Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Requires Word Of God confirmation
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* AuthorsSavingThrow: The writers have realized that fans are kinda-sorta tired of the whole "event" idea and have worked it so that it is confined to one title with no tie-ins, one-shots, prologues, epilogues and the like.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* LikeYouWouldReallyDoIt: Johnny Storm being killed by the pyramoid in issue 3. Make even less believable considering he is currently the co-protagonist of Marvel Two-In-One, something the writer of said series pointed out almost immediately.
to:
* LikeYouWouldReallyDoIt: Johnny Storm being killed by the pyramoid in issue 3. Make even less believable considering he is currently the co-protagonist of Marvel Two-In-One, ''ComicBook/MarvelTwoInOne'', something the writer of said series pointed out almost immediately.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* {{Narm}}: The Avengers acting as if Johnny and Red Wolf are totally dead and gone forever for reals. Even while they don't have the audience's advantage of knowing they're still alive, it still comes across as ridiculously wangsty. Even more so when the Immortal Hulk shows up, with a whole montage demonstrating the sheer imperminance of death in comic books.
to:
* {{Narm}}: The Avengers acting as if Johnny and Red Wolf are totally dead and gone forever for reals. Even while they don't have the audience's advantage of knowing they're still alive, it still comes across as ridiculously wangsty. Even more so when the Immortal Hulk shows up, with a whole montage demonstrating the sheer imperminance impermanence of death in comic books.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* {{Narm}}: The Avengers acting as if Johnny and Red Wolf are totally dead and gone forever for reals. Even while they don't have the audience's advantage of knowing they're still alive, it still comes across as ridiculously wangsty. Even more so when the Immortal Hulk shows up, with a whole montage demonstrating the sheer imperminance of death in comic books.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 5,7 (click to see context) :
* CounterpartComparison:
** [[AlliterativeName Valerie Vector]] aka Voyager, a new character being retconned into [[spoiler: being a founding member of the Avengers]]. Many have compared her to the [[ComicBook/TheSentry Sentry]], and to DC's Triumph. [[spoiler: Both contemporary heroes retconned into their respective universe's early history]].
** Many have also taken into comparing her with [[VideoGame/KingdomHearts358DaysOver2 Xion]], specifically, her stint of [[spoiler: being erased from history and memory alike]].
** [[AlliterativeName Valerie Vector]] aka Voyager, a new character being retconned into [[spoiler: being a founding member of the Avengers]]. Many have compared her to the [[ComicBook/TheSentry Sentry]], and to DC's Triumph. [[spoiler: Both contemporary heroes retconned into their respective universe's early history]].
** Many have also taken into comparing her with [[VideoGame/KingdomHearts358DaysOver2 Xion]], specifically, her stint of [[spoiler: being erased from history and memory alike]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Author's saving throw means that the story is changed in reaction to the audience. Not the case for this reveal, obviously planned from the start
Deleted line(s) 3 (click to see context) :
** [[RememberTheNewGuy Voyager]] being exposed as [[spoiler: a fraud who gave the other characters FalseMemories after Jarvis, whose memories went unaltered, awoke from his coma.]] Essentially, she's a ''subversion'' of [[spoiler: Mark Waid's previous character Triumph and his backstory and (attempted) integration into the DC mythos.]]
