Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Recap / LawAndOrderS10E20Untitled

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Misuse ("revolting" =/= incomprehensible)


* TrueArtIsIncomprehensible: InUniverse. Mark Vee is happy when his painting is found revolting.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

!!This episode contains examples of:

Added: 414

Changed: 565

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Arts patron Lucy Young is found murdered in her loft, her hands cut off at the wrists and her mouth taped. The detectives find out that she liked to sponsor artists, the farther away from the mainstream the better. One of those artists, Mark Vee, had created "Perfect Woman #3", a portrait where the subject has no mouth or hands, just like Lucy was posed. The detectives talk to a journalist who had been interviewing Vee, and she points out a man who was creating a disturbance during the exhibit of Vee's painting. The detectives track down Larry Brunig, who claims extreme emotional disturbance in his defense at trial.

* AnArmAndALeg: Two hands, in the victim's case, to match Mark Vee's painting.

to:

Arts patron Lucy Young is found murdered in her loft, her hands cut off at the wrists and her mouth taped. The detectives Briscoe and Green find out that she liked to sponsor artists, the farther away from the mainstream the better. One of those artists, Mark Vee, had created "Perfect Woman #3", a portrait where the subject has no mouth or hands, just like Lucy was posed. The detectives talk to a journalist who had been interviewing Vee, and she points out a man who was creating a disturbance during the exhibit of Vee's painting. The detectives track down Larry Brunig, who claims he was not at the gallery. After the DA's office takes a look at letters to the editor, they find that Brunig did write a letter to the ''Daily Ledger'' that could be considered a threat, but he is eventually ruled out. An incident in Barcelona where he tried to vandalize a Dali painting of a woman with no head, hands or feet comes out. During his trial for murder one, he claims extreme emotional disturbance in his defense at trial.

defense. He says he just wanted to talk to Lucy Young about the art she sponsored (for example, Madonnas submerged in body fluid, or animal feces). In the end, he is found guilty.

* AnArmAndALeg: Two hands, in the victim's case, to match Mark Vee's painting.painting.
* NeverMyFault: Larry Brunig's statements while being cross-examined:
-->"Lucy Young did this to me. She made me feel this. She put this painting in a gallery. I had to make it stop."
* TrueArtIsIncomprehensible: InUniverse. Mark Vee is happy when his painting is found revolting.
* ThinkOfTheChildren: Per his testimony, Brunig just wanted to confront Lucy Young about the harm art like Vee's could have on children.

Added: 78

Changed: 597

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A patron of the arts is murdered. She is posed identically as the latest work of an artist she had sponsored, who was known for depicting misogynistic and graphic violence. The detectives locate a suspect who claims extreme emotional disturbance in his defense at trial.

to:

A Arts patron of Lucy Young is found murdered in her loft, her hands cut off at the arts is murdered. She is posed identically as the latest work of an artist she had sponsored, who was known for depicting misogynistic wrists and graphic violence. her mouth taped. The detectives locate find out that she liked to sponsor artists, the farther away from the mainstream the better. One of those artists, Mark Vee, had created "Perfect Woman #3", a suspect portrait where the subject has no mouth or hands, just like Lucy was posed. The detectives talk to a journalist who had been interviewing Vee, and she points out a man who was creating a disturbance during the exhibit of Vee's painting. The detectives track down Larry Brunig, who claims extreme emotional disturbance in his defense at trial.trial.

* AnArmAndALeg: Two hands, in the victim's case, to match Mark Vee's painting.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

A patron of the arts is murdered. She is posed identically as the latest work of an artist she had sponsored, who was known for depicting misogynistic and graphic violence. The detectives locate a suspect who claims extreme emotional disturbance in his defense at trial.

Top