Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Tropers / Westrim

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Articles I have started (not really indicative of my interests, just what I came across that lacked a page yet):

to:

Articles I have started (not really indicative of my interests, just what I came across that lacked a page yet): yet). Somewhat oddly, most were created well after their subject had been released:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


CriticalStaffingShortage

to:

* CriticalStaffingShortage
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

CriticalStaffingShortage


Added DiffLines:

* VirtualDangerDenial

Added: 63

Changed: 179

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AnArmAndALeg (My first trope to 1000 wicks, I feel so proud.)



* RepairDontRespond

to:

* RepairDontRespondRepairDontRespond (You know you hit a good name for a concept when multiple other pages get folded into it and you regularly come across other people using it. One of the ideas I'm most proud of.)

Added: 16

Changed: 20

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MonumentalView



* WhyDoYouHateTheDog

to:

* WhyDoYouHateTheDog

Changed: 1399

Removed: 126

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Spoilers should be reduced as much as possible. I keep them on so that I can be aware of them, though I always look underneath. Founder of TropersOpposedToNegligentAndGratuitousSpoilers to counter their mis- and overuse.
* I lean heavily towards SPOON, but decline to commit to any naming convention, as each have their pros, cons, and exceptions.

to:

* Spoilers Spoiler tags should be reduced used as much little as possible.possible. Minor plot points, oneshot characters, and characteristics should all be left un spoiler tagged. I keep them on so that I can be aware of them, though I always look underneath. Founder of TropersOpposedToNegligentAndGratuitousSpoilers to counter their mis- and overuse.\n* I lean heavily towards SPOON, but decline to commit to any naming convention, as each have their pros, cons, and exceptions.



* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons, a lot of them having to do with my faith in humanity. Unfortunately, much of the community of the site that is active there is polarized and cliqueish. For instance, TropeRepairShop people pounce on anyone from outside interested in making the case for a trope to be kept, responding with rudeness and sarcasm, then censure anyone who responds in kind because they aren't part of the group. In general on the forums, if you aren't a name they recognize prepare to encounter a 'not made here' attitude that is really negatively affecting the site. So I stick to editing formatting and the occasional new trope or work page and leave larger issues alone.
* Edit reasons are generally unnecessary since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw; 90% of changes are simply not going to be noticed or disputed in any way. In addition, not putting an edit reason gives less cause for dispute; the old 'if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all' comes to mind. I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case. And don't be upset if I don't PM you before making a modification, I absolutely never use that first thing.

to:

* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons, a lot of them having to do with my faith in humanity. Unfortunately, much of the community of the site that is active there is polarized and cliqueish. For instance, in my experience TropeRepairShop people regulars pounce on anyone from outside interested in making the case for a trope to be kept, responding with rudeness and sarcasm, then censure censuring anyone who responds in kind because they aren't part of the group. In general on the forums, if you aren't a name they recognize prepare to encounter a 'not made here' attitude that is really negatively affecting the site. So I stick to editing formatting and the occasional new trope or work page and leave larger issues alone.
* Censorship and gratuitous vulgarity are both uncalled for. In general I let work derived vulgarity stand but ease user created vulgarity. I consider the gutting of works and tropes considered to be too sexual to be a travesty against wisdom and maturity; we're all adults or will be in a few years, and pretending things don't exist by erasing them or disallowing them for inherently amorphous values that shift over time is a tragedy of censorship.
* Edit reasons are generally unnecessary since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw; 90% of changes are simply not going to be noticed or disputed in any way. In addition, not putting an edit reason gives less cause for dispute; the old 'if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all' comes to mind. I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case. And don't be upset if I don't PM you before making a modification, I absolutely never use that first thing.
case.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons, a lot of them having to do with my faith in humanity. Administration of the site is polarized and cliqueish. For instance, TropeRepairShop people pounce on anyone from outside interested in making the case for a trope to be kept, responding with rudeness and sarcasm, then censure anyone who responds in kind because they aren't part of the group. In general, if you aren't a name they recognize prepare to encounter a 'not made here' attitude that is really negatively affecting the site. So I stick to editing formatting and the occasional new trope or work page and leave larger issues alone.

to:

* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons, a lot of them having to do with my faith in humanity. Administration Unfortunately, much of the community of the site that is active there is polarized and cliqueish. For instance, TropeRepairShop people pounce on anyone from outside interested in making the case for a trope to be kept, responding with rudeness and sarcasm, then censure anyone who responds in kind because they aren't part of the group. In general, general on the forums, if you aren't a name they recognize prepare to encounter a 'not made here' attitude that is really negatively affecting the site. So I stick to editing formatting and the occasional new trope or work page and leave larger issues alone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PowerEqualsResponsibility

Added: 433

Changed: 11

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Tropes I have created the pages for:

to:

Tropes I have created the pages for: YKTTW for:
* The47Society
* AdaptationInspiration
* AmicableExes
* CasualInterplanetaryTravel


Added DiffLines:

* EveryonesInTheLoop
* FirstPersonPerspective
* HatedHometown


Added DiffLines:

* LinkingToAnArticleWithinTheArticle
* OddlyOvertrainedSecurity
* PerfectionIsImpossible
* PlotSensitiveLatch
* PowerEqualsResponsibility


Added DiffLines:

* RandomPasserbyAdvice


Added DiffLines:

* RevengeMyopia
* SavedForTheSequel
* ScaleModelDestruction
* SexWithTheEx
* TheShelfOfMovieLanguishment
* SpaceEpisode


Added DiffLines:

* TwentyMinutesIntoThePast

Changed: 1613

Removed: 48

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


I'm mostly an editor and tends to focus on cleaning up entries and pages, although I have created quite a few of both (as listed below) and added tropes and examples. I've been probably been editing since about September of 2008. I fit pretty well into the bell curve of TroperDemographics. I'm from Southern California.

My main (relevant to this site) life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations that way. Unfortunately, it's also led to an acute sense of how much I don't know.

to:

I'm mostly an editor and tends tend to focus on cleaning up entries and pages, although I have created quite a few of both (as listed several pages (listed below) and added tropes and examples. I've been probably been editing since about September of 2008. I fit pretty well into the bell curve of TroperDemographics. I'm from Southern California.

My main (relevant to this site) life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking
California. I'm a fellow expert for pretty good at least remaining objective, but I'm pretty bad at ''sounding'' objective, since I generally don't speak unless I care.

I like to accumulate knowledge, and know quite
a couple bit about a wide variety of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations that way.fields. Unfortunately, it's also led to an acute sense of how much I don't know.



* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons, a lot of them having to do with my faith in humanity.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later -- or if they do check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg. adding a trope, spoilering it). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.

to:

* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons, a lot of them having to do with my faith in humanity.
humanity. Administration of the site is polarized and cliqueish. For instance, TropeRepairShop people pounce on anyone from outside interested in making the case for a trope to be kept, responding with rudeness and sarcasm, then censure anyone who responds in kind because they aren't part of the group. In general, if you aren't a name they recognize prepare to encounter a 'not made here' attitude that is really negatively affecting the site. So I stick to editing formatting and the occasional new trope or work page and leave larger issues alone.
* Edit entries reasons are generally only necessary the second time around, unnecessary since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that SturgeonsLaw; 90% of changes are driveby edits, never simply not going to be checked up on again and never to notice if noticed or disputed in any way. In addition, not putting an edit reason gives less cause for dispute; the old 'if you delete it an hour later -- or if they do check, they don't decide have anything nice to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg. adding a trope, spoilering it). say, don't say anything at all' comes to mind. I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.
case. And don't be upset if I don't PM you before making a modification, I absolutely never use that first thing.




to:

* {{Defiance}}



Articles I've overhauled and am keeping a close eye on (read: I check every time their main page and subpages are edited):
* TheSalvationWar
* UpInTheAir

Quite a few others.

to:

Articles I've overhauled and am keeping a close eye on (read: I check every time their main page and subpages There are edited):
* TheSalvationWar
* UpInTheAir

Quite
also quite a few others.others that I make a solid effort to keep an eye on. Maybe I'll make a list at some point.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhyDoYouHateTheDog?

to:

* WhyDoYouHateTheDog?
WhyDoYouHateTheDog


Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


TheSalvationWar
UpInTheAir
A quite a few others.

to:

* TheSalvationWar
* UpInTheAir
A quite Quite a few others.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

----

Added: 112

Changed: 324

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


I'm an editor from Southern California who tends to focus on cleaning up entries and pages, although I have created quite a few of both (as listed below). I've been probably been editing since about September of 2008. I fit pretty well into the bell curve of TroperDemographics.

My main (relevant to this site) life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations that way.

to:

I'm mostly an editor from Southern California who and tends to focus on cleaning up entries and pages, although I have created quite a few of both (as listed below).below) and added tropes and examples. I've been probably been editing since about September of 2008. I fit pretty well into the bell curve of TroperDemographics.

TroperDemographics. I'm from Southern California.

My main (relevant to this site) life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations that way.
way. Unfortunately, it's also led to an acute sense of how much I don't know.



Articles I have started:

to:

It feels like bragging, but I've noticed it's a common thing for people to note on these pages what pages they've created/edit/whatever, so here's mine.

Articles I have started: started (not really indicative of my interests, just what I came across that lacked a page yet):



* NewspaperComic/NonSequitur

to:

* NewspaperComic/NonSequiturComicStrip/NonSequitur

Added: 21

Changed: 57

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.

to:

* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons.
reasons, a lot of them having to do with my faith in humanity.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- later -- or if they do check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg eg. adding a trope, spoilering it). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.


Added DiffLines:

* {{Film/Battleship}}

Added: 473

Changed: 652

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* I believe in politeness, yet I have a tendency to be sarcastic. Sorry about that, it's a personal demon I try to counter. There are several habits on the wiki that I consider rude, like bolding trope names in a response.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.

to:

* I believe in politeness, yet I have a tendency to be sarcastic. Sorry about that, it's a personal demon I try to counter. I can also be politely rude sometimes, usually to self kicking when I look at it later.
*
There are several habits common practices on the wiki that I consider rude, like bolding trope names in a response.
* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.).it). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.

Added: 113

Changed: 1050

Removed: 94

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Hi. I'm me, and as you may have figured out by now, you are you. I am an editor of the species Homo sapiens sapiens. I've been active off and on (mostly on) since September of 2008, or maybe sooner; it might be sooner, because I remember many references to TheGreatCrash but it had been several months since that (presumably) horrible event. I think CodeGeass brought me here, but I'm not sure.

...Ahem. As you can see, I have a tendency to go into detail and a not very clear memory (though it is ''very'' expansive). My most relevant life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations that way.

to:

Hi. I'm me, and as you may have figured out by now, you are you. I am an editor from Southern California who tends to focus on cleaning up entries and pages, although I have created quite a few of the species Homo sapiens sapiens. both (as listed below). I've been active off and on (mostly on) probably been editing since about September of 2008, or maybe sooner; it might be sooner, because 2008. I remember many references to TheGreatCrash but it had been several months since that (presumably) horrible event. I think CodeGeass brought me here, but I'm not sure.

...Ahem. As you can see, I have a tendency to go
fit pretty well into detail and a not very clear memory (though it is ''very'' expansive). the bell curve of TroperDemographics.

My most relevant main (relevant to this site) life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations that way.



* Spoilers should be reduced as much as possible. I keep them on so that I can be aware of them, though I always look underneath. I'm currently looking into starting a society to counter their overuse.
* I lean heavily towards SPOON, but decline to commit.
* I believe in politeness, yet I have a tendency to be sarcastic. Sorry about that, it's a personal demon I'm trying to counter.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do chck, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.

to:

* Spoilers should be reduced as much as possible. I keep them on so that I can be aware of them, though I always look underneath. I'm currently looking into starting a society Founder of TropersOpposedToNegligentAndGratuitousSpoilers to counter their mis- and overuse.
* I lean heavily towards SPOON, but decline to commit.
commit to any naming convention, as each have their pros, cons, and exceptions.
* I believe in politeness, yet I have a tendency to be sarcastic. Sorry about that, it's a personal demon I'm trying I try to counter.
counter. There are several habits on the wiki that I consider rude, like bolding trope names in a response.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do chck, check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.



* {{Flashpoint}}
* NewspaperComic/NonSequitur
* TheSkyCrawlers
* {{Strikeback}}

Tropes I have created the pages for:



* {{Strikeback}}



* {{Flashpoint}}
* TheSkyCrawlers
* NewspaperComic/NonSequitur

Articles I've overhauled and am keeping an eye on:

to:

* {{Flashpoint}}
* TheSkyCrawlers
* NewspaperComic/NonSequitur


Articles I've overhauled and am keeping an a close eye on:on (read: I check every time their main page and subpages are edited):



A whole bunch of others.

to:

A whole bunch of quite a few others.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Series/Strikeback

to:

* Series/Strikeback{{Strikeback}}
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Series/Strikeback
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Alphas}}

Added: 34

Changed: 60

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Articles I've taken under my wing (so be nice to them or else!):

to:

Articles I've taken under my wing (so be nice to them or else!):overhauled and am keeping an eye on:


Added DiffLines:

UpInTheAir
A whole bunch of others.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheWarToEndAllWars

Added: 26

Changed: 40

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ThrowingOffTheDisability



* [[ptitlem9zm3qtq What's An X Like You Doing In A Y Like This?]]

to:

* [[ptitlem9zm3qtq [[WhatsAnXLikeYouDoingInAYLikeThis What's An X Like You Doing In A Y Like This?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* VastBureaucracy
* [[ptitlem9zm3qtq What's An X Like You Doing In A Y Like This?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

TheSalvationWar

Changed: 124

Removed: 40

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do chck, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.). I still do it sometimes on the first

to:

* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do chck, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.). I still do it sometimes on the first
first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.



Articles I have contributed greatly to, and perhaps led you to this page:
ZipMeUp

Articles I've taken under my wing

to:

Articles I have contributed greatly to, and perhaps led you to this page:
ZipMeUp

Articles I've taken under my wingwing (so be nice to them or else!):

Added: 806

Changed: 113

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Hi. I'm me, and as you may have figured out by now, you are you. I am an editor of the species Homo sapiens sapiens. I've been active off and on (mostly on) since September of 2008, or maybe sooner it might be sooner, because I remember many references to TheGreatCrash but it had been several months since that (presumably) horrible event. I think Code Geass brought me here, but I'm not sure.

...Ahem. As you can see, I have a tendency to go into detail and a not very clear memory (though it is ''very'' expansive). My most relevant life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations about WorldOfWarcraft and {{Twilight}} that way.


to:

Hi. I'm me, and as you may have figured out by now, you are you. I am an editor of the species Homo sapiens sapiens. I've been active off and on (mostly on) since September of 2008, or maybe sooner sooner; it might be sooner, because I remember many references to TheGreatCrash but it had been several months since that (presumably) horrible event. I think Code Geass CodeGeass brought me here, but I'm not sure.

...Ahem. As you can see, I have a tendency to go into detail and a not very clear memory (though it is ''very'' expansive). My most relevant life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations about WorldOfWarcraft and {{Twilight}} that way.

A few of my philosophical views as a troper:
* Spoilers should be reduced as much as possible. I keep them on so that I can be aware of them, though I always look underneath. I'm currently looking into starting a society to counter their overuse.
* I lean heavily towards SPOON, but decline to commit.
* I believe in politeness, yet I have a tendency to be sarcastic. Sorry about that, it's a personal demon I'm trying to counter.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do chck, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.). I still do it sometimes on the first




to:

* NewspaperComic/NonSequitur
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ImNotAngry
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SkyCrawlers

to:

* SkyCrawlers
TheSkyCrawlers

Added: 40

Changed: 11

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*

Articles I have contributed greatly to, and perhaps led you to this page:

to:

*

* SkyCrawlers

Articles I have contributed greatly to, and perhaps led you to this page:page:
ZipMeUp

Articles I've taken under my wing

Top