Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** Bob praises Alice for something completely unrelated to the novel he’s reviewing.
to:
** Bob praises Alice for something completely unrelated to the novel he’s he's reviewing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob and thanks him for his good review of her book. Bob points out, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole review, you would have gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like that book.”
to:
* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob and thanks him for his good review of her book. Bob points out, “Every "Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole review, you would have gathered quite quickly that I didn’t didn't like that book.”"
Changed line(s) 42 (click to see context) from:
DamnedByFaintPraise … lists examples of its appearances in media and real life. There. Are you satisfied?
to:
DamnedByFaintPraise … lists examples of its appearances in media and real life. There. Are you satisfied?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Bob has such high standards that him giving minor praise and describing Alice's novel as NotBad is treated as a glowing review.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* '''Downplayed''': Bob gives Alice a StealthInsult or two.
to:
* '''Downplayed''': Bob gives Alice calls Alice's novel a StealthInsult or two."good debut", implying she still needs improvement due to inexperience.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Bob states that Alice's book is the worst she's ever written...which is still better than the work produced by most writers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* '''Subverted''': Bob writes, "What does this book do well?" ...and then [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments praises its narrative structure as being "impressively original."]]
to:
* '''Subverted''': Bob writes, "What does this book do well?" ...and then [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments praises its narrative structure as being "impressively original."]]"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* '''Straight''': Critic Bob writes, in his review of Alice's novel, "This book is good in that it features characters I have never seen before in this guise." Note he does not say whether she used CharacterizationTropes well or not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.
to:
* '''Straight''': Critic Bob writes, in his review of doesn't like Alice's novel, so he writes, "This book is good in that it features characters I have never seen before in this guise." Note he does not say whether she used CharacterizationTropes well or not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** Bob praises the book using an OverlyNarrowSuperlative taken UpToEleven. For instance: "This is the finest book about an elderly cat's observations on life in Johannesburg just before the end of Apartheid that I've read this week."
to:
** Bob praises the book using an OverlyNarrowSuperlative taken UpToEleven. For instance: "This is the finest book about an elderly cat's observations on [[UsefulNotes/TheApartheidEra life in Johannesburg just before the end of Apartheid Apartheid]] that I've read this week."
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
** A minor critique being used to show that something is actually very good; i.e. Bob loves Alice’s book and regrets only that it is shorter than he’d have liked.
to:
** A minor critique being used to show that something is actually very good; i.e.g. Bob loves Alice’s book and regrets only that it is shorter than he’d have liked.
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* '''Subverted''': Bob writes, "What does this book do right?" ...and then [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments praises its narrative structure as being "impressively original"]].
to:
* '''Subverted''': Bob writes, "What does this book do right?" ...well?" ...and then [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments praises its narrative structure as being "impressively original"]].original."]]
Changed line(s) 22,23 (click to see context) from:
* '''Zig Zagged''': Bob writes in complete honesty about how engaging the book's plot is, but awkwardly avoids talking about how flat the characters are.
* '''Averted''': Bob [[BrutalHonesty always says exactly what he thinks of a book or elements thereof.]]
* '''Averted''': Bob [[BrutalHonesty always says exactly what he thinks of a book or elements thereof.]]
to:
* '''Zig Zagged''': '''Zig-Zagged''': Bob writes in complete honesty about how engaging the book's plot is, but awkwardly avoids talking about how flat the characters are.
* '''Averted''':Bob [[BrutalHonesty Bob always says exactly what he thinks of a book or elements thereof.]]
* '''Averted''':
Changed line(s) 32,33 (click to see context) from:
-->'''[[DaEditor Mike]]:''' You said Alice [=LaTropé=] wrote ''Being a Trope'' in a legible language. It's bad, isn't it?\\
'''Bob:''' Mm-hmm.
'''Bob:''' Mm-hmm.
to:
-->'''[[DaEditor Mike]]:''' You said Alice [=LaTropé=] wrote ''Being a Trope'' in a legible language. It's bad, isn't it?\\
'''Bob:'''it?
-->'''Bob:''' Mm-hmm.
'''Bob:'''
-->'''Bob:''' Mm-hmm.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Bob gives Alice's novel a glowing review, but she misinterprets the whole thing as sarcastic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Bob praises the book using an OverlyNarrowSuperlative taken UpToEleven. For instance: "This is the finest book about an elderly cat's observations on life in Johannesburg just before the end of Apartheid that I've read this week."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
** Bob loves Alice’s book and regrets only that it is shorter than he’d have liked.
to:
** A minor critique being used to show that something is actually very good; i.e. Bob loves Alice’s book and regrets only that it is shorter than he’d have liked.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** Bob cites the fact that Alice's novel consists of ''words'' as its greatest virtue.
to:
** Bob cites the fact that Alice's novel [[TriviallyObvious consists of ''words'' of]] ''[[TriviallyObvious words]]'' as its greatest virtue.
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* '''Zig Zagged''': ???
to:
* '''Zig Zagged''': ???Bob writes in complete honesty about how engaging the book's plot is, but awkwardly avoids talking about how flat the characters are.
Deleted line(s) 36,37 (click to see context) :
%%* '''Played for Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted a Good Waste''':
%%* '''Plotted a Good Waste''':
Changed line(s) 40 (click to see context) from:
----
to:
%%* '''Played for Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted a Good Waste''':
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
'''Basic Trope''': Some work has serious problems, which someone brings into relief by citing its minor aspects as “virtues.”
* '''Straight''': Critic Bob writes, in his review of Alice’s novel, “This book is good in that it features characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether she used CharacterizationTropes well or not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.
* '''Straight''': Critic Bob writes, in his review of Alice’s novel, “This book is good in that it features characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether she used CharacterizationTropes well or not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.
to:
'''Basic Trope''': Some work has serious problems, which someone brings into relief by citing its minor aspects as “virtues.”
"virtues".
* '''Straight''': Critic Bob writes, in his review ofAlice’s Alice's novel, “This "This book is good in that it features characters I have never seen before in this guise.” " Note he does not say whether she used CharacterizationTropes well or not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.
* '''Straight''': Critic Bob writes, in his review of
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** Bob cites the fact that Alice’s novel consists of ''words'' as its greatest virtue.
to:
** Bob cites the fact that Alice’s Alice's novel consists of ''words'' as its greatest virtue.
Changed line(s) 13,14 (click to see context) from:
* '''Subverted''': Bob writes, “What does this book do right?” … and then [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments praises its narrative structure as being “impressively original.”]]
* '''Double Subverted''': [[BaitAndSwitchComment “… because nobody else in the history of literature has ever built a story so haphazardly!”]]
* '''Double Subverted''': [[BaitAndSwitchComment “… because nobody else in the history of literature has ever built a story so haphazardly!”]]
to:
* '''Subverted''': Bob writes, “What "What does this book do right?” … right?" ...and then [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments praises its narrative structure as being “impressively original.”]]
"impressively original"]].
* '''Double Subverted''': [[BaitAndSwitchComment“… "...because nobody else in the history of literature has ever built a story so haphazardly!”]]haphazardly!"]]
* '''Double Subverted''': [[BaitAndSwitchComment
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
** Bob’s review includes the phrase, “Clearly, [[NoSuchThingAsAlienPopCulture aliens from a race that hasn’t perfected the modern novel]] did ''not'' write this thing!”
to:
** Bob’s Bob's review includes the phrase, “Clearly, "Clearly, [[NoSuchThingAsAlienPopCulture aliens from a race that hasn’t hasn't perfected the modern novel]] did ''not'' write this thing!”thing!"
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
** Bob says something like “At least it doesn’t give you cancer” or “It’s better than a kick to the face.”
to:
** Bob says something like “At "At least it doesn’t doesn't give you cancer” cancer" or “It’s "It's better than a kick to the face.”"
Changed line(s) 29,34 (click to see context) from:
-->'''[[DaEditor Mike]]''': You said Alice [=LaTropé=] wrote ''Being a Trope'' in a legible language. It’s bad, isn’t it?\\
'''Bob''': Mm-hmm.
* '''Conversed''': “I hope we’re not watching this show because it advertised itself the way its InUniverse [[SturgeonsLaw crappy media]] do.”
* '''Implied''': When asked whether anyone gave her book a good review, Alice says only that Bob gave her a “sort of good” review.
* '''Deconstructed''': Alice realizes the critics don’t like her output and stops writing.
* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and [[GrowingTheBeard becomes a much better writer.]]
'''Bob''': Mm-hmm.
* '''Conversed''': “I hope we’re not watching this show because it advertised itself the way its InUniverse [[SturgeonsLaw crappy media]] do.”
* '''Implied''': When asked whether anyone gave her book a good review, Alice says only that Bob gave her a “sort of good” review.
* '''Deconstructed''': Alice realizes the critics don’t like her output and stops writing.
* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and [[GrowingTheBeard becomes a much better writer.]]
to:
-->'''[[DaEditor Mike]]''': Mike]]:''' You said Alice [=LaTropé=] wrote ''Being a Trope'' in a legible language. It’s It's bad, isn’t isn't it?\\
'''Bob''': '''Bob:''' Mm-hmm.
* '''Conversed''':“I "I hope we’re we're not watching this show because it advertised itself the way its InUniverse [[SturgeonsLaw crappy media]] do.”
"
* '''Implied''': When asked whether anyone gave her book a good review, Alice says only that Bob gave her a“sort "sort of good” good" review.
* '''Deconstructed''': Alice realizes the criticsdon’t don't like her output and stops writing.
* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and [[GrowingTheBeard becomes a much betterwriter.]]writer]].
* '''Conversed''':
* '''Implied''': When asked whether anyone gave her book a good review, Alice says only that Bob gave her a
* '''Deconstructed''': Alice realizes the critics
* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and [[GrowingTheBeard becomes a much better
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* '''Justified''': [[CausticCritic Bob]] [[GenreSavvy realizes]] that if he presents his unfiltered opinion, people might perceive him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, [[GiftedlyBad the actual quality of her writing]] notwithstanding.
to:
* '''Justified''': '''Justified''':
** [[CausticCritic Bob]][[GenreSavvy realizes]] realizes that if he presents his unfiltered opinion, people might perceive him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, [[GiftedlyBad the actual quality of her writing]] notwithstanding.notwithstanding.
** Most of the time, when reviewing works he does not like, Bob can find some qualities that are able to mitigate the negative qualities, but in this case he can't find any and instead makes a snarky remark.
** [[CausticCritic Bob]]
** Most of the time, when reviewing works he does not like, Bob can find some qualities that are able to mitigate the negative qualities, but in this case he can't find any and instead makes a snarky remark.
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
** Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and regrets only that it is shorter than he’d have liked.
to:
** Bob '''loves''' loves Alice’s book and regrets only that it is shorter than he’d have liked.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
** Bob says the novel is {{asbestos free|Cereal}}.
to:
** Bob says the novel novel's best aspect is that it is completely {{asbestos free|Cereal}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* '''Justified''': [[CausticCritic Bob]] [[GenreSavvy realizes]] that if he presents his unfiltered opinion, people might perceive him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, regardless of [[GiftedlyBad the actual quality of her writing]].
to:
* '''Justified''': [[CausticCritic Bob]] [[GenreSavvy realizes]] that if he presents his unfiltered opinion, people might perceive him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, regardless of [[GiftedlyBad the actual quality of her writing]].writing]] notwithstanding.
Changed line(s) 9,10 (click to see context) from:
** Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”
** Bob favorably compares Alice's book to a well loved classic, but Alice treats this as an insult [[SmallNameBigEgo insisting her novel is far better]].
** Bob favorably compares Alice's book to a well loved classic, but Alice treats this as an insult [[SmallNameBigEgo insisting her novel is far better]].
to:
** Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its regrets only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”
that it is shorter than he’d have liked.
** Bob favorably comparesAlice's book Alice’s novel to a well loved well-loved classic, but Alice treats this as an insult insult, [[SmallNameBigEgo insisting her novel hers is far better]].better.]]
** Bob favorably compares
Changed line(s) 18,20 (click to see context) from:
* '''Averted''': Bob [[BrutalHonesty always says exactly what he thinks of a work or elements therein]].
* '''Enforced''': Bob works for a publication that’s heavy on the FourPointScale and they mandate that all critics on their payroll say something kind about every work they review.
* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob and thanks him for his good review of her book. Bob points out, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole review, you would’ve gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like that book.”
* '''Enforced''': Bob works for a publication that’s heavy on the FourPointScale and they mandate that all critics on their payroll say something kind about every work they review.
* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob and thanks him for his good review of her book. Bob points out, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole review, you would’ve gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like that book.”
to:
* '''Averted''': Bob [[BrutalHonesty always says exactly what he thinks of a work book or elements therein]].
thereof.]]
* '''Enforced''': Bob works for a publication that’s heavy on theFourPointScale FourPointScale, and they his editors mandate that all critics on their payroll say something kind about every work they review.
* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob and thanks him for his good review of her book. Bob points out, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole review, youwould’ve would have gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like that book.”
* '''Enforced''': Bob works for a publication that’s heavy on the
* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob and thanks him for his good review of her book. Bob points out, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole review, you
Changed line(s) 25 (click to see context) from:
** Bob rereads the novel again, hoping to find something he can praise sincerely.
to:
** Bob rereads the novel again, novel, hoping to find something he can praise sincerely.
Changed line(s) 32,33 (click to see context) from:
* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and [[GrowingTheBeard becomes much better]].
%%* '''Played for Laughs''':
%%* '''Played for Laughs''':
to:
* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and [[GrowingTheBeard becomes a much better]].
%%*better writer.]]
* '''Played forLaughs''':Laughs''': In his review, Bob cracks joke after joke about how anyone could have done the basic story construction job Alice did.
%%*
* '''Played for
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* '''Inverted''': Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”
to:
* '''Inverted''': '''Inverted''':
** Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.””
** Bob favorably compares Alice's book to a well loved classic, but Alice treats this as an insult [[SmallNameBigEgo insisting her novel is far better]].
** Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.
** Bob favorably compares Alice's book to a well loved classic, but Alice treats this as an insult [[SmallNameBigEgo insisting her novel is far better]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
'''Basic Trope''': Implying that something is of low quality by pointing out virtues one expects of it.
* '''Straight''': Critic Bob’s review of Alice’s novel says, “This book is good in that it features characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether she used CharacterizationTropes well or not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.
* '''Straight''': Critic Bob’s review of Alice’s novel says, “This book is good in that it features characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether she used CharacterizationTropes well or not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.
to:
'''Basic Trope''': Implying that something is of low quality Some work has serious problems, which someone brings into relief by pointing out virtues one expects of it.
citing its minor aspects as “virtues.”
* '''Straight''': CriticBob’s Bob writes, in his review of Alice’s novel says, novel, “This book is good in that it features characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether she used CharacterizationTropes well or not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.
* '''Straight''': Critic
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob in person and thanks him for his good review of her first book. Bob retorts, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole review, you would’ve gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like that book.”
to:
* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob in person and thanks him for his good review of her first book. Bob retorts, points out, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole review, you would’ve gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like that book.”
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
** Bob says something along the lines of "It's better than a kick to the face" or "At least it doesn't give you cancer".
to:
** Bob says something along the lines of "It's like “At least it doesn’t give you cancer” or “It’s better than a kick to the face" or "At least it doesn't give you cancer".face.”
%%* '''Played for Laughs''':
%%* '''Played for Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted a Good Waste''':
%%* '''Played for Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted a Good Waste''':
Changed line(s) 32,37 (click to see context) from:
DamnedByFaintPraise … lists examples of where it’s appeared in media and real life. There. Are you happy now?
----
%%Optional examples, added after Conversed, at your discretion:
%%* '''Played For Laughs''':
%%* '''Played For Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted A Good Waste''':
----
%%Optional examples, added after Conversed, at your discretion:
%%* '''Played For Laughs''':
%%* '''Played For Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted A Good Waste''':
to:
DamnedByFaintPraise … lists examples of where it’s appeared its appearances in media and real life. There. Are you happy now?
----
%%Optional examples, added after Conversed, at your discretion:
%%* '''Played For Laughs''':
%%* '''Played For Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted A Good Waste''':satisfied?
----
----
%%Optional examples, added after Conversed, at your discretion:
%%* '''Played For Laughs''':
%%* '''Played For Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted A Good Waste''':
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Bob says something along the lines of "It's better than a kick to the face" or "At least it doesn't give you cancer".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Playing With wiki points must be \"generic\" and self-contained. If specific knowledge of a certain work or author is required to understand them, them they aren\'t valid.
Changed line(s) 8,10 (click to see context) from:
* '''Inverted''':
** Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”
** Bob says that the book has “poorer characterization than Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire.”
** Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”
** Bob says that the book has “poorer characterization than Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire.”
to:
* '''Inverted''':
**'''Inverted''': Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”
** Bob says that the book has “poorer characterization than Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire.”
**
** Bob says that the book has “poorer characterization than Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
It\'s funny because George R. R. Martin is regarded as a master of characterization. Dont Explain The Joke. Wait, does that apply to edit reasons? We need a committee!
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* '''Inverted''': Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”
to:
* '''Inverted''': '''Inverted''':
** Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”
** Bob says that the book has “poorer characterization than Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire.”
** Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”
** Bob says that the book has “poorer characterization than Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire.”
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
** Bob says the novel is {{asbestos free|cereal}}.
to:
** Bob says the novel is {{asbestos free|cereal}}.free|Cereal}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* '''Parodied''': Bob’s review includes the phrase, “Clearly, [[NoSuchThingAsAlienPopCulture aliens from a race that hasn’t perfected the modern novel]] did ''not'' write this thing!”
to:
* '''Parodied''': '''Parodied''':
** Bob’s review includes the phrase, “Clearly, [[NoSuchThingAsAlienPopCulture aliens from a race that hasn’t perfected the modern novel]] did ''not'' write thisthing!”thing!”
** Bob says the novel is {{asbestos free|cereal}}.
** Bob’s review includes the phrase, “Clearly, [[NoSuchThingAsAlienPopCulture aliens from a race that hasn’t perfected the modern novel]] did ''not'' write this
** Bob says the novel is {{asbestos free|cereal}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** Bob cites the fact that Alice’s novel comprises ''words'' as its greatest virtue.
to:
** Bob cites the fact that Alice’s novel comprises consists of ''words'' as its greatest virtue.
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
-->'''[[DaEditor Michael]]''': You said Alice [=LaTropé=] wrote ''Being a Trope'' in a legible language. It’s bad, isn’t it?\\
to:
-->'''[[DaEditor Michael]]''': Mike]]''': You said Alice [=LaTropé=] wrote ''Being a Trope'' in a legible language. It’s bad, isn’t it?\\
* '''Implied''': When asked whether anyone gave her book a good review, Alice says only that Bob gave her a “sort of good” review.
Deleted line(s) 31 (click to see context) :
%%* '''Implied''':
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* '''Exaggerated''': Bob cites the fact that Alice’s novel comprises ''words'' as its greatest virtue.
to:
* '''Exaggerated''': '''Exaggerated''':
** Bob cites the fact that Alice’s novel comprises ''words'' as its greatestvirtue.virtue.
** Bob praises Alice for something completely unrelated to the novel he’s reviewing.
** Bob cites the fact that Alice’s novel comprises ''words'' as its greatest
** Bob praises Alice for something completely unrelated to the novel he’s reviewing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* '''Straight''': Critic Bob’s review of Alice’s novel says, “This book is good in that it comprises characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether those characters are well-written or not.
to:
* '''Straight''': Critic Bob’s review of Alice’s novel says, “This book is good in that it comprises features characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether those characters are well-written she used CharacterizationTropes well or not.not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* '''Downplayed''': Bob gives Alice a BackhandedCompliment or two.
to:
* '''Downplayed''': Bob gives Alice a BackhandedCompliment StealthInsult or two.
Changed line(s) 18,20 (click to see context) from:
** Bob rereads the novel again and finds something he can praise sincerely.
* '''Discussed''': ???
* '''Conversed''': ???
* '''Discussed''': ???
* '''Conversed''': ???
to:
** Bob rereads the novel again and finds again, hoping to find something he can praise sincerely.
*'''Discussed''': ???
'''Discussed''':
-->'''[[DaEditor Michael]]''': You said Alice [=LaTropé=] wrote ''Being a Trope'' in a legible language. It’s bad, isn’t it?\\
'''Bob''': Mm-hmm.
* '''Conversed''':???“I hope we’re not watching this show because it advertised itself the way its InUniverse [[SturgeonsLaw crappy media]] do.”
*
-->'''[[DaEditor Michael]]''': You said Alice [=LaTropé=] wrote ''Being a Trope'' in a legible language. It’s bad, isn’t it?\\
'''Bob''': Mm-hmm.
* '''Conversed''':
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* '''Defied''': To escape ExecutiveMeddling, Bob quits his job and becomes an independent critic so he can present his opinions as he sees fit.
to:
* '''Defied''': '''Defied''':
** To escape ExecutiveMeddling, Bob quits his job and becomes an independent critic so he can present his opinions as he seesfit.fit.
** Bob rereads the novel again and finds something he can praise sincerely.
** To escape ExecutiveMeddling, Bob quits his job and becomes an independent critic so he can present his opinions as he sees
** Bob rereads the novel again and finds something he can praise sincerely.
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and becomes much better.
to:
* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and [[GrowingTheBeard becomes much better.better]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* '''Straight''': Literary critic Bob writes a negative review of Alice’s debut novel. He gives the standard loose plot outline and then begins his actual evaluation of the work thus: “This book is good in that it comprises characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether those characters are well-written or not.
to:
* '''Straight''': Literary critic Bob writes a negative Critic Bob’s review of Alice’s debut novel. He gives the standard loose plot outline and then begins his actual evaluation of the work thus: novel says, “This book is good in that it comprises characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether those characters are well-written or not.
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
* '''Downplayed''': ???
* '''Justified''': This is the only way [[CausticCritic Bob]] can keep his job without people perceiving him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, regardless of the actual quality of her writing.
* '''Justified''': This is the only way [[CausticCritic Bob]] can keep his job without people perceiving him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, regardless of the actual quality of her writing.
to:
* '''Downplayed''': ???
Bob gives Alice a BackhandedCompliment or two.
* '''Justified''':This is the only way [[CausticCritic Bob]] can keep [[GenreSavvy realizes]] that if he presents his job without unfiltered opinion, people perceiving might perceive him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, regardless of [[GiftedlyBad the actual quality of her writing.writing]].
* '''Justified''':
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* '''Double Subverted''': He [[BackhandedCompliment goes on to write “… because nobody else in the history of literature has ever built a story so haphazardly!”]]
to:
* '''Double Subverted''': He [[BackhandedCompliment goes on to write [[BaitAndSwitchComment “… because nobody else in the history of literature has ever built a story so haphazardly!”]]
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob in person and thanks him for his good review of her first book. Bob retorts, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole thing, you would’ve gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like it.”
to:
* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob in person and thanks him for his good review of her first book. Bob retorts, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole thing, review, you would’ve gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like it.that book.”
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* '''Defied''': ???
to:
* '''Defied''': ??? To escape ExecutiveMeddling, Bob quits his job and becomes an independent critic so he can present his opinions as he sees fit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
'''Basic Trope''': Implying that something is of low quality by pointing out virtues one expects of it.
* '''Straight''': Literary critic Bob writes a negative review of Alice’s debut novel. He gives the standard loose plot outline and then begins his actual evaluation of the work thus: “This book is good in that it comprises characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether those characters are well-written or not.
* '''Exaggerated''': Bob cites the fact that Alice’s novel comprises ''words'' as its greatest virtue.
* '''Downplayed''': ???
* '''Justified''': This is the only way [[CausticCritic Bob]] can keep his job without people perceiving him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, regardless of the actual quality of her writing.
* '''Inverted''': Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”
* '''Subverted''': Bob writes, “What does this book do right?” … and then [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments praises its narrative structure as being “impressively original.”]]
* '''Double Subverted''': He [[BackhandedCompliment goes on to write “… because nobody else in the history of literature has ever built a story so haphazardly!”]]
* '''Parodied''': Bob’s review includes the phrase, “Clearly, [[NoSuchThingAsAlienPopCulture aliens from a race that hasn’t perfected the modern novel]] did ''not'' write this thing!”
* '''Zig Zagged''': ???
* '''Averted''': Bob [[BrutalHonesty always says exactly what he thinks of a work or elements therein]].
* '''Enforced''': Bob works for a publication that’s heavy on the FourPointScale and they mandate that all critics on their payroll say something kind about every work they review.
* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob in person and thanks him for his good review of her first book. Bob retorts, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole thing, you would’ve gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like it.”
* '''Invoked''': Bob knows Alice is inordinately proud of herself and wants to BreakTheHaughty.
* '''Exploited''': Just one way among many to PolishTheTurd.
* '''Defied''': ???
* '''Discussed''': ???
* '''Conversed''': ???
* '''Deconstructed''': Alice realizes the critics don’t like her output and stops writing.
* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and becomes much better.
----
DamnedByFaintPraise … lists examples of where it’s appeared in media and real life. There. Are you happy now?
----
%%Optional examples, added after Conversed, at your discretion:
%%* '''Implied''':
%%* '''Played For Laughs''':
%%* '''Played For Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted A Good Waste''':
* '''Straight''': Literary critic Bob writes a negative review of Alice’s debut novel. He gives the standard loose plot outline and then begins his actual evaluation of the work thus: “This book is good in that it comprises characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether those characters are well-written or not.
* '''Exaggerated''': Bob cites the fact that Alice’s novel comprises ''words'' as its greatest virtue.
* '''Downplayed''': ???
* '''Justified''': This is the only way [[CausticCritic Bob]] can keep his job without people perceiving him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, regardless of the actual quality of her writing.
* '''Inverted''': Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”
* '''Subverted''': Bob writes, “What does this book do right?” … and then [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments praises its narrative structure as being “impressively original.”]]
* '''Double Subverted''': He [[BackhandedCompliment goes on to write “… because nobody else in the history of literature has ever built a story so haphazardly!”]]
* '''Parodied''': Bob’s review includes the phrase, “Clearly, [[NoSuchThingAsAlienPopCulture aliens from a race that hasn’t perfected the modern novel]] did ''not'' write this thing!”
* '''Zig Zagged''': ???
* '''Averted''': Bob [[BrutalHonesty always says exactly what he thinks of a work or elements therein]].
* '''Enforced''': Bob works for a publication that’s heavy on the FourPointScale and they mandate that all critics on their payroll say something kind about every work they review.
* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob in person and thanks him for his good review of her first book. Bob retorts, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole thing, you would’ve gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like it.”
* '''Invoked''': Bob knows Alice is inordinately proud of herself and wants to BreakTheHaughty.
* '''Exploited''': Just one way among many to PolishTheTurd.
* '''Defied''': ???
* '''Discussed''': ???
* '''Conversed''': ???
* '''Deconstructed''': Alice realizes the critics don’t like her output and stops writing.
* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and becomes much better.
----
DamnedByFaintPraise … lists examples of where it’s appeared in media and real life. There. Are you happy now?
----
%%Optional examples, added after Conversed, at your discretion:
%%* '''Implied''':
%%* '''Played For Laughs''':
%%* '''Played For Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted A Good Waste''':