Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Quotes / TheBlockbusterAgeOfHollywood

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-> ''When I was young, box office reports were confined to industry journals like The Hollywood Reporter. Now, I'm afraid that they've become...everything. Box office is the undercurrent in almost all discussions of cinema, and frequently it’s more than just an undercurrent. The brutal judgmentalism that has made opening-weekend grosses into a bloodthirsty spectator sport seems to have encouraged an even more brutal approach to film reviewing. I’m talking about market research firms like Cinemascore, which started in the late '70s, and online “aggregators” like Rotten Tomatoes, which have absolutely nothing to do with real film criticism. They rate a picture the way you'd rate a horse at the racetrack, a restaurant in a Zagat's guide, or a household appliance in Consumer Reports. They have everything to do with the movie business and absolutely nothing to do with either the creation or the intelligent viewing of film. The filmmaker is reduced to a content manufacturer and the viewer to an unadventurous consumer.''

to:

-> ''When ->''"When I was young, box office reports were confined to industry journals like The Hollywood Reporter. Now, I'm afraid that they've become...everything. Box office is the undercurrent in almost all discussions of cinema, and frequently it’s more than just an undercurrent. The brutal judgmentalism that has made opening-weekend grosses into a bloodthirsty spectator sport seems to have encouraged an even more brutal approach to film reviewing. I’m talking about market research firms like Cinemascore, which started in the late '70s, and online “aggregators” like Rotten Tomatoes, which have absolutely nothing to do with real film criticism. They rate a picture the way you'd rate a horse at the racetrack, a restaurant in a Zagat's guide, or a household appliance in Consumer Reports. They have everything to do with the movie business and absolutely nothing to do with either the creation or the intelligent viewing of film. The filmmaker is reduced to a content manufacturer and the viewer to an unadventurous consumer.consumer".''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->"''[[MoneyDearBoy The reality of our current situation is that the five families don’t want to make anything that can’t make them a billion dollars]]. None of them want to be in the medium-priced challenging content business. And that cleaves off exactly the kind of movies I make ... What [[Creator/Netflix the streamers]] are doing is providing a platform for the kind of cinema that actually reflects our culture and wrestles with big ideas: where things are, what people are anxious and unsure about. Those are the kinds of movies that would have been dead on arrival five years ago.''"

to:

->"''[[MoneyDearBoy The reality of our current situation is that the five families don’t want to make anything that can’t make them a billion dollars]]. None of them want to be in the medium-priced challenging content business. And that cleaves off exactly the kind of movies I make ... What [[Creator/Netflix the streamers]] streamers are doing is providing a platform for the kind of cinema that actually reflects our culture and wrestles with big ideas: where things are, what people are anxious and unsure about. Those are the kinds of movies that would have been dead on arrival five years ago.''"

Changed: 297

Removed: 307

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->"''[[MoneyDearBoy The reality of our current situation is that the five families don’t want to make anything that can’t make them a billion dollars]]. None of them want to be in the medium-priced challenging content business. And that cleaves off exactly the kind of movies I make ...
\\
What [[Creator/Netflix the streamers]] are doing is providing a platform for the kind of cinema that actually reflects our culture and wrestles with big ideas: where things are, what people are anxious and unsure about. Those are the kinds of movies that would have been dead on arrival five years ago.''"

to:

->"''[[MoneyDearBoy The reality of our current situation is that the five families don’t want to make anything that can’t make them a billion dollars]]. None of them want to be in the medium-priced challenging content business. And that cleaves off exactly the kind of movies I make ... \n\\\n What [[Creator/Netflix the streamers]] are doing is providing a platform for the kind of cinema that actually reflects our culture and wrestles with big ideas: where things are, what people are anxious and unsure about. Those are the kinds of movies that would have been dead on arrival five years ago.''"

Added: 547

Changed: 287

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

->"''[[MoneyDearBoy The reality of our current situation is that the five families don’t want to make anything that can’t make them a billion dollars]]. None of them want to be in the medium-priced challenging content business. And that cleaves off exactly the kind of movies I make ...
\\
What [[Creator/Netflix the streamers]] are doing is providing a platform for the kind of cinema that actually reflects our culture and wrestles with big ideas: where things are, what people are anxious and unsure about. Those are the kinds of movies that would have been dead on arrival five years ago.''"
-->'''Creator/DavidFincher''', [[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/2020/11/14/david-fincher-film-studios-dont-want-make-anything-cant-make/ "David Fincher: film studios 'don’t want to make anything that can’t make them a billion dollars'"]]

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->''"Creator/WillSmith is living out the common conundrum of almost every once-and-future movie star. Audiences don’t show up for star vehicles (anymore), but they still show up for [[DerivativeWorks franchises]], often the very kind of franchises that lead to accusations of [[CashCowFranchise selling out or cashing in]]... ...And this October, Film/GeminiMan, which gives you two Will Smiths for the price of one, will likely fall well short of [[Film/Joker2019 a gritty Joaquin Phoenix crime drama]] purely because [[Creator/JoaquinPhoenix Phoenix]] is playing ComicBook/TheJoker."''\\

to:

->''"Creator/WillSmith is living out the common conundrum of almost every once-and-future movie star. Audiences don’t show up for star vehicles (anymore), [anymore], but they still show up for [[DerivativeWorks franchises]], often the very kind of franchises that lead to accusations of [[CashCowFranchise selling out or cashing in]]... ...And this October, Film/GeminiMan, which gives you two Will Smiths for the price of one, will likely fall well short of [[Film/Joker2019 a gritty Joaquin Phoenix crime drama]] purely because [[Creator/JoaquinPhoenix Phoenix]] is playing ComicBook/TheJoker."''\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''"(Gemini Man) looks great, has a killer hook and [[Creator/AngLee a critically-acclaimed (and twice Oscar-winning) director]]. However, it is a giant question mark because it’s not an IP adaptation. In short, Will Smith, Creator/BradPitt and the like didn’t stop becoming movie stars. Audiences just care more about popular characters and popular IP than popular actors and popular filmmakers. Unless you’re Creator/LeonardoDiCaprio and/or [[Creator/ChristopherNolan Chris Nolan]] (or Creator/JordanPeele), but you get the idea."''

to:

''"(Gemini Man) ''"It [Gemini Man] looks great, has a killer hook and [[Creator/AngLee a critically-acclaimed (and twice Oscar-winning) director]]. However, it is a giant question mark because it’s not an IP adaptation. In short, Will Smith, Creator/BradPitt and the like didn’t stop becoming movie stars. Audiences just care more about popular characters and popular IP than popular actors and popular filmmakers. Unless you’re Creator/LeonardoDiCaprio and/or [[Creator/ChristopherNolan Chris Nolan]] (or Creator/JordanPeele), but you get the idea."''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None






to:

\n\n\n->''"Creator/WillSmith is living out the common conundrum of almost every once-and-future movie star. Audiences don’t show up for star vehicles (anymore), but they still show up for [[DerivativeWorks franchises]], often the very kind of franchises that lead to accusations of [[CashCowFranchise selling out or cashing in]]... ...And this October, Film/GeminiMan, which gives you two Will Smiths for the price of one, will likely fall well short of [[Film/Joker2019 a gritty Joaquin Phoenix crime drama]] purely because [[Creator/JoaquinPhoenix Phoenix]] is playing ComicBook/TheJoker."''\\
\\
''"(Gemini Man) looks great, has a killer hook and [[Creator/AngLee a critically-acclaimed (and twice Oscar-winning) director]]. However, it is a giant question mark because it’s not an IP adaptation. In short, Will Smith, Creator/BradPitt and the like didn’t stop becoming movie stars. Audiences just care more about popular characters and popular IP than popular actors and popular filmmakers. Unless you’re Creator/LeonardoDiCaprio and/or [[Creator/ChristopherNolan Chris Nolan]] (or Creator/JordanPeele), but you get the idea."''
-->-- '''Scott Mendelson''', [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2019/04/25/will-smith-men-in-black-tessa-thompson-gemini-man-aladdin-chris-hemsworth-suicide-squad/#34a799644f3c How Will Smith Personifies The Problems Facing Today's Movie Stars]]

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->-- '''Creator/MartinScorsese''', in an October 10, 2017 [[http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/martin-scorsese-rotten-tomatoes-box-office-obsession-why-mother-was-misjudged-guest-column-1047286 article]], for ''The Hollywood Reporter''.

to:

-->-- '''Creator/MartinScorsese''', in an October 10, 2017 [[http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/martin-scorsese-rotten-tomatoes-box-office-obsession-why-mother-was-misjudged-guest-column-1047286 article]], for ''The Hollywood Reporter''.Reporter''.

->''"It changed for the good and the bad. When you bring new things to a society, it's like the balance of the force, you can either use it for good or you can use it for evil. What happens when there is something new is people have a tendency to overdo it, they abuse it. There are two things that got abused with Star Wars and it's still being abused. When Star Wars came out, [[ItWillNeverCatchOn everyone said it's a silly movie, just a bunch of space battles and stuff]]...[[HiddenDepths There's more to it than that]] but everyone said it's just a bunch of spaceships...that part of the science fantasy got terribly abused. So everyone [[FollowTheLeader went out and made spaceship movies]] and they were all horrible and lost tons of money. The other part is the technology...especially when it came down later to digital technology, where you can really do anything. Which people just abused, which they did with colour, they did with sound. Whenever someone brings a new tool, everyone just abuses it and you forget the fact there's actually a story. The other thing that got abused...the studios said "Wow we can make a lot of money, this is a license to kill" and the only way you can do that is not take chances. Do something that's proven. [[EarlyInstallmentWeirdness You have to remember]] that Franchise/StarWars [[SleeperHit came from nowhere]], Film/AmericanGraffiti came from nowhere. There was nothing like it. [[{{Sequelitis}} Now if you do anything that's not a sequel]] or a TV series or looks like one, they won't do it. That's [[FranchiseOriginalSin the downside of Star Wars]] and it really shows the enormous lack of imagination and creativity on the part of the industry."''
-->-- '''George Lucas''', [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEIrQUXm_hY Interview with Charlie Rose]].





----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

-> ''When I was young, box office reports were confined to industry journals like The Hollywood Reporter. Now, I'm afraid that they've become...everything. Box office is the undercurrent in almost all discussions of cinema, and frequently it’s more than just an undercurrent. The brutal judgmentalism that has made opening-weekend grosses into a bloodthirsty spectator sport seems to have encouraged an even more brutal approach to film reviewing. I’m talking about market research firms like Cinemascore, which started in the late '70s, and online “aggregators” like Rotten Tomatoes, which have absolutely nothing to do with real film criticism. They rate a picture the way you'd rate a horse at the racetrack, a restaurant in a Zagat's guide, or a household appliance in Consumer Reports. They have everything to do with the movie business and absolutely nothing to do with either the creation or the intelligent viewing of film. The filmmaker is reduced to a content manufacturer and the viewer to an unadventurous consumer.''
-->-- '''Creator/MartinScorsese''', in an October 10, 2017 [[http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/martin-scorsese-rotten-tomatoes-box-office-obsession-why-mother-was-misjudged-guest-column-1047286 article]], for ''The Hollywood Reporter''.

Top