Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope was cut/disambiguated due to cleanup
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
** Zoë Lessard, Mission Scientist, [[CanadaEh Canadian]].
to:
** Zoë Lessard, Mission Scientist, [[CanadaEh Canadian]].Canadian.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Misspelled word, "is" to "if"
Changed line(s) 23 (click to see context) from:
** The [[SomeKindOfForcefield force-field]]-like magnetic radiation shielding - purely theoretical; although is they have access to ''magnetically''-contained fusion, it's not much of a stretch.
to:
** The [[SomeKindOfForcefield force-field]]-like magnetic radiation shielding - purely theoretical; although is if they have access to ''magnetically''-contained fusion, it's not much of a stretch.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The Chick is now a disambig.
Deleted line(s) 35 (click to see context) :
%% * TheChick: Sulman.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
** To leave the surface of Venus and go back to orbit requires about 27 kilometers per second of delta-v (change in velocity), because of its dense atmosphere. For comparison, orbiting Earth requires a delta-v of 9 to 10 km/s. The rocket would need to be much larger (and be multi-stage instead of a single stage, like in [[https://youtu.be/Em11onVu8_E?t=1317 this video]]), or the engine would need to have both high thrust and very high efficiency. Real-life spaceflight propulsion systems have had one or the other, but not both.
to:
** To leave the surface of Venus and go back to orbit requires about 27 kilometers per second of delta-v (change in velocity), because of its dense atmosphere. For comparison, orbiting Earth requires a delta-v of 9 to 10 km/s. The rocket would need to be A much larger (and be multi-stage rocket (multi-stage instead of a single stage, single-stage, like in [[https://youtu.be/Em11onVu8_E?t=1317 this video]]), video]]) would be needed, or the a high-thrust engine would need to have both high thrust and very high efficiency. Real-life spaceflight propulsion systems have had one or that was way more efficient than anything conceived in real life, even the other, but not both.aforementioned aerospikes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
** To leave the surface of Venus and go back to orbit requires about 27 kilometers per second of delta-v (change in velocity). For comparison, orbiting Earth requires a delta-v of 9 to 10 km/s. The rocket would need to be much larger (and be multi-stage instead of a single stage, like in [[https://youtu.be/Em11onVu8_E?t=1317 this video]]), or the engine would need to have both high thrust and very high efficiency. Real-life spaceflight propulsion systems have had one or the other, but not both.
to:
** To leave the surface of Venus and go back to orbit requires about 27 kilometers per second of delta-v (change in velocity).velocity), because of its dense atmosphere. For comparison, orbiting Earth requires a delta-v of 9 to 10 km/s. The rocket would need to be much larger (and be multi-stage instead of a single stage, like in [[https://youtu.be/Em11onVu8_E?t=1317 this video]]), or the engine would need to have both high thrust and very high efficiency. Real-life spaceflight propulsion systems have had one or the other, but not both.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
** To leave the surface of Venus and go back to orbit requires about 27 kilometers per second of delta-v (change in velocity). For comparison, orbiting Earth requires a delta-v of 9 to 10 km/s. The rocket would need to be much larger (and be multi-stage instead of a single stage), or the engine would need to have both high thrust and very high efficiency. Real-life spaceflight propulsion systems have had one or the other, but not both.
to:
** To leave the surface of Venus and go back to orbit requires about 27 kilometers per second of delta-v (change in velocity). For comparison, orbiting Earth requires a delta-v of 9 to 10 km/s. The rocket would need to be much larger (and be multi-stage instead of a single stage), stage, like in [[https://youtu.be/Em11onVu8_E?t=1317 this video]]), or the engine would need to have both high thrust and very high efficiency. Real-life spaceflight propulsion systems have had one or the other, but not both.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
** The toroidal aerospike rockets that allow the landers ''Orpheus'' and ''Ares'' to descend to and take off from Venus and Mars respectively - aerospike engines have undergone testing and a ''linear'' aerospike was even proposed for the Space Shuttle, but none have been flown into space,.
to:
** The toroidal aerospike rockets that allow the landers ''Orpheus'' and ''Ares'' to descend to and take off from Venus and Mars respectively - aerospike engines have undergone testing and a ''linear'' aerospike was even proposed for the Space Shuttle, but none have been flown into space,.space.
** To leave the surface of Venus and go back to orbit requires about 27 kilometers per second of delta-v (change in velocity). For comparison, orbiting Earth requires a delta-v of 9 to 10 km/s. The rocket would need to be much larger (and be multi-stage instead of a single stage), or the engine would need to have both high thrust and very high efficiency. Real-life spaceflight propulsion systems have had one or the other, but not both.
** To leave the surface of Venus and go back to orbit requires about 27 kilometers per second of delta-v (change in velocity). For comparison, orbiting Earth requires a delta-v of 9 to 10 km/s. The rocket would need to be much larger (and be multi-stage instead of a single stage), or the engine would need to have both high thrust and very high efficiency. Real-life spaceflight propulsion systems have had one or the other, but not both.
