Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Recap / StarTrekDeepSpaceNineS04E18RulesOfEngagement

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DontAnswerThat: When Ch'Pok asks for Worf's permission to use information gathered from an unsanctioned search of Worf's personal database.
--> '''Sisko:''' ''(whispering, to Worf)'' Don't play his game.\\
'''Worf:''' I have nothing to hide.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BatmanGambit: The Klingon plan required Worf to notice a consistent pattern in their attack, predict the most likely position of the Bird-of-Prey when it decloaks at the exact right moment, and open fire before completely identifying his target.

to:

* BatmanGambit: The Klingon plan required Worf to notice a consistent pattern in their attack, predict the most likely position of the Bird-of-Prey when it decloaks at exactly the exact right moment, and open fire before completely identifying his target.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[quoteright:350:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ds9_rulesengagement_019.jpg]]
[[caption-width-right:350:Worf goes on trial. We should all be so lucky to have Ben Sisko as a lawyer.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BatmanGambit: The Klingon plan required Worf to notice a consistent pattern in their attack, predict the most likely position of the Bird-of-Prey when it decloaks at the exact right moment, and open fire before completely identifying his target.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HollywoodLaw: By the episode's own admission, there are no current diplomatic relations between the Federation and the Klingon Empire, which ought to mean that the Klingons have no standing to demand the extradition of an active-duty Starfleet officer for actions carried out in the performance of his duties. However for some bizarre reason the Vulcan (!) judge finds it logical (!!) to not only allow the extradition hearing to proceed, but allow it to proceed under ''Klingon'' legal norms (!!!).

to:

* HollywoodLaw: By the episode's own admission, there are no current diplomatic relations between the Federation and the Klingon Empire, which ought to mean that the Klingons have no standing to demand the extradition of an active-duty Starfleet officer for actions carried out in the performance of his duties.duties (particularly duties in combat ''against'' the Klingons). However for some bizarre reason the Vulcan (!) judge finds it logical (!!) to not only allow the extradition hearing to proceed, but allow it to proceed under ''Klingon'' legal norms (!!!).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HollywoodLaw: By the episode's own admission, there are no current diplomatic relations between the Federation and the Klingon Empire, which ought to mean that the Klingons have no standing to demand the extradition of an active-duty Starfleet officer for actions carried out in the performance of his duties. However for some bizarre reason the Vulcan (!) judge finds it logical (!!) to not only allow the extradition hearing to proceed, but allow it to proceed under ''Klingon'' legal norms (!!!).


Added DiffLines:

* SciFiWritersHaveNoSenseOfScale: The episode completely falls apart when you factor in that SpaceIsBig. There is no sane reason for a civilian ship not part of the convoy to come within an astronomical unit of the battle in the first place, which should have clued people in that there was more going on.

Added: 132

Changed: 145

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheVoiceless: Morn. When Quark is trying to recall his story, he suddenly remembers that he was talking to Morn and Morn said...and then he's told to just get on with it.

to:

* TheVoiceless: Morn. When Quark is trying to recall his story, he suddenly remembers that he was talking to Morn and Morn said...and then Even in flashbacks, he's told not allowed to just speak on-screen.
--> '''Quark:''' And he was the one who turned to [Rolidia] and said--\\
'''Ch'Pok:''' Can we
get on with it. back to the matter at hand, please?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* PunctuatedForEmphasis: When Sisko confronts Ch'Pok with the evidence that Odo found, proving that the Klingon Empire set Worf up to look like a murderer.
--> '''Sisko:''' Tell me, ''Advocate...isn't...it...possible''?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TooDumbToLive: Subverted. Decloaking in front of a active warship in mid-battle may seem stupid, but considering the Klingons were actively ''trying'' to get Worf to blow up the transport, not so much.

to:

* TooDumbToLive: Subverted. Decloaking in front of a an active warship in mid-battle may seem stupid, but considering the Klingons were actively ''trying'' to get Worf to blow up the transport, not so much.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DebateAndSwitch: The situation regarding the unfortunate situation of firing on a civilian ship in this situation ultimately goes unresolved (though Sisko, at least, believes Worf was wrong to be so quick on the trigger), as the situation is proven to have been deliberately set up to disgrace Worf.

to:

* DebateAndSwitch: The situation regarding the unfortunate situation of firing on a civilian ship in this situation ultimately goes unresolved (though Sisko, at least, believes Worf was wrong to be so quick on the trigger), as the situation is proven to have been deliberately set up to disgrace Worf.



* FrameUp: The entire situation was a ploy by the Empire to disgrace Worf. The transport ship was totally empty, and its passengers had already died in a horrific crash in the not-to-distant past.

to:

* FrameUp: The entire situation was a ploy by the Empire to disgrace Worf. The transport ship was totally empty, and its passengers had already died in a horrific crash in the not-to-distant not-too-distant past.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WouldNotShootACivilian: Sisko makes it clear that a Starfleet officer ''never'' fires at a target unless they are absolutely sure it is a hostile, even if it means hesitating will cost them their life. (Although somehow nobody had a problem with it when James T. Kirk was faced with practically the exact same tactical situation in ''Film/StarTrekVI'', and didn't even wait for the bird-of-prey to decloak before firing.)

to:

* WouldNotShootACivilian: Sisko makes it clear that a Starfleet officer ''never'' fires at a target unless they are absolutely sure it is a hostile, even if it means hesitating will cost them their life. (Although somehow nobody had a problem with it when James T. Kirk was faced with practically the exact same tactical situation in ''Film/StarTrekVI'', ''Film/StarTrekVITheUndiscoveredCountry'', and didn't even wait for the bird-of-prey to decloak before firing.)

Added: 204

Removed: 198

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AntiVillain: Ch'Pok isn't evil; he's just doing his job, and even offers to defend Worf himself if the ruling is for extradition. (How much he knew about Worf being set up is never totally clear.)


Added DiffLines:

* PunchClockVillain: Ch'Pok isn't evil; he's just doing his job, and even offers to defend Worf himself if the ruling is for extradition. (How much he knew about Worf being set up is never totally clear.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MurderSimulators: While Dax is on the witness stand, Ch'Pok questions her about a holodeck program Worf ran shortly before the escort mission, which casts him in the role of one of Klingon culture's greatest heroes, who ordered an entire city put to death after he conquered it. He uses this as evidence against Worf by forcing Dax to acknowledge that Worf does give the order to slaughter the inhabitants, and she is overruled when she tries to point out that this is ''required'' in order to finish the program. The argument is presented in much the same way that MoralGuardians use to attack violent video games today.

Added: 212

Changed: 15

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArmorPiercingQuestion: Ch'Pok has O'Brien on the stand, and tells him to imagine that he was in command instead of Worf during the same situation. Would he also give the order to open fire? O'Brien says he wouldn't, but also points out that he ''wasn't'' there and that it's easy to throw stones after the fact.

to:

* ArmorPiercingQuestion: Ch'Pok has O'Brien on the stand, and tells him to imagine that he was in command instead of Worf during the same situation. Would he also give the order to open fire? O'Brien says he wouldn't, but also points out that he ''wasn't'' there in command and that it's easy to throw stones after the fact.fact.
* BullyingADragon: Ch'Pok verbally hammers on Worf's honor and pride until Worf rises from the witness chair and knocks him to the deck, to prove that Worf is capable of attacking anyone if sufficiently provoked.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

--> '''Worf:''' Life is a great deal more complicated in this red uniform.\\
'''Sisko:''' Wait 'till you get ''four'' pips on that collar. You'll wish you had gone into botany.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheVoiceless: Morn. When Quark is trying to recall his story, he suddenly remembers that he was talking to Morn and Morn said...and then he's told to just get on with it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Commander Worf is on trial. The cause of which is to establish motive in a horrible tragedy. In the heat of battle, did he purposely fire on a transport ship full of innocent civilians on purpose? Or was it simply a case of reflexive action in a heated situation?

to:

Commander Worf is on trial. The cause of which is to establish motive in a horrible tragedy. In the heat of battle, did he purposely fire on a transport ship full of innocent civilians on purpose? civilians? Or was it simply a case of reflexive action in a heated situation?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Commander Worf is on trial. The cause of which is to establish motive in a horrible tragedy. In the heat of battle, did he purposely fire on a transport shoot full of innocent civilians on purpose? Or was it simply a case of reflexive action in a heated situation?

to:

Commander Worf is on trial. The cause of which is to establish motive in a horrible tragedy. In the heat of battle, did he purposely fire on a transport shoot ship full of innocent civilians on purpose? Or was it simply a case of reflexive action in a heated situation?



* AntiVillain: Ch'Pok isn't evil; he's just doing his job. (How much he knew about Worf being set up is never totally clear.)
* ArmorPiercingQuestion: Ch'Pok has O'Brien on the stand, and tells him to imagine that he was in command instead of Worf during the same situation. Would he also give the order to open fire? O'Brien, after some anguish, says he wouldn't.

to:

* AntiVillain: Ch'Pok isn't evil; he's just doing his job.job, and even offers to defend Worf himself if the ruling is for extradition. (How much he knew about Worf being set up is never totally clear.)
* ArmorPiercingQuestion: Ch'Pok has O'Brien on the stand, and tells him to imagine that he was in command instead of Worf during the same situation. Would he also give the order to open fire? O'Brien, after some anguish, O'Brien says he wouldn't.wouldn't, but also points out that he ''wasn't'' there and that it's easy to throw stones after the fact.



** Not to mention the question of ''why'' an unarmed freighter would decloak right in the middle of a battle--again, becoming irrelevant once the FrameUp is revealed. Same can be said of the question of why an unarmed passenger freighter ''has'' a cloaking device in the first place...

to:

** Not to mention the question of ''why'' an unarmed freighter would decloak right in the middle of a battle--again, becoming irrelevant once the FrameUp is revealed. Same can be said of the question of why an unarmed passenger freighter even ''has'' a cloaking device in the first place...



* WouldNotShootACivilian: Sisko makes it clear that a Starfleet officer ''never'' fires at a target unless they are absolutely sure it is a hostile, even if it means hesitating will cost them their life.

to:

* WouldNotShootACivilian: Sisko makes it clear that a Starfleet officer ''never'' fires at a target unless they are absolutely sure it is a hostile, even if it means hesitating will cost them their life. (Although somehow nobody had a problem with it when James T. Kirk was faced with practically the exact same tactical situation in ''Film/StarTrekVI'', and didn't even wait for the bird-of-prey to decloak before firing.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Not to mention the question of ''why'' an unarmed freighter would decloak right in the middle of a battle--again, becoming irrelevant once the FrameUp is revealed.

to:

** Not to mention the question of ''why'' an unarmed freighter would decloak right in the middle of a battle--again, becoming irrelevant once the FrameUp is revealed. Same can be said of the question of why an unarmed passenger freighter ''has'' a cloaking device in the first place...

Added: 301

Changed: 181

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Not to mention the question of ''why'' an unarmed freighter would decloak right in the middle of a battle--again, becoming irrelevant once the FrameUp is revealed.



* InvisibilityFlicker: Worf's battle plan is to shoot at whatever starts to decloak.

to:

* HamToHamCombat: With Sisko and two Klingons in the room, this is pretty much inevitable. No wonder they need a Vulcan admiral to keep everyone under control.
* InvisibilityFlicker: Worf's battle plan is to shoot at whatever starts to decloak.decloak--[[BatmanGambit just as the Klingon Empire wants]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TooDumbToLive: Subverted. Decloaking in front of a active warship in mid-battle may seem stupid, but considering the Klingons were actively ''trying'' to get Worf to blow up the transport, not so much.



* WouldNotShootACivilian: Sisko makes it clear that a Starfleet officer ''never'' fires at a target unless they are absolutely sure it is a hostile, even if it means hesitating will cost them their life.

to:

* WouldNotShootACivilian: Sisko makes it clear that a Starfleet officer ''never'' fires at a target unless they are absolutely sure it is a hostile, even if it means hesitating will cost them their life.life.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArmorPiercingQuestion: Ch'Pok has O'Brien on the stand, and tells him to imagine that he was in command instead of Worf during the same situation. Would he also give the order to open fire? O'Brien, after some anguish, says he wouldn't.



* WhatTheHellHero: Sisko chews Worf out for shooting at something before making sure it's a legitimate target. He then treats it as a potential CareerBuildingBlunder by assuring Worf that he'll still make a great captain someday.

to:

* WhatTheHellHero: Sisko chews Worf out for shooting at something before making sure it's a legitimate target. He then treats it as a potential CareerBuildingBlunder by assuring Worf that he'll still make a great captain someday.someday.
* WouldNotShootACivilian: Sisko makes it clear that a Starfleet officer ''never'' fires at a target unless they are absolutely sure it is a hostile, even if it means hesitating will cost them their life.

Added: 301

Changed: 75

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AntiVillain: Ch'Pok isn't evil; he's just doing his job.

to:

* AntiVillain: Ch'Pok isn't evil; he's just doing his job. (How much he knew about Worf being set up is never totally clear.)



* CompletelyMissingThePoint: Quark is more concerned trying to figure out who was sitting at the bar than remembering what Worf was doing there.

to:

* CompletelyMissingThePoint: ComicallyMissingThePoint: Quark is more concerned trying to figure out who was sitting at the bar than remembering what Worf was doing there.


Added DiffLines:

* DebateAndSwitch: The situation regarding the unfortunate situation of firing on a civilian ship in this situation ultimately goes unresolved (though Sisko, at least, believes Worf was wrong to be so quick on the trigger), as the situation is proven to have been deliberately set up to disgrace Worf.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InvisibilityFlicker: Worf's battle plan is to shoot at whatever starts to decloak.



* ProudWarriorRaceGuy: Ch'Pok may be a lawyer, but he proves he's still a Klingon by treating the trial as a fight.

to:

* ProudWarriorRaceGuy: Ch'Pok may be a lawyer, but he proves he's still a Klingon by treating the trial as a fight.fight.
* WhatTheHellHero: Sisko chews Worf out for shooting at something before making sure it's a legitimate target. He then treats it as a potential CareerBuildingBlunder by assuring Worf that he'll still make a great captain someday.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FrameUp: The entire situation was a ploy by the Empire to disgrace Worf. The transport ship was totally empty.

to:

* FrameUp: The entire situation was a ploy by the Empire to disgrace Worf. The transport ship was totally empty.empty, and its passengers had already died in a horrific crash in the not-to-distant past.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheChainsOfCommanding: Sisko gives a lesson recap on them to Worf at the end of the episode.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MyGodWhatHaveIDone: Eeveryone's reaction when the transport blows up.

to:

* MyGodWhatHaveIDone: Eeveryone's Everyone's reaction when the transport blows up.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AntiVillain: Ch'Pok isn't evil; he's just doing his job.



* LeaningOnTheFourthWall: The witness flashbacks speak directly at the camera, almost appearing to talk to the viewer.

to:

* LeaningOnTheFourthWall: The witness flashbacks speak directly at the camera, almost appearing to talk to the viewer.viewer.
* MyGodWhatHaveIDone: Eeveryone's reaction when the transport blows up.
* ProudWarriorRaceGuy: Ch'Pok may be a lawyer, but he proves he's still a Klingon by treating the trial as a fight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FrameUp: The entire situation was a ploy by the Empire to disgrace Worf. The transport ship was totally empty.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Commander Worf is on trial. The cause of which is to establish motive in a horrible tragedy. In the heat of battle, did he purposely fire on a transport shoot full of innocent civilians on purpose? Or was it simply a case of reflexive action in a heated situation?
----
!!Tropes
* CompletelyMissingThePoint: Quark is more concerned trying to figure out who was sitting at the bar than remembering what Worf was doing there.
* CourtroomEpisode
* LeaningOnTheFourthWall: The witness flashbacks speak directly at the camera, almost appearing to talk to the viewer.

Top