Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** The production team [[https://www.startrek.com/article/cause-and-effect-25-years-later had hoped]] to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Creator/KelseyGrammer (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts. If this had come to pass, and the dates used in the final version were not changed, this would have caused a fairly epic ContinuitySnarl, as 2278 is seven years ''before'' ''Star Trek II''.
to:
** The production team [[https://www.startrek.com/article/cause-and-effect-25-years-later had hoped]] to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Creator/KelseyGrammer (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts. If this had come to pass, and the dates used in the final version were not changed, this would have caused a fairly epic ContinuitySnarl, as 2278 is seven years ''before'' ''Star Star Trek II''.II.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** The production team [[https://www.startrek.com/article/cause-and-effect-25-years-later had hoped]] to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Creator/KelseyGrammer (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts. If this had come to pass, and the dates used in the final version were not changed, this would have caused a fairly epic ContinuitySnarl, as 2278 is seven years ''before'' Star Trek II.
to:
** The production team [[https://www.startrek.com/article/cause-and-effect-25-years-later had hoped]] to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Creator/KelseyGrammer (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts. If this had come to pass, and the dates used in the final version were not changed, this would have caused a fairly epic ContinuitySnarl, as 2278 is seven years ''before'' Star ''Star Trek II.II''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Executive producer Rick Berman insisted that each time loop would have no reused footage. As a consequence director Jonathan Frakes had the cameras film scenes from multiple angles to make every scene appear different. Eventually the film crew started including odd angles such as the overhead shot of the conference room in the final loop. A case of TropesAreTools since fans (including Website/SFDebris) agree that the lack of reused footage helps set the episode apart from most GroundhogDayLoop stories.
to:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Executive producer Rick Berman insisted that each time loop would have no reused footage. As a consequence consequence, director Jonathan Frakes had the cameras film scenes from multiple angles to make every scene appear different. Eventually the film crew started including odd angles such as the overhead shot of the conference room in the final loop. A case of TropesAreTools since fans (including Website/SFDebris) agree that the lack of reused footage helps set the episode apart from most GroundhogDayLoop stories.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The production team [[https://www.startrek.com/article/cause-and-effect-25-years-later had hoped]] to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Creator/KelseyGrammer (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts. If this had come to pass, and the dates used in the final version were not changed, this would have caused a fairly epic ContinuitySnarl, as 2278 is seven years ''before'' Star Trek II.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: WhatCouldHaveBeen:
** The production team [[https://www.startrek.com/article/cause-and-effect-25-years-later had hoped]] to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Creator/KelseyGrammer (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts. If this had come to pass, and the dates used in the final version were not changed, this would have caused a fairly epic ContinuitySnarl, as 2278 is seven years ''before'' Star TrekII.II.
** There were other design options for the ''Bozeman'' including a brand new design or even a ''TOS''-era ''Constitution''-class. Budget problems forced them to reuse the old ''Reliant'' model instead.
** The production team [[https://www.startrek.com/article/cause-and-effect-25-years-later had hoped]] to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Creator/KelseyGrammer (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts. If this had come to pass, and the dates used in the final version were not changed, this would have caused a fairly epic ContinuitySnarl, as 2278 is seven years ''before'' Star Trek
** There were other design options for the ''Bozeman'' including a brand new design or even a ''TOS''-era ''Constitution''-class. Budget problems forced them to reuse the old ''Reliant'' model instead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Executive producer Rick Berman insisted that each time loop would have no reused footage. As a consequence director Jonathan Frakes had the cameras film scenes from multiple angles to make every scene appear different. Eventually the film crew started including odd angles such as the overhead shot of the conference room in the final loop. A case of TropesAreTools since fans (including WebOriginal/SFDebris) agree that the lack of reused footage helps set the episode apart from most GroundhogDayLoop stories.
to:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Executive producer Rick Berman insisted that each time loop would have no reused footage. As a consequence director Jonathan Frakes had the cameras film scenes from multiple angles to make every scene appear different. Eventually the film crew started including odd angles such as the overhead shot of the conference room in the final loop. A case of TropesAreTools since fans (including WebOriginal/SFDebris) Website/SFDebris) agree that the lack of reused footage helps set the episode apart from most GroundhogDayLoop stories.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Executive producer Rick Berman insisted that each time loop would have no reused footage. As a consequence director Jonathan Frakes had the cameras film scenes from multiple angles to make every scene appear different. Eventually the film crew started including odd angles such as the overhead shot of the conference room in the final loop. A case of TropesAreTools since fans (including WebVideo/SFDebris) agree that the lack of reused footage helps set the episode apart from most GroundhogDayLoop stories.
to:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Executive producer Rick Berman insisted that each time loop would have no reused footage. As a consequence director Jonathan Frakes had the cameras film scenes from multiple angles to make every scene appear different. Eventually the film crew started including odd angles such as the overhead shot of the conference room in the final loop. A case of TropesAreTools since fans (including WebVideo/SFDebris) WebOriginal/SFDebris) agree that the lack of reused footage helps set the episode apart from most GroundhogDayLoop stories.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Executive producer Rick Berman insisted that each time loop would have no reused footage. As a consequence director Jonathan Frakes had the cameras film scenes from multiple angles to make every scene appear different. Eventually the film crew started including odd angles such as the overhead shot of the conference room in the final loop.
to:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Executive producer Rick Berman insisted that each time loop would have no reused footage. As a consequence director Jonathan Frakes had the cameras film scenes from multiple angles to make every scene appear different. Eventually the film crew started including odd angles such as the overhead shot of the conference room in the final loop. A case of TropesAreTools since fans (including WebVideo/SFDebris) agree that the lack of reused footage helps set the episode apart from most GroundhogDayLoop stories.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* PropRecycling: The USS ''Bozeman'' is a reuse of the Miranda-class USS ''Reliant'' model from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan''.
to:
* PropRecycling: The USS ''Bozeman'' is a modified reuse of the Miranda-class USS ''Reliant'' model from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Executive producer Rick Berman insisted that each time loop would have no reused footage. As a consequence director Jonathan Frakes had the cameras film scenes from multiple angles to make every scene appear different including the overhead shot of the conference room in the final loop.
to:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Executive producer Rick Berman insisted that each time loop would have no reused footage. As a consequence director Jonathan Frakes had the cameras film scenes from multiple angles to make every scene appear different different. Eventually the film crew started including odd angles such as the overhead shot of the conference room in the final loop.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Apparently producer Rick Berman insisted that each time loop would have no reused footage. As a consequence director Jonathan Frakes had the cameras film scenes from multiple angles to make every scene appear different including the overhead shot of the conference room in the final loop.
to:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Apparently Executive producer Rick Berman insisted that each time loop would have no reused footage. As a consequence director Jonathan Frakes had the cameras film scenes from multiple angles to make every scene appear different including the overhead shot of the conference room in the final loop.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Apparently producer Rick Berman insisted that each time loop would have no reused footage. As a consequence director Jonathan Frakes had the cameras film scenes from multiple angles to make every scene appear different including the overhead shot of the conference room in the final loop.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* BeamMeUpScotty: In a fashion. Despite being the fifth season of ''TNG'', this is the first time the phrase "eject the warp core" had ever been uttered in any ''Star Trek'' production.
to:
* BeamMeUpScotty: In a fashion. Despite being the fifth season of ''TNG'', this is the first time the phrase "eject the warp core" had ever been uttered in any ''Star Trek'' production. The nearest previous instance had been in "Yesterday's Enterprise", where the alternate-timeline Geordi said he might have to "dump the core".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The production team [[https://www.startrek.com/article/cause-and-effect-25-years-later had hoped]] to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Creator/KelseyGrammer (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts.
** If this had come to pass, and the dates used in the final version were not changed, this would have caused a fairly epic ContinuitySnarl, as 2278 is seven years ''before'' Star Trek II.
** If this had come to pass, and the dates used in the final version were not changed, this would have caused a fairly epic ContinuitySnarl, as 2278 is seven years ''before'' Star Trek II.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The production team [[https://www.startrek.com/article/cause-and-effect-25-years-later had hoped]] to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Creator/KelseyGrammer (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts.
**conflicts. If this had come to pass, and the dates used in the final version were not changed, this would have caused a fairly epic ContinuitySnarl, as 2278 is seven years ''before'' Star Trek II.
**
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* PropRecycling: The USS ''Bozeman'' is a reuse of the Miranda-class USS ''Reliant'' model from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* BeamMeUpScotty: In a fashion. Despite being the fifth season of ''TNG'', this is the first time the phrase "eject the warp core" had ever been uttered in any ''Star Trek'' production.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The production team had hoped to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Creator/KelseyGrammer (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The production team [[https://www.startrek.com/article/cause-and-effect-25-years-later had hoped hoped]] to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Creator/KelseyGrammer (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The production team had hoped to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Creator/KelseyGrammar (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The production team had hoped to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Creator/KelseyGrammar Creator/KelseyGrammer (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The production team had hoped to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Kelsey Grammar (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The production team had hoped to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Kelsey Grammar Creator/KelseyGrammar (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
** If this had come to pass, and the dates used in the final version were not changed, this would have caused a fairly epic ContinuitySnarl, as 2278 is seven years ''before'' Star Trek II.
** The ''Star Trek: 30 Years and Beyond'' special [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qxD2eoh-W4 would feature]] the cast of ''Series/{{Frasier}}'' as members of ''Voyager''.
** The ''Star Trek: 30 Years and Beyond'' special [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qxD2eoh-W4 would feature]] the cast of ''Series/{{Frasier}}'' as members of ''Voyager''.
to:
** If this had come to pass, and the dates used in the final version were not changed, this would have caused a fairly epic ContinuitySnarl, as 2278 is seven years ''before'' Star Trek II.
** The ''Star Trek: 30 Years and Beyond'' special [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qxD2eoh-W4 would feature]] the cast of ''Series/{{Frasier}}'' as members of ''Voyager''.II.
** The ''Star Trek: 30 Years and Beyond'' special [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qxD2eoh-W4 would feature]] the cast of ''Series/{{Frasier}}'' as members of ''Voyager''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** If this had come to pass, and the dates used in the final version were not changed, this would have caused a fairly epic ContinuitySnarl, as 2278 is seven years ''before'' ''Wrath of Khan''.
to:
** If this had come to pass, and the dates used in the final version were not changed, this would have caused a fairly epic ContinuitySnarl, as 2278 is seven years ''before'' ''Wrath of Khan''.Star Trek II.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not trivia
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* CreatorsPet: The ''Bozeman'' is Brannon Braga's pet starship, since he's from Bozeman, Montana.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** The Emmy Awards [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6iI1iSdXGM would feature]] the cast of ''Series/{{Frasier}}'' as members of ''Voyager''.
to:
** The Emmy Awards [[http://www.''Star Trek: 30 Years and Beyond'' special [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6iI1iSdXGM com/watch?v=8qxD2eoh-W4 would feature]] the cast of ''Series/{{Frasier}}'' as members of ''Voyager''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* HeyItsThatGuy: Kelsey Grammar as Captain Morgan Bateson.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** If this had come to pass, and the dates used in the final version were not changed, this would have caused a fairly epic ContinuitySnarl, as 2278 is seven years ''before'' ''Wrath of Khan''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CreatorsPet: The ''Bozeman'' is Brannon Braga's pet starship, since he's from Bozeman, Montana.
* HeyItsThatGuy: Kelsey Grammar as Captain Morgan Bateson.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The production team had hoped to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Kelsey Grammar (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts.
** The Emmy Awards [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6iI1iSdXGM would feature]] the cast of ''Series/{{Frasier}}'' as members of ''Voyager''.
* HeyItsThatGuy: Kelsey Grammar as Captain Morgan Bateson.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The production team had hoped to get Creator/KirstieAlley to reprise her role as Lt. Saavik from ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' for a cameo appearance behind Kelsey Grammar (doubling as a CastingGag due to both having had main character roles in ''Series/{{Cheers}}'') but could not due to scheduling conflicts.
** The Emmy Awards [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6iI1iSdXGM would feature]] the cast of ''Series/{{Frasier}}'' as members of ''Voyager''.
