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* RetroactiveRecognition: Dr. Calvin is more recognizable to modern audiences [[{{Series/BlueBloods}} ADA Erin Reagan]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The fact that [[spoiler:VIKI]] is the BigBad should be blindingly obvious within a minute of their introduction, particularly when they [[spoiler:say they can't retrieve the security footage from the room that Dr. Lanning jumped from]].

to:

* CaptainObviousReveal: The fact that [[spoiler:VIKI]] is the BigBad should be blindingly obvious within a minute of their introduction, particularly when they [[spoiler:say they can't retrieve the security footage from the room that Dr. Lanning jumped from]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The fact that [[spoiler:VIKI]] is the BigBad should be blindingly obvious within a minute of their introduction, particularly when they [[spoiler:say they can't retrieve the security footage from the room that Dr. Lanning jumped from]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WTHCastingAgency: Shia LaBeouf, owing to the fact that he has almost no role to play in the actual plot.

to:

* WTHCastingAgency: Shia LaBeouf, [=LaBeouf=], owing to the fact that he has almost no role to play in the actual plot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The "Can a robot write a symphony?" line to anyone familiar with [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHJqp4SlsoU Emily Howell]], a computer program that composed "her" first symphony, (''From Darkness, Light'') in 2009.

to:

** The "Can a robot write a symphony?" line can be this to anyone familiar with [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHJqp4SlsoU Emily Howell]], a computer program that composed "her" first symphony, (''From Darkness, Light'') in 2009.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The "Can a robot write a symphony?" line to anyone familiar with [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHJqp4SlsoU Emily Howell]]

to:

** The "Can a robot write a symphony?" line to anyone familiar with [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHJqp4SlsoU Emily Howell]] Howell]], a computer program that composed "her" first symphony, (''From Darkness, Light'') in 2009.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The "Can a robot write a symphony?" line to anyone familiar with [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHJqp4SlsoU Emily Howell]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*WTHCastingAgency: Shia LaBeouf, owing to the fact that he has almost no role to play in the actual plot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Sunny's "Can you?" response to Spooner about CreativeSterility is often parodied with funny comebacks or robots allegedly depicting self-awareness.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FairForItsDay: Asimov wrote his stories with Susan Calvin at a time when nearly all women were [[DamselInDistress captured by the villain]], or love interests. Still, he stuck mostly 50's gender roles in most of his stories. The short story "Liar!", which shows more of Calvin's personality, was rewritten a couple of times after Asimov realized his first version was terrible. In the 1950s, Calvin was hailed as a great SF example of a strong female character. In the light of the 21st century, she's misanthropic, can't get a man but is desperate for one ("Liar"), feels happiest when she can mother a "baby" robot ("Lenny"), and in general appears to be a man's idea of what a woman in a man's profession "must" be like: unfulfilled and mean.

to:

* FairForItsDay: Asimov wrote his stories with Susan Calvin at a time when nearly all women were [[DamselInDistress captured by the villain]], or love interests. Still, he stuck mostly 50's gender roles in most of his stories. The short story "Liar!", which shows more of Calvin's personality, was rewritten a couple of times after Asimov realized his first version was terrible. In the 1950s, Calvin was hailed as a great SF example of a strong female character. In the light of the 21st century, she's misanthropic, can't get a man but is desperate for one ("Liar"), feels happiest when she can mother a "baby" robot ("Lenny"), and in general appears to be a (somewhat chauvinistic) man's idea of what a woman in a man's profession "must" be like: unfulfilled and mean.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInHindsight: In "Evidence", Stephen Byerley, a liberal public prosecutor who really is doing things to stop crime and redeem criminals, is a candidate for mayor of NYC. He is accused abruptly of being a RidiculouslyHumanRobot, which would disqualify him from the election. Quinn, the political boss who propagates the rumor, is a conservative SleazyPolitician who admittedly couldn’t care less for the civil rights of his people, and so are his subordinates. The premise seems kind of silly and it's hard to believe that so many people would believe that Byerley is a robot based on such flimsy evidence. Sixty years after Asimov wrote this story, President UsefulNotes/BarackObama faced accusations that he wasn't born an American citizen, and the principal promoter of that idea was Creator/DonaldTrump. And in both cases, there were hardcases to whom no amount of proof was "proof."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This movie brought "AW HELL NO!" into our vocabulary.

to:

** This movie brought [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=im_5QdHp04E "AW HELL NO!" NO!"]] into our vocabulary.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInHindsight: In "Evidence", Stephen Byerley, a liberal public prosecutor who really is doing things to stop crime and redeem criminals, is a candidate for mayor of NYC. He is accused abruptly of being a RidiculouslyHumanRobot, which would disqualify him from the election. Quinn, the political boss who propagates the rumor, is a conservative SleazyPolitician who admittedly couldn’t care less for the civil rights of his people, and so are his subordinates. The premise seems kind of silly and it's hard to believe that so many people would believe that Byerley is a robot based on such flimsy evidence. Sixty years after Asimov wrote this story, President UsefulNotes/BarackObama faced accusations that he wasn't born an American citizen, and the principal promoter of that idea was DonaldTrump. And in both cases, there were hardcases to whom no amount of proof was "proof."

to:

* HarsherInHindsight: In "Evidence", Stephen Byerley, a liberal public prosecutor who really is doing things to stop crime and redeem criminals, is a candidate for mayor of NYC. He is accused abruptly of being a RidiculouslyHumanRobot, which would disqualify him from the election. Quinn, the political boss who propagates the rumor, is a conservative SleazyPolitician who admittedly couldn’t care less for the civil rights of his people, and so are his subordinates. The premise seems kind of silly and it's hard to believe that so many people would believe that Byerley is a robot based on such flimsy evidence. Sixty years after Asimov wrote this story, President UsefulNotes/BarackObama faced accusations that he wasn't born an American citizen, and the principal promoter of that idea was DonaldTrump.Creator/DonaldTrump. And in both cases, there were hardcases to whom no amount of proof was "proof."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FauxSymbolism: The lone figure on the hill. The scene is a reference to one of Asimov's short stories, in which a robot designed to dream imagines himself standing on a hill and shouting "Let my people go!"

to:

* FauxSymbolism: The lone figure on the hill. The scene is a reference to one of Asimov's short stories, in which a robot designed to dream imagines himself standing on a hill and shouting "Let my people go!"go!" [[spoiler:Somewhat ironically, in the short story Susan Calvin destroys the robot as soon as it admits to the full dream.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not a YM trope.


* DarkAndTroubledPast: As AlexProyas got attached to the project, the story grew darker and darker. In the commentary, he reveals that he and Bridget Moynahan talked about the possibility of Susan Calvin [[RapeAsBackstory having been raped,]] leading to her (less so than in the book) misanthropic nature, denial of her emotions, and complete trust of robots "because they're safe." Subtle hints of this are actually visible in the film, if you watch the performance closely.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DarkAndTroubledPast: As AlexProyas got attached to the project, the story grew darker and darker. In the commentary, he reveals that he and BridgetMoynahan talked about the possibility of Susan Calvin [[RapeAsBackstory having been raped,]] leading to her (less so than in the book) misanthropic nature, denial of her emotions, and complete trust of robots "because they're safe." Subtle hints of this are actually visible in the film, if you watch the performance closely.

to:

* DarkAndTroubledPast: As AlexProyas got attached to the project, the story grew darker and darker. In the commentary, he reveals that he and BridgetMoynahan Bridget Moynahan talked about the possibility of Susan Calvin [[RapeAsBackstory having been raped,]] leading to her (less so than in the book) misanthropic nature, denial of her emotions, and complete trust of robots "because they're safe." Subtle hints of this are actually visible in the film, if you watch the performance closely.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DarkAndTroubledPast: As AlexProyas got attached to the project, the story grew darker and darker. In the commentary, he reveals that he and BridgetMoynahan talked about the possibility of Susan Calvin [[RapeAsBackstory having been raped,]] leading to her (less so than in the book) misanthropic nature, denial of her emotions, and complete trust of robots "because they're safe." Subtle hints of this are actually visible in the film, if you watch the performance closely.

Changed: 8

Removed: 129

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** AnalogyBackfire: In the Harlan Ellison screenplay, Quinn was right and Byerley was a liar ([[ForTheGreaterGood but still]])...



* TheWoobie:
** Gloria in "Robbie".
** Susan Calvin in "Liar!"

to:

* %%* TheWoobie:
** %%** Gloria in "Robbie".
** %%** Susan Calvin in "Liar!"



* TheScrappy: Farber.

to:

* %%* TheScrappy: Farber.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: ShiaLaBeouf having some [[Film/{{Transformers}} robot]] issues.

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: ShiaLaBeouf Creator/ShiaLaBeouf having some [[Film/{{Transformers}} robot]] issues.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** '''"DO I LOOK LIKE I GIVE A ''SHIT'' WHAT YOU THINK?"'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MisBlamed: People who didn't like the movie tend to complain that VIKI's [[spoiler:ZerothLawRebellion]] is totally contrary to Asimov's writing. Actually, one of the short stories in the original I, Robot ([[spoiler:"The Evitable Conflict"]]) dealt with exactly that.

to:

* MisBlamed: People who didn't like the movie tend to complain that VIKI's [[spoiler:ZerothLawRebellion]] is totally contrary to Asimov's writing. Actually, one of the short stories in the original I, Robot ([[spoiler:"The Evitable Conflict"]]) dealt with exactly that.that, though in a much subtler and (arguably) benevolent way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Further, the film's biggest piece of ProductPlacement, US Robotics, was in RealLife named in reference to the company in Asimov's stories as a ShoutOut.

Changed: 59

Removed: 67

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight:
** Yes, "Aw, Hell no." did appear in one of Asimov's robot stories.

to:

* HilariousInHindsight:
** Yes,
HilariousInHindsight: "Aw, Hell no." did appear in one of Asimov's robot stories.

Changed: 230

Removed: 323

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInHindsight: In "Evidence", Stephen Byerley, a liberal public prosecutor who really is doing things to stop crime and redeem criminals, is a candidate for mayor of NYC who is accused of being a robot, which would disqualify him from the election. Quinn, the political boss who propagates the rumor, is a conservative SleazyPolitician who admittedly couldn’t care less for the civil rights of his people, and so are his subordinates. The premise seems kind of silly and it's hard to believe that so many people would believe that Byerley is a robot based on such flimsy evidence. Fast forward to 2008, when people are arguing that President UsefulNotes/BarackObama wasn't born in the United States (and the principal promoter of that idea was DonaldTrump), and it seems much more plausible.

to:

* HarsherInHindsight: In "Evidence", Stephen Byerley, a liberal public prosecutor who really is doing things to stop crime and redeem criminals, is a candidate for mayor of NYC who NYC. He is accused abruptly of being a robot, RidiculouslyHumanRobot, which would disqualify him from the election. Quinn, the political boss who propagates the rumor, is a conservative SleazyPolitician who admittedly couldn’t care less for the civil rights of his people, and so are his subordinates. The premise seems kind of silly and it's hard to believe that so many people would believe that Byerley is a robot based on such flimsy evidence. Fast forward to 2008, when people are arguing that Sixty years after Asimov wrote this story, President UsefulNotes/BarackObama faced accusations that he wasn't born in the United States (and an American citizen, and the principal promoter of that idea was DonaldTrump), and it seems much more plausible.DonaldTrump. And in both cases, there were hardcases to whom no amount of proof was "proof."



** Sixty years after Asimov wrote about an American presidential candidate facing absurd demands that he "prove" he's not a robot, an American presidential candidate faced absurd demands that he "prove" he was born in America. And in both cases, concrete proof only raised cries of conspiracy and demands for further proof.

Added: 390

Changed: 64

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: Yes, "Aw, Hell no." did appear in one of Asimov's robot stories.

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: HilariousInHindsight:
**
Yes, "Aw, Hell no." did appear in one of Asimov's robot stories.stories.
** Sixty years after Asimov wrote about an American presidential candidate facing absurd demands that he "prove" he's not a robot, an American presidential candidate faced absurd demands that he "prove" he was born in America. And in both cases, concrete proof only raised cries of conspiracy and demands for further proof.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
fan dumb is Flame Bait and this sounds as natter


* MisBlamed: People who didn't like the movie tend to complain that VIKI's [[spoiler:ZerothLawRebellion]] is totally contrary to Asimov's writing. Actually, one of the short stories in the original I, Robot ([[spoiler:"The Evitable Conflict"]]) dealt with exactly that. When one actually ''reads'' that particular story, however, the FanDumb's argument becomes partially justified- [[spoiler: The {{ma|sterComputer}}chines in ''The Evitable Conflict'' were passively manipulating humanity -- a factory shutdown here, an employee transfer there -- for our own good, being careful to avoid letting humanity find out that it was no longer fully in charge. VIKI, on the other hand, was doing so via Killer Robot Takeover, which was precisely the sort of cliche Asimov wanted to get away from.]]

to:

* MisBlamed: People who didn't like the movie tend to complain that VIKI's [[spoiler:ZerothLawRebellion]] is totally contrary to Asimov's writing. Actually, one of the short stories in the original I, Robot ([[spoiler:"The Evitable Conflict"]]) dealt with exactly that. When one actually ''reads'' that particular story, however, the FanDumb's argument becomes partially justified- [[spoiler: The {{ma|sterComputer}}chines in ''The Evitable Conflict'' were passively manipulating humanity -- a factory shutdown here, an employee transfer there -- for our own good, being careful to avoid letting humanity find out that it was no longer fully in charge. VIKI, on the other hand, was doing so via Killer Robot Takeover, which was precisely the sort of cliche Asimov wanted to get away from.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInHindsight: In "Evidence", Stephen Byerley, a liberal public prosecutor who really is doing things to stop crime and redeem criminals, is a candidate for mayor of NYC who is accused of being a robot, which would disqualify him from the election. Quinn, the political boss who propagates the rumor, is a conservative SleazyPolitician who admittedly couldn’t care less for the civil rights of his people, and so are his subordinates. The premise seems kind of silly and it's hard to believe that so many people would believe that Byerley is a robot based on such flimsy evidence. Fast forward to 2008, when people are arguing that President BarackObama wasn't born in the United States (and the principal promoter of that idea was DonaldTrump), and it seems much more plausible.

to:

* HarsherInHindsight: In "Evidence", Stephen Byerley, a liberal public prosecutor who really is doing things to stop crime and redeem criminals, is a candidate for mayor of NYC who is accused of being a robot, which would disqualify him from the election. Quinn, the political boss who propagates the rumor, is a conservative SleazyPolitician who admittedly couldn’t care less for the civil rights of his people, and so are his subordinates. The premise seems kind of silly and it's hard to believe that so many people would believe that Byerley is a robot based on such flimsy evidence. Fast forward to 2008, when people are arguing that President BarackObama UsefulNotes/BarackObama wasn't born in the United States (and the principal promoter of that idea was DonaldTrump), and it seems much more plausible.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->''Some people are sure to be disbelieving and say, "But how can a computer possibly produce a great symphony, a great work of art, a great new scientific theory?"
--> The retort I am usually tempted to make to this question is, "Can you?" ''

to:

-->''Some people are sure to be disbelieving and say, "But how can a computer possibly produce a great symphony, a great work of art, a great new scientific theory?"
theory?"''
--> The ''The retort I am usually tempted to make to this question is, "Can you?" ''you?"''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FairForItsDay: Asimov wrote his stories with Susan Calvin at a time when nearly all women were [[DistressedDamsel captured by the villain,]] or love interests. Still, he stuck mostly 50's gender roles in most of his stories. The short story "Liar!", which shows more of Calvin's personality, was rewritten a couple of times after Asimov realized his first version was terrible. In the 1950s, Calvin was hailed as a great SF example of a strong female character. In the light of the 21st century, she's misanthropic, can't get a man but is desperate for one ("Liar"), feels happiest when she can mother a "baby" robot ("Lenny"), and in general appears to be a man's idea of what a woman in a man's profession "must" be like: unfulfilled and mean.

to:

* FairForItsDay: Asimov wrote his stories with Susan Calvin at a time when nearly all women were [[DistressedDamsel [[DamselInDistress captured by the villain,]] villain]], or love interests. Still, he stuck mostly 50's gender roles in most of his stories. The short story "Liar!", which shows more of Calvin's personality, was rewritten a couple of times after Asimov realized his first version was terrible. In the 1950s, Calvin was hailed as a great SF example of a strong female character. In the light of the 21st century, she's misanthropic, can't get a man but is desperate for one ("Liar"), feels happiest when she can mother a "baby" robot ("Lenny"), and in general appears to be a man's idea of what a woman in a man's profession "must" be like: unfulfilled and mean.



* NightmareFuel: ''Escape!'' is a story that unites all the characters that appeared before(Susan Calvin, Lanning, Powell and Donovan), in which The Brain is given the problem of creating a hyperspatial drive. A solution is found, but long story short, [[spoiler:the crew of the ship has to die temporarily for it to perform the hyperspace jump]]. And that conclusion comes only after we are told what happens with someone who [[spoiler: dies temporarily (Donovan, in short, has visions of his own funeral and then goes briefly to Hell).]]

to:

* NightmareFuel: ''Escape!'' is a story that unites all the characters that appeared before(Susan Calvin, Lanning, Powell and Donovan), in which The Brain is given the problem of creating a hyperspatial drive. A solution is found, but long story short, [[spoiler:the crew of the ship has to die temporarily for it to perform the hyperspace jump]]. And that conclusion comes only after we are told what happens with someone who [[spoiler: dies temporarily (Donovan, in short, has visions of his own funeral and then goes briefly to Hell).]]Hell)]].



** Susan Calvin in "Liar!".

to:

** Susan Calvin in "Liar!".
"Liar!"



* HilariousInHindsight: ShiaLaBeouf having some [[Film/{{Transformers}} robots]] issues.
* ItWasHisSled: "Hey, you saw ''I, Robot'' yet? [[spoiler:Yeah, it's a ZerothLawRebellion movie."]]

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: ShiaLaBeouf having some [[Film/{{Transformers}} robots]] robot]] issues.
* ItWasHisSled: "Hey, you saw ''I, Robot'' yet? [[spoiler:Yeah, it's a ZerothLawRebellion movie."]] ]]"



* MisBlamed: People who didn't like the movie tend to complain that VIKI's [[spoiler:ZerothLawRebellion]] is totally contrary to Asimov's writing. Actually, one of the short stories in the original I, Robot ([[spoiler:"The Evitable Conflict"]]) dealt with exactly that. When one actually ''reads'' that particular story, however, the FanDumb's argument becomes partially justified- [[spoiler: The [[MasterComputer machines]] in ''The Evitable Conflict'' were passively manipulating humanity -- a factory shutdown here, an employee transfer there -- for our own good, being careful to avoid letting humanity find out that it was no longer fully in charge. VIKI, on the other hand, was doing so via Killer Robot Takeover, which was precisely the sort of cliche Asimov wanted to get away from.]]

to:

* MisBlamed: People who didn't like the movie tend to complain that VIKI's [[spoiler:ZerothLawRebellion]] is totally contrary to Asimov's writing. Actually, one of the short stories in the original I, Robot ([[spoiler:"The Evitable Conflict"]]) dealt with exactly that. When one actually ''reads'' that particular story, however, the FanDumb's argument becomes partially justified- [[spoiler: The [[MasterComputer machines]] {{ma|sterComputer}}chines in ''The Evitable Conflict'' were passively manipulating humanity -- a factory shutdown here, an employee transfer there -- for our own good, being careful to avoid letting humanity find out that it was no longer fully in charge. VIKI, on the other hand, was doing so via Killer Robot Takeover, which was precisely the sort of cliche Asimov wanted to get away from.]]

Added: 26

Changed: 245

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: Hey look, ShiaLaBeouf's character has some [[{{Transformers}} robots]] issues.
* ItWasHisSled: "Hey, you saw ''I, Robot'' yet? [[spoiler:Yeah, it's a ZerothLawRebellion movie."]] Yes, even on this very website.

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: Hey look, ShiaLaBeouf's character has ShiaLaBeouf having some [[{{Transformers}} [[Film/{{Transformers}} robots]] issues.
* ItWasHisSled: "Hey, you saw ''I, Robot'' yet? [[spoiler:Yeah, it's a ZerothLawRebellion movie."]] Yes, even on this very website.



** This movie brought "AW HELL [[strike:NO]] NAW!" into our vocabulary.

to:

** This movie brought "AW HELL [[strike:NO]] NAW!" NO!" into our vocabulary.



** "I did not murder him!"



* TheScrappy: Farber. If you removed him from the film, would anyone notice? What purpose does he serve the plot again? All he does is point out ProductPlacement an be a PluckyComicRelief.

to:

* TheScrappy: Farber. If you removed him from the film, would anyone notice? What purpose does he serve the plot again? All he does is point out ProductPlacement an be a PluckyComicRelief.
Farber.

Top