Follow TV Tropes

Following

History ObviousRulePatch / Sports

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** However, the 2026 World Cup, to be played in North America, will feature a record 48 teams, with an original plan for 16 groups of three teams each... making it ''impossible'' for all the teams in a group to play simultaneously. FIFA has suggested that draws may be prevented during the group stage by the use of penalty shootouts...which would introduce the possibility of a team losing a penalty shootout ''on purpose'' to eliminate a rival. The possibility of this happening was removed in 2023, when FIFA announced that the 2026 World Cup would feature 12 groups of four, with the top two and eight best third-placed team advancing to the elimination rounds, citing satisfaction with the group stage in 2022, where only three of the 16 teams progressing to the knock-out stage were known with a game left, fewer than usual.
** In each World Cup held between 1934 and 1954[[note]]the teams in the 1930 World Cup were invited[[/note]], at least one team qualified without playing a game, due to the other teams in their group withdrawing. This was changed in time for the 1958 edition so that only the host country and, until 2002, defending champions qualified automatically.

to:

*** However, the 2026 World Cup, to be played in North America, will feature a record 48 teams, with an original plan for 16 groups of three teams each... making it ''impossible'' for all the teams in a group to play simultaneously. FIFA has suggested that draws may be prevented during the group stage by the use of penalty shootouts...shootouts... which would introduce the possibility of a team losing a penalty shootout ''on purpose'' to eliminate a rival. The possibility of this happening was removed in 2023, when FIFA announced that the 2026 World Cup would feature 12 groups of four, with the top two and eight best third-placed team advancing to the elimination rounds, citing satisfaction with the group stage in 2022, where only three of the 16 teams progressing to the knock-out stage were known with a game left, fewer than usual.
** In each World Cup held between 1934 and 1954[[note]]the teams in the 1930 World Cup were invited[[/note]], at least one team qualified without playing a game, due to the other teams in their group withdrawing. This was changed in time for the 1958 edition so that only the host country and, until 2002, defending champions qualified automatically. This immediately affected Israel, who won the Africa and Asia qualifying group after all their would-be opponents withdrew; rather than qualify by default as would have happened in the past, they were made to play an intercontinental playoff against Wales, which they lost.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This doesn't qualify, because a foul bunt being a strike (1894) predates a foul swing being a strike (1901/03), so it wasn't an attempt to patch an existing rule.


** As a batter, you can't strike out by hitting foul balls ''except'' if that foul ball results from a bunt. Bunts are considered strike three solely to prevent batters from wearing down the opposing pitchers (a tactic that has actually been used in the past), as bunting the ball is easier than swinging and hitting it foul.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This is also the reason that the "lunge rule" on women's floor exercise was eliminated. For many years, gymnasts were allowed to take a choreographed step, or "lunge", out of their passes on floor exercise; it was meant to be for the sake of presentation, but in reality, the exact line between a controlled, intentional lunge out of a good landing and a bounce or step on landing being covered as a lunge was not always clear, especially for judges making scoring decisions in real time. The rule was eliminated in 2009[[note]]albeit not without controversy, as the lunge also helped to alleviate the impact on gymnasts' legs from landing, increasing the risk of repetitive-stress injuries -- especially since female gymnasts, unlike their male counterparts, also can't land with their feet apart (another way of lessening the impact) without incurring form deductions[[/note]]. To get around this, some gymnasts will do jumps out of their landings to avoid having to hit a true stick, but since jumps are actual ''elements'' which have requirements and can be deducted if done incorrectly, the governing body has generally seen this as acceptable.

to:

** This is also the reason that the "lunge rule" on women's floor exercise was eliminated. For many years, gymnasts were allowed to take a choreographed step, or "lunge", out of their passes on floor exercise; it was meant to be for the sake of presentation, but in reality, the exact line between a controlled, intentional lunge out of a good landing and a bounce or step on landing being covered as a lunge was not always clear, especially for judges making scoring decisions in real time. The rule was eliminated in 2009[[note]]albeit not without controversy, as the lunge also helped to alleviate the impact on gymnasts' legs from landing, increasing the risk of repetitive-stress injuries -- especially since female gymnasts, unlike their male counterparts, also can't land with their feet apart (another way of lessening the impact) without incurring form deductions[[/note]]. To get around this, some gymnasts will do jumps out of their landings to avoid having to hit a true stick, but since given that jumps are actual ''elements'' which have requirements a lot more difficult than just doing a lunge step and also carry a risk for additional deductions (since the jump itself can be deducted if done incorrectly, incorrectly), the governing body has generally seen this as acceptable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This is also the reason that the "lunge rule" on women's floor exercise was eliminated. For many years, gymnasts were allowed to take a choreographed step, or "lunge", out of their passes on floor exercise; it was meant to be for the sake of presentation, but in reality, the exact line between a controlled, intentional lunge out of a good landing and a bounce or step on landing being covered as a lunge was not always clear, especially for judges making scoring decisions in real time. The rule was eliminated in 2009. (Since then, some gymnasts will do a jump out of landings to avoid having to hit a true stick, but jumps are much more difficult and are also evaluated for deductions, so it's not quite the same thing.)

to:

** This is also the reason that the "lunge rule" on women's floor exercise was eliminated. For many years, gymnasts were allowed to take a choreographed step, or "lunge", out of their passes on floor exercise; it was meant to be for the sake of presentation, but in reality, the exact line between a controlled, intentional lunge out of a good landing and a bounce or step on landing being covered as a lunge was not always clear, especially for judges making scoring decisions in real time. The rule was eliminated in 2009. (Since then, 2009[[note]]albeit not without controversy, as the lunge also helped to alleviate the impact on gymnasts' legs from landing, increasing the risk of repetitive-stress injuries -- especially since female gymnasts, unlike their male counterparts, also can't land with their feet apart (another way of lessening the impact) without incurring form deductions[[/note]]. To get around this, some gymnasts will do a jump jumps out of their landings to avoid having to hit a true stick, but since jumps are much more difficult actual ''elements'' which have requirements and are also evaluated for deductions, so it's not quite can be deducted if done incorrectly, the same thing.)governing body has generally seen this as acceptable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In 2023, the NFL passed the '''Brock Purdy Rule''', allowing teams to have a third quarterback available on game day in case their first two quarterbacks are either injured, suspended, or ejected from the game. This was in response to the [=49ers=] losing both of their quarterbacks to injuries during the 2022 NFC Championship Game. The rule comes with caveats to avoid further exploitation: a team must have two other quarterbacks on the 53-man roster in order to use the emergency QB, and said first two quarterbacks must be on the 48-man gameday "dressed" roster. Originally, there was also a caveat that an emergency QB must be on the team's active 53-man roster rather than being a practice squad elevation, but this was removed in a secondary patch a year later because it was found that the requirement to set aside a roster spot for a player who might never play made the rule too burdensome for most teams to actually use; starting in 2024, teams will be able to elevate a practice squad quarterback to emergency quarterback status (as part of this, elevation to emergency quarterback won't count against a player's number of total elevations for the season, but does still count against the team's total number of practice squad elevations per week); to counter possible abuse of this rule[[note]]the main fear was that teams might e.g. use the spot for a QB/tight end hybrid player and then play that player as a tight end[[/note]], the NFL added a new caveat saying that the emergency quarterback can only come in if neither of the original quarterbacks is able to play, and if one of the main-roster quarterbacks is later cleared to return, the emergency QB goes back to the bench.

to:

** In 2023, the NFL passed the '''Brock Purdy Rule''', allowing teams to have a third quarterback available on game day in case their first two quarterbacks are either injured, suspended, or ejected from the game. This was in response to the [=49ers=] losing both of their quarterbacks to injuries during the 2022 NFC Championship Game. The rule comes with caveats to avoid further exploitation: a team must have two other quarterbacks on the 53-man roster in order to use the emergency QB, and said first two quarterbacks must be on the 48-man gameday "dressed" roster. Originally, there was also a caveat that an emergency QB must be on the team's active 53-man roster rather than being a practice squad elevation, but this was removed in a secondary patch a year later because it was found that the requirement to set aside a roster spot for a player who might never play made the rule too burdensome for most teams to actually use; starting in 2024, teams will be able to elevate a practice squad quarterback to emergency quarterback status (as part of this, elevation to emergency quarterback won't count against a player's number of total elevations for the season, but does still count against the team's total number of practice squad elevations per week); to counter possible abuse of this rule[[note]]the main fear was that teams might e.g. use the spot for a QB/tight end hybrid player and then play that player as a tight end[[/note]], end, essentially giving them an extra roster spot[[/note]], the NFL added a new caveat saying that the emergency quarterback can only come in if neither of the original quarterbacks is able to play, and if one of the main-roster quarterbacks is later cleared to return, the emergency QB goes back to the bench.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In 2023, the NFL passed the '''Brock Purdy Rule''', allowing teams to have a third quarterback available on game day in case their first two quarterbacks are either injured, suspended, or ejected from the game. This was in response to the [=49ers=] losing both of their quarterbacks to injuries during the 2022 NFC Championship Game. The rule comes with caveats to avoid further exploitation: a team must have two other quarterbacks on the 53-man roster in order to use the emergency QB, said first two quarterbacks must be on the 48-man gameday "dressed" roster, and if either of the original quarterbacks is cleared to return to play, the team has to pull the emergency quarterback and put the main roster QB in. Originally, there was also a caveat that an emergency QB must be on the team's active 53-man roster rather than being a practice squad elevation, but this was removed in a secondary patch a year later because it was found that the requirement to set aside a roster spot for a player who might never play made the rule too burdensome for most teams to actually use; starting in 2024, teams will be able to elevate a practice squad quarterback to emergency quarterback status (as part of this, elevation to emergency quarterback won't count against a player's number of total elevations for the season, but does still count against the team's total number of practice squad elevations per week).

to:

** In 2023, the NFL passed the '''Brock Purdy Rule''', allowing teams to have a third quarterback available on game day in case their first two quarterbacks are either injured, suspended, or ejected from the game. This was in response to the [=49ers=] losing both of their quarterbacks to injuries during the 2022 NFC Championship Game. The rule comes with caveats to avoid further exploitation: a team must have two other quarterbacks on the 53-man roster in order to use the emergency QB, and said first two quarterbacks must be on the 48-man gameday "dressed" roster, and if either of the original quarterbacks is cleared to return to play, the team has to pull the emergency quarterback and put the main roster QB in. roster. Originally, there was also a caveat that an emergency QB must be on the team's active 53-man roster rather than being a practice squad elevation, but this was removed in a secondary patch a year later because it was found that the requirement to set aside a roster spot for a player who might never play made the rule too burdensome for most teams to actually use; starting in 2024, teams will be able to elevate a practice squad quarterback to emergency quarterback status (as part of this, elevation to emergency quarterback won't count against a player's number of total elevations for the season, but does still count against the team's total number of practice squad elevations per week).week); to counter possible abuse of this rule[[note]]the main fear was that teams might e.g. use the spot for a QB/tight end hybrid player and then play that player as a tight end[[/note]], the NFL added a new caveat saying that the emergency quarterback can only come in if neither of the original quarterbacks is able to play, and if one of the main-roster quarterbacks is later cleared to return, the emergency QB goes back to the bench.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** With the 2002 establishment of the Houston Texans, the NFL had 32 teams, so they realigned to 4 divisions per conference each containing 4 teams and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_regular_season#Current_formula developed a scheduling formula so that each team played every other team at every stadium within a 8-year span]], and road/home games set on an alphabetical pairing, e.g. teams scheduled to play the NFC North (Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings) would travel to Chicago and Detroit and host Green Bay and Minnesota or vice-versa. This became problematic in the 2008-09 season, when the AFC East (Buffalo Bills, Miami Dolphins, New England Patriots, New York Jets) was scheduled to play both the AFC West (Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs, Oakland Raiders[[note]]now Las Vegas Raiders[[/note]], San Diego Chargers[[note]]now Los Angeles Chargers[[/note]]) and NFC West (Arizona Cardinals, St. Louis Rams[[note]]now Los Angeles Rams[[/note]], San Francisco 49ers, Seattle Seahawks), with the Patriots and Jets scheduled to travel to Oakland, San Diego, San Francisco, and Seattle all in the same season. Starting in the 2010-11 season, the scheduling formula was amended so that teams scheduled to play the AFC West and/or NFC West would only play 1 West Coast team and 1 team closer to the Midwest for their road games, e.g. teams traveling to Oakland[[note]]now Las Vegas[[/note]] would also travel to Denver, and teams traveling to Seattle would also travel to St. Louis. (However, this became a bit muddier on the NFC side after the Rams moved back to Los Angeles, as with three teams in the NFC West playing on the West Coast [[note]]San Fransisco, Seattle, Los Angeles; the only exception is Arizona[[/note]], there's no way to avoid having some teams play two West Coast games.)

to:

** With the 2002 establishment of the Houston Texans, the NFL had 32 teams, so they realigned to 4 divisions per conference each containing 4 teams and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_regular_season#Current_formula developed a scheduling formula so that each team played every other team at every stadium within a 8-year span]], and road/home games set on an alphabetical pairing, e.g. teams scheduled to play the NFC North (Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings) would travel to Chicago and Detroit and host Green Bay and Minnesota or vice-versa. This became problematic in the 2008-09 season, when the AFC East (Buffalo Bills, Miami Dolphins, New England Patriots, New York Jets) was scheduled to play both the AFC West (Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs, Oakland Raiders[[note]]now Las Vegas Raiders[[/note]], San Diego Chargers[[note]]now Los Angeles Chargers[[/note]]) and NFC West (Arizona Cardinals, St. Louis Rams[[note]]now Los Angeles Rams[[/note]], San Francisco 49ers, Seattle Seahawks), with the Patriots and Jets scheduled to travel to Oakland, San Diego, San Francisco, and Seattle all in the same season. Starting in the 2010-11 season, the scheduling formula was amended so that teams scheduled to play the AFC West and/or NFC West would only play 1 West Coast team and 1 team closer to the Midwest for their road games, e.g. teams traveling to Oakland[[note]]now Las Vegas[[/note]] would also travel to Denver, and teams traveling to Seattle would also travel to St. Louis. (However, this became a bit muddier on the NFC side after the Rams moved back to Los Angeles, as with three teams in the NFC West playing on the West Coast [[note]]San Fransisco, Seattle, Los Angeles; the only exception is Arizona[[/note]], there's no way to avoid having some two of the teams from any division facing the NFC West play two West Coast games.)

Added: 1714

Changed: 891

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** "Icing" refers to the practice of a defending team flinging the puck all the way down the ice and forcing the opponent to go fetch it. They patched this by blowing the whistle immediately after the opponent touches it after it crosses the far goal line, bringing the face-off back to the defending team's zone. This slowed the game down a lot when a team was killing a penalty, so they re-patched it to allow shorthanded teams to ice the puck.[[note]]Except in U.S. youth hockey (i.e., 14-and-under), where icing is prohibited at all times, even when shorthanded.[[/note]] More recent rule changes tweak it to prevent players from crashing into the boards chasing after the puck, so now you don't have to physically collect the puck for icing to be called (resulting in a rule that fans, players, and even officials aren't entirely sure of). And another recent change prevents teams from substituting players after they ice the puck -- and they had to patch ''that'' immediately to delay television timeouts from occurring and giving the tired players a reprieve. (You can call a timeout, but you only have one for the whole game.)

to:

** "Icing" refers to the practice of a defending team flinging the puck all the way down the ice and forcing the opponent to go fetch it. They patched this by blowing the whistle immediately after the opponent touches it after it crosses the far goal line, bringing the face-off back to the defending team's zone. This slowed the game down a lot when a team was killing a penalty, so they re-patched it to allow shorthanded teams to ice the puck.[[note]]Except in U.S. youth hockey (i.e., 14-and-under), where icing is prohibited at all times, even when shorthanded.[[/note]] More recent Later rule changes tweak it to prevent players from crashing into the boards chasing after the puck, so now you don't have to physically collect the puck for icing to be called (resulting in a rule that fans, players, and even officials aren't entirely sure of). And another recent Another change prevents teams from substituting players after they ice the puck -- and they had to patch ''that'' immediately to delay television timeouts from occurring and giving the tired players a reprieve. (You can call reprieve, and a timeout, but you only have one third time to remove the ability for the whole game.)team that iced the puck to call their timeout.



** Shortly after the introduction of the so-called "loser point" as part of the aforementioned overtime changes, a coach in the minor-league AHL (the now-infamous John Tortorella) tried and failed to win in overtime by pulling the goaltender for an extra attacker. After all, the worst that could happen to his team is losing one point. Days later, the AHL implemented a rule stating that scoring on an empty net in overtime (unless it involves a delayed penalty) causes the losing team to forfeit their point for making it to overtime, which was implemented into the NHL rulebook as well. As such, the tactic is now exclusively used by desperate teams as a last ditch effort to keep their playoff hopes alive, with the 2024 Minnesota Wild being the most noteworthy example to date.



*** In the 2019 Stanley Cup playoffs series between the San Jose Sharks and the Vegas Golden Knights, Sharks captain Joe Pavelski took a hit up high, fell to the ground, and took a severe injury from the fall. The Vegas player was assessed a five-minute major penalty and ejected from the game, despite the fact that the injury was less about the hit and more about the unfortunate way that Pavelski fell. The Sharks proceeded to score a whopping four goals during that five minute power play and ultimately won the series in overtime. The end result is that the refs are now allowed to use video review to confirm or reduce major penalties.

to:

*** Coaches quickly learned that a challenge takes longer than the 30 seconds that a timeout grants, and would challenge clearly good goals in an effort to slow the game down and reset momentum. As a result, the punishment for an unsuccessful challenge was changed from losing the team's only timeout to being assessed a delay-of-game penalty.
*** In the 2019 Stanley Cup playoffs series between the San Jose Sharks and the Vegas Golden Knights, Sharks captain Joe Pavelski took a hit up high, fell to the ground, high and took suffered a severe injury from hitting the fall.ice. The Vegas player was assessed a five-minute major penalty and ejected from the game, despite the fact that the injury was less about the hit and more about the unfortunate way that Pavelski fell. The Sharks Sharks, who were down 3-0 when this happened, proceeded to score a whopping four goals during that five minute power play and ultimately won the series in overtime. The end result is that the refs referees are now allowed to use video review to confirm or reduce major penalties.penalties. This rule was expanded to allow video review of double-minor high sticking calls for similar reasons, as there were countless instances of players being hit by teammates ''or even themselves'' that unfairly resulted in lengthy penalties for their opponents.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In 2023, the NFL passed the '''Brock Purdy Rule''', allowing teams to have a third quarterback available on game day in case their first two quarterbacks are either injured, suspended, or ejected from the game. This was in response to the [=49ers=] losing all of their quarterbacks to injuries during the 2022 NFC Championship Game. The rule comes with caveats to avoid further exploitation: the emergency QB must be on the team's active 53-man roster and can't be shuttled off-and-on the team's practice squad, a team must have two other quarterbacks on the 53-man roster in order to use the emergency QB, and said first two quarterbacks must be on the 48-man gameday "dressed" roster.

to:

** In 2023, the NFL passed the '''Brock Purdy Rule''', allowing teams to have a third quarterback available on game day in case their first two quarterbacks are either injured, suspended, or ejected from the game. This was in response to the [=49ers=] losing all both of their quarterbacks to injuries during the 2022 NFC Championship Game. The rule comes with caveats to avoid further exploitation: the emergency QB must be on the team's active 53-man roster and can't be shuttled off-and-on the team's practice squad, a team must have two other quarterbacks on the 53-man roster in order to use the emergency QB, and said first two quarterbacks must be on the 48-man gameday "dressed" roster.roster, and if either of the original quarterbacks is cleared to return to play, the team has to pull the emergency quarterback and put the main roster QB in. Originally, there was also a caveat that an emergency QB must be on the team's active 53-man roster rather than being a practice squad elevation, but this was removed in a secondary patch a year later because it was found that the requirement to set aside a roster spot for a player who might never play made the rule too burdensome for most teams to actually use; starting in 2024, teams will be able to elevate a practice squad quarterback to emergency quarterback status (as part of this, elevation to emergency quarterback won't count against a player's number of total elevations for the season, but does still count against the team's total number of practice squad elevations per week).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** With the 2002 establishment of the Houston Texans, the NFL had 32 teams, so they realigned to 4 divisions per conference each containing 4 teams and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_regular_season#Current_formula developed a scheduling formula so that each team played every other team at every stadium within a 8-year span]], and road/home games set on an alphabetical pairing, e.g. teams scheduled to play the NFC North (Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings) would travel to Chicago and Detroit and host Green Bay and Minnesota or vice-versa. This became problematic in the 2008-09 season, when the AFC East (Buffalo Bills, Miami Dolphins, New England Patriots, New York Jets) was scheduled to play both the AFC West (Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs, Oakland Raiders[[note]]now Las Vegas Raiders[[/note]], San Diego Chargers[[note]]now Los Angeles Chargers[[/note]]) and NFC West (Arizona Cardinals, St. Louis Rams[[note]]now Los Angeles Rams[[/note]], San Francisco 49ers, Seattle Seahawks), with the Patriots and Jets scheduled to travel to Oakland, San Diego, San Francisco, and Seattle all in the same season. Starting in the 2010-11 season, the scheduling formula was amended so that teams scheduled to play the AFC West and/or NFC West would only play 1 West Coast team and 1 team closer to the Midwest for their road games, e.g. teams traveling to Oakland[[note]]now Las Vegas[[/note]] would also travel to Denver, and teams traveling to Seattle would also travel to St. Louis. (However, this became a bit muddier on the NFC side after the Rams moved back to Los Angeles, as with three teams in the NFC West playing on the West Coast [[note]]San Fransisco, Seattle, Los Angeles; the only exception is Arizona[[/note]] , there's no way to avoid having some teams play two West Coast games.)

to:

** With the 2002 establishment of the Houston Texans, the NFL had 32 teams, so they realigned to 4 divisions per conference each containing 4 teams and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_regular_season#Current_formula developed a scheduling formula so that each team played every other team at every stadium within a 8-year span]], and road/home games set on an alphabetical pairing, e.g. teams scheduled to play the NFC North (Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings) would travel to Chicago and Detroit and host Green Bay and Minnesota or vice-versa. This became problematic in the 2008-09 season, when the AFC East (Buffalo Bills, Miami Dolphins, New England Patriots, New York Jets) was scheduled to play both the AFC West (Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs, Oakland Raiders[[note]]now Las Vegas Raiders[[/note]], San Diego Chargers[[note]]now Los Angeles Chargers[[/note]]) and NFC West (Arizona Cardinals, St. Louis Rams[[note]]now Los Angeles Rams[[/note]], San Francisco 49ers, Seattle Seahawks), with the Patriots and Jets scheduled to travel to Oakland, San Diego, San Francisco, and Seattle all in the same season. Starting in the 2010-11 season, the scheduling formula was amended so that teams scheduled to play the AFC West and/or NFC West would only play 1 West Coast team and 1 team closer to the Midwest for their road games, e.g. teams traveling to Oakland[[note]]now Las Vegas[[/note]] would also travel to Denver, and teams traveling to Seattle would also travel to St. Louis. (However, this became a bit muddier on the NFC side after the Rams moved back to Los Angeles, as with three teams in the NFC West playing on the West Coast [[note]]San Fransisco, Seattle, Los Angeles; the only exception is Arizona[[/note]] , Arizona[[/note]], there's no way to avoid having some teams play two West Coast games.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** With the 2002 establishment of the Houston Texans, the NFL had 32 teams, so they realigned to 4 divisions per conference each containing 4 teams and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_regular_season#Current_formula developed a scheduling formula so that each team played every other team at every stadium within a 8-year span]], and road/home games set on an alphabetical pairing, e.g. teams scheduled to play the NFC North (Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings) would travel to Chicago and Detroit and host Green Bay and Minnesota or vice-versa. This became problematic in the 2008-09 season, when the AFC East (Buffalo Bills, Miami Dolphins, New England Patriots, New York Jets) was scheduled to play both the AFC West (Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs, Oakland Raiders[[note]]now Las Vegas Raiders[[/note]], San Diego Chargers[[note]]now Los Angeles Chargers[[/note]]) and NFC West (Arizona Cardinals, St. Louis Rams[[note]]now Los Angeles Rams[[/note]], San Francisco 49ers, Seattle Seahawks), with the Patriots and Jets scheduled to travel to Oakland, San Diego, San Francisco, and Seattle all in the same season. Starting in the 2010-11 season, the scheduling formula was amended so that teams scheduled to play the AFC West and/or NFC West would only play 1 West Coast team and 1 team closer to the Midwest for their road games, e.g. teams traveling to Oakland[[note]]now Las Vegas[[/note]] would also travel to Denver, and teams traveling to Seattle would also travel to St. Louis[[note]]now Los Angeles[[/note]].

to:

** With the 2002 establishment of the Houston Texans, the NFL had 32 teams, so they realigned to 4 divisions per conference each containing 4 teams and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_regular_season#Current_formula developed a scheduling formula so that each team played every other team at every stadium within a 8-year span]], and road/home games set on an alphabetical pairing, e.g. teams scheduled to play the NFC North (Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings) would travel to Chicago and Detroit and host Green Bay and Minnesota or vice-versa. This became problematic in the 2008-09 season, when the AFC East (Buffalo Bills, Miami Dolphins, New England Patriots, New York Jets) was scheduled to play both the AFC West (Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs, Oakland Raiders[[note]]now Las Vegas Raiders[[/note]], San Diego Chargers[[note]]now Los Angeles Chargers[[/note]]) and NFC West (Arizona Cardinals, St. Louis Rams[[note]]now Los Angeles Rams[[/note]], San Francisco 49ers, Seattle Seahawks), with the Patriots and Jets scheduled to travel to Oakland, San Diego, San Francisco, and Seattle all in the same season. Starting in the 2010-11 season, the scheduling formula was amended so that teams scheduled to play the AFC West and/or NFC West would only play 1 West Coast team and 1 team closer to the Midwest for their road games, e.g. teams traveling to Oakland[[note]]now Las Vegas[[/note]] would also travel to Denver, and teams traveling to Seattle would also travel to St. Louis[[note]]now Louis. (However, this became a bit muddier on the NFC side after the Rams moved back to Los Angeles[[/note]].Angeles, as with three teams in the NFC West playing on the West Coast [[note]]San Fransisco, Seattle, Los Angeles; the only exception is Arizona[[/note]] , there's no way to avoid having some teams play two West Coast games.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The women's doubles event in badminton during the 2012 Olympics saw two matches in which both pairs were blatantly playing poorly so that they would get a better draw in the next round, which lead to all of them being disqualified. To avoid a repeat of this, the next Olympics saw the runners-up in each group in all events being assigned a pair by a random draw (save for not being drawn against the winner of the group they were in).

to:

* The women's doubles event in badminton during the 2012 Olympics saw two matches in which both pairs were blatantly playing poorly so that they would get a better draw in the next round, which lead to all of them being disqualified. To avoid a repeat of this, the next Olympics saw the runners-up in each group in all events being assigned a pair by a random draw (save for not being drawn against the winner of the group they were in).in).
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)


** In the Six Nations tournament teams score 4 points for a win, 2 points for a draw, but can also score one bonus point for scoring four try's in a match and for losing by seven points or fewer. Because this meant that a team which won all of their matches but failed to get any bonus points would finish with 20 points but a team which won four matches, losing one by less than seven points and scoring four try's in every game would finish with 22 points, a rule was added that a team which won all of their matches would score 3 extra points guaranteeing that they would win the tournament.

to:

** In the Six Nations tournament teams score 4 points for a win, 2 points for a draw, but can also score one bonus point for scoring four try's tries in a match and for losing by seven points or fewer. Because this meant that a team which won all of their matches but failed to get any bonus points would finish with 20 points but a team which won four matches, losing one by less than seven points and scoring four try's tries in every game would finish with 22 points, a rule was added that a team which won all of their matches would score 3 extra points guaranteeing that they would win the tournament.

Added: 350

Changed: 6

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the 1982 World Cup, West Germany and Austria went into their last match of the first round [[ForegoneConclusion knowing that a win by West Germany by one or two goals would put both teams into the next round,]] the other two teams in the pool having played their last match the previous day. West Germany scored after ten minutes, and the teams kicked the ball around aimlessly for the rest of the match, which drew a lot of booing and ire from the spectators. This match is known today as [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disgrace_of_Gij%C3%B3n "The Disgrace of Gijón".]] FIFA changed the rules so that in future, the last matches in pool play would be played simultaneously - this would eventually filter down into the various continental championships.
*** However, the 2026 World Cup, to be played in North America, will feature a record 48 teams, with an original plan for 16 groups of three teams each... making it ''impossible'' for all the teams in a group to play simultaneously. FIFA has suggested that draws may be prevented during the group stage by the use of penalty shootouts...which would introduce the possibility of a team losing a penalty shootout ''on purpose'' to eliminate a rival. The possibility of this happening was removed in 2023, when FIFA announced that the 2026 World Cup would feature 12 groups of four, with the top two and eight best third-placed team advancing to the elimination rounds, citing satisfaction with the group stage in 2022, where only three of the 16 team progressing to the knock-out stage were known with a game left, fewer than usual.

to:

** In the 1982 World Cup, West Germany and Austria went into their last match of the first round [[ForegoneConclusion knowing that a win by West Germany by one or two goals would put both teams into the next round,]] the other two teams in the pool having played their last match the previous day. West Germany scored after ten minutes, and the teams kicked the ball around aimlessly for the rest of the match, which drew a lot of booing and ire from the spectators. This match is known today as [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disgrace_of_Gij%C3%B3n org/wiki/Disgrace_of_Gijón "The Disgrace of Gijón".]] FIFA changed the rules so that in future, the last matches in pool play would be played simultaneously - this would eventually filter down into the various continental championships.
*** However, the 2026 World Cup, to be played in North America, will feature a record 48 teams, with an original plan for 16 groups of three teams each... making it ''impossible'' for all the teams in a group to play simultaneously. FIFA has suggested that draws may be prevented during the group stage by the use of penalty shootouts...which would introduce the possibility of a team losing a penalty shootout ''on purpose'' to eliminate a rival. The possibility of this happening was removed in 2023, when FIFA announced that the 2026 World Cup would feature 12 groups of four, with the top two and eight best third-placed team advancing to the elimination rounds, citing satisfaction with the group stage in 2022, where only three of the 16 team teams progressing to the knock-out stage were known with a game left, fewer than usual.usual.
** In each World Cup held between 1934 and 1954[[note]]the teams in the 1930 World Cup were invited[[/note]], at least one team qualified without playing a game, due to the other teams in their group withdrawing. This was changed in time for the 1958 edition so that only the host country and, until 2002, defending champions qualified automatically.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** During the 2022 Xfinity 500 race at Martinsville, Creator/RossChastain managed to drive his car into (and partially on) the wall during the final lap to set a NASCAR record for the fastest lap ever at Martinsville at 130 mph en route to being credited with a fifth-place finish (later fourth after original fourth-place finisher Brad Keselowski's car was determined to be underweight and he was disqualified) while clinching a spot in the Championship 4. Despite NASCAR initially ruling the video game-esque move[[note]]Chastain would later say that he was inspired by the UsefulNotes/NintendoGameCube version of ''NASCAR Thunder 2005''[[/note]] (nicknamed the "Hail Melon" as a play on both the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hail_Mary_pass Hall Mary pass]] in American football and a reference to Chastain's "Watermelon Kid" nickname due to his habit of SmashingWatermelons after victories) legal and the move gaining over 100 million views on social media; NASCAR received enough complaints about the possible risk to safety that the "Hail Melon" was outlawed beginning in 2023.

to:

** During the 2022 Xfinity 500 race at Martinsville, Creator/RossChastain managed to drive his car into (and partially on) the wall during the final lap to set a NASCAR record for the fastest lap ever at Martinsville at 130 mph en route to being credited with a fifth-place finish (later fourth after original fourth-place finisher Brad Keselowski's car was determined to be underweight and he was disqualified) while clinching a spot in the Championship 4. Despite NASCAR initially ruling the video game-esque move[[note]]Chastain would later say that he was inspired by the UsefulNotes/NintendoGameCube Platform/NintendoGameCube version of ''NASCAR Thunder 2005''[[/note]] (nicknamed the "Hail Melon" as a play on both the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hail_Mary_pass Hall Mary pass]] in American football and a reference to Chastain's "Watermelon Kid" nickname due to his habit of SmashingWatermelons after victories) legal and the move gaining over 100 million views on social media; NASCAR received enough complaints about the possible risk to safety that the "Hail Melon" was outlawed beginning in 2023.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)

Added DiffLines:

** In the Six Nations tournament teams score 4 points for a win, 2 points for a draw, but can also score one bonus point for scoring four try's in a match and for losing by seven points or fewer. Because this meant that a team which won all of their matches but failed to get any bonus points would finish with 20 points but a team which won four matches, losing one by less than seven points and scoring four try's in every game would finish with 22 points, a rule was added that a team which won all of their matches would score 3 extra points guaranteeing that they would win the tournament.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Much of the NHL's video review rules were created to counter very specific situations that had occurred:
*** Initially, Coach's Challenge only covered goals scored off of potential goaltender interference and offside situations. While goalie interference was always a contentious topic, offside reviews were included largely because of a hilariously-offside play in a 2013 Nashville Predators-Colorado Avalanche game that wasn't blown dead by the linesman and resulted in a goal.
*** In the 2019 Stanley Cup playoffs series between the San Jose Sharks and the Vegas Golden Knights, Sharks captain Joe Pavelski took a hit up high, fell to the ground, and took a severe injury from the fall. The Vegas player was assessed a five-minute major penalty and ejected from the game, despite the fact that the injury was less about the hit and more about the unfortunate way that Pavelski fell. The Sharks proceeded to score a whopping four goals during that five minute power play and ultimately won the series in overtime. The end result is that the refs are now allowed to use video review to confirm or reduce major penalties.
*** San Jose had another controversial win during that same playoff run, this time against the St. Louis Blues, where Timo Meier used his hand to bat the puck to Erik Karlsson who scored to end overtime. The play was supposed to be blown dead due to "hand pass" rules (you can't pass the puck to another player using your hands unless you are in your defensive zone), but the refs didn't call it and it wasn't covered by video review. In direct response, Coach's Challenge added a new "missed game stoppage" category, which covers hand passes, pucks played with a high stick, and pucks that hit the protective netting above the boards and are thus considered out-of-play.

Added: 379

Changed: 166

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The ICC introduced the system of bonus points in multi-nation tournaments, which offered 1 bonus point to a team [[CurbStompBattle winning by a great margin.]] Curiously enough, they also offered the bonus point to the ''losing'' side if they lost by a smaller margin. This was abused by some teams in EnemyMine situations. When a team realized they were far ahead and [[WhatCouldPossiblyGoWrong couldn't lose.]] they would deliberately play poorly to reduce their winning margin and give away the bonus point to the losing side. This would let the losing side get ahead of a third team in the points table, making conditions more favourable to the winning side later on in the tournament. The ICC eventually patched this abuse by doing away with giving the bonus point to the losing side.

to:

** The ICC introduced the system of bonus points in multi-nation tournaments, which offered 1 bonus point to a team [[CurbStompBattle winning by a great margin.]] Curiously enough, they also offered the bonus point to the ''losing'' side if they lost by a smaller margin. This was abused by some teams in EnemyMine situations. When a team realized they were far ahead and [[WhatCouldPossiblyGoWrong couldn't lose.]] lose]], they would deliberately play poorly to reduce their winning margin and give away the bonus point to the losing side. This would let the losing side get ahead of a third team in the points table, making conditions more favourable to the winning side later on in the tournament. The ICC eventually patched this abuse by doing away with giving the bonus point to the losing side.



** The 2019 Cricket World Cup final between England and New Zealand saw both teams score 240 runs in the overs. This resulted in a Super-over, which saw both teams score 15 runs. As a result, England were declared victors on boundary countback. After dissatisfaction with this outcome, the ICC would later change this to require as many Super-overs has needed to secure a result.



*** However, the 2026 World Cup, to be played in North America, will feature a record 48 teams, with an original plan for 16 groups of three teams each... making it ''impossible'' for all the teams in a group to play simultaneously. FIFA has suggested that draws may be prevented during the group stage by the use of penalty shootouts...which would introduce the possibility of a team losing a penalty shootout ''on purpose'' to eliminate a rival. The possibility of this happening was removed in 2023, when FIFA announced that the 2026 World Cup would feature 12 groups of four, with the top two and eight best third-placed team advancing to the elimination rounds.

to:

*** However, the 2026 World Cup, to be played in North America, will feature a record 48 teams, with an original plan for 16 groups of three teams each... making it ''impossible'' for all the teams in a group to play simultaneously. FIFA has suggested that draws may be prevented during the group stage by the use of penalty shootouts...which would introduce the possibility of a team losing a penalty shootout ''on purpose'' to eliminate a rival. The possibility of this happening was removed in 2023, when FIFA announced that the 2026 World Cup would feature 12 groups of four, with the top two and eight best third-placed team advancing to the elimination rounds.rounds, citing satisfaction with the group stage in 2022, where only three of the 16 team progressing to the knock-out stage were known with a game left, fewer than usual.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In 2023, the NFL passed the '''Brock Purdy Rule''', allowing teams to have a third quarterback available on game day in case their first two quarterbacks are either injured, suspended, or ejected from the game. This was in response to the [=49ers=] losing all of their quarterbacks to injuries during the 2022 NFC Championship Game.

to:

** In 2023, the NFL passed the '''Brock Purdy Rule''', allowing teams to have a third quarterback available on game day in case their first two quarterbacks are either injured, suspended, or ejected from the game. This was in response to the [=49ers=] losing all of their quarterbacks to injuries during the 2022 NFC Championship Game. The rule comes with caveats to avoid further exploitation: the emergency QB must be on the team's active 53-man roster and can't be shuttled off-and-on the team's practice squad, a team must have two other quarterbacks on the 53-man roster in order to use the emergency QB, and said first two quarterbacks must be on the 48-man gameday "dressed" roster.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In 1908, player Germany Schaefer of the Detroit Tigers confused the opposing catcher by running backwards from second base to first, creating an opening for teammate Davy Jones to steal home plate. Major League Baseball banned backwards running [[http://books.google.com/books?id=mBRdDyCKxvcC&pg=PA12&dq=Germany+Schaefer+stealing+base+in+reverse&hl=en&sa=X&ei=K-XxUdOLHomMqwGWpIB4&ved=0CDAQuwUwAA#v=onepage&q=Germany%20Schaefer%20stealing%20base%20in%20reverse&f=false the next day.]] (Also reported in ''Website/{{Cracked}}'''s [[http://www.cracked.com/article_20717_5-dumb-ways-people-have-won-at-sports.html 5 Dumb Ways People Have Won at Sports]].)

to:

** In 1908, player Germany Schaefer of the [[UsefulNotes/MajorLeagueBaseball Detroit Tigers Tigers]] confused the opposing catcher by running backwards from second base to first, creating an opening for teammate Davy Jones to steal home plate. Major League Baseball banned backwards running [[http://books.google.com/books?id=mBRdDyCKxvcC&pg=PA12&dq=Germany+Schaefer+stealing+base+in+reverse&hl=en&sa=X&ei=K-XxUdOLHomMqwGWpIB4&ved=0CDAQuwUwAA#v=onepage&q=Germany%20Schaefer%20stealing%20base%20in%20reverse&f=false the next day.]] (Also reported in ''Website/{{Cracked}}'''s [[http://www.cracked.com/article_20717_5-dumb-ways-people-have-won-at-sports.html 5 Dumb Ways People Have Won at Sports]].)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The NFL Draft order was revised starting with the 2010 NFL Draft, in response to the 8-8 then-San Diego Chargers and 9-6-1 Philadelphia Eagles still being able to pick early in the 2009 NFL Draft despite going deeper into the 2008 NFL Playoffs; the Chargers and Eagles would lose in the Divisional Round and NFC Championship, respectively. Meanwhile, other teams who missed the playoffs with 10 or more wins, including the 11-5 Patriots, had to wait due to the drafting order at the time being determined by the team's regular season record, regardless of whether or not they make the playoffs, except for teams that made the Super Bowl. The drafting order was modified to not only account for non-playoff teams, but also for teams where they would finish in the playoffs. Non-playoff teams would get picks 1-20 (changed in 2020 to picks 1-18 after the Wild Card Round was expanded to include two more teams), Wild Card runners-up would get picks 21-24 (changed in 2020 to picks 19-24), Divisional runners-up get picks 25-28, and Conference runners-up gets picks 29-30.

Top