Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18,19 (click to see context) from:
Clearly, Peter Ludlow wasn't the only member of [=InGen=] with a hard-on for exploiting the dinosaurs of Site B. It wouldn't be a stretch to assume that at least one of his CorruptCorporateExecutive board members thought they might be able to spin public support against Hammond and the dinosaurs through extreme measures. It would explain how the crew got killed and why their remains ended up all over the place -- of course an [=InGen=] agent would want the public to think the dinosaurs were responsible. The killer (possibly one of the few surviving mercenaries, a "backup plan" as Nick Van Owen was Hammond's backup plan) waits until they're back at the mainland to make his move, kidnaps Van Owen (explaining his mysterious disappearance), staged the scene, rigged the ship, then escaped in the chaos. The mastermind likely intended the Rex to be heroically brought down by [=InGen=] agents, bringing them public support for a second invasion of Site B..
to:
Clearly, Peter Ludlow wasn't the only member of [=InGen=] with a hard-on for exploiting the dinosaurs of Site B. It wouldn't be a stretch to assume that at least one of his CorruptCorporateExecutive board members thought they might be able to spin public support against Hammond and the dinosaurs through extreme measures. It would explain how the crew got killed and why their remains ended up all over the place -- of course an [=InGen=] agent would want the public to think the dinosaurs were responsible. The killer (possibly one of the few surviving mercenaries, a "backup plan" as Nick Van Owen was Hammond's backup plan) waits until they're back at the mainland to make his move, kidnaps Van Owen (explaining his mysterious disappearance), staged the scene, rigged the ship, then escaped in the chaos. The mastermind likely intended the Rex to be heroically brought down by [=InGen=] agents, bringing them public support for a second invasion of Site B..
B.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9,10 (click to see context) from:
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
to:
[[WMG: Dilophosaurus is JustHiding]]
After infamously disappearing in this movie (save for one shot on a computer screen), the fate of this species was left up in the air. But recall how they no-showed the tour in the first movie. What if in addition to blinding spit, they also have the chameleon ability the Indominous Rex has later on -- they're just more cavalier about using it?
After infamously disappearing in this movie (save for one shot on a computer screen), the fate of this species was left up in the air. But recall how they no-showed the tour in the first movie. What if in addition to blinding spit, they also have the chameleon ability the Indominous Rex has later on -- they're just more cavalier about using it?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
to:
[[WMG: A RightWingMilitiaFanatic kidnapped Nick Van Owen, murdered the crew and deliberately crashed the ship into the dock which caused the San Diego Incident]]
Clearly, Peter Ludlow wasn't the only member of [=InGen=] with a hard-on for exploiting the dinosaurs of Site B. It wouldn't be a stretch to assume that at least one of his CorruptCorporateExecutive board members thought they might be able to spin public support against Hammond and the dinosaurs through extreme measures. It would explain how the crew got killed and why their remains ended up all over the place -- of course an [=InGen=] agent would want the public to think the dinosaurs were responsible. The killer (possibly one of the few surviving mercenaries, a "backup plan" as Nick Van Owen was Hammond's backup plan) waits until they're back at the mainland to make his move, kidnaps Van Owen (explaining his mysterious disappearance), staged the scene, rigged the ship, then escaped in the chaos. The mastermind likely intended the Rex to be heroically brought down by [=InGen=] agents, bringing them public support for a second invasion of Site B..
Clearly, Peter Ludlow wasn't the only member of [=InGen=] with a hard-on for exploiting the dinosaurs of Site B. It wouldn't be a stretch to assume that at least one of his CorruptCorporateExecutive board members thought they might be able to spin public support against Hammond and the dinosaurs through extreme measures. It would explain how the crew got killed and why their remains ended up all over the place -- of course an [=InGen=] agent would want the public to think the dinosaurs were responsible. The killer (possibly one of the few surviving mercenaries, a "backup plan" as Nick Van Owen was Hammond's backup plan) waits until they're back at the mainland to make his move, kidnaps Van Owen (explaining his mysterious disappearance), staged the scene, rigged the ship, then escaped in the chaos. The mastermind likely intended the Rex to be heroically brought down by [=InGen=] agents, bringing them public support for a second invasion of Site B..
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13,15 (click to see context) from:
Clearly, John Hammond wasn't the only one against the dinosaurs on Site-B being exploited. It wouldn't be a stretch to assume that there was a group or group members that would use extreme measures. It would explain how the crew got killed and how their remains ended up all over the place. The killer (possibly the one who explained to Malcom and Sarah what happened) was a crew member who waited until they were near San Diego and then did his thing, staged the scene, rigged the ship, then escaped in the chaos. The aftermath brings both public attention to InGen's actions and leads to the isolation of Site-B.
to:
Clearly, John Hammond wasn't the only one against the dinosaurs on Site-B being exploited. It wouldn't be a stretch to assume that there was a group or group members that would use extreme measures. It would explain how the crew got killed and how their remains ended up all over the place. The killer (possibly the one who explained to Malcom and Sarah what happened) was a crew member who waited until they were near San Diego and then did his thing, staged the scene, rigged the ship, then escaped in the chaos. The aftermath brings both public attention to InGen's [=InGen=]'s actions and leads to the isolation of Site-B.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Revised text.
Changed line(s) 13,17 (click to see context) from:
Clearly, John Hammond wasn't the only one against the dinosaurs on Site-B being exploited. It wouldn't be a stretch to assume that there was a group or group members that would use extreme measures. It would explain how the crew got killed and how their remains ended up all over the place. The killer was a crew member who waited until they were near San Diego and then did his thing, staged the scene, rigged the ship, then escaped in the chaos. The aftermath brings both public attention to InGen's actions and leads to the isolation of Site-B.
The killer could've been the crew member that explained what happened on board to Malcolm and Sarah.
The killer could've been the crew member that explained what happened on board to Malcolm and Sarah.
to:
Clearly, John Hammond wasn't the only one against the dinosaurs on Site-B being exploited. It wouldn't be a stretch to assume that there was a group or group members that would use extreme measures. It would explain how the crew got killed and how their remains ended up all over the place. The killer (possibly the one who explained to Malcom and Sarah what happened) was a crew member who waited until they were near San Diego and then did his thing, staged the scene, rigged the ship, then escaped in the chaos. The aftermath brings both public attention to InGen's actions and leads to the isolation of Site-B.
The killer could've been the crew member that explained what happened on board to Malcolm and Sarah.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13,14 (click to see context) from:
Clearly, John Hammond wasn't the only one against the dinosaurs on Site-B being exploited. It wouldn't be a stretch to assume that there's a group or group members that would use extreme measures. It would explain how the crew got killed and how their remains ended up all over the place. The killer was a crew member who waited until they were near San Diego and then did his thing, staged the scene, rigged the sip, then escaped in the chaos. The aftermath brings both public attention to InGen's actions and leads to the isolation of Site-B.
to:
Clearly, John Hammond wasn't the only one against the dinosaurs on Site-B being exploited. It wouldn't be a stretch to assume that there's there was a group or group members that would use extreme measures. It would explain how the crew got killed and how their remains ended up all over the place. The killer was a crew member who waited until they were near San Diego and then did his thing, staged the scene, rigged the sip, ship, then escaped in the chaos. The aftermath brings both public attention to InGen's actions and leads to the isolation of Site-B.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11,12 (click to see context) from:
[[WMG: An Eco-Terrorist murdered the crew and deliberately crashed the ship into the dock to deliberately cause the San Diego Incident]]
to:
[[WMG: An Eco-Terrorist murdered the crew and deliberately crashed the ship into the dock to deliberately cause which caused the San Diego Incident]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: An Eco-Terrorist murdered the crew and deliberately crashed the ship into the dock to deliberately cause the San Diego Incident]]
Clearly, John Hammond wasn't the only one against the dinosaurs on Site-B being exploited. It wouldn't be a stretch to assume that there's a group or group members that would use extreme measures. It would explain how the crew got killed and how their remains ended up all over the place. The killer was a crew member who waited until they were near San Diego and then did his thing, staged the scene, rigged the sip, then escaped in the chaos. The aftermath brings both public attention to InGen's actions and leads to the isolation of Site-B.
The killer could've been the crew member that explained what happened on board to Malcolm and Sarah.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
to:
*This is shown in one of the deleted scenes to have been the case, however they escaped after killing the crew instead of taking on the T. Rex.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: Raptors made it on the ship]]
T-Rex clearly could not have killed people on the bridge and other spaces that were too confined for him. However, if Raptors made it onto the ship, they could have easily disposed of the crew before making a suicidal attack on the T-Rex.
T-Rex clearly could not have killed people on the bridge and other spaces that were too confined for him. However, if Raptors made it onto the ship, they could have easily disposed of the crew before making a suicidal attack on the T-Rex.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
How did the T-Rex manage to kill everyone aboard the ship, even the ones completely in other places that were too small and confined for it to make it inside? Obviously another byproduct of the frog DNA mutation, like breeding in the first film. It basically [[Franchise/SuperMarioBros Yoshi'd]] Or worse, what they got was [[{{WesternAnimation/Futurama}} Hypnotoad]] DNA, and it mindfucked everyone to kill themselves.
to:
How did else could the T-Rex manage have managed to kill everyone aboard the ship, even the ones completely in other places that were too small and confined for it to make it inside? Obviously it was another byproduct of the frog DNA mutation, like breeding in the first film. It basically [[Franchise/SuperMarioBros Yoshi'd]] the crew to death. Or worse, what they got was [[{{WesternAnimation/Futurama}} Hypnotoad]] DNA, and it the T-Rex mindfucked everyone to kill themselves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: The frog DNA gave the T-Rex a long extendable tongue]]
How did the T-Rex manage to kill everyone aboard the ship, even the ones completely in other places that were too small and confined for it to make it inside? Obviously another byproduct of the frog DNA mutation, like breeding in the first film. It basically [[Franchise/SuperMarioBros Yoshi'd]] Or worse, what they got was [[{{WesternAnimation/Futurama}} Hypnotoad]] DNA, and it mindfucked everyone to kill themselves.
----
How did the T-Rex manage to kill everyone aboard the ship, even the ones completely in other places that were too small and confined for it to make it inside? Obviously another byproduct of the frog DNA mutation, like breeding in the first film. It basically [[Franchise/SuperMarioBros Yoshi'd]] Or worse, what they got was [[{{WesternAnimation/Futurama}} Hypnotoad]] DNA, and it mindfucked everyone to kill themselves.
----
