Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* AngstWhatAngst: None of the animals left behind seem terribly upset about their impending doom before the flood comes, and the survivors on the ark don't seem to mind losing them, aside from Xiro lamenting Bruma beeing crushed by a hippopotamus.
to:
* AngstWhatAngst: None of the animals left behind seem terribly upset about their impending doom before the flood comes, and the survivors on the ark don't seem to mind losing them, aside from Xiro lamenting Bruma beeing being crushed by a hippopotamus.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
If the problem is with determining who it's aimed at, that's Uncertain Audience.
Deleted line(s) 6 (click to see context) :
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: It's an animated retelling of the story of Noah's Ark, but the movie seemed to have no idea who its audience was supposed to be. Christians who would have been interested in the film for its Biblical story were turned off by its blasphemy and raunchiness, the aforementioned sexual themes made the movie unsuitable for children when its art style seemed geared for them, and everyone except for a few members of the UsefulNotes/FurryFandom were repulsed by a few heavily sexualised animal characters. And to cap it all off a large number of furries are put off by the biblical themes.
Added DiffLines:
* UncertainAudience: It's an animated retelling of the story of Noah's Ark, but the movie seemed to have no idea who its audience was supposed to be. Christians who would have been interested in the film for its Biblical story were turned off by its blasphemy and raunchiness, the aforementioned sexual themes made the movie unsuitable for children when its art style seemed geared for them, and everyone except for a few members of the UsefulNotes/FurryFandom were repulsed by a few heavily sexualised animal characters. And to cap it all off a large number of furries are put off by the biblical themes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AllAnimationIsDisney: Technically, Patagonik is part of [[Creator/TouchstonePictures Buena Vista International]], which is Creator/{{Disney}}'s global distribution company. In a roundabout way, it is a Disney film. However, the [[WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids more adult themes]] and the fact that it was released under Creator/TouchstonePictures can give away that this isn't a typical kids' Disney film.
to:
* AllAnimationIsDisney: Technically, Patagonik is part of [[Creator/TouchstonePictures Buena Vista International]], which is Creator/{{Disney}}'s global distribution company. In a roundabout way, it is a Disney film. However, the [[WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids more adult themes]] and that would likely fall under Creator/TouchstonePictures, coupled with the fact that it was released under Creator/TouchstonePictures distributed in the United States by Creator/ShoutFactory can give away that this isn't a typical kids' Disney film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AllAnimationIsDisney: Technically, Patagonik is part of [[Creator/TouchstonePictures Buena Vista International]], which is Creator/{{Disney}}'s global distribution company. In a roundabout way, it is a Disney film. However, the [[WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids more adult themes]] can give away that this isn't a Disney film.
to:
* AllAnimationIsDisney: Technically, Patagonik is part of [[Creator/TouchstonePictures Buena Vista International]], which is Creator/{{Disney}}'s global distribution company. In a roundabout way, it is a Disney film. However, the [[WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids more adult themes]] and the fact that it was released under Creator/TouchstonePictures can give away that this isn't a typical kids' Disney film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AllAnimationIsDisney: Technically, Patagonik is part of Buena Vista, which is Creator/{{Disney}}'s global distribution company. In a roundabout way, it is a Disney film. However, the [[WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids more adult themes]] can give away that this isn't a Disney film.
to:
* AllAnimationIsDisney: Technically, Patagonik is part of [[Creator/TouchstonePictures Buena Vista, Vista International]], which is Creator/{{Disney}}'s global distribution company. In a roundabout way, it is a Disney film. However, the [[WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids more adult themes]] can give away that this isn't a Disney film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Did Dagnino try to take over the ark to eat the herbivores or did he do it [[WellIntentionedExtremist so that his fellow animal would thrive until the flood is over]]?
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: Is Bombay CampStraight, Camp Bi, or are he and Lilly just serving as each other's [[TheBeard beards]] so they can survive the flood?
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: AlternativeCharacterInterpretation:
** Is Bombay CampStraight, Camp Bi, or are he and Lilly just serving as each other's [[TheBeard beards]] so they can survive theflood?flood?
** Did Dagnino try to take over the ark to eat the herbivores or did he do it [[WellIntentionedExtremist so that his fellow animal would thrive until the flood is over]]?
** Is Bombay CampStraight, Camp Bi, or are he and Lilly just serving as each other's [[TheBeard beards]] so they can survive the
** Did Dagnino try to take over the ark to eat the herbivores or did he do it [[WellIntentionedExtremist so that his fellow animal would thrive until the flood is over]]?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Di Dagnino try to take over the ark to eat the herbivores or did he do it [[WellIntentionedExtremist so that his fellow animal would thrive until the flood is over]]?
to:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Di Did Dagnino try to take over the ark to eat the herbivores or did he do it [[WellIntentionedExtremist so that his fellow animal would thrive until the flood is over]]?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: It's an animated retelling of the story of Noah's Ark, but the movie seemed to have no idea who its audience was supposed to be. Christians who would have been interested in the film for its Biblical story were turned off by its blasphemy and raunchiness, the aforementioned sexual themes made the movie unsuitable for children when its art style seemed geared for them, and everyone except for a few members of the UsefulNotes/FurryFandom were repulsed by a few heavily sexualised animal characters.
to:
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: It's an animated retelling of the story of Noah's Ark, but the movie seemed to have no idea who its audience was supposed to be. Christians who would have been interested in the film for its Biblical story were turned off by its blasphemy and raunchiness, the aforementioned sexual themes made the movie unsuitable for children when its art style seemed geared for them, and everyone except for a few members of the UsefulNotes/FurryFandom were repulsed by a few heavily sexualised animal characters. And to cap it all off a large number of furries are put off by the biblical themes.
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
%%* ValuesDissonance: A lot of the more adult themes could be chalked up to family-friendliness standards in Argentina being different than those in the USA.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** It turns out the film is somewhat self aware, as in one scene where things start getting a little too hot and heavy between Xiro and Panthy, God has to chime in and remind his assistant that the Bible is intended to be suitable for all ages.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Di Dagnino try to take over the ark to eat the herbivores or did he do it [[WellIntentionedExtremist so that his fellow animal would thrive until the flood is over]]?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
* BestKnownForTheFanservice: This film is best known for being a retelling of ''Noah’s Arc'' with highly curvaceous female felines, especially Panthy and her giant bust. To a lesser extent, Kairel and her giant ''butt''.
* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: Xiro and his friends confront Dagnino's gang by performing The Hakka... yeah, no one really mentions this again. Even Dagnino's gang seems confused by this.
* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: Xiro and his friends confront Dagnino's gang by performing The Hakka... yeah, no one really mentions this again. Even Dagnino's gang seems confused by this.
to:
* BestKnownForTheFanservice: This film is best known for being a retelling of ''Noah’s Arc'' with highly curvaceous female felines, especially Panthy and her giant bust. To a lesser extent, Kairel and her giant ''butt''.
bottom.
* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: Xiro and his friends confront Dagnino's gang by performing The Hakka... yeah, no one really mentions this again. [[DidNotSeeThatComing Even Dagnino's gang seems confused bythis.this]].
* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: Xiro and his friends confront Dagnino's gang by performing The Hakka... yeah, no one really mentions this again. [[DidNotSeeThatComing Even Dagnino's gang seems confused by
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: It's an animated retelling of the story of Noah's Ark, but the movie seemed to have no idea who its audience were supposed to be. Christians who would have been interested in the film for its Biblical story were turned off by its blasphemy and raunchiness, the aforementioned sexual themes made the movie unsuitable for children when its art style seemed geared for them, and everyone except for a few members of the UsefulNotes/FurryFandom were repulsed by a few heavily sexualised animal characters.
to:
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: It's an animated retelling of the story of Noah's Ark, but the movie seemed to have no idea who its audience were was supposed to be. Christians who would have been interested in the film for its Biblical story were turned off by its blasphemy and raunchiness, the aforementioned sexual themes made the movie unsuitable for children when its art style seemed geared for them, and everyone except for a few members of the UsefulNotes/FurryFandom were repulsed by a few heavily sexualised animal characters.
