Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 6,7 (click to see context) :
* ShockingSwerve + FridgeLogic: The split-screen sequence between Dr. Elliot listening to a phone message from Bobbi vs. Liz making various financial transactions while being (supposedly) watched by Bobbi is presumably meant to ''completely'' throw viewers off the track. The strong implication seems to be that the two events ''are'' simultaneous--especially considering how Dr. Elliot and Liz end up both watching the same episode of Phil Donahue. The problem is...how does this reconcile with Dr. Elliot ''being'' Bobbi?
** The sequence in the police station near the end seems to explain that the woman following Liz around is the woman working for Det. Mannion. It wasn't ''really'' Bobbi.
** The sequence in the police station near the end seems to explain that the woman following Liz around is the woman working for Det. Mannion. It wasn't ''really'' Bobbi.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* FairForItsDay: The portrayal of trans people has not aged well in the slightest, being based off of fears of Cis people and harmful stereotypes. However, the sex worker protagonist (whom is never judged or treated as lesser due to her profession) is notabley progressive, and rare even today.
to:
* FairForItsDay: The portrayal of trans people has not aged well in the slightest, being based off of fears of Cis people and harmful stereotypes. However, the sex worker protagonist (whom is never judged or treated as lesser due to her profession) is notabley notably progressive, and rare even today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
* FairForItsDay: The portrayl of trans people has not aged well in the slightest, being based off of fears of Cis people and harmful stereotypes. However, the sex worker protagonist (whom is never judged or treated as lesser due to her proffesion) is notabley progressive, and rare even today.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* FairForItsDay: The portrayl of trans people has not aged well in the slightest, being based off of fears of Cis people and harmful stereotypes. However, the sex worker protagonist (whom is never judged or treated as lesser due to her proffesion) is notabley progressive, and rare even today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CaptainObviousReveal: Wait, so that blonde woman killing people who looks like Creator/MichaelCaine in a wig & sunglasses actually was Michael Caine in a wig & sunglasses? [[SarcasmMode Well, knock me over with a feather.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: The "secondary hero" Peter looks a ''lot'' like Franchise/HarryPotter (particularly Harry's EightiesHair look in his [[Film/HarryPotterandTheGobletOfFire fourth movie]]) with his untidy black hair and round glasses, so much that it can be distracting. This film predates the Potter books and movies by almost two decades.
to:
* HilariousInHindsight: HilariousInHindsight:
** The "secondary hero" Peter looks a ''lot'' like Franchise/HarryPotter (particularly Harry's EightiesHair look in his [[Film/HarryPotterandTheGobletOfFire fourth movie]]) with his untidy black hair and round glasses, so much that it can be distracting. This film predates the Potter books and movies by almost twodecades.decades.
** Creator/DennisFranz appears in this film that homages ''Film/{{Psycho}}'', then three years later following the theatrical release of this film, he appeared in the latter's sequel ''Film/PsychoII''.
** The "secondary hero" Peter looks a ''lot'' like Franchise/HarryPotter (particularly Harry's EightiesHair look in his [[Film/HarryPotterandTheGobletOfFire fourth movie]]) with his untidy black hair and round glasses, so much that it can be distracting. This film predates the Potter books and movies by almost two
** Creator/DennisFranz appears in this film that homages ''Film/{{Psycho}}'', then three years later following the theatrical release of this film, he appeared in the latter's sequel ''Film/PsychoII''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* {{Giallo}}: A rare American example.
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** The sequence in the police station near the end seems to explain that the woman following Liz around is the woman working for Det. Mannion. It wasn't ''really'' Bobbi.
to:
** The sequence in the police station near the end seems to explain that the woman following Liz around is the woman working for Det. Mannion. It wasn't ''really'' Bobbi.Bobbi.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: The "secondary hero" Peter looks a ''lot'' like Franchise/HarryPotter (particularly Harry's EightiesHair look in his [[Film/HarryPotterandTheGobletOfFire fourth movie]]) with his untidy black hair and round glasses. This film predates the Potter books and movies by almost two decades.
to:
* HilariousInHindsight: The "secondary hero" Peter looks a ''lot'' like Franchise/HarryPotter (particularly Harry's EightiesHair look in his [[Film/HarryPotterandTheGobletOfFire fourth movie]]) with his untidy black hair and round glasses.glasses, so much that it can be distracting. This film predates the Potter books and movies by almost two decades.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: The "secondary hero" Peter looks a ''lot'' like Franchise/HarryPotter (particularly Harry's look in his [[Film/HarryPotterandTheGobletOfFire fourth movie]]) with his untidy black hair and round glasses. This film predates the Potter books and movies by almost two decades.
to:
* HilariousInHindsight: The "secondary hero" Peter looks a ''lot'' like Franchise/HarryPotter (particularly Harry's EightiesHair look in his [[Film/HarryPotterandTheGobletOfFire fourth movie]]) with his untidy black hair and round glasses. This film predates the Potter books and movies by almost two decades.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: Peter looks a ''lot'' like Franchise/HarryPotter.
to:
* HilariousInHindsight: The "secondary hero" Peter looks a ''lot'' like Franchise/HarryPotter.Franchise/HarryPotter (particularly Harry's look in his [[Film/HarryPotterandTheGobletOfFire fourth movie]]) with his untidy black hair and round glasses. This film predates the Potter books and movies by almost two decades.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HilariousInHindsight: Peter looks a ''lot'' like Franchise/HarryPotter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* ShockingSwerve + FridgeLogic: The split-screen sequence between Dr. Elliot listening to a phone message from Bobbi vs. Liz making various financial transactions while being ( watched by Bobbi is presumably meant to ''completely'' throw viewers off the track. The strong implication seems to be that the two events ''are'' simultaneous--especially considering how Dr. Elliot and Liz end up both watching the same episode of Phil Donahue. The problem is...how does this reconcile with Dr. Elliot ''being'' Bobbi?
** The sequence in the police station near the end seems to explain that the woman following Liz around is working for Det. Mannion.
** The sequence in the police station near the end seems to explain that the woman following Liz around is working for Det. Mannion.
to:
* ShockingSwerve + FridgeLogic: The split-screen sequence between Dr. Elliot listening to a phone message from Bobbi vs. Liz making various financial transactions while being ( (supposedly) watched by Bobbi is presumably meant to ''completely'' throw viewers off the track. The strong implication seems to be that the two events ''are'' simultaneous--especially considering how Dr. Elliot and Liz end up both watching the same episode of Phil Donahue. The problem is...how does this reconcile with Dr. Elliot ''being'' Bobbi?
** The sequence in the police station near the end seems to explain that the woman following Liz around is the woman working for Det. Mannion. It wasn't ''really'' Bobbi.
** The sequence in the police station near the end seems to explain that the woman following Liz around is the woman working for Det. Mannion. It wasn't ''really'' Bobbi.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ShockingSwerve + FridgeLogic: The split-screen sequence between Dr. Elliot listening to a phone message from Bobbi vs. Liz making various financial transactions while being ( watched by Bobbi is presumably meant to ''completely'' throw viewers off the track. The strong implication seems to be that the two events ''are'' simultaneous--especially considering how Dr. Elliot and Liz end up both watching the same episode of Phil Donahue. The problem is...how does this reconcile with Dr. Elliot ''being'' Bobbi?
** The sequence in the police station near the end seems to explain that the woman following Liz around is working for Det. Mannion.
** The sequence in the police station near the end seems to explain that the woman following Liz around is working for Det. Mannion.
