Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Role Reprise requires a gap of at least 5 years.
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* DyeingForYourArt: The male Thal extras, largely performed by Covent Garden porters, negotiated a special fee for having to have their chest- and arm-hair shaved.
to:
* DyeingForYourArt: The male Thal extras, largely performed by Covent Garden porters, negotiated a special fee for having to have their chest- chests and arm-hair arms shaved.
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* PropRecycling: Some of the Dalek models built for the film would find their way back into the tv series in the following years. In another rather amusing example, for a long time it was thought that the movie's TARDIS met its end in an episode of ''Series/TheNewAvengers'' in 1976, blown to pieces by an exploding pram, but some detective work from the [[http://www.dalek6388.co.uk/ Dalek6388]] site discovered that was actually Creator/PinewoodStudios' prop (each studio having a police box prop to play actual police boxes). The Shepperton prop used for the movie made various appearances in movies and television until 1971, playing a regular old police box once more.
to:
* PropRecycling: Some of the Dalek models built for the film would find their way back into the tv TV series in the following years. In another rather amusing example, for a long time it was thought that the movie's TARDIS met its end in an episode of ''Series/TheNewAvengers'' in 1976, blown to pieces by an exploding pram, but some detective work from the [[http://www.dalek6388.co.uk/ Dalek6388]] site discovered that was actually Creator/PinewoodStudios' prop (each studio having a police box prop to play actual police boxes). The Shepperton prop used for the movie made various appearances in movies and television until 1971, playing a regular old police box once more.
Deleted line(s) 7 (click to see context) :
* RoleReprise: Though uncredited, Peter Hawkins and David Graham reprised their roles as the Dalek voices.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Just because the BBC may or may not own the rights to this movie and Daleks Invasion Earth 2150 AD doesn't mean it's out of print. Both movies are available on Blu-ray and Britbox, and a UHD Blu-ray release is coming out this year.
Deleted line(s) 4 (click to see context) :
* KeepCirculatingTheTapes: Creator/TheBBC doesn't own this movie; nor does it own the sequel, ''Film/DaleksInvasionEarth2150AD''. Both are owned by Creator/StudioCanal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* FriendshipOnTheSet: Creator/PeterCushing developed such a rapport with Roberta Tovey that he would only return for the sequel if she did.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* KeepCirculatingTheTapes: Creator/TheBBC doesn't own this movie; nor does it own the sequel, ''Film/DaleksInvasionEarth2150AD''. Both are owned by Creator/StudioCanal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* OneTakeWonder: As an incentive Roberta Tovey (who was 11 at the time the film was produced) was paid a [[UsefulNotes/OldBritishMoney shilling]] (5p) by director Gordon Flemyng every time she did a scene in one take. She made so much money, Flemyng didn't offer her the same deal for the sequel.
to:
* OneTakeWonder: As an incentive Roberta Tovey (who was 11 at the time the film was produced) was paid a [[UsefulNotes/OldBritishMoney shilling]] 1/-]] (5p) by director Gordon Flemyng every time she did a scene in one take. She made so much money, Flemyng didn't offer her the same deal for the sequel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* PropRecycling: Some of the Dalek models built for the film would find their way back into the tv series in the following years. In another rather amusing example, for a long time it was thought that the movie's TARDIS met its end in an episode of ''Series/TheNewAvengers'' in 1976, blown to pieces by an exploding pram, but some detective work from the [[http://www.dalek6388.co.uk/ Dalek6388]] site discovered that was actually Creator/PinewoodStudio's prop (each studio having a police box prop to play actual police boxes). The Shepperton prop used for the movie made various appearances in movies and television until 1971, playing a regular old police box once more.
to:
* PropRecycling: Some of the Dalek models built for the film would find their way back into the tv series in the following years. In another rather amusing example, for a long time it was thought that the movie's TARDIS met its end in an episode of ''Series/TheNewAvengers'' in 1976, blown to pieces by an exploding pram, but some detective work from the [[http://www.dalek6388.co.uk/ Dalek6388]] site discovered that was actually Creator/PinewoodStudio's Creator/PinewoodStudios' prop (each studio having a police box prop to play actual police boxes). The Shepperton prop used for the movie made various appearances in movies and television until 1971, playing a regular old police box once more.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* PropRecycling: Some of the Dalek models built for the film would find their way back into the tv series in the following years. In another rather amusing example, for a long time it was thought that the movie's ''Tardis'' met its end in an episode of [[Series/TheAvengers1960s The New Avengers]] in 1976, blown to pieces by an exploding pram, but some detective work from the [[http://www.dalek6388.co.uk/ Dalek6388]] site discovered that was actually Pinewood Studio's prop (each studio having a police box prop to play actual police boxes). The Shepperton prop used for the movie made various appearances in movies and tv until 1971, playing a regular old police box once more.
to:
* PropRecycling: Some of the Dalek models built for the film would find their way back into the tv series in the following years. In another rather amusing example, for a long time it was thought that the movie's ''Tardis'' TARDIS met its end in an episode of [[Series/TheAvengers1960s The New Avengers]] ''Series/TheNewAvengers'' in 1976, blown to pieces by an exploding pram, but some detective work from the [[http://www.dalek6388.co.uk/ Dalek6388]] site discovered that was actually Pinewood Studio's Creator/PinewoodStudio's prop (each studio having a police box prop to play actual police boxes). The Shepperton prop used for the movie made various appearances in movies and tv television until 1971, playing a regular old police box once more.
Changed line(s) 6,7 (click to see context) from:
* RoleReprise:
** Though uncredited, Peter Hawkins and David Graham reprised their roles as the Dalek voices.
** Though uncredited, Peter Hawkins and David Graham reprised their roles as the Dalek voices.
to:
* RoleReprise:
**RoleReprise: Though uncredited, Peter Hawkins and David Graham reprised their roles as the Dalek voices.
**
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 7 (click to see context) :
* PropRecycling: Some of the Dalek models built for the film would find their way back into the tv series in the following years. In another rather amusing example, for a long time it was thought that the movie's ''Tardis'' met its end in an episode of [[Series/TheAvengers1960s The New Avengers]] in 1976, blown to pieces by an exploding pram, but some detective work from the [[http://www.dalek6388.co.uk/ Dalek6388]] site discovered that was actually Pinewood Studio's prop (each studio having a police box prop to play actual police boxes). The Shepperton prop used for the movie made various appearances in movies and tv until 1971, playing a regular old police box once more.
Deleted line(s) 7 (click to see context) :
** In a reverse of this, the Dalek models used in this story were eventually reused in the actual series.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** Originally the Daleks were to be armed with flamethrowers, but these were vetoed on health and safety grounds and because they were considered too frightening for a young audience. Instead, the guns produced jets of CO2 gas from internally mounted fire extinguishers.
to:
** Originally the Daleks were to be armed with flamethrowers, but these were vetoed on health and safety grounds and because they were considered too frightening for a young audience. Instead, the guns produced jets of CO2 carbon dioxide gas from internally mounted fire extinguishers. extinguishers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: It was planned to show one of the denizens of the swamp of mutations, but the prop constructed for the sequence was deemed rather unconvincing. In contrast, a writhing creature designed to be glimpsed inside a Dalek casing was judged too unsettling for the family audience the film was aimed at[[note]]the producers, in fact, prided themselves on not relying on gore, shock and sex like their rivals at Hammer, and Milton Subotsky himself apparently demanded the full shots of the Dalek mutant removed as he felt they were just "shock and horror for shock and horror's sake"[[/note]].
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: WhatCouldHaveBeen:
** It was planned to show one of the denizens of the swamp of mutations, but the prop constructed for the sequence was deemed rather unconvincing. In contrast, a writhing creature designed to be glimpsed inside a Dalek casing was judged too unsettling for the family audience the film was aimed at[[note]]the producers, in fact, prided themselves on not relying on gore, shock and sex like their rivals at Hammer, and Milton Subotsky himself apparently demanded the full shots of the Dalek mutant removed as he felt they were just "shock and horror for shock and horror'ssake"[[/note]].sake"[[/note]].
** Originally the Daleks were to be armed with flamethrowers, but these were vetoed on health and safety grounds and because they were considered too frightening for a young audience. Instead, the guns produced jets of CO2 gas from internally mounted fire extinguishers.
** It was planned to show one of the denizens of the swamp of mutations, but the prop constructed for the sequence was deemed rather unconvincing. In contrast, a writhing creature designed to be glimpsed inside a Dalek casing was judged too unsettling for the family audience the film was aimed at[[note]]the producers, in fact, prided themselves on not relying on gore, shock and sex like their rivals at Hammer, and Milton Subotsky himself apparently demanded the full shots of the Dalek mutant removed as he felt they were just "shock and horror for shock and horror's
** Originally the Daleks were to be armed with flamethrowers, but these were vetoed on health and safety grounds and because they were considered too frightening for a young audience. Instead, the guns produced jets of CO2 gas from internally mounted fire extinguishers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: It was planned to show one of the denizens of the swamp of mutations, but the prop constructed for the sequence was deemed rather unconvincing. In contrast, a writhing creature designed to be glimpsed inside a Dalek casing was judged too unsettling for the family audience the film was aimed at[[note]]the producers, in fact, prided themselves on not relying on gore, shock and sex like their rivals at Hammer, and Milton Subotsky himself apparently demanded the full shots of the Dalek mutant removed as he felt they were just "shock and horror for shock and horror's sake".
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: It was planned to show one of the denizens of the swamp of mutations, but the prop constructed for the sequence was deemed rather unconvincing. In contrast, a writhing creature designed to be glimpsed inside a Dalek casing was judged too unsettling for the family audience the film was aimed at[[note]]the producers, in fact, prided themselves on not relying on gore, shock and sex like their rivals at Hammer, and Milton Subotsky himself apparently demanded the full shots of the Dalek mutant removed as he felt they were just "shock and horror for shock and horror's sake".sake"[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: It was planned to show one of the denizens of the swamp of mutations, but the prop constructed for the sequence was deemed rather unconvincing. In contrast, a writhing creature designed to be glimpsed inside a Dalek casing was judged too unsettling for the family audience the film was aimed at.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: It was planned to show one of the denizens of the swamp of mutations, but the prop constructed for the sequence was deemed rather unconvincing. In contrast, a writhing creature designed to be glimpsed inside a Dalek casing was judged too unsettling for the family audience the film was aimed at.at[[note]]the producers, in fact, prided themselves on not relying on gore, shock and sex like their rivals at Hammer, and Milton Subotsky himself apparently demanded the full shots of the Dalek mutant removed as he felt they were just "shock and horror for shock and horror's sake".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* OneTakeWonder: As an incentive Roberta Tovey (who was 11 at the time the film was produced) was paid a shilling (5p) by director Gordon Flemyng every time she did a scene in one take. She made so much money, Flemyng didn't offer her the same deal for the sequel.
to:
* OneTakeWonder: As an incentive Roberta Tovey (who was 11 at the time the film was produced) was paid a shilling [[UsefulNotes/OldBritishMoney shilling]] (5p) by director Gordon Flemyng every time she did a scene in one take. She made so much money, Flemyng didn't offer her the same deal for the sequel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
A reprisal is a retaliatory attack; this is now Role Reprise.
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* RoleReprisal:
to:
* RoleReprisal: RoleReprise:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* RoleReprisal: Though uncredited, Peter Hawkins and David Graham reprised their roles as the Dalek voices.
to:
* RoleReprisal: RoleReprisal:
** Though uncredited, Peter Hawkins and David Graham reprised their roles as the Dalek voices.
** Though uncredited, Peter Hawkins and David Graham reprised their roles as the Dalek voices.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 3 (click to see context) :
* ActorInspiredElement: Keen amateur florist Creator/PeterCushing contributed the name "lilium philadelphicum" for the flower Susan discovers growing on Skaro.
* DyeingForYourArt: The male Thal extras, largely performed by Covent Garden porters, negotiated a special fee for having to have their chest- and arm-hair shaved.
* OneTakeWonder: As an incentive Roberta Tovey (who was 11 at the time the film was produced) was paid a shilling (5p) by director Gordon Flemyng every time she did a scene in one take. She made so much money, Flemyng didn't offer her the same deal for the sequel.
* DyeingForYourArt: The male Thal extras, largely performed by Covent Garden porters, negotiated a special fee for having to have their chest- and arm-hair shaved.
* OneTakeWonder: As an incentive Roberta Tovey (who was 11 at the time the film was produced) was paid a shilling (5p) by director Gordon Flemyng every time she did a scene in one take. She made so much money, Flemyng didn't offer her the same deal for the sequel.
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** In a reverse of this, the Dalek models used in this story were eventually reused in the actual series.
to:
** In a reverse of this, the Dalek models used in this story were eventually reused in the actual series.series.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: It was planned to show one of the denizens of the swamp of mutations, but the prop constructed for the sequence was deemed rather unconvincing. In contrast, a writhing creature designed to be glimpsed inside a Dalek casing was judged too unsettling for the family audience the film was aimed at.
----
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: It was planned to show one of the denizens of the swamp of mutations, but the prop constructed for the sequence was deemed rather unconvincing. In contrast, a writhing creature designed to be glimpsed inside a Dalek casing was judged too unsettling for the family audience the film was aimed at.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* RoleReprisal: Though uncredited, Peter Hawkins and David Graham reprised their roles as the Dalek voices.
to:
* RoleReprisal: Though uncredited, Peter Hawkins and David Graham reprised their roles as the Dalek voices.voices.
** In a reverse of this, the Dalek models used in this story were eventually reused in the actual series.
** In a reverse of this, the Dalek models used in this story were eventually reused in the actual series.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ReferencedBy: The movies' Daleks have cameos in, of all things, ''Film/LooneyTunesBackInAction'' (in the Area 52 scene).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* RoleReprisal: Though uncredited, Peter Hawkins and David Graham reprised their roles as the Dalek voices.