Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Series / MurderOne

Go To

OR

Changed: 84

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added spoiler tags for the epilogue. Other plot points on this page have spoiler tags, so it seems odd that the main points of the ending do not. If the page had a notice that the series is so old that all spoilers are in the clear, that would be one thing, but may I request that the spoiler tags—including my new ones—remain in place until that happens?


* WhereAreTheyNowEpilogue: The series ends with the arrest of the real murderer. Subsequent captions tell us that he was convicted and is currently on death row, that the doctor who had worked for him to frame Neil is serving a ten-year prison sentence for perverting the course of justice, and that Richard Cross died of AIDS a few days after speaking at Neil's appeal.

to:

* WhereAreTheyNowEpilogue: The series ends with the arrest of the real murderer. Subsequent captions tell us that he [[spoiler:he]] was convicted and is currently on death row, that the doctor [[spoiler:doctor]] who had worked for him [[spoiler:him]] to frame Neil [[spoiler:Neil]] is serving a ten-year prison sentence for perverting the course of justice, and that Richard Cross [[spoiler:Richard Cross]] died of AIDS [[spoiler:of AIDS]] a few days after speaking at Neil's [[spoiler:Neil]]'s appeal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GoodLawyersGoodClients: Nuh-uh. Teddy Hoffman, as played by Daniel Benzali, is a ''good'' lawyer, but he's not a Good Guy. Not a Bad Guy, either, mind you: he's in a class of his own. And although there are a few innocent people scattered about, most of the clients that Hoffman and Associates are seen to represent are guilty, and require good defense lawyers to get them the best possible deal, rather than a not guilty verdict.

to:

* GoodLawyersGoodClients: Nuh-uh. Teddy Hoffman, as played by Daniel Benzali, Creator/DanielBenzali, is a ''good'' lawyer, but he's not a Good Guy. Not a Bad Guy, either, mind you: he's in a class of his own. And although there are a few innocent people scattered about, most of the clients that Hoffman and Associates are seen to represent are guilty, and require good defense lawyers to get them the best possible deal, rather than a not guilty verdict.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HelloAttorney: Multiple examples, with Creator/MaryMcCormack as Justine Appleton being the most apparent.

to:

* HelloAttorney: Multiple examples, with Creator/MaryMcCormack as Justine Appleton being the most apparent. When asked how she dealt with a prickly client, she deadpans "I practised my posture for him" and arches her back slightly to draw attention to her chest.



* ReasonableAuthorityFigure: A good number of them, as the legal process is mostly depicted in a good light. In particular ADA Miriam Grasso is a shining light of fairness. She might be prosecuting Neil Avedon, but she doesn't hold this fact against anyone in Hoffman and Associates or their many other defendants. Some of the trial judges in the single episode cases also stand out, such as the judge that does his level best to settle a neighborly dispute without court time, and then issues the guilty party with a lenient sentence that reflects the true facts of the case.

to:

* ReasonableAuthorityFigure: A good number of them, as the legal process is mostly depicted in a good light. In particular ADA Miriam Grasso is a shining light of fairness. She might be prosecuting Neil Avedon, but she doesn't hold this fact against anyone in Hoffman and Associates or their many other defendants. Some of the trial judges in the single episode cases also stand out, such as the judge that does his level best to settle a neighborly dispute without court time, and then when that fails, issues the guilty party with a lenient sentence that reflects the true facts of the case.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AffablyEvil: Richard Cross. He keeps his cards close to his chest but it's always clear he's up to something shady and is not someone to fully trust or treat lightly yet he rarely has any issue manipulating even those who are smart enough to know his game, due in no small part to being played by Creator/StanleyTucci who oozes charisma, style and dark wit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HypercompetentSidekick: Louis makes it abundantly clear in pretty much every scene he's in that he is the go-to guy at Hoffman & Associates for anything to do with running the day-to-day. In Season Two, [[Creator/PauleyPerrette Gwen]] fills the same role for Jimmy Wyler, but after she leaves, Louis comes straight back to his old role and owns it just as effortlessly as before.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EveryoneKnewAlready: when it's finally revealed publicly that [[spoiler: Chris and Lisa]] are dating, Teddy asks if he's the only one who didn't already know. Louis deadpans "I think there's a Temp in Typing."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Bald Of Awesome is being renamed and redefined per TRS decision


* BaldOfAwesome: Ted Hoffman is played by Daniel Benzali, so this is pretty much a given. Also he is recognized in universe as an awesome defense attorney, hair or no hair.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheSwearJar: Ted Hoffman had one at home, monitored by his young daughter. When he said cursed and she brought him the jar, he smiled.
--->'''Hoffman:''' Here's a quarter -- and a kiss.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added an example from the trope page.

Added DiffLines:

* OminousLegalPhraseTitle: Derived from another name for first-degree murder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AmoralAttorney: The firm's lawyers often walk down the knife edge of acceptable behavior, staying just out of this trope. One divorce lawyer that we meet, however, not only embodies this trope but gleefully embraces it. The morality is made even grayer by the fact that, while defending people they may know to be murderers, the lawyers genuinely believe in what they are doing, that every individual deserves the best legal aid they can get.

to:

* AmoralAttorney: The firm's lawyers often walk down the knife edge of acceptable behavior, staying just out of the ''Immoral'' Attorney version of this trope. One divorce lawyer that we meet, however, not only embodies this trope it, but gleefully embraces it. it, at least until Teddy convinces the prospective divorcee that it's not the way to go. The morality is made show reflects the moral neutrality that Lawyers are supposed to maintain in RealLife; even grayer by the fact that, while if they are defending people they may actually know to be murderers, guilty[[note]]A good lawyer will ''never'' ask their clients if they did it, because the job is the same regardless of how the client answers[[/note]], lawyers genuinely believe in what they are doing, that every individual deserves required by their oaths to be zealous advocates for their clients. The Quotes page for AmoralAttorney features a lengthy speech by Ted Hoffman to his juniors outlining his thoughts on the best legal aid they can get.matter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HelloAttorney: Multiple examples, with Mary [=McCormack=] as Justine Appleton being the most apparent.

to:

* HelloAttorney: Multiple examples, with Mary [=McCormack=] Creator/MaryMcCormack as Justine Appleton being the most apparent.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InspectorJavert: Arthur Polson comes across this way at first, since he is the lead detective investigating the Costello murder.

to:

* InspectorJavert: Arthur Polson comes across this way at first, since he is the lead detective investigating the Costello murder. [[spoiler: Later, this turns into something of an advantage for Hoffman & Associates, because once he starts suspecting that he ''might'' not have arrested the right man, he can't leave it alone.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ClueEvidenceAndASmokingGun: handled very realistically. Through most of the series, the clues and evidence are suggestive, but not conclusive. When a smoking gun finally turns up, the lawyers have to spend most of an entire episode getting that evidence verified by experts, then have to convince a judge to allow it to be admitted, then have to defend it against the prosecution's attacks. [[spoiler: Although in the last of those, it's against the DA rather than the prosecutor Miriam Grasso, because she's convinced it's genuine and he doesn't want to give up a win.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DropDeadGorgeous: Jessica Costello's body is found completely naked, and she's shown from behind. Given that she's supposed to be 15 years old, this is quite extreme for network television.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Murder One'' is LawProcedural that broke new ground during its run in the late 90s. Rather than follow a [[MysteryOfTheWeek new crime each week]], the show dedicates an entire season of 23 episodes to a single case, along with a number of side-plots. This provides an extremely detailed view of the central case, more akin to how actual lawyers would approach them. For example, several episodes are spent on the process of jury selection, something rarely covered on other shows at the time.

The first season was a hit, but the second season floundered with several key cast changes and a softening of the previous tight focus, causing its cancellation after the second season's conclusion.

to:

''Murder One'' is LawProcedural that broke new ground during its run in the late 90s. Rather than follow a [[MysteryOfTheWeek new crime each week]], the show dedicates an entire season of 23 episodes to a single case, along with a number of side-plots. case. This provides an extremely detailed view of the central case, more akin to how actual lawyers would approach them.it. For example, several episodes are spent on the process of jury selection, something rarely covered on other shows at the time. \n\n A number of smaller cases are handled as side-plots throughout the run.

The first season was a hit, but the second season floundered with due to several key cast changes and a softening of the previous tight focus, causing leading to the show's cancellation. In spite of its cancellation after brief run, the second season's conclusion.
show helped pave the way for increased serialization in prime-time drama shows.

Added: 198

Changed: 579

Removed: 108

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A LawProcedural like no other; the first season follows a single murder case across twenty three episodes, covering ground almost never seen in any other legal drama (several episodes are spent on the process of jury selection, for instance). The second season, with several key cast changes and a softening of the previous tight focus, was not as successful, but it's hardly devoid of interest.

to:

A ''Murder One'' is LawProcedural like no other; that broke new ground during its run in the first late 90s. Rather than follow a [[MysteryOfTheWeek new crime each week]], the show dedicates an entire season follows of 23 episodes to a single murder case across twenty three episodes, covering ground almost never seen in any other legal drama (several case, along with a number of side-plots. This provides an extremely detailed view of the central case, more akin to how actual lawyers would approach them. For example, several episodes are spent on the process of jury selection, for instance). something rarely covered on other shows at the time.

The first season was a hit, but the second season, season floundered with several key cast changes and a softening of the previous tight focus, was not as successful, but it's hardly devoid of interest.causing its cancellation after the second season's conclusion.



* BaldOfAwesome: Ted Hoffman is played by Daniel Benzali, so this is pretty much a given. Also he is recognised in universe as an awesome defense attorney, hair or no hair.

to:

* BaldOfAwesome: Ted Hoffman is played by Daniel Benzali, so this is pretty much a given. Also he is recognised recognized in universe as an awesome defense attorney, hair or no hair.



* HollywoodLaw: Averted. The lengthy process of trials and appeals are shown without obvious errors in law.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhereAreTheyNowEnding: The series ends with the arrest of the real murderer. Subsequent captions tell us that he was convicted and is currently on death row, that the doctor who had worked for him to frame Neil is serving a ten-year prison sentence for perverting the course of justice, and that Richard Cross died of AIDS a few days after speaking at Neil's appeal.

to:

* WhereAreTheyNowEnding: WhereAreTheyNowEpilogue: The series ends with the arrest of the real murderer. Subsequent captions tell us that he was convicted and is currently on death row, that the doctor who had worked for him to frame Neil is serving a ten-year prison sentence for perverting the course of justice, and that Richard Cross died of AIDS a few days after speaking at Neil's appeal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* WhereAreTheyNowEnding: The series ends with the arrest of the real murderer. Subsequent captions tell us that he was convicted and is currently on death row, that the doctor who had worked for him to frame Neil is serving a ten-year prison sentence for perverting the course of justice, and that Richard Cross died of AIDS a few days after speaking at Neil's appeal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ConspiracyTheorist: In episode eleven one of the potential jurors turns out to be convinced that Cross and Avedon are part of a Masonic plot. He takes his own dismissal as further evidence for this, naturally.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GoodLawyersGoodClients: Nuh-uh. Teddy Hoffman, as played by Daniel Benzali, is a ''good'' lawyer, but he's not a Good Guy. Not a Bad Guy, either, mind you: he's in a class of his own. And although there are a few innocent people scattered about, most of the clients that Hoffman and Associates are seen to represent are guilty, and require good defense lawyers to get them the best possible deal, rather than a not-guilty verdict.

to:

* GoodLawyersGoodClients: Nuh-uh. Teddy Hoffman, as played by Daniel Benzali, is a ''good'' lawyer, but he's not a Good Guy. Not a Bad Guy, either, mind you: he's in a class of his own. And although there are a few innocent people scattered about, most of the clients that Hoffman and Associates are seen to represent are guilty, and require good defense lawyers to get them the best possible deal, rather than a not-guilty not guilty verdict.



* StrawFeminist: {{Deconstructed}} in episode ten. A woman who works at a women's health clinic is a potential juror in the case, who's counseled rape victims in the past. The defense is afraid she might be biased given their client is charged with the rape and murder of a woman he was sleeping with, thinking she's a feminist who will have hostile views of him. Their jury consultant points out things she might feel which are in their favor though, showing they shouldn't assume this just on the basis of her (inferred) feminism.

to:

* StrawFeminist: {{Deconstructed}} {{Subverted}} in episode ten. A woman who works at a women's health clinic is a potential juror called in the case, Avedon trial, who's counseled rape victims in the past. The defense is afraid she might be biased given their client is charged with the rape and murder of a woman he was sleeping with, thinking she's a feminist who will thus have some hostile views of him. Their jury consultant points out things she might feel which are in their favor though, showing they shouldn't assume this just on the basis of her (inferred) feminism.

Added: 576

Changed: 866

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ReasonableAuthorityFigure: A good number of them, as the legal process is mostly depicted in a good light. In particular ADA Miriam Grasso is a shining light of fairness. She might be prosecuting Neil Avedon, but she doesn't hold this fact against anyone in Hoffman and Associates or their many other defendants. Some of the trial judges in the single episode cases also stand out, such as the judge that does his level best to settle a neighborly dispute without court time, and then issues the guilty party with a lenient sentence that reflects the true facts of the case.



* ReasonableAuthorityFigure: A good number of them, as the legal process is mostly depicted in a good light. In particular ADA Miriam Grasso is a shining light of fairness. She might be prosecuting Neil Avedon, but she doesn't hold this fact against anyone in Hoffman and Associates or their many other defendants. Some of the trial judges in the single episode cases also stand out, such as the judge that does his level best to settle a neighbourly dispute without court time, and then issues the guilty party with a lenient sentence that reflects the true facts of the case.

to:

* ReasonableAuthorityFigure: A good number of them, as the legal process is mostly depicted StrawFeminist: {{Deconstructed}} in episode ten. A woman who works at a good light. In particular ADA Miriam Grasso women's health clinic is a shining light of fairness. She potential juror in the case, who's counseled rape victims in the past. The defense is afraid she might be prosecuting Neil Avedon, but she doesn't hold this fact against anyone in Hoffman and Associates or biased given their many other defendants. Some of the trial judges in the single episode cases also stand out, such as the judge that does his level best to settle a neighbourly dispute without court time, and then issues the guilty party client is charged with a lenient sentence that reflects the true facts rape and murder of a woman he was sleeping with, thinking she's a feminist who will have hostile views of him. Their jury consultant points out things she might feel which are in their favor though, showing they shouldn't assume this just on the case.basis of her (inferred) feminism.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BoomerangBigot: Episode five has one Jewish man on trial for attacking another in an antisemitic outburst. This turns out to be the result of a brain tumor, which causes a dismissal as he couldn't help himself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FireForgedFriends: Polson and Hoffman. They spend the first half of season 1 openly antagonistic to each other, then [[spoiler:Hoffman's daughter is kidnapped and Polson goes out of his way to help bring her safely home.]] Afterwards the two are still on opposite sides of the legal process, but the respect level between them is noticeably increased.


Added DiffLines:

* InspectorJavert: Arthur Polson comes across this way at first, since he is the lead detective investigating the Costello murder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BaldOfAwesome: Ted Hoffman is played by Daniel Benzali, so this is pretty much a given. Also he is recognised in universe as an awesome defense attorney, hair or no hair.


Added DiffLines:

* DisposableSexWorker: The whole driving element of the first series, a dead fifteen year old prostitute.


Added DiffLines:

* ReasonableAuthorityFigure: A good number of them, as the legal process is mostly depicted in a good light. In particular ADA Miriam Grasso is a shining light of fairness. She might be prosecuting Neil Avedon, but she doesn't hold this fact against anyone in Hoffman and Associates or their many other defendants. Some of the trial judges in the single episode cases also stand out, such as the judge that does his level best to settle a neighbourly dispute without court time, and then issues the guilty party with a lenient sentence that reflects the true facts of the case.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved to the correct namespace.

Added DiffLines:

A LawProcedural like no other; the first season follows a single murder case across twenty three episodes, covering ground almost never seen in any other legal drama (several episodes are spent on the process of jury selection, for instance). The second season, with several key cast changes and a softening of the previous tight focus, was not as successful, but it's hardly devoid of interest.

----
!!Series One provides examples of:
* AlwaysMurder: Slightly averted in that several other trials, mostly not murders, are shown, mostly during the earlier episodes. But, well, [[ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin it is right there in the title.]]
* AmoralAttorney: The firm's lawyers often walk down the knife edge of acceptable behavior, staying just out of this trope. One divorce lawyer that we meet, however, not only embodies this trope but gleefully embraces it. The morality is made even grayer by the fact that, while defending people they may know to be murderers, the lawyers genuinely believe in what they are doing, that every individual deserves the best legal aid they can get.
* BigSecret: An awful lot of people have them. They tend to be very closely related to the case, rather than being incidental.
* DisregardThatStatement: Frequently. We also see the reverse, with lawyers attempting to limit testimony and questioning in advance of the witness taking the stand because "you can't unring a bell weeks after it's been rung".
* GoodLawyersGoodClients: Nuh-uh. Teddy Hoffman, as played by Daniel Benzali, is a ''good'' lawyer, but he's not a Good Guy. Not a Bad Guy, either, mind you: he's in a class of his own. And although there are a few innocent people scattered about, most of the clients that Hoffman and Associates are seen to represent are guilty, and require good defense lawyers to get them the best possible deal, rather than a not-guilty verdict.
* HelloAttorney: Multiple examples, with Mary [=McCormack=] as Justine Appleton being the most apparent.
* HollywoodLaw: Averted. The lengthy process of trials and appeals are shown without obvious errors in law.
* HonorBeforeReason: Ted and the firm are in the habit of representing clients known to be guilty or at least facing impossible odds because they believe its the right thing to do.
* LawProcedural: To the extent that, apparently, law students were advised to watch it as it covered more stages of trial than any other series before or since.
* NeverOneMurder: Although the series focuses tightly on the murder of Jessica Costello, people get killed in pursuit of the truth.
* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: Played straight with Teddy's refusal to represent Jessica Costello's murderer for the sum of twenty million. After seeing how much damage he has caused, he tells him there isn't enough money in the world.
* ScrewTheRulesIHaveMoney: Averted, then played at full strength. Richard Cross has massive amounts of both money and connections, including being a financial supporter of the current DA. It doesn't do him a whole lot of good, initially, as everyone is keen to be seen not to be caving in to him. After everyone has demonstrated for the press and public just how unimpressed they are, things change.
* ShoutOut: Hoffman and his associates often refer to an unseen "Ensalmo case," a running gag in ''Series/{{Moonlighting}}''.
----

Top