Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 4 (click to see context) :
* UnfortunateImplications: As [[http://americancentury.omeka.wlu.edu/exhibits/show/reinforcement-of-gender-roles-/item/242 this]] points out, the short's reinforcement of [[StayInTheKitchen traditional gender roles]] is staggering, even for the time period.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* UnintentionalPeriodPiece: Seriously, this thing couldn't have screamed "TheFifties" any louder if it had been a deliberate parody of the period.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* NightmareFuel: The very idea that this crypto-authoritarianism was once considered [[{{Eagleland}} "All-American"]]. With the hyper-rigid Gender roles, deprecation of emotionality and individuality, the whole short plays like a How-To Guide for [[Film/InvasionOfTheBodySnatchers Pod People]].
to:
* NightmareFuel: The very idea that this crypto-authoritarianism was once considered [[{{Eagleland}} "All-American"]]. With the hyper-rigid Gender gender roles, deprecation of emotionality and individuality, the whole short plays like a How-To Guide for [[Film/InvasionOfTheBodySnatchers Pod People]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not YMMV.
Deleted line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) :
* StepfordSuburbia: Unintentionally done, as the narrator emphasizes "unemotional" discussion at the dinner table, and that it's a place for ''pleasant'' discussions. Even prior, Junior and Brother are discouraged from bringing up anything negative with Father after he comes home.
-->'''Narrator''': If they have disagreeable news, they'll postpone the discussion until another time.
-->'''Narrator''': If they have disagreeable news, they'll postpone the discussion until another time.
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesDissonance: Displays the early [[TheFifties 1950's]] in all their repressive, [[CrapsaccharineWorld crapsaccharine]] glory. Aside from the mass smoking and TV dinners, it has just about every essential 50's trope there is.
to:
* ValuesDissonance: Displays the early [[TheFifties 1950's]] in all their repressive, [[CrapsaccharineWorld crapsaccharine]] glory. Aside from the mass smoking and TV dinners, it has just about every essential 50's trope there is.is.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** The elder son is said to treat his mother "as he would his best girl".
to:
** The elder son Brother is said to treat his mother "as he would his best girl".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** The elder son is said to treat his mother "as he would his best girl".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* UnfortunateImplications: As [[http://americancentury.omeka.wlu.edu/exhibits/show/reinforcement-of-gender-roles-/item/242 this]] points out, the short's re-enforcement of [[StayInTheKitchen traditional gender roles]] is staggering, even for the time period.
to:
* UnfortunateImplications: As [[http://americancentury.omeka.wlu.edu/exhibits/show/reinforcement-of-gender-roles-/item/242 this]] points out, the short's re-enforcement reinforcement of [[StayInTheKitchen traditional gender roles]] is staggering, even for the time period.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added missing "how".
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AccidentalInnuendo: The narrator describes the women wearing their best dresses 'for the men of the family', clearly missing out on incestuous that sounds.
to:
* AccidentalInnuendo: The narrator describes the women wearing their best dresses 'for the men of the family', clearly missing out on how incestuous that sounds.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AccidentalInnuendo: The narrator describes the women wearing their best dresses 'for the men of the family', clearly missing out on incestuous that sounds.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* NightmareFuel: The very idea that this crypto-authoritarianism was once considered [[{{Eagleland}} "All-American"]]. With the hyper-rigid Gender roles, deprecation of emotionality and individuality, the whole short plays like a How-To Guide for [[ReplicantSnatching Pod People]].
to:
* NightmareFuel: The very idea that this crypto-authoritarianism was once considered [[{{Eagleland}} "All-American"]]. With the hyper-rigid Gender roles, deprecation of emotionality and individuality, the whole short plays like a How-To Guide for [[ReplicantSnatching [[Film/InvasionOfTheBodySnatchers Pod People]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesDissonance: The early [[TheFifties 1950's]] in all their repressive, [[CrapsaccharineWorld crapsaccharine]] glory. Aside from the mass smoking and TV dinners, it has just about every essential 50's trope there is.
to:
* ValuesDissonance: The Displays the early [[TheFifties 1950's]] in all their repressive, [[CrapsaccharineWorld crapsaccharine]] glory. Aside from the mass smoking and TV dinners, it has just about every essential 50's trope there is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 3 (click to see context) :
* NightmareFuel: The very idea that this crypto-authoritarianism was once considered [[{{Eagleland}} "All-American"]]. With the hyper-rigid Gender roles, deprecation of emotionality and individuality, the whole short plays like a How-To Guide for [[ReplicantSnatching Pod People]].
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* UnfortunateImplications: As [[http://americancentury.omeka.wlu.edu/exhibits/show/reinforcement-of-gender-roles-/item/242 this]] points out, with its enforcement of Gender Roles, deprecation of emotionality and individuality, the whole short plays like a How-To Guide for [[ReplicantSnatching Pod People]].
to:
* UnfortunateImplications: As [[http://americancentury.omeka.wlu.edu/exhibits/show/reinforcement-of-gender-roles-/item/242 this]] points out, with its enforcement of Gender Roles, deprecation of emotionality and individuality, the whole short plays like a How-To Guide short's re-enforcement of [[StayInTheKitchen traditional gender roles]] is staggering, even for [[ReplicantSnatching Pod People]].the time period.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesDissonance: It's amazing, but aside from the mass smoking and TV dinners, it has just about every essential 1950s thing about it.
to:
* UnfortunateImplications: As [[http://americancentury.omeka.wlu.edu/exhibits/show/reinforcement-of-gender-roles-/item/242 this]] points out, with its enforcement of Gender Roles, deprecation of emotionality and individuality, the whole short plays like a How-To Guide for [[ReplicantSnatching Pod People]].
* ValuesDissonance:It's amazing, but aside The early [[TheFifties 1950's]] in all their repressive, [[CrapsaccharineWorld crapsaccharine]] glory. Aside from the mass smoking and TV dinners, it has just about every essential 1950s thing about it.50's trope there is.
* ValuesDissonance:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* StepfordSuburbia: Unintentionally done, as the narrator emphasizes "unemotional" discussion at the dinner table, and that it's a place for ''pleasant'' discussions. Even prior, Junior and Brother are discouraged from bringing up anything negative with Father after he comes home.
-->'''Narrator''': If they have disagreeable news, they'll postpone the discussion until another time.
-->'''Narrator''': If they have disagreeable news, they'll postpone the discussion until another time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
unfortunate implications need citations.
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* UnfortunateImplications: The title. Also, how the message of the film pretty much boils down to everyone putting on an act for the dinner table.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
moved from main
Added DiffLines:
* UnfortunateImplications: The title. Also, how the message of the film pretty much boils down to everyone putting on an act for the dinner table.
* ValuesDissonance: It's amazing, but aside from the mass smoking and TV dinners, it has just about every essential 1950s thing about it.
* ValuesDissonance: It's amazing, but aside from the mass smoking and TV dinners, it has just about every essential 1950s thing about it.