Follow TV Tropes

Following

History WMG / WilliamShakespeare

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Cymbeline is full of [[ShoutOut allusions]] to Shakespeare's other, more legendary plays. The play is all right, but not Shakespeare good. It's a little too educated, like Jonson himself.

Jonson was pals with Shakespeare (and defended him often), but considered himself a genius and Shakespeare a hack (he often heckled Shakespeare's plays). Cymbeline comes off as a StealthParody.

to:

Cymbeline ''Cymbeline'' is full of [[ShoutOut allusions]] to Shakespeare's other, more legendary plays. The play is all right, but not Shakespeare good. It's good -- it's a little too educated, like Jonson himself.

himself. Jonson was pals with Shakespeare (and defended him often), but considered himself a genius and Shakespeare a hack (he often heckled Shakespeare's plays). Cymbeline comes off as a StealthParody.
* Alternately, Shakespeare could have written ''Cymbeline'' as a [[SelfDeprecation parody of his own work]], perhaps to placate Ben.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* There has been a tremendous amount of speculation that Creator/WilliamShakespeare was merely an actor and was used as a front for somebody else who wrote his famous plays. The finger is generally pointed at such notables as Sir Francis Bacon, Queen Elizabeth, Creator/ChristopherMarlowe, and Edward de Vere, meaning any or all of them could have written the plays ("all of them" being [[TheDevTeamThinksOfEverything the "Round Table" Hypothesis]]). MarkTwain was one of the earliest prominent believers in these theories, which means it's OlderThanRadio.

to:

* There has been a tremendous amount of speculation that Creator/WilliamShakespeare was merely an actor and was used as a front for somebody else who wrote his famous plays. The finger is generally pointed at such notables as Sir Francis Bacon, Queen Elizabeth, Creator/ChristopherMarlowe, and Edward de Vere, meaning any or all of them could have written the plays ("all of them" being [[TheDevTeamThinksOfEverything the "Round Table" Hypothesis]]). MarkTwain was one of the earliest [[OlderThanRadio earliest]] prominent believers in these theories, which means it's OlderThanRadio.theories.


Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** This is also justified in that William Shakespeare of London was constantly running afoul of the London tax collectors, who were unable to locate him in London despite several attempts. A man who didn't understand how to handle money would constantly run afoul of tax collectors.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* One of the few types of records that exist about William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon indicate that he was very good at business math, having made so much money off of something other than plays[[hottip:*:(Playwriting in Shakespeare's time, before copyrights, did not pay at all well. Since Shakespeare '''''needs to have made a lot of money off his plays''''', the [[WildMassGuessing Official History]] requires that playwriting in the time of Shakespeare pay so well you can buy '''houses''' (as in, more than one) with the income)]] that he was able to revive his family business, buy the largest house in Stratford, and buy enough property in Stratford to earn himself a kingly 60 pounds a year in landlord income.

to:

* One of the few types of records that exist about William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon indicate that he was very good at business math, having made so much money off of something other than plays[[hottip:*:(Playwriting in Shakespeare's time, before copyrights, did not pay at all well. Since Shakespeare '''''needs to have made a lot of money off his plays''''', the [[WildMassGuessing WildMassGuessing Official History]] History requires that playwriting in the time of Shakespeare pay so well you can buy '''houses''' (as in, more than one) with the income)]] that he was able to revive his family business, buy the largest house in Stratford, and buy enough property in Stratford to earn himself a kingly 60 pounds a year in landlord income.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** A counter-argument in favor of him being the Playwright anyway is that since William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon never wrote a letter home from London, yet somehow managed to become a successful businessman in Stratford, is that his wife Anne Hathaway may have been the real business genius in the family, doing business in his name back in Stratford. This would allow him to be awful at business math and still be the Playwright, while appearing in official documents to be a successful businessman.

to:

*** ** A counter-argument in favor of him being the Playwright anyway is that since William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon never wrote a letter home from London, yet somehow managed to become a successful businessman in Stratford, is that his wife Anne Hathaway may have been the real business genius in the family, doing business in his name back in Stratford. This would allow him to be awful at business math and still be the Playwright, while appearing in official documents to be a successful businessman.

Added: 225

Changed: 465

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The scene is usually cut by most modern Shakespeare directors to avoid having to cut other, slightly more important parts of "Macbeth." This has resulted in an unjustified impression that the scene itself is not very good.




to:

** Of course, due to the near absence of copyrights, coupled with Shakespeare borrowing so much from other authors, it is a difficult claim to make that Shakespeare didn't just add in some other author's songs into his original play.




to:

* Again, the scene is usually cut by most modern Shakespeare directors to avoid having to cut other, slightly more important parts of "Macbeth." This has resulted in an unjustified impression that the scene itself is not very good.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Immortality does not require the actual unending life of the physical body. Children represent a form of immortality, and the writer of the Sonnets is frequently goading the object of his Sonnets into reproducing.




to:

* There are similarities between "Merchant of Venice" and Marlowe's play "The Jew Of Malta". One such similarity takes the concept of "daughter by another man" speculation a bit further, by having Barabas (the titular "Jew of Malta") poisoning an entire convent, in which his daughter now resides. Of course, this would imply that Barabas was revenging himself and not merely evil, which goes against Marlowe's concept of Barabas as a mustache-twirling one-dimensional melodrama villain.




to:

** While they didn't know the contents of the letter, they were hired by Claudius to spy on Hamlet, a detail they hide so unskillfully that Hamlet picks up on it himself. So "innocent" is not the word I would use to describe them.




to:

* [[http://www.fbrt.org.uk/pages/enigma/contemporary%20suspicions.html Ben Jonson knew two separate people named William Shakespeare]], one an ''author'', whom Jonson liked, and the other an ''actor'', whom Jonson hated. Jonson likens the ''actor'' Shakespeare to the Roman orator ''Haterius'', a highly ineloquent and unenlightened person who had the unfortunate reputation of being so impetuous and carried away with his words that he would muddle them, burst into tears, speak ex tempore and so profusely that he usually had to be stopped. Jonson also insists that Shakespeare the ''actor'' never wrote anything, indicating that Jonson is referring to two different people. Of course, since the [[WildMassGuessing Official History]] indicates that William Shakespeare the Playwright was ''also'' an actor, Ben Jonson's differentiation between the ''author'' and the ''actor'' presents a problem.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** For starters, the coastline of Bohemia. The extent of a country's borders, at that time and even now, is not solely determined by pure geography. Today we talk of, for example, "U.S. Soil" in terms of U.S. embassies, even though the ground they stand on is clearly a part of some other country, because of legal fictions used today and in Shakespeare's time. The same is true of the coastline of Bohemia: the Bohemian Empire once extended to the ocean (under King of Bohemia and Holy Roman Emperor [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_II,_Holy_Roman_Emperor Rudolf II]], from 1575–1608, '''the period of Shakespeare'''), even though Bohemia itself has no coastline. Thus a Shakespearean contemporary would know of a Bohemian coastline that existed from 1575 to 1608.

to:

*** For starters, the coastline of Bohemia. The extent of a country's borders, at that time and even now, is not solely determined by pure geography. Today we talk of, for example, "U.S. Soil" in terms of U.S. embassies, even though the ground they stand on is clearly a part of some other country, because of legal fictions used today and in Shakespeare's time. The same is true of the coastline of Bohemia: the Bohemian Empire once extended to the ocean (under King of Bohemia and Holy Roman Emperor [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_II,_Holy_Roman_Emperor Rudolf II]], from 1575–1608, '''the period of Shakespeare'''), even though Bohemia itself has no coastline. Thus a Shakespearean contemporary would know of a Bohemian "Bohemian" coastline that existed from 1575 to 1608.1608, in spite of the fact that Bohemia itself had no coastline.

Added: 2140

Changed: 1085

Removed: 116

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* There has been a tremendous amount of speculation that William Creator/WilliamShakespeare was merely an actor and was used as a front for somebody else who wrote his famous plays. The finger is generally pointed at such notables as Sir Francis Bacon, Queen Elizabeth, Creator/ChristopherMarlowe, and Edward de Vere, meaning any or all of them could have written the plays ("all of them" being [[TheDevTeamThinksOfEverything the "Round Table" Hypothesis]]). MarkTwain was one of the earliest prominent believers in these theories, which means it's OlderThanRadio.
** Ben Jonson [[http://www.fbrt.org.uk/pages/enigma/contemporary%20suspicions.html knew a William Shakespeare who was an actor]], and according to Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare the actor never wrote anything. Mind you, it could simply be that the Stratfordians are wrong and William Shakespeare was never an actor, since saying William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon was an actor is also WildMassGuessing, the explanation of how their Author ended up in London: the undocumented joining of a troupe of actors headed for London (most probably Leicester's Men or the Queen's Men), at some point between 1585 and 1592.

to:

* There has been a tremendous amount of speculation that William Creator/WilliamShakespeare was merely an actor and was used as a front for somebody else who wrote his famous plays. The finger is generally pointed at such notables as Sir Francis Bacon, Queen Elizabeth, Creator/ChristopherMarlowe, and Edward de Vere, meaning any or all of them could have written the plays ("all of them" being [[TheDevTeamThinksOfEverything the "Round Table" Hypothesis]]). MarkTwain was one of the earliest prominent believers in these theories, which means it's OlderThanRadio.
** Ben Jonson [[http://www.fbrt.org.uk/pages/enigma/contemporary%20suspicions.html knew a William Shakespeare who was an actor]], and according to Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare the actor never wrote anything. Mind you, it could simply be that the Stratfordians are wrong and William Shakespeare was never an actor, since saying William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon was an actor is also WildMassGuessing, the explanation of how their Author ended up in London: the undocumented joining tale of how William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon joined a troupe of actors headed for London (most probably Leicester's Men or the Queen's Men), at some point between 1585 and 1592.



*** In order to give Bacon time to write Shakespeare's plays, Shakespeare wrote Bacon's essays. So in a way, he did.



Second, S. made a number of elementary geographical mistakes in his plays -- one of the most famous (it was mocked by Ben Jonson) being that he had characters in ''The Winter's Tale'' shipwrecked on the coast of Bohemia. That's right -- shipwrecked on the coast of a landlocked country. Furthermore, in ''Two Gentlemen'' Valentine travels from Verona to Milan ''via'' ship. Yup -- both landlocked again.[[hottip:*: It was apparently possible to sail from one to the other via canal, but Shakespeare's language suggests he was thinking about actual sailing ships, not canal boats.]] In the early play ''King John'' a Duke of Austria does appear -- called "Lymoges" by the playwright, who was apparently not aware that RichardTheLionheart's enemies Ademar V, Viscount of Limoges (in west-central France) and Leopold V, Duke of Austria, ruled territors some 950 miles apart. Third, the nomenclature of ''Measure For Measure'' consists of common English names, like Froth, Elbow, and Mistress Overdone; classical names like Escalus and Pompey; and ''Italian'' names like Vincentio (the Duke), Isabella, Claudio, Juliet, Angelo, Mariana, and Lucio -- and not one single German name! Finally, Shakespeare makes none of the two usual Jacobean jokes about the Germans -- the bagginess of their pants (a joke which he ''does'' make about "Austria" in ''King John'') nor even the ancient, universal, and certainly highly appropriate for ''Measure For Measure'' one about their drunkenness (a joke which he ''does'' make about the Duke of Saxony's nephew in ''Merchant of Venice''). Obviously, ol' Will couldn't tell the difference between Vienna and Verona, and proceeded accordingly.

to:

* Second, S. made a number of elementary geographical mistakes in his plays -- one of the most famous (it was mocked by Ben Jonson) being that he had characters in ''The Winter's Tale'' shipwrecked on the coast of Bohemia. That's right -- shipwrecked on the coast of a landlocked country. [[hottip:*: Furthermore, in ''Two Gentlemen'' Valentine travels from Verona to Milan ''via'' ship. Yup -- both landlocked again.[[hottip:*: It was apparently possible to sail from one to the other via canal, but Shakespeare's language suggests he was thinking about actual sailing ships, not canal boats.]] In the early play ''King John'' a Duke of Austria does appear -- called "Lymoges" by the playwright, who was apparently not aware that RichardTheLionheart's enemies Ademar V, Viscount of Limoges (in west-central France) and Leopold V, Duke of Austria, ruled territors some 950 miles apart.
*
Third, the nomenclature of ''Measure For Measure'' consists of common English names, like Froth, Elbow, and Mistress Overdone; classical names like Escalus and Pompey; and ''Italian'' names like Vincentio (the Duke), Isabella, Claudio, Juliet, Angelo, Mariana, and Lucio -- and not one single German name! name!
*
Finally, Shakespeare makes none of the two usual Jacobean jokes about the Germans -- the bagginess of their pants (a joke which he ''does'' make about "Austria" in ''King John'') nor even the ancient, universal, and certainly highly appropriate for ''Measure For Measure'' one about their drunkenness (a joke which he ''does'' make about the Duke of Saxony's nephew in ''Merchant of Venice''). Obviously, ol' Will couldn't tell the difference between Vienna and Verona, and proceeded accordingly.




to:

* Of course, Shakespeare's Genius is evident in the fact that most of the people saying he knew nothing about geography apparently know very little about Shakespearean '''''contemporary''''' geography.
*** For starters, the coastline of Bohemia. The extent of a country's borders, at that time and even now, is not solely determined by pure geography. Today we talk of, for example, "U.S. Soil" in terms of U.S. embassies, even though the ground they stand on is clearly a part of some other country, because of legal fictions used today and in Shakespeare's time. The same is true of the coastline of Bohemia: the Bohemian Empire once extended to the ocean (under King of Bohemia and Holy Roman Emperor [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_II,_Holy_Roman_Emperor Rudolf II]], from 1575–1608, '''the period of Shakespeare'''), even though Bohemia itself has no coastline. Thus a Shakespearean contemporary would know of a Bohemian coastline that existed from 1575 to 1608.
*** Next, getting from Milan to the ocean via boat. Some have made the error of assuming that Italy's canals were small enough that large boats could not make their way up its canal system. [[http://www.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/CanalsofMilan.pdf The Grand Canal]], still in existence today, shows that quite large ships could make their way deep "inland" into Italy. Shakespeare's extensive sailing knowledge and sailing language does not preclude the use of large canal boats used to get to the ocean sailing ships, that then wreck on distant shores.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Mind you, the idea that Shakespeare got an education at all is circular reasoning: the author of Shakespeare's plays was clearly an educated man, so even though there are no records of William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon getting an education, because it is assumed William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon wrote the plays, he must have received an extensive grammar school education.
*** This assumption that William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon wrote the plays also makes the Stratford grammar school have a much more extensive library than most grammar schools would have had at the time: because Shakespeare the Playwright has to have read from these books in order to have written the plays, therefore the country grammar school had the budget to purchase a huge selection of books, at a time when books cost as much as new cars do today.
* There has been a tremendous amount of speculation that William Creator/WilliamShakespeare was merely an actor and was used as a front for somebody else who wrote his famous plays. The finger is generally pointed at such notables as Sir Francis Bacon, Queen Elizabeth, Creator/ChristopherMarlowe, and Edward de Vere, meaning any or all of them could have written the plays ("all of them" being the Round Table Hypothesis). MarkTwain was one of the earliest prominent believers in these theories, which means it's OlderThanRadio.
** Ben Jonson [[http://www.fbrt.org.uk/pages/enigma/contemporary%20suspicions.html knew a William Shakespeare who was an actor]], and according to Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare the actor never wrote anything. Mind you, it could simply be that the Stratfordians are wrong and William Shakespeare was never an actor, since saying William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon was an actor is also WildMassGuessing.

to:

** Mind you, It is not "well-documented" that William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon attended grammar school[[hottip:*: (There are no records of '''any''' student at the Stratford school before 1700, as most Stratfordians concede)]]. In fact, there are no records of William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon getting any education at all. The idea that Shakespeare got an education at all is circular reasoning: the author of Shakespeare's plays was clearly an educated man, well-educated, so even though there are no records of William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon getting an education, because it is assumed William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon wrote the plays, he must have received an extensive education, including, presumably, at the free Stratford grammar school education.
school.
*** This assumption that William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon wrote the plays also makes the Stratford grammar school have a much more extensive library than most grammar schools would have had at the time: because Shakespeare the Playwright has to have read from these books in order to have written the plays, therefore the country grammar school had the budget to purchase a the huge selection of books, books read by Shakespeare the Playwright, at a time when books cost as much as new cars do today.
* There has been a tremendous amount of speculation that William Creator/WilliamShakespeare was merely an actor and was used as a front for somebody else who wrote his famous plays. The finger is generally pointed at such notables as Sir Francis Bacon, Queen Elizabeth, Creator/ChristopherMarlowe, and Edward de Vere, meaning any or all of them could have written the plays ("all of them" being [[TheDevTeamThinksOfEverything the Round Table Hypothesis)."Round Table" Hypothesis]]). MarkTwain was one of the earliest prominent believers in these theories, which means it's OlderThanRadio.
** Ben Jonson [[http://www.fbrt.org.uk/pages/enigma/contemporary%20suspicions.html knew a William Shakespeare who was an actor]], and according to Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare the actor never wrote anything. Mind you, it could simply be that the Stratfordians are wrong and William Shakespeare was never an actor, since saying William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon was an actor is also WildMassGuessing.WildMassGuessing, the explanation of how their Author ended up in London: the undocumented joining of a troupe of actors headed for London (most probably Leicester's Men or the Queen's Men), at some point between 1585 and 1592.



*** Plus Marlowe wrote plays which had the same basic plots and themes of some of Shakespeare's plays, unnecessary duplication if he was also Shakespeare, and also dramatically different ideas about people in the world. Take Marlowe's "The Jew of Malta", his version of Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice". Marlowe's Jew, Barabas (a clear reference to the Bible's "Barrabas" who was released in place of Jesus) is a mustache-twirling one-dimensional melodrama villain who delights in violating his own religion, and at one point poisons an entire convent of nuns '''which includes his own daughter'''. Shakespeare's Shylock gets one of the more famous sympathy-gathering monologues of all time--"If you prick us, do we not bleed?"--as well as being a devout Jew right up to the point where he is forced to convert or be executed.

to:

*** Plus Marlowe wrote plays which had the same basic plots and themes of some of Shakespeare's plays, unnecessary duplication if he was also Shakespeare, and also dramatically different ideas about people in the world. Take Marlowe's "The Jew of Malta", his version of Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice". Marlowe's Jew, Barabas (a clear reference to the Bible's "Barrabas" who was released in place of Jesus) is a mustache-twirling one-dimensional melodrama villain who delights in violating his own religion, and at one point poisons an entire convent of nuns '''which includes his own daughter'''. Shakespeare's Shylock gets one of the more famous sympathy-gathering monologues of all time--"If you prick us, do we not bleed?"--as well as being a devout Jew right up to the point where he is forced to convert or be executed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* One of the few types of records that exist about William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon indicate that he was very good at business math, having made so much money off of something other than plays that he was able to revive his family business, buy the largest house in Stratford, and buy enough property in Stratford to earn himself a kingly 60 pounds a year in landlord income.
** An argument against him being William Shakespeare the Playwright is that Shakespeare the Playwright is spectacularly '''bad at math''', especially '''business math'''.

to:

* One of the few types of records that exist about William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon indicate that he was very good at business math, having made so much money off of something other than plays plays[[hottip:*:(Playwriting in Shakespeare's time, before copyrights, did not pay at all well. Since Shakespeare '''''needs to have made a lot of money off his plays''''', the [[WildMassGuessing Official History]] requires that playwriting in the time of Shakespeare pay so well you can buy '''houses''' (as in, more than one) with the income)]] that he was able to revive his family business, buy the largest house in Stratford, and buy enough property in Stratford to earn himself a kingly 60 pounds a year in landlord income.
** An argument against him William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon being William Shakespeare the Playwright is that Shakespeare the Playwright is spectacularly '''bad at math''', especially '''business math'''.

Added: 2936

Changed: 103

Removed: 1535

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Ben Jonson [[http://www.fbrt.org.uk/pages/enigma/contemporary%20suspicions.html knew a William Shakespeare who was an actor]], and according to Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare the actor never wrote anything. Mind you, it could simply be that the Stratfordians are wrong and William Shakespeare was never an actor.

to:

** Ben Jonson [[http://www.fbrt.org.uk/pages/enigma/contemporary%20suspicions.html knew a William Shakespeare who was an actor]], and according to Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare the actor never wrote anything. Mind you, it could simply be that the Stratfordians are wrong and William Shakespeare was never an actor.actor, since saying William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon was an actor is also WildMassGuessing.



*** Plus Marlowe wrote plays which had the same basic plots and themes of some of Shakespeare's plays, unnecessary duplication if he was also Shakespeare, and also dramatically different ideas about people in the world. Take Marlowe's "The Jew of Malta", his version of Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice". Marlowe's Jew, Barabas (a clear reference to the Bible's "Barrabas" who was released in place of Jesus) is a mustache-twirling one-dimensional melodrama villain who delights in violating his own religion, and at one point poisons an entire convent of nuns '''which includes his own daughter'''. Shakespeare's Shylock gets one of the more famous sympathy-gathering monologues of all time--"If you prick us, do we not bleed?"--as well as being a devout Jew right up to the point where he is forced to convert or be executed.



*** In order to give Bacon time to write Shakespeare's plays, Shakespeare wrote Bacon's essays. So in a way, he did.



** A "mimick ape" or "poet ape" was a career back then, a person who agreed to front for an author who didn't want it known that he was a writer. Often used to protect a noble's desire to not be seen as doing any real work, or to attempt to avoid being prosecuted for embarrassing or seditious prose (Richard II, anyone?).



** [[http://www.fbrt.org.uk/pages/enigma/contemporary%20suspicions.html There were contemporary individuals who questioned the authorship of Shakespeare's plays]]. Ben Jonson himself appears to have known both an ''author'' named William Shakespeare (whom Jonson liked), and an ''actor'' named William Shakespeare (whom Jonson hated). According to Stratfordians, William Shakespeare of Stratford on Avon was definitely an actor; according to Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare the actor never wrote anything.
** As for Shakespeare being wealthy and the son of the wealthiest man in Stratford, being successful at business in Shakespeare's day did not require an education in anything other than basic business math. Yes, he was a successful merchant at ''something'' ("grain merchant" is often mentioned but this, like most Shakespeare "history", is also WildMassGuessing) which allowed him to buy a lot of land in Stratford, and not a peasant, but this is not evidence that he ever received an education.
*** One of the things we are certain about William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon is that he seems to have been '''''very good at business math''''', due to existing records showing him earning a kingly 60 pounds a year off estates purchased in Stratford, after he had already purchased the biggest house in Stratford. One of the things we are certain about William Shakespeare the Playwright is that he was '''''very bad at business math''''', one of the very few areas in which William Shakespeare the Playwright was not a genius.



** Its also not true that the authorship wasn't questioned well before that 150 year mark. [[http://www.fbrt.org.uk/pages/enigma/contemporary%20suspicions.html There were Shakespearean contemporaries who questioned the authorship of Shakespeare's plays]]. Ben Jonson himself appears to have known both an ''author'' named William Shakespeare (whom Jonson liked), and an ''actor'' named William Shakespeare (whom Jonson hated). According to Stratfordians, William Shakespeare of Stratford on Avon was definitely an actor; according to Ben Jonson, during "The Time Of Shakespeare", William Shakespeare the actor never wrote anything.
** As for Shakespeare being wealthy and the son of the wealthiest man in Stratford, being successful at business in Shakespeare's day did not require an education in anything other than basic business math. Yes, he was a successful merchant at ''something'' ("grain merchant" is often mentioned but this, like most Shakespeare "history", is also WildMassGuessing) which allowed him to buy a lot of land in Stratford, and not a peasant, but this is not evidence that he ever received an education.
*** One of the things we are certain about William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon is that he seems to have been '''''very good at business math''''', due to existing records showing him earning a kingly 60 pounds a year off estates purchased in Stratford, after he had already purchased the biggest house in Stratford. One of the things we are certain about William Shakespeare the Playwright is that he was '''''very bad at business math''''', one of the very few areas in which William Shakespeare the Playwright was not a genius.



** Performing play was not illegal until years after Shakespeare's death, when the Puritans took over England, under Oliver Cromwell. In fact, Shakespeare's troope was called the King's Men, because of royal patronage of King James.

to:

** Performing play was not illegal until years after Shakespeare's death, when the Puritans took over England, under Oliver Cromwell. In fact, Shakespeare's troope troop was called the King's Men, because of royal patronage of King James.



*** A counter-argument in favor of him being the Playwright anyway is that since William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon never wrote a letter home from London, yet somehow managed to become a successful businessman in Stratford, his wife Anne Hathaway may have been the real business genius in the family, doing business in his name back in Stratford. This would allow him to be awful at business math and still be the Playwright, while appearing in official documents to be a successful businessman.

to:

*** A counter-argument in favor of him being the Playwright anyway is that since William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon never wrote a letter home from London, yet somehow managed to become a successful businessman in Stratford, is that his wife Anne Hathaway may have been the real business genius in the family, doing business in his name back in Stratford. This would allow him to be awful at business math and still be the Playwright, while appearing in official documents to be a successful businessman.

Added: 501

Changed: 854

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Ben Jonson [[url=http://www.fbrt.org.uk/pages/enigma/contemporary%20suspicions.html knew a William Shakespeare who was an actor]], and according to Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare the actor never wrote anything. Mind you, it could simply be that the Stratfordians are wrong and William Shakespeare was never an actor.

to:

** Ben Jonson [[url=http://www.[[http://www.fbrt.org.uk/pages/enigma/contemporary%20suspicions.html knew a William Shakespeare who was an actor]], and according to Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare the actor never wrote anything. Mind you, it could simply be that the Stratfordians are wrong and William Shakespeare was never an actor.



** [[url=http://www.fbrt.org.uk/pages/enigma/contemporary%20suspicions.html There were contemporary individuals who questioned the authorship of Shakespeare's plays]]. Ben Jonson himself appears to have known both an ''author'' named William Shakespeare (whom Jonson liked), and an ''actor'' named William Shakespeare (whom Jonson hated). According to Stratfordians, William Shakespeare of Stratford on Avon was definitely an actor; according to Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare the actor never wrote anything.
** As for Shakespeare being wealthy and the son of the wealthiest man in Stratford, being successful at business in Shakespeare's day did not require an education in anything other than basic business math. Yes, he was a successful merchant at ''something'' ("grain merchant" is often mentioned but this, like most Shakespeare "history", is also Wild Mass Guessing) which allowed him to buy a lot of land in Stratford, and not a peasant, but this is not evidence that he ever received an education.
*** One of the things we are certain about William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon is that he seems to have been '''very good at business math''', due to existing records showing him earning a kingly 60 pounds a year off estates purchased in Stratford, after he had already purchased the biggest house in Stratford. One of the things we are certain about William Shakespeare the Playwright is that he was '''very bad at business math''', one of the very few areas in which William Shakespeare the Playwright was not a genius.

to:

** [[url=http://www.[[http://www.fbrt.org.uk/pages/enigma/contemporary%20suspicions.html There were contemporary individuals who questioned the authorship of Shakespeare's plays]]. Ben Jonson himself appears to have known both an ''author'' named William Shakespeare (whom Jonson liked), and an ''actor'' named William Shakespeare (whom Jonson hated). According to Stratfordians, William Shakespeare of Stratford on Avon was definitely an actor; according to Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare the actor never wrote anything.
** As for Shakespeare being wealthy and the son of the wealthiest man in Stratford, being successful at business in Shakespeare's day did not require an education in anything other than basic business math. Yes, he was a successful merchant at ''something'' ("grain merchant" is often mentioned but this, like most Shakespeare "history", is also Wild Mass Guessing) WildMassGuessing) which allowed him to buy a lot of land in Stratford, and not a peasant, but this is not evidence that he ever received an education.
*** One of the things we are certain about William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon is that he seems to have been '''very '''''very good at business math''', math''''', due to existing records showing him earning a kingly 60 pounds a year off estates purchased in Stratford, after he had already purchased the biggest house in Stratford. One of the things we are certain about William Shakespeare the Playwright is that he was '''very '''''very bad at business math''', math''''', one of the very few areas in which William Shakespeare the Playwright was not a genius.



* One of the few types of records that exist about William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon indicate that he was very good at business math, having made so much money off of something other than plays that he was able to revive his family business, buy the largest house in Stratford, and buy enough property in Stratford to earn himself a kingly 60 pounds a year in landlord income. An argument against him being William Shakespeare the Playwright is that Shakespeare the Playwright is spectacularly '''bad at math''', especially '''business math'''. A counter-argument in favor of him being the Playwright anyway is that since William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon never wrote a letter home from London, yet somehow managed to become a successful businessman in Stratford, his wife Anne Hathaway may have been the real business genius in the family, doing business in his name back in Stratford. This would allow him to be awful at business math and still be the Playwright, while appearing in official documents to be a successful businessman.

to:

* One of the few types of records that exist about William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon indicate that he was very good at business math, having made so much money off of something other than plays that he was able to revive his family business, buy the largest house in Stratford, and buy enough property in Stratford to earn himself a kingly 60 pounds a year in landlord income.
**
An argument against him being William Shakespeare the Playwright is that Shakespeare the Playwright is spectacularly '''bad at math''', especially '''business math'''. math'''.
***
A counter-argument in favor of him being the Playwright anyway is that since William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon never wrote a letter home from London, yet somehow managed to become a successful businessman in Stratford, his wife Anne Hathaway may have been the real business genius in the family, doing business in his name back in Stratford. This would allow him to be awful at business math and still be the Playwright, while appearing in official documents to be a successful businessman.

Added: 2849

Changed: 1722

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* There has been a tremendous amount of speculation that William Creator/WilliamShakespeare was merely an actor and was used as a front for somebody else who wrote his famous plays. The finger is generally pointed at such notables as Sir Francis Bacon, Queen Elizabeth, Creator/ChristopherMarlowe, and Edward de Vere, all based on shaky circumstantial evidence (which means that they all wrote the plays). MarkTwain was one of the earliest prominent believers in these theories, which means it's OlderThanRadio.

to:

** Mind you, the idea that Shakespeare got an education at all is circular reasoning: the author of Shakespeare's plays was clearly an educated man, so even though there are no records of William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon getting an education, because it is assumed William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon wrote the plays, he must have received an extensive grammar school education.
*** This assumption that William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon wrote the plays also makes the Stratford grammar school have a much more extensive library than most grammar schools would have had at the time: because Shakespeare the Playwright has to have read from these books in order to have written the plays, therefore the country grammar school had the budget to purchase a huge selection of books, at a time when books cost as much as new cars do today.
* There has been a tremendous amount of speculation that William Creator/WilliamShakespeare was merely an actor and was used as a front for somebody else who wrote his famous plays. The finger is generally pointed at such notables as Sir Francis Bacon, Queen Elizabeth, Creator/ChristopherMarlowe, and Edward de Vere, meaning any or all based on shaky circumstantial evidence (which means that they all wrote of them could have written the plays). plays ("all of them" being the Round Table Hypothesis). MarkTwain was one of the earliest prominent believers in these theories, which means it's OlderThanRadio.OlderThanRadio.
** Ben Jonson [[url=http://www.fbrt.org.uk/pages/enigma/contemporary%20suspicions.html knew a William Shakespeare who was an actor]], and according to Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare the actor never wrote anything. Mind you, it could simply be that the Stratfordians are wrong and William Shakespeare was never an actor.



** [[url=http://www.fbrt.org.uk/pages/enigma/contemporary%20suspicions.html There were contemporary individuals who questioned the authorship of Shakespeare's plays]]. Ben Jonson himself appears to have known both an ''author'' named William Shakespeare (whom Jonson liked), and an ''actor'' named William Shakespeare (whom Jonson hated). According to Stratfordians, William Shakespeare of Stratford on Avon was definitely an actor; according to Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare the actor never wrote anything.
** As for Shakespeare being wealthy and the son of the wealthiest man in Stratford, being successful at business in Shakespeare's day did not require an education in anything other than basic business math. Yes, he was a successful merchant at ''something'' ("grain merchant" is often mentioned but this, like most Shakespeare "history", is also Wild Mass Guessing) which allowed him to buy a lot of land in Stratford, and not a peasant, but this is not evidence that he ever received an education.
*** One of the things we are certain about William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon is that he seems to have been '''very good at business math''', due to existing records showing him earning a kingly 60 pounds a year off estates purchased in Stratford, after he had already purchased the biggest house in Stratford. One of the things we are certain about William Shakespeare the Playwright is that he was '''very bad at business math''', one of the very few areas in which William Shakespeare the Playwright was not a genius.




to:

* One of the few types of records that exist about William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon indicate that he was very good at business math, having made so much money off of something other than plays that he was able to revive his family business, buy the largest house in Stratford, and buy enough property in Stratford to earn himself a kingly 60 pounds a year in landlord income. An argument against him being William Shakespeare the Playwright is that Shakespeare the Playwright is spectacularly '''bad at math''', especially '''business math'''. A counter-argument in favor of him being the Playwright anyway is that since William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon never wrote a letter home from London, yet somehow managed to become a successful businessman in Stratford, his wife Anne Hathaway may have been the real business genius in the family, doing business in his name back in Stratford. This would allow him to be awful at business math and still be the Playwright, while appearing in official documents to be a successful businessman.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Okay, hear me out here. Banquo was murdered by a band of three murderers, right? But what about the mysterious third murderer who just appears out of nowhere? In one of the film adaptations, he kills the other two after Banquo dies. But it wasn't really Banquo, it was a body double that Banquo had hired. He knew that Macbeth was going to try and kill him. Fleance escaped because the third murderer (Banquo) went after him to instruct him to spread word of "Banquo's" demise. Banquo's ghost at the banquet was actually Banquo pretending to be his ghost. The reason for this was that if he could drive MacBeth insane with guilt, he would retire the throne. However, the rest of the people there (even Lady Macbeth) were in on this. You've noticed how Lady MacBeth seemed like she didn't want anymore killing, that's evidence that she doesn't approve of MacBeth anymore and wants him out of power. The reason Banquo's "ghost" only appears once is because there was a large group of people there (it's useless to go "insane" if there's no witnesses), ripe to spread rumors about their insane ruler.

to:

Okay, hear me out here. Banquo was murdered by a band of three murderers, right? But what about the mysterious third murderer who just appears out of nowhere? In one of the film adaptations, he kills the other two after Banquo dies. But it wasn't really Banquo, it was a body double that Banquo had hired. He knew that Macbeth was going to try and kill him. Fleance escaped because the third murderer (Banquo) went after him to instruct him to spread word of "Banquo's" demise. Banquo's ghost at the banquet was actually Banquo pretending to be his ghost. The reason for this was that if he could drive MacBeth [=MacBeth=] insane with guilt, he would retire the throne. However, the rest of the people there (even Lady Macbeth) were in on this. You've noticed how Lady MacBeth [=MacBeth=] seemed like she didn't want anymore killing, that's evidence that she doesn't approve of MacBeth [=MacBeth=] anymore and wants him out of power. The reason Banquo's "ghost" only appears once is because there was a large group of people there (it's useless to go "insane" if there's no witnesses), ripe to spread rumors about their insane ruler.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Well, in the chronicles Shakespeare was using, yes. Not so much real life, since Banquo probably didn't exist - "Fleance" is based on Flaald of Dol, who was actually a Breton who migrated to Scotland. Flaald's real father almost certainly never met Macbeth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Except not really; [[spoiler: he doesn't die onscreen, and it's never clearly shown whose bodies are dumped into the ocean. It could just as easily be Desdemona and Othello being tossed overboard.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** Well, half true -- performing plays without a license (granted, in Elizabeth's England, by the Master of the Revels) was illegal and anyone associated could be jailed if they were caught.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[WMG: Banquo's ghost wasn't really a ghost]]
Okay, hear me out here. Banquo was murdered by a band of three murderers, right? But what about the mysterious third murderer who just appears out of nowhere? In one of the film adaptations, he kills the other two after Banquo dies. But it wasn't really Banquo, it was a body double that Banquo had hired. He knew that Macbeth was going to try and kill him. Fleance escaped because the third murderer (Banquo) went after him to instruct him to spread word of "Banquo's" demise. Banquo's ghost at the banquet was actually Banquo pretending to be his ghost. The reason for this was that if he could drive MacBeth insane with guilt, he would retire the throne. However, the rest of the people there (even Lady Macbeth) were in on this. You've noticed how Lady MacBeth seemed like she didn't want anymore killing, that's evidence that she doesn't approve of MacBeth anymore and wants him out of power. The reason Banquo's "ghost" only appears once is because there was a large group of people there (it's useless to go "insane" if there's no witnesses), ripe to spread rumors about their insane ruler.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: Shakespeare wrote the plays, but the ''actor'' Shakespeare was actually someone else.]]
I'm surprised I've never heard this theory before.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG: Romeo and Juliet died because Mercutio [[APlagueOnBothYourHouses cursed their families]].]]

to:

[[WMG: Romeo and Juliet died because Mercutio [[APlagueOnBothYourHouses [[DyingCurse cursed their families]].]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Second, S. made a number of elementary geographical mistakes in his plays -- one of the most famous (it was mocked by Ben Jonson) being that he had characters in ''The Winter's Tale'' shipwrecked on the coast of Bohemia. That's right -- shipwrecked on the coast of a landlocked country. Furthermore, in ''Two Gentlemen'' Valentine travels from Verona to Milan ''via'' ship. Yup -- both landlocked again. In the early play ''King John'' a Duke of Austria does appear -- called "Lymoges" by the playwright, who was apparently not aware that RichardTheLionheart's enemies Ademar V, Viscount of Limoges (in west-central France) and Leopold V, Duke of Austria, ruled territors some 950 miles apart. Third, the nomenclature of ''Measure For Measure'' consists of common English names, like Froth, Elbow, and Mistress Overdone; classical names like Escalus and Pompey; and ''Italian'' names like Vincentio (the Duke), Isabella, Claudio, Juliet, Angelo, Mariana, and Lucio -- and not one single German name! Finally, Shakespeare makes none of the two usual Jacobean jokes about the Germans -- the bagginess of their pants (a joke which he ''does'' make about "Austria" in ''King John'') nor even the ancient, universal, and certainly highly appropriate for ''Measure For Measure'' one about their drunkenness (a joke which he ''does'' make about the Duke of Saxony's nephew in ''Merchant of Venice''). Obviously, ol' Will couldn't tell the difference between Vienna and Verona, and proceeded accordingly.

to:

Second, S. made a number of elementary geographical mistakes in his plays -- one of the most famous (it was mocked by Ben Jonson) being that he had characters in ''The Winter's Tale'' shipwrecked on the coast of Bohemia. That's right -- shipwrecked on the coast of a landlocked country. Furthermore, in ''Two Gentlemen'' Valentine travels from Verona to Milan ''via'' ship. Yup -- both landlocked again. [[hottip:*: It was apparently possible to sail from one to the other via canal, but Shakespeare's language suggests he was thinking about actual sailing ships, not canal boats.]] In the early play ''King John'' a Duke of Austria does appear -- called "Lymoges" by the playwright, who was apparently not aware that RichardTheLionheart's enemies Ademar V, Viscount of Limoges (in west-central France) and Leopold V, Duke of Austria, ruled territors some 950 miles apart. Third, the nomenclature of ''Measure For Measure'' consists of common English names, like Froth, Elbow, and Mistress Overdone; classical names like Escalus and Pompey; and ''Italian'' names like Vincentio (the Duke), Isabella, Claudio, Juliet, Angelo, Mariana, and Lucio -- and not one single German name! Finally, Shakespeare makes none of the two usual Jacobean jokes about the Germans -- the bagginess of their pants (a joke which he ''does'' make about "Austria" in ''King John'') nor even the ancient, universal, and certainly highly appropriate for ''Measure For Measure'' one about their drunkenness (a joke which he ''does'' make about the Duke of Saxony's nephew in ''Merchant of Venice''). Obviously, ol' Will couldn't tell the difference between Vienna and Verona, and proceeded accordingly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Which leaves the question that: If Bacon wrote Shakespeare, did Shakespeare ever write him back?

to:

** Which leaves the question that: If Bacon wrote did write Shakespeare, did would Shakespeare ever write him back?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Which leaves the question that: If Bacon wrote Shakespeare, did Shakespeare ever write him back?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* There has been a tremendous amount of speculation that William Main/{{Shakespeare}} was merely an actor and was used as a front for somebody else who wrote his famous plays. The finger is generally pointed at such notables as Sir Francis Bacon, Queen Elizabeth, Creator/ChristopherMarlowe, and Edward de Vere, all based on shaky circumstantial evidence (which means that they all wrote the plays). MarkTwain was one of the earliest prominent believers in these theories, which means it's OlderThanRadio.

to:

* There has been a tremendous amount of speculation that William Main/{{Shakespeare}} Creator/WilliamShakespeare was merely an actor and was used as a front for somebody else who wrote his famous plays. The finger is generally pointed at such notables as Sir Francis Bacon, Queen Elizabeth, Creator/ChristopherMarlowe, and Edward de Vere, all based on shaky circumstantial evidence (which means that they all wrote the plays). MarkTwain was one of the earliest prominent believers in these theories, which means it's OlderThanRadio.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG: The "pound of flesh" bargain in ''Theatre/TheMerchantOfVenice'' is the result of Shylock and Antonio's dueling [[XanatosGambit Xanatos Gambits]].]]

to:

[[WMG: The "pound of flesh" bargain in ''Theatre/TheMerchantOfVenice'' is the result of Shylock and Antonio's dueling [[XanatosGambit Xanatos Gambits]].]]{{plan}}s]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Namespace


* [[MontyPythonsFlyingCircus Mr. Norman Voles]] [[http://www.thestar.com/Article/257081 of Gravesend]] wrote the plays and his wife helped with the sonnets.

to:

* [[MontyPythonsFlyingCircus [[Series/MontyPythonsFlyingCircus Mr. Norman Voles]] [[http://www.thestar.com/Article/257081 of Gravesend]] wrote the plays and his wife helped with the sonnets.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Apparently, this isn't too far off from what happened in real life. Banquo was an accomplice in Macbeth's plot but Shakespeare made him a good guy because he as an ancestor of King James.

to:

* Apparently, this isn't too far off from what happened in real life. Banquo was an accomplice in Macbeth's plot but Shakespeare made him a good guy because he as was an ancestor of King James.




to:

* Isn't this canon?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Apparently, this isn't too far off from what happened in real life. Banquo was an accomplice in Macbeth's plot but Shakespeare made him a good guy because he as an ancestor of King James.

Top