Follow TV Tropes

Following

History PlayingWith / DamnedByFaintPraise

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Bob praises Alice for something completely unrelated to the novel he’s reviewing.

to:

** Bob praises Alice for something completely unrelated to the novel he’s he's reviewing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob and thanks him for his good review of her book. Bob points out, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole review, you would have gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like that book.”

to:

* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob and thanks him for his good review of her book. Bob points out, “Every "Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole review, you would have gathered quite quickly that I didn’t didn't like that book."



DamnedByFaintPraise … lists examples of its appearances in media and real life. There. Are you satisfied?

to:

DamnedByFaintPraise lists examples of its appearances in media and real life. There. Are you satisfied?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Bob has such high standards that him giving minor praise and describing Alice's novel as NotBad is treated as a glowing review.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* '''Downplayed''': Bob gives Alice a StealthInsult or two.

to:

* '''Downplayed''': Bob gives Alice calls Alice's novel a StealthInsult or two."good debut", implying she still needs improvement due to inexperience.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Bob states that Alice's book is the worst she's ever written...which is still better than the work produced by most writers.
Tabs MOD

Changed: 34

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* '''Subverted''': Bob writes, "What does this book do well?" ...and then [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments praises its narrative structure as being "impressively original."]]

to:

* '''Subverted''': Bob writes, "What does this book do well?" ...and then [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments praises its narrative structure as being "impressively original."]]"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* '''Straight''': Critic Bob writes, in his review of Alice's novel, "This book is good in that it features characters I have never seen before in this guise." Note he does not say whether she used CharacterizationTropes well or not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.

to:

* '''Straight''': Critic Bob writes, in his review of doesn't like Alice's novel, so he writes, "This book is good in that it features characters I have never seen before in this guise." Note he does not say whether she used CharacterizationTropes well or not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.



** Bob praises the book using an OverlyNarrowSuperlative taken UpToEleven. For instance: "This is the finest book about an elderly cat's observations on life in Johannesburg just before the end of Apartheid that I've read this week."

to:

** Bob praises the book using an OverlyNarrowSuperlative taken UpToEleven. For instance: "This is the finest book about an elderly cat's observations on [[UsefulNotes/TheApartheidEra life in Johannesburg just before the end of Apartheid Apartheid]] that I've read this week."



** A minor critique being used to show that something is actually very good; i.e. Bob loves Alice’s book and regrets only that it is shorter than he’d have liked.

to:

** A minor critique being used to show that something is actually very good; i.e.g. Bob loves Alice’s book and regrets only that it is shorter than he’d have liked.



* '''Subverted''': Bob writes, "What does this book do right?" ...and then [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments praises its narrative structure as being "impressively original"]].

to:

* '''Subverted''': Bob writes, "What does this book do right?" ...well?" ...and then [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments praises its narrative structure as being "impressively original"]].original."]]



* '''Zig Zagged''': Bob writes in complete honesty about how engaging the book's plot is, but awkwardly avoids talking about how flat the characters are.
* '''Averted''': Bob [[BrutalHonesty always says exactly what he thinks of a book or elements thereof.]]

to:

* '''Zig Zagged''': '''Zig-Zagged''': Bob writes in complete honesty about how engaging the book's plot is, but awkwardly avoids talking about how flat the characters are.
* '''Averted''': Bob [[BrutalHonesty Bob always says exactly what he thinks of a book or elements thereof.]]



-->'''[[DaEditor Mike]]:''' You said Alice [=LaTropé=] wrote ''Being a Trope'' in a legible language. It's bad, isn't it?\\
'''Bob:''' Mm-hmm.

to:

-->'''[[DaEditor Mike]]:''' You said Alice [=LaTropé=] wrote ''Being a Trope'' in a legible language. It's bad, isn't it?\\
'''Bob:'''
it?
-->'''Bob:'''
Mm-hmm.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Bob gives Alice's novel a glowing review, but she misinterprets the whole thing as sarcastic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Bob praises the book using an OverlyNarrowSuperlative taken UpToEleven. For instance: "This is the finest book about an elderly cat's observations on life in Johannesburg just before the end of Apartheid that I've read this week."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Bob says "It's a book!"

Changed: 71

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Bob loves Alice’s book and regrets only that it is shorter than he’d have liked.

to:

** A minor critique being used to show that something is actually very good; i.e. Bob loves Alice’s book and regrets only that it is shorter than he’d have liked.

Added: 58

Changed: 178

Removed: 58

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Bob cites the fact that Alice's novel consists of ''words'' as its greatest virtue.

to:

** Bob cites the fact that Alice's novel [[TriviallyObvious consists of ''words'' of]] ''[[TriviallyObvious words]]'' as its greatest virtue.



* '''Zig Zagged''': ???

to:

* '''Zig Zagged''': ???Bob writes in complete honesty about how engaging the book's plot is, but awkwardly avoids talking about how flat the characters are.



%%* '''Played for Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted a Good Waste''':



----

to:

--------
%%* '''Played for Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted a Good Waste''':
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Basic Trope''': Some work has serious problems, which someone brings into relief by citing its minor aspects as “virtues.”
* '''Straight''': Critic Bob writes, in his review of Alice’s novel, “This book is good in that it features characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether she used CharacterizationTropes well or not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.

to:

'''Basic Trope''': Some work has serious problems, which someone brings into relief by citing its minor aspects as “virtues.”
"virtues".
* '''Straight''': Critic Bob writes, in his review of Alice’s Alice's novel, “This "This book is good in that it features characters I have never seen before in this guise." Note he does not say whether she used CharacterizationTropes well or not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.



** Bob cites the fact that Alice’s novel consists of ''words'' as its greatest virtue.

to:

** Bob cites the fact that Alice’s Alice's novel consists of ''words'' as its greatest virtue.



* '''Subverted''': Bob writes, “What does this book do right?” … and then [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments praises its narrative structure as being “impressively original.”]]
* '''Double Subverted''': [[BaitAndSwitchComment “… because nobody else in the history of literature has ever built a story so haphazardly!”]]

to:

* '''Subverted''': Bob writes, “What "What does this book do right?” … right?" ...and then [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments praises its narrative structure as being “impressively original.”]]
"impressively original"]].
* '''Double Subverted''': [[BaitAndSwitchComment “… "...because nobody else in the history of literature has ever built a story so haphazardly!”]]haphazardly!"]]



** Bob’s review includes the phrase, “Clearly, [[NoSuchThingAsAlienPopCulture aliens from a race that hasn’t perfected the modern novel]] did ''not'' write this thing!”

to:

** Bob’s Bob's review includes the phrase, “Clearly, "Clearly, [[NoSuchThingAsAlienPopCulture aliens from a race that hasn’t hasn't perfected the modern novel]] did ''not'' write this thing!”thing!"



** Bob says something like “At least it doesn’t give you cancer” or “It’s better than a kick to the face.”

to:

** Bob says something like “At "At least it doesn’t doesn't give you cancer” cancer" or “It’s "It's better than a kick to the face."



-->'''[[DaEditor Mike]]''': You said Alice [=LaTropé=] wrote ''Being a Trope'' in a legible language. It’s bad, isn’t it?\\
'''Bob''': Mm-hmm.
* '''Conversed''': “I hope we’re not watching this show because it advertised itself the way its InUniverse [[SturgeonsLaw crappy media]] do.”
* '''Implied''': When asked whether anyone gave her book a good review, Alice says only that Bob gave her a “sort of good” review.
* '''Deconstructed''': Alice realizes the critics don’t like her output and stops writing.
* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and [[GrowingTheBeard becomes a much better writer.]]

to:

-->'''[[DaEditor Mike]]''': Mike]]:''' You said Alice [=LaTropé=] wrote ''Being a Trope'' in a legible language. It’s It's bad, isn’t isn't it?\\
'''Bob''': '''Bob:''' Mm-hmm.
* '''Conversed''': “I "I hope we’re we're not watching this show because it advertised itself the way its InUniverse [[SturgeonsLaw crappy media]] do.
"
* '''Implied''': When asked whether anyone gave her book a good review, Alice says only that Bob gave her a “sort "sort of good” good" review.
* '''Deconstructed''': Alice realizes the critics don’t don't like her output and stops writing.
* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and [[GrowingTheBeard becomes a much better writer.]]writer]].

Added: 432

Changed: 235

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* '''Justified''': [[CausticCritic Bob]] [[GenreSavvy realizes]] that if he presents his unfiltered opinion, people might perceive him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, [[GiftedlyBad the actual quality of her writing]] notwithstanding.

to:

* '''Justified''': '''Justified''':
**
[[CausticCritic Bob]] [[GenreSavvy realizes]] realizes that if he presents his unfiltered opinion, people might perceive him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, [[GiftedlyBad the actual quality of her writing]] notwithstanding.notwithstanding.
** Most of the time, when reviewing works he does not like, Bob can find some qualities that are able to mitigate the negative qualities, but in this case he can't find any and instead makes a snarky remark.



** Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and regrets only that it is shorter than he’d have liked.

to:

** Bob '''loves''' loves Alice’s book and regrets only that it is shorter than he’d have liked.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Bob says the novel is {{asbestos free|Cereal}}.

to:

** Bob says the novel novel's best aspect is that it is completely {{asbestos free|Cereal}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* '''Justified''': [[CausticCritic Bob]] [[GenreSavvy realizes]] that if he presents his unfiltered opinion, people might perceive him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, regardless of [[GiftedlyBad the actual quality of her writing]].

to:

* '''Justified''': [[CausticCritic Bob]] [[GenreSavvy realizes]] that if he presents his unfiltered opinion, people might perceive him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, regardless of [[GiftedlyBad the actual quality of her writing]].writing]] notwithstanding.



** Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”
** Bob favorably compares Alice's book to a well loved classic, but Alice treats this as an insult [[SmallNameBigEgo insisting her novel is far better]].

to:

** Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its regrets only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”
that it is shorter than he’d have liked.
** Bob favorably compares Alice's book Alice’s novel to a well loved well-loved classic, but Alice treats this as an insult insult, [[SmallNameBigEgo insisting her novel hers is far better]].better.]]



* '''Averted''': Bob [[BrutalHonesty always says exactly what he thinks of a work or elements therein]].
* '''Enforced''': Bob works for a publication that’s heavy on the FourPointScale and they mandate that all critics on their payroll say something kind about every work they review.
* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob and thanks him for his good review of her book. Bob points out, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole review, you would’ve gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like that book.”

to:

* '''Averted''': Bob [[BrutalHonesty always says exactly what he thinks of a work book or elements therein]].
thereof.]]
* '''Enforced''': Bob works for a publication that’s heavy on the FourPointScale FourPointScale, and they his editors mandate that all critics on their payroll say something kind about every work they review.
* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob and thanks him for his good review of her book. Bob points out, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole review, you would’ve would have gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like that book.”



** Bob rereads the novel again, hoping to find something he can praise sincerely.

to:

** Bob rereads the novel again, novel, hoping to find something he can praise sincerely.



* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and [[GrowingTheBeard becomes much better]].
%%* '''Played for Laughs''':

to:

* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and [[GrowingTheBeard becomes a much better]].
%%*
better writer.]]
*
'''Played for Laughs''':Laughs''': In his review, Bob cracks joke after joke about how anyone could have done the basic story construction job Alice did.

Added: 248

Changed: 93

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* '''Inverted''': Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”

to:

* '''Inverted''': '''Inverted''':
**
Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.
** Bob favorably compares Alice's book to a well loved classic, but Alice treats this as an insult [[SmallNameBigEgo insisting her novel is far better]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Basic Trope''': Implying that something is of low quality by pointing out virtues one expects of it.
* '''Straight''': Critic Bob’s review of Alice’s novel says, “This book is good in that it features characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether she used CharacterizationTropes well or not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.

to:

'''Basic Trope''': Implying that something is of low quality Some work has serious problems, which someone brings into relief by pointing out virtues one expects of it.
citing its minor aspects as “virtues.”
* '''Straight''': Critic Bob’s Bob writes, in his review of Alice’s novel says, novel, “This book is good in that it features characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether she used CharacterizationTropes well or not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.



* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob in person and thanks him for his good review of her first book. Bob retorts, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole review, you would’ve gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like that book.”

to:

* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob in person and thanks him for his good review of her first book. Bob retorts, points out, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole review, you would’ve gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like that book.”

Added: 86

Changed: 116

Removed: 149

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Bob says something along the lines of "It's better than a kick to the face" or "At least it doesn't give you cancer".

to:

** Bob says something along the lines of "It's like “At least it doesn’t give you cancer” or “It’s better than a kick to the face" or "At least it doesn't give you cancer".face.”



%%* '''Played for Laughs''':
%%* '''Played for Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted a Good Waste''':



DamnedByFaintPraise … lists examples of where it’s appeared in media and real life. There. Are you happy now?
----
%%Optional examples, added after Conversed, at your discretion:
%%* '''Played For Laughs''':
%%* '''Played For Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted A Good Waste''':

to:

DamnedByFaintPraise … lists examples of where it’s appeared its appearances in media and real life. There. Are you happy now?
----
%%Optional examples, added after Conversed, at your discretion:
%%* '''Played For Laughs''':
%%* '''Played For Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted A Good Waste''':
satisfied?
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Bob says something along the lines of "It's better than a kick to the face" or "At least it doesn't give you cancer".

Changed: 93

Removed: 185

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Playing With wiki points must be \"generic\" and self-contained. If specific knowledge of a certain work or author is required to understand them, them they aren\'t valid.


* '''Inverted''':
** Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”
** Bob says that the book has “poorer characterization than Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire.”

to:

* '''Inverted''':
**
'''Inverted''': Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.
** Bob says that the book has “poorer characterization than Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire.

Added: 185

Changed: 93

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
It\'s funny because George R. R. Martin is regarded as a master of characterization. Dont Explain The Joke. Wait, does that apply to edit reasons? We need a committee!


* '''Inverted''': Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”

to:

* '''Inverted''': '''Inverted''':
**
Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.
** Bob says that the book has “poorer characterization than Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Bob says the novel is {{asbestos free|cereal}}.

to:

** Bob says the novel is {{asbestos free|cereal}}.free|Cereal}}.

Added: 218

Changed: 166

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* '''Parodied''': Bob’s review includes the phrase, “Clearly, [[NoSuchThingAsAlienPopCulture aliens from a race that hasn’t perfected the modern novel]] did ''not'' write this thing!”

to:

* '''Parodied''': '''Parodied''':
**
Bob’s review includes the phrase, “Clearly, [[NoSuchThingAsAlienPopCulture aliens from a race that hasn’t perfected the modern novel]] did ''not'' write this thing!”thing!”
** Bob says the novel is {{asbestos free|cereal}}.

Added: 130

Changed: 1

Removed: 18

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Bob cites the fact that Alice’s novel comprises ''words'' as its greatest virtue.

to:

** Bob cites the fact that Alice’s novel comprises consists of ''words'' as its greatest virtue.



-->'''[[DaEditor Michael]]''': You said Alice [=LaTropé=] wrote ''Being a Trope'' in a legible language. It’s bad, isn’t it?\\

to:

-->'''[[DaEditor Michael]]''': Mike]]''': You said Alice [=LaTropé=] wrote ''Being a Trope'' in a legible language. It’s bad, isn’t it?\\



* '''Implied''': When asked whether anyone gave her book a good review, Alice says only that Bob gave her a “sort of good” review.



%%* '''Implied''':

Added: 168

Changed: 82

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* '''Exaggerated''': Bob cites the fact that Alice’s novel comprises ''words'' as its greatest virtue.

to:

* '''Exaggerated''': '''Exaggerated''':
**
Bob cites the fact that Alice’s novel comprises ''words'' as its greatest virtue.virtue.
** Bob praises Alice for something completely unrelated to the novel he’s reviewing.

Added: 160

Changed: 268

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* '''Straight''': Critic Bob’s review of Alice’s novel says, “This book is good in that it comprises characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether those characters are well-written or not.

to:

* '''Straight''': Critic Bob’s review of Alice’s novel says, “This book is good in that it comprises features characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether those characters are well-written she used CharacterizationTropes well or not.not, and also that he left it open-ended as to whether they were very original.



* '''Downplayed''': Bob gives Alice a BackhandedCompliment or two.

to:

* '''Downplayed''': Bob gives Alice a BackhandedCompliment StealthInsult or two.



** Bob rereads the novel again and finds something he can praise sincerely.
* '''Discussed''': ???
* '''Conversed''': ???

to:

** Bob rereads the novel again and finds again, hoping to find something he can praise sincerely.
* '''Discussed''': ???
'''Discussed''':
-->'''[[DaEditor Michael]]''': You said Alice [=LaTropé=] wrote ''Being a Trope'' in a legible language. It’s bad, isn’t it?\\
'''Bob''': Mm-hmm.
* '''Conversed''': ???“I hope we’re not watching this show because it advertised itself the way its InUniverse [[SturgeonsLaw crappy media]] do.”

Added: 205

Changed: 148

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* '''Defied''': To escape ExecutiveMeddling, Bob quits his job and becomes an independent critic so he can present his opinions as he sees fit.

to:

* '''Defied''': '''Defied''':
**
To escape ExecutiveMeddling, Bob quits his job and becomes an independent critic so he can present his opinions as he sees fit.fit.
** Bob rereads the novel again and finds something he can praise sincerely.



* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and becomes much better.

to:

* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and [[GrowingTheBeard becomes much better.better]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* '''Straight''': Literary critic Bob writes a negative review of Alice’s debut novel. He gives the standard loose plot outline and then begins his actual evaluation of the work thus: “This book is good in that it comprises characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether those characters are well-written or not.

to:

* '''Straight''': Literary critic Bob writes a negative Critic Bob’s review of Alice’s debut novel. He gives the standard loose plot outline and then begins his actual evaluation of the work thus: novel says, “This book is good in that it comprises characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether those characters are well-written or not.



* '''Downplayed''': ???
* '''Justified''': This is the only way [[CausticCritic Bob]] can keep his job without people perceiving him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, regardless of the actual quality of her writing.

to:

* '''Downplayed''': ???
Bob gives Alice a BackhandedCompliment or two.
* '''Justified''': This is the only way [[CausticCritic Bob]] can keep [[GenreSavvy realizes]] that if he presents his job without unfiltered opinion, people perceiving might perceive him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, regardless of [[GiftedlyBad the actual quality of her writing.writing]].



* '''Double Subverted''': He [[BackhandedCompliment goes on to write “… because nobody else in the history of literature has ever built a story so haphazardly!”]]

to:

* '''Double Subverted''': He [[BackhandedCompliment goes on to write [[BaitAndSwitchComment “… because nobody else in the history of literature has ever built a story so haphazardly!”]]



* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob in person and thanks him for his good review of her first book. Bob retorts, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole thing, you would’ve gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like it.”

to:

* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob in person and thanks him for his good review of her first book. Bob retorts, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole thing, review, you would’ve gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like it.that book.



* '''Defied''': ???

to:

* '''Defied''': ??? To escape ExecutiveMeddling, Bob quits his job and becomes an independent critic so he can present his opinions as he sees fit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

'''Basic Trope''': Implying that something is of low quality by pointing out virtues one expects of it.
* '''Straight''': Literary critic Bob writes a negative review of Alice’s debut novel. He gives the standard loose plot outline and then begins his actual evaluation of the work thus: “This book is good in that it comprises characters I have never seen before in this guise.” Note he does not say whether those characters are well-written or not.
* '''Exaggerated''': Bob cites the fact that Alice’s novel comprises ''words'' as its greatest virtue.
* '''Downplayed''': ???
* '''Justified''': This is the only way [[CausticCritic Bob]] can keep his job without people perceiving him as a snob who dismisses [[PluckyGirl Alice]] unfairly, regardless of the actual quality of her writing.
* '''Inverted''': Bob '''loves''' Alice’s book and refers to its only flaw as its being “only 203 pages long.”
* '''Subverted''': Bob writes, “What does this book do right?” … and then [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments praises its narrative structure as being “impressively original.”]]
* '''Double Subverted''': He [[BackhandedCompliment goes on to write “… because nobody else in the history of literature has ever built a story so haphazardly!”]]
* '''Parodied''': Bob’s review includes the phrase, “Clearly, [[NoSuchThingAsAlienPopCulture aliens from a race that hasn’t perfected the modern novel]] did ''not'' write this thing!”
* '''Zig Zagged''': ???
* '''Averted''': Bob [[BrutalHonesty always says exactly what he thinks of a work or elements therein]].
* '''Enforced''': Bob works for a publication that’s heavy on the FourPointScale and they mandate that all critics on their payroll say something kind about every work they review.
* '''Lampshaded''': Alice meets Bob in person and thanks him for his good review of her first book. Bob retorts, “Every work of fiction has characters. If you had read the whole thing, you would’ve gathered quite quickly that I didn’t like it.”
* '''Invoked''': Bob knows Alice is inordinately proud of herself and wants to BreakTheHaughty.
* '''Exploited''': Just one way among many to PolishTheTurd.
* '''Defied''': ???
* '''Discussed''': ???
* '''Conversed''': ???
* '''Deconstructed''': Alice realizes the critics don’t like her output and stops writing.
* '''Reconstructed''': Alice strives to learn from her past inferior efforts and becomes much better.
----
DamnedByFaintPraise … lists examples of where it’s appeared in media and real life. There. Are you happy now?
----
%%Optional examples, added after Conversed, at your discretion:
%%* '''Implied''':
%%* '''Played For Laughs''':
%%* '''Played For Drama''':
%%* '''Plotted A Good Waste''':

Top