Follow TV Tropes

Following

History MediaNotes / TheComicsCode

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


!!Media referencing the Comics Code:
* ''ComicBook/SheHulk'' frequently lampooned the Comics Code.
** In one cover from Creator/JohnByrne's run (which is the image for the {{Fanservice}} page), the naked She-Hulk [[HandOrObjectUnderwear covers herself up with]] a giant "Comics Code Approved" stamp.
** In Creator/DanSlott's run, the Comics Code is actually essential in-universe to the narrative. Creator/MarvelComics turns out to exist within the Franchise/MarvelUniverse (yes, really!), publishing comics of the "real life" superheroes and their true adventures. Their comics being screened by the CAA makes them recognized as legal government approved documents, meaning ''comic books can be used as evidence in a trial''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Good news, everybody! The language prohibiting "the walking dead," non-literary monsters, and words like "horror" and "terror" is gone now, and it's OK to use that stuff now!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Major publishing houses Franchise/ArchieComics (protecting its image of "wholesome American youth") and Creator/DCComics (which made most of its money from kid-friendly romance and science fiction titles during this time period) more or less forced the Code onto the entire comics industry. Numerous publishing houses folded after the formation of the CCA because their subject matter couldn't pass the Code -- which ''[[SarcasmMode just happened]]'' to cut down on Archie and DC's competition, as well as the competiton to DC-owned Independent News, then the largest distributor in the Comics Magazine Association of America (the Code's governing body).

to:

Major publishing houses Franchise/ArchieComics (protecting (protected by its image of "wholesome American youth") youth" and the controller of the Comics Code Authority) and Creator/DCComics (which made most of its money from kid-friendly romance and science fiction titles during this time period) more or less forced the Code onto the entire comics industry. Numerous publishing houses folded after the formation of the CCA because their subject matter couldn't pass the Code -- which ''[[SarcasmMode just happened]]'' to cut down on Archie and DC's competition, as well as the competiton to DC-owned Independent News, then the largest distributor in the Comics Magazine Association of America (the Code's governing body).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** (Villains could not torture, murder, or sexually assault their victims, and so had to resort to a lot of gloating and outrageous GlobalDomination schemes. Also, no stories centered on sexual perversion - consensual or otherwise.)

to:

** (Villains could not torture, murder, or sexually assault their victims, and so had to resort to a lot of gloating and outrageous GlobalDomination schemes.schemes to TakeOverTheWorld. Also, no stories centered on sexual perversion - consensual or otherwise.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "Nudity in any form is prohibited, as is indecent or undue exposure]."

to:

* "Nudity in any form is prohibited, as is indecent or undue exposure].exposure."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing sinkhole


* "Nudity in any form is prohibited, as is [[BarbieDollAnatomy indecent or undue exposure]]."

to:

* "Nudity in any form is prohibited, as is [[BarbieDollAnatomy indecent or undue exposure]].exposure]."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Among other things, the CCA (and its governing rules, known as The Comics Code) prohibited depictions of characters questioning public authority figures, revealing clothing, and narcotics (in any context). The Code also banned certain words from comic titles ('horror' and 'terror', most notably) and forced every story to have a happy ending. The Code regulated what advertising could appear in comic books, as well, but most of the restrictions it put into place wouldn't count as surprising or controversial even now (no ads for liquor, tobacco, weapons, fireworks, or gambling equipment).

to:

Among other things, the CCA (and its governing rules, known as The Comics Code) prohibited depictions of characters questioning public authority figures, revealing clothing, and narcotics (in any context). The Code also banned certain words from comic titles ('horror' and 'terror', most notably) and forced every story to have a happy ending. ending - even multi-part stories with cliffhangers had to be specially approved. The Code regulated what advertising could appear in comic books, books as well, but most of the restrictions it put into place wouldn't count as surprising or controversial even now (no ads for liquor, tobacco, weapons, fireworks, or gambling equipment).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The Code began to lose power in [[TheSeventies the 1970s]] when Creator/StanLee wrote a ''[[Comicbook/SpiderMan Spider-Man]]'' story involving narcotics. Even though he portrayed drugs in an extremely negative light and wrote the story on the recommendation of the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, the CCA refused to place a seal of approval on the story because of the depiction of a character using drugs. In contrast, the CCA approved an earlier ''Comicbook/{{Deadman}}'' story where the superhero fought drug smugglers because the story focused on the ''wholesale'' handling of narcotics (the CCA always handled its own rules in an inconsistent way). Lee defied the CCA by removing the Code Seal from the storyline, which appeared in ''Amazing Spider-Man'' issues #96-98.

When Lee's story gained considerable public appreciation and critical acclaim, all the egg on its face forced the CCA into changing the Code to allow negative portrayals of drug abuse -- but even with the change, the CCA would never recover from the damage to its reputation.

to:

The Code began to lose power in [[TheSeventies the 1970s]] when Creator/StanLee wrote a ''[[Comicbook/SpiderMan Spider-Man]]'' story involving narcotics. Even though he portrayed drugs in an extremely negative light and wrote the story on the recommendation of the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, the CCA refused to place a seal of approval on the story because of the depiction of a character using drugs. In contrast, the CCA approved an earlier ''Comicbook/{{Deadman}}'' story where the superhero fought drug smugglers because the story focused on the ''wholesale'' handling of narcotics (the CCA always handled its own rules in an inconsistent way). Lee [[DefyingTheCensors defied the CCA CCA]] by removing the Code Seal from the storyline, which appeared in ''Amazing Spider-Man'' issues #96-98.

When Lee's story gained considerable public appreciation and critical acclaim, all the egg on its face forced the CCA into changing the Code to allow negative portrayals of drug abuse provided that it was clearly shown in a negative light -- but even with the change, the CCA would never recover from the damage to its reputation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Back in [[TheFifties the 1950s]], a moral panic about the corrupting influence of crime and horror comics swept North America, thanks in part to psychologist Frederic Wertham and his book ''Seduction of the Innocent''. To head off calls for government regulation, the comic book publishers formed the Comics Code Authority as a self-censoring body to prevent the government from stepping in and making a mess of things -- which likely led to even tighter censoring in order to get their ruleset approved by the government.

to:

Back in [[TheFifties the 1950s]], a moral panic about the corrupting influence of crime and horror comics swept North America, thanks in part to psychologist Frederic Wertham and his book ''Seduction of the Innocent''. (Just to note, it turns out that [[https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140804/08494028095/learning-history-how-one-lying-liar-almost-screwed-comic-book-industry.shtml the content of Wertham's book was pretty much fabricated in various ways]] - in other words, this entire mess was partially started by a man whose defining work was entirely composed of lies, half-truths, omission of facts, and modifying his patients stories to achieve his desired conclusion.) To head off calls for government regulation, the comic book publishers formed the Comics Code Authority as a self-censoring body to prevent the government from stepping in and making a mess of things -- which likely led to even tighter censoring in order to get their ruleset approved by the government.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Good news, everybody! The language prohibiting "the walking dead," non-literary monsters, and words like "horror" and "terror" is gone now, and it's OK to use that stuff now!

to:

* Good news, everybody! The language prohibiting "the walking dead," non-literary monsters, and words like "horror" and "terror" is gone now, and it's OK to use that stuff now!now!
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
A couple of mistakes, and I realized doing this way would probably be better.


DC Comics dropped the Code from the majority of its titles shortly after the turn of the 21st Century; MarvelComics withdrew from the Code entirely at around the same time period. In January 2011, DC abandoned the Code entirely in favor of its own in-house rating system. After those major departures, Archie Comics remained the Code's sole participant and administrator[[note]]An Archie employee had always supervised the Code since its inception[[/note]]. Archie figured that the Code served no purpose in light of its publishing standards [[note]]"We aren't about to start [[StuffedIntoTheFridge stuffing bodies into refrigerators]]", said Archie Comics' President Mike Pellerito[[/note]], Archie abandoned the Code the day after DC's abandonment. The Comics Code had officially died.

(According to [[http://www.newsarama.com/comics/who-has-been-running-the-comics-code-authority-11012-22.html some sources]], the CMAA barely existed in its final year or so anyway. One person would check the few DC books that still used the code, and Archie just assumed that their comics would always pass muster because... Well, why wouldn't they? Granted, this was ''before'' Archie suddenly decided to [[AfterlifeWithArchie decided to make a series featuring its namesake's setting in a zombie apocalypse]], which makes Mike Pellerito's quote HilariousInHindsight.)

to:

DC Comics dropped the Code from the majority of its titles shortly after the turn of the 21st Century; MarvelComics withdrew from the Code entirely at around the same time period. In January 2011, DC abandoned the Code entirely in favor of its own in-house rating system. After those major departures, Archie Comics remained the Code's sole participant and administrator[[note]]An Archie employee had always supervised the Code since its inception[[/note]]. Archie figured that the Code served no purpose in light of its publishing standards [[note]]"We aren't about to start [[StuffedIntoTheFridge stuffing bodies into refrigerators]]", said Archie Comics' President Mike Pellerito[[/note]], Pellerito. Note that this was ''before'' Archie suddenly [[ComicBook/AfterlifeWithArchie decided to make a series featuring its namesake's setting in a zombie apocalypse]], including characters actually dying, which makes the quote HilariousInHindsight.[[/note]], Archie abandoned the Code the day after DC's abandonment. The Comics Code had officially died.

(According to [[http://www.newsarama.com/comics/who-has-been-running-the-comics-code-authority-11012-22.html some sources]], the CMAA barely existed in its final year or so anyway. One person would check the few DC books that still used the code, and Archie just assumed that their comics would always pass muster because... Well, why wouldn't they? Granted, Once again, this was ''before'' before Archie suddenly decided to [[AfterlifeWithArchie decided to make a series featuring become more bold with content in its namesake's setting in a zombie apocalypse]], which makes Mike Pellerito's quote HilariousInHindsight.flagship franchise.)



* Good news, everybody! The language prohibiting "the walking dead," non-literary monsters, and words like "horror" and "terror" is gone now, and it's OK to use that stuff now!

to:

* Good news, everybody! The language prohibiting "the walking dead," non-literary monsters, and words like "horror" and "terror" is gone now, and it's OK to use that stuff now!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


(According to [[http://www.newsarama.com/comics/who-has-been-running-the-comics-code-authority-11012-22.html some sources]], the CMAA barely existed in its final year or so anyway. One person would check the few DC books that still used the code, and Archie just assumed that their comics would always pass muster because... Well, why wouldn't they? Granted, this was ''before'' Archie suddenly decided to [[AfterlifeWithArchie decided to make a series featuring its namesake's setting in a zombie apocalypse, which makes Mike Pellerito's quote HilariousInHindsight.]])

to:

(According to [[http://www.newsarama.com/comics/who-has-been-running-the-comics-code-authority-11012-22.html some sources]], the CMAA barely existed in its final year or so anyway. One person would check the few DC books that still used the code, and Archie just assumed that their comics would always pass muster because... Well, why wouldn't they? Granted, this was ''before'' Archie suddenly decided to [[AfterlifeWithArchie decided to make a series featuring its namesake's setting in a zombie apocalypse, apocalypse]], which makes Mike Pellerito's quote HilariousInHindsight.]])
)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


(According to [[http://www.newsarama.com/comics/who-has-been-running-the-comics-code-authority-11012-22.html some sources]], the CMAA barely existed in its final year or so anyway. One person would check the few DC books that still used the code, and Archie just assumed that their comics would always pass muster because...well, why wouldn't they?)

to:

(According to [[http://www.newsarama.com/comics/who-has-been-running-the-comics-code-authority-11012-22.html some sources]], the CMAA barely existed in its final year or so anyway. One person would check the few DC books that still used the code, and Archie just assumed that their comics would always pass muster because...well, Well, why wouldn't they?)
they? Granted, this was ''before'' Archie suddenly decided to [[AfterlifeWithArchie decided to make a series featuring its namesake's setting in a zombie apocalypse, which makes Mike Pellerito's quote HilariousInHindsight.]])

Changed: 22

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "Scenes dealing with, or instruments associated with [[OurZombiesAreDifferent walking dead]], torture, [[OurVampiresAreDifferent vampires and vampirism]], [[OurGhoulsAreDifferent ghouls]], [[IAmAHumanitarian cannibalism]], and [[WolfMan werewolfism]] are prohibited."

to:

* "Scenes dealing with, or instruments associated with [[OurZombiesAreDifferent walking dead]], torture, [[OurVampiresAreDifferent vampires and vampirism]], [[OurGhoulsAreDifferent ghouls]], [[IAmAHumanitarian cannibalism]], and [[WolfMan [[OurWerewolvesAreDifferent werewolfism]] are prohibited."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Once in place, The Code killed off adult interest in comic books ''and'' stereotyped the medium as fit only for children. William Gaines' ECComics essentially left the newsstand comics business to focus on ''Magazine/{{MAD}}''. [[note]]The company originally published ''Mad'' as a comic book, but later changed to magazine format. Many people think the company made the change to escape the Code; while this did happen, [[http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/06/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-45/ the company actually changed formats to keep editor Harvey Kurtzman on board]].[[/note]] Incidentally, Dr. Wertham (whose book started the whole moral panic in the first place) denounced the Code as a whitewash that made comics worse by removing the consequences of violence.

to:

Once in place, The Code killed off adult interest in comic books ''and'' stereotyped the medium as fit only for children. William Gaines' ECComics ECComics, the most notorious publisher during the popular backlash, tried to operate under the Code, but gave up when a science fiction story, "Judgement Day," was reprinted and the CCA vetoed it simply because the main character was an African American. With Gaines at the end of his patience dealing not only with the CCA's stifling rules, but now also its unalloyed racism, EC essentially left the newsstand comics business to focus on ''Magazine/{{MAD}}''. [[note]]The company originally published ''Mad'' as a comic book, but later changed to magazine format. Many people think the company made the change to escape the Code; while this did happen, [[http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/06/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-45/ the company actually changed formats to keep editor Harvey Kurtzman on board]].[[/note]] Incidentally, Dr. Wertham (whose book started the whole moral panic in the first place) denounced the Code as a whitewash that made comics worse by removing the consequences of violence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** (Law enforcers were not allowed to appear [[BadCopIncompetentCop incompetent]] or [[DirtyCop corrupt,]] and there was no such thing as an [[PunchClockVillain antagonist who only dabbles in villainy as a hobby]].)

to:

** (Law enforcers were not allowed to appear [[PoliceAreUseless incompetent]] [[BadCopIncompetentCop incompetent]] or or]] [[DirtyCop corrupt,]] and there was no such thing as an [[PunchClockVillain antagonist who only dabbles in villainy as a hobby]].)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** (Law enforcers were not allowed to appear incompetent or [[CorruptCop corrupt,]] and there was no such thing as an [[PunchClockVillain antagonist who only dabbles in villainy as a hobby]].)

to:

** (Law enforcers were not allowed to appear incompetent [[BadCopIncompetentCop incompetent]] or [[CorruptCop [[DirtyCop corrupt,]] and there was no such thing as an [[PunchClockVillain antagonist who only dabbles in villainy as a hobby]].)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
One more try: \"abandonment\"


DC Comics dropped the Code from the majority of its titles shortly after the turn of the 21st Century; MarvelComics withdrew from the Code entirely at around the same time period. In January 2011, DC abandoned the Code entirely in favor of its own in-house rating system. After those major departures, Archie Comics remained the Code's sole participant and administrator[[note]]An Archie employee had always supervised the Code since its inception[[/note]]. Archie figured that the Code served no purpose in light of its publishing standards [[note]]"We aren't about to start [[StuffedIntoTheFridge stuffing bodies into refrigerators]]", said Archie Comics' President Mike Pellerito[[/note]], Archie abandoned the Code the day after DC's abandoment. The Comics Code had officially died.

to:

DC Comics dropped the Code from the majority of its titles shortly after the turn of the 21st Century; MarvelComics withdrew from the Code entirely at around the same time period. In January 2011, DC abandoned the Code entirely in favor of its own in-house rating system. After those major departures, Archie Comics remained the Code's sole participant and administrator[[note]]An Archie employee had always supervised the Code since its inception[[/note]]. Archie figured that the Code served no purpose in light of its publishing standards [[note]]"We aren't about to start [[StuffedIntoTheFridge stuffing bodies into refrigerators]]", said Archie Comics' President Mike Pellerito[[/note]], Archie abandoned the Code the day after DC's abandoment.abandonment. The Comics Code had officially died.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


DC Comics dropped the Code from the majority of its titles shortly after the turn of the 21st Century; MarvelComics withdrew from the Code entirely at around the same time period. In January 2011, DC abandoned the Code entirely in favor of its own in-house rating system. After those major departures, Archie Comics remained the Code's sole participant and administrator[[note]]An Archie employee had always supervised the Code since its inception[[/note]]. Archie figured that the Code served no purpose in light of its publishing standards [[note]]"We aren't about to start [[StuffedIntoTheFridge stuffing bodies into refrigerators]]", said Archie Comics' President Mike Pellerito[[/note]] Archie abandoned the Code the day after DC's abandomnet. The Comics Code had officially died.

to:

DC Comics dropped the Code from the majority of its titles shortly after the turn of the 21st Century; MarvelComics withdrew from the Code entirely at around the same time period. In January 2011, DC abandoned the Code entirely in favor of its own in-house rating system. After those major departures, Archie Comics remained the Code's sole participant and administrator[[note]]An Archie employee had always supervised the Code since its inception[[/note]]. Archie figured that the Code served no purpose in light of its publishing standards [[note]]"We aren't about to start [[StuffedIntoTheFridge stuffing bodies into refrigerators]]", said Archie Comics' President Mike Pellerito[[/note]] Pellerito[[/note]], Archie abandoned the Code the day after DC's abandomnet.abandoment. The Comics Code had officially died.

Added: 746

Changed: 10528

Removed: 4

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


For decades, '''''The Comics Code''''' served as one of America's premier {{Censorship Bureau}}s (this site even named the page after it for a time).

Back in [[TheFifties the 1950s]], a moral panic about the corrupting influence of crime and horror comics swept North America, leading to calls for government regulation. To head it off, the comic book publishers formed the Comics Code Authority as a self-censoring body to prevent the government from stepping in and making a mess of things - which probably led to even tighter censoring in order to get their code approved by the government. Among other things, the CCA - and its governing rules, known as The Comics Code - prohibited characters from questioning public authority figures, the usage of revealing clothing, and ''any'' depiction of narcotics, as well as banning certain words from titles ('horror' and 'terror', most notably) and demanding that every story have a happy ending. The Code also regulated what advertising could appear in comic books, though the restrictions are not especially surprising or controversial even now (e.g, no ads for liquor, tobacco, weapons, fireworks or gambling equipment...)

Once in place, The Code killed off adult interest in comic books ''and'' stereotyped the medium as fit only for children. William Gaines' ECComics essentially left the newsstand comics business to focus on ''Magazine/{{MAD}}''. [[note]]The company originally published ''Mad'' as a comic book, but later changed to magazine format. Many people think the company made the change to escape the Code. The change indeed ''did'' allow ''Mad'' to escape the code, [[http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/06/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-45/ but in truth, the reason for the change was to keep editor Harvey Kurtzman on board]].[[/note]] Incidentally, Dr. Frederic Wertham, the psychologist who fueled much of the public backlash against the medium with his book, ''Seduction of the Innocent'', actually denounced the code as a whitewash that made comics worse by removing the consequences of violence.

Major publishing houses Franchise/ArchieComics (protecting its image of "wholesome American youth") and Creator/DCComics (which, at the time, made most of its money from kid-friendly romance and science fiction titles) more or less forced the Code onto the comics industry. DC also owned Independent News, then the largest distributor in the Code's governing body, the Comics Magazine Association. Numerous publishing houses folded after the formation of the CCA since their subject matter was too dark, or had the living dead in their most popular comics, and so couldn't pass the code, which ''[[SarcasmMode just happened]]'' to cut down on their competition.

Creator/DellComics and Gilberton (publisher of ''Classics Illustrated'') stayed out of the CCA; Dell believed that their company brand and reputation was enough to reassure parents, and sold its comics with the slogan "Dell Comics are ''Good'' Comics." Neither publisher's lack of a CCA stamp harmed their profits, as both companies' comics sold well for most of the Comics Code's heyday. This also allowed Dell (and GoldKeyComics, which "spun off" from Dell in 1962) to occasionally publish comics that would not pass muster under the code, such as an adaptation of ''Series/DarkShadows'' featuring vampire Barnabas Collins.[[note]]Even then, Gold Key was careful to show restraint - for example, vampire bites were only implied, never explicitly shown.[[/note]]

The Code began to lose power in [[TheSeventies the 1970s]] when Creator/StanLee wrote a ''[[Comicbook/SpiderMan Spider-Man]]'' story involving narcotics. Even though he portrayed drugs in an ''extremely'' negative light and wrote the story ''on the recommendation of the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare'', the CCA stubbornly refused to place a seal of approval on the story because of the depiction of narcotics being used. In contrast, the CCA approved an earlier ''Comicbook/{{Deadman}}'' story where the superhero fought narcotics smugglers because the story focused on the ''wholesale'' handling of narcotics (it was often wildly inconsistent that way0. Lee defied the CCA by removing the Code Seal from the storyline, which appeared in ''Amazing Spider-Man'' issues #96-98. Lee's story gained considerable public appreciation and critical acclaim, and thanks to all the egg on its face in light of the story's success, the CCA changed the Code to allow negative portrayals of drug abuse -- but even with the change, the CCA would never recover from the damage to its reputation.

Two major revisions - [[http://www.thecomicbooks.com/old/cca2.html one in 1971]] and [[http://www.reocities.com/athens/8580/cca3.html another in 1989]] - relaxed and outright dropped many of The Code's stricter rules. The 1971 revision altered some of the stricter and more outdated provisions of the original Code while maintaining its basic structure, and the 1989 revision combined less restrictive views on old "crime, punishment, and sexuality" issues with PoliticallyCorrect injunctions against stereotyping.

The Code lapsed into true irrelevance during [[TheEighties the 1980s]]. "Direct market" comic book specialty stores (which the Code didn't cover) cut into sales on the newsstands (which the Code ''did'' cover), and as "direct-only" comics from the established publishers became increasingly common, those publishers began to publish more and more comics without the Code Seal. Newer publishers, often producing comics explicitly aimed at older teen and adult readers, ignored the Code entirely.

DC Comics dropped the Code from the majority of their titles shortly after the turn of the 21st century, at about the same time that MarvelComics withdrew from the Code entirely. In January 2011, DC abandoned the Code entirely in favor of its own in-house rating system. After those major departures, Archie Comics remained the Code's sole participant and administrator[[note]]The Code had always been under the supervision of an Archie employee[[/note]], and after concluding that the Code served no purpose in light of its publishing standards - "We aren't about to start [[StuffedIntoTheFridge stuffing bodies into refrigerators]]", said Archie Comics' President Mike Pellerito (although that might have made an interesting plot twist) - Archie abandoned the Code the day after DC did, thus rendering The Comics Code officially defunct.

According to [[http://www.newsarama.com/comics/who-has-been-running-the-comics-code-authority-11012-22.html some sources]], the CMAA barely existed in the final year or so anyway; one person was checking the few DC books, while Archie just assumed that their comics were entitled to bear the stamp because, well, it was Archie, why wouldn't they?

On September 29th 2011, the Comics Magazine Association of America announced it had sold the intellectual property rights of the Comics Code seal to the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund (a U.S-based non-profit organization which helps to protect the First Amendment rights of comic creators, publishers, and retailers by helping cover legal expenses). In a nice little twist, the sale coincided with the annual Banned Books Week campaign.

to:

For decades, '''''The Comics Code''''' served as one of America's premier {{Censorship Bureau}}s (this site even named the said page after it the Code for a time).

Back in [[TheFifties the 1950s]], a moral panic about the corrupting influence of crime and horror comics swept North America, leading thanks in part to psychologist Frederic Wertham and his book ''Seduction of the Innocent''. To head off calls for government regulation. To head it off, regulation, the comic book publishers formed the Comics Code Authority as a self-censoring body to prevent the government from stepping in and making a mess of things - -- which probably likely led to even tighter censoring in order to get their code ruleset approved by the government. government.

Among other things, the CCA - and (and its governing rules, known as The Comics Code - Code) prohibited depictions of characters from questioning public authority figures, the usage of revealing clothing, and ''any'' depiction of narcotics, as well as banning narcotics (in any context). The Code also banned certain words from comic titles ('horror' and 'terror', most notably) and demanding that forced every story to have a happy ending. The Code also regulated what advertising could appear in comic books, though as well, but most of the restrictions are not especially it put into place wouldn't count as surprising or controversial even now (e.g, no (no ads for liquor, tobacco, weapons, fireworks fireworks, or gambling equipment...)

equipment).

Once in place, The Code killed off adult interest in comic books ''and'' stereotyped the medium as fit only for children. William Gaines' ECComics essentially left the newsstand comics business to focus on ''Magazine/{{MAD}}''. [[note]]The company originally published ''Mad'' as a comic book, but later changed to magazine format. Many people think the company made the change to escape the Code. The change indeed ''did'' allow ''Mad'' to escape the code, Code; while this did happen, [[http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/06/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-45/ but in truth, the reason for the change was company actually changed formats to keep editor Harvey Kurtzman on board]].[[/note]] Incidentally, Dr. Frederic Wertham, Wertham (whose book started the psychologist who fueled much of whole moral panic in the public backlash against the medium with his book, ''Seduction of the Innocent'', actually first place) denounced the code Code as a whitewash that made comics worse by removing the consequences of violence.

Major publishing houses Franchise/ArchieComics (protecting its image of "wholesome American youth") and Creator/DCComics (which, at the time, (which made most of its money from kid-friendly romance and science fiction titles) titles during this time period) more or less forced the Code onto the entire comics industry. DC also owned Independent News, then the largest distributor in the Code's governing body, the Comics Magazine Association. industry. Numerous publishing houses folded after the formation of the CCA since because their subject matter was too dark, or had the living dead in their most popular comics, and so couldn't pass the code, Code -- which ''[[SarcasmMode just happened]]'' to cut down on their competition.

Archie and DC's competition, as well as the competiton to DC-owned Independent News, then the largest distributor in the Comics Magazine Association of America (the Code's governing body).

Creator/DellComics and Gilberton (publisher of ''Classics Illustrated'') stayed out of the CCA; Dell believed that their company brand and reputation was enough to would reassure parents, and sold which led to the company advertising its comics with the slogan "Dell Comics are ''Good'' Comics." Neither publisher's lack of a CCA stamp harmed their profits, as both companies' comics sold well for most of the Comics Code's heyday. This also allowed Dell (and GoldKeyComics, which "spun off" from Dell in 1962) to occasionally publish comics that would not pass muster under the code, Code, such as an adaptation of ''Series/DarkShadows'' featuring vampire Barnabas Collins.[[note]]Even then, Gold Key was careful to show showed restraint - -- for example, the artwork implied vampire bites were only implied, never without explicitly shown.showing them.[[/note]]

The Code began to lose power in [[TheSeventies the 1970s]] when Creator/StanLee wrote a ''[[Comicbook/SpiderMan Spider-Man]]'' story involving narcotics. Even though he portrayed drugs in an ''extremely'' extremely negative light and wrote the story ''on on the recommendation of the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare'', Welfare, the CCA stubbornly refused to place a seal of approval on the story because of the depiction of narcotics being used. a character using drugs. In contrast, the CCA approved an earlier ''Comicbook/{{Deadman}}'' story where the superhero fought narcotics drug smugglers because the story focused on the ''wholesale'' handling of narcotics (it was often wildly (the CCA always handled its own rules in an inconsistent that way0. way). Lee defied the CCA by removing the Code Seal from the storyline, which appeared in ''Amazing Spider-Man'' issues #96-98. #96-98.

When
Lee's story gained considerable public appreciation and critical acclaim, and thanks to all the egg on its face in light of the story's success, forced the CCA changed into changing the Code to allow negative portrayals of drug abuse -- but even with the change, the CCA would never recover from the damage to its reputation.

Two major revisions - [[http://www.([[http://www.thecomicbooks.com/old/cca2.html one in 1971]] and [[http://www.reocities.com/athens/8580/cca3.html another in 1989]] - 1989]]) either relaxed and outright or dropped many of The Code's stricter rules. The 1971 revision altered some of the stricter and more outdated provisions of the original Code while maintaining without altering its basic structure, and while the 1989 revision combined less restrictive views on old "crime, punishment, and sexuality" issues with PoliticallyCorrect injunctions against stereotyping.

The Code lapsed into true irrelevance during [[TheEighties the 1980s]]. "Direct 1980s]] when "direct market" comic book specialty stores (which the Code didn't cover) cut into the sales of comics on the newsstands (which the Code ''did'' cover), and as cover). As "direct-only" comics from the established publishers became increasingly more common, those said publishers began to publish published more and more comics without the Code Seal. Newer publishers, Seal, and newer publishers (who often producing produced comics explicitly aimed at older teen teens and adult readers, adults) ignored the Code entirely.

DC Comics dropped the Code from the majority of their its titles shortly after the turn of the 21st century, at about the same time that Century; MarvelComics withdrew from the Code entirely.entirely at around the same time period. In January 2011, DC abandoned the Code entirely in favor of its own in-house rating system. After those major departures, Archie Comics remained the Code's sole participant and administrator[[note]]The Code administrator[[note]]An Archie employee had always been under supervised the supervision of an Code since its inception[[/note]]. Archie employee[[/note]], and after concluding figured that the Code served no purpose in light of its publishing standards - "We [[note]]"We aren't about to start [[StuffedIntoTheFridge stuffing bodies into refrigerators]]", said Archie Comics' President Mike Pellerito (although that might have made an interesting plot twist) - Pellerito[[/note]] Archie abandoned the Code the day after DC did, thus rendering DC's abandomnet. The Comics Code had officially defunct.

According
died.

(According
to [[http://www.newsarama.com/comics/who-has-been-running-the-comics-code-authority-11012-22.html some sources]], the CMAA barely existed in the its final year or so anyway; one anyway. One person was checking would check the few DC books, while books that still used the code, and Archie just assumed that their comics were entitled to bear the stamp because, would always pass muster because...well, it was Archie, why wouldn't they?

they?)

On September 29th 2011, the Comics Magazine Association of America CMAA announced it had sold the intellectual property rights of the Comics Code seal to the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund (a U.S-based non-profit organization which helps to protect the First Amendment rights of comic creators, publishers, and retailers by helping cover via covering legal expenses). In a nice little twist, the sale coincided with the annual Banned Books Week campaign.



----

Added: 770

Changed: 753

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** (Self-explanatory: Don't use racial or ethnic stereotypes.) *** Ironically, the Code office itself tried to use their power for this exact purpose at least once. One of the last EC stories, a science-fiction piece called ''Judgement Day'', focused on a planet of intelligent robots - who [[FantasticRacism have a strict segregation between orange- and blue-plated robots, despite all being made from the same parts]] - being denied membership in [[TheFederation The Galactic Republic]] by a human diplomat named Tarleton. In the final panel, Tarleton finally removes his space helmet, revealing that he's a black man - and realistically-drawn, without giant lips or googly eyes. The Code authority tried to force EC editor Bill Gaines to change the ending, because, in their exact words: "You can't have a Negro."

to:

** (Self-explanatory: Don't use racial or ethnic stereotypes.) )
*** Ironically, the Code office itself tried to use their power for this exact purpose at least once.once back in the '50s. One of the last EC stories, a science-fiction piece called ''Judgement Day'', focused on a planet of intelligent robots - who [[FantasticRacism have a strict segregation between orange- and blue-plated robots, despite all being made from the same parts]] - being denied membership in [[TheFederation The Galactic Republic]] by a human diplomat named Tarleton. In the final panel, Tarleton finally removes his space helmet, revealing that he's a black man - and realistically-drawn, without giant lips or googly eyes. The Code authority tried to force EC editor Bill Gaines to change the ending, because, in their exact words: "You can't have a Negro."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->-- '''Jonathan Ross''' on ''Series/{{QI}}''. The specific alleged rule is [[http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/07/23/comic-book-legends-revealed-217/ just an urban legend]], though comics editors were aware of TheProblemWithPenIsland.

to:

-->-- '''Jonathan Ross''' on ''Series/{{QI}}''. The specific alleged rule is [[http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/07/23/comic-book-legends-revealed-217/ just an urban legend]], and Spider-Man didn't exist yet, though comics editors were aware of TheProblemWithPenIsland.



Back in [[TheFifties the 1950s]], a moral panic about the corrupting influence of crime and horror comics swept North America, leading to calls for government regulation. To head it off, the comic book publishers formed the Comics Code Authority as a self-censoring body to prevent the government from stepping in and making a mess of things - which probably led to even tighter censoring in order to get their code approved by the government. Among other things, the CCA - and its governing rules, known as The Comics Code - prohibited characters from questioning public authority figures, the usage of revealing clothing, and ''any'' depiction of narcotics. The Code also regulated what advertising could appear in comic books, though the restrictions are not especially surprising or controversial even now (e.g, no ads for liquor, tobacco, weapons, fireworks or gambling equipment...)

to:

Back in [[TheFifties the 1950s]], a moral panic about the corrupting influence of crime and horror comics swept North America, leading to calls for government regulation. To head it off, the comic book publishers formed the Comics Code Authority as a self-censoring body to prevent the government from stepping in and making a mess of things - which probably led to even tighter censoring in order to get their code approved by the government. Among other things, the CCA - and its governing rules, known as The Comics Code - prohibited characters from questioning public authority figures, the usage of revealing clothing, and ''any'' depiction of narcotics.narcotics, as well as banning certain words from titles ('horror' and 'terror', most notably) and demanding that every story have a happy ending. The Code also regulated what advertising could appear in comic books, though the restrictions are not especially surprising or controversial even now (e.g, no ads for liquor, tobacco, weapons, fireworks or gambling equipment...)



The Code began to lose power in [[TheSeventies the 1970s]] when Creator/StanLee wrote a ''[[Comicbook/SpiderMan Spider-Man]]'' story involving narcotics. Even though he portrayed drugs in an ''extremely'' negative light and wrote the story ''on the recommendation of the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare'', the CCA stubbornly refused to place a seal of approval on the story because of the depiction of narcotics being used. In contrast, the CCA approved an earlier ''Comicbook/{{Deadman}}'' story where the superhero fought narcotics smugglers because the story focused on the ''wholesale'' handling of narcotics. Lee defied the CCA by removing the Code Seal from the storyline, which appeared in ''Amazing Spider-Man'' issues #96-98. Lee's story gained considerable public appreciation and critical acclaim, and thanks to all the egg on its face in light of the story's success, the CCA changed the Code to allow negative portrayals of drug abuse -- but even with the change, the CCA would never recover from the damage to its reputation.

to:

The Code began to lose power in [[TheSeventies the 1970s]] when Creator/StanLee wrote a ''[[Comicbook/SpiderMan Spider-Man]]'' story involving narcotics. Even though he portrayed drugs in an ''extremely'' negative light and wrote the story ''on the recommendation of the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare'', the CCA stubbornly refused to place a seal of approval on the story because of the depiction of narcotics being used. In contrast, the CCA approved an earlier ''Comicbook/{{Deadman}}'' story where the superhero fought narcotics smugglers because the story focused on the ''wholesale'' handling of narcotics.narcotics (it was often wildly inconsistent that way0. Lee defied the CCA by removing the Code Seal from the storyline, which appeared in ''Amazing Spider-Man'' issues #96-98. Lee's story gained considerable public appreciation and critical acclaim, and thanks to all the egg on its face in light of the story's success, the CCA changed the Code to allow negative portrayals of drug abuse -- but even with the change, the CCA would never recover from the damage to its reputation.



DC Comics dropped the Code from the majority of their titles shortly after the turn of the 21st century, at about the same time that MarvelComics withdrew from the Code entirely. In January 2011, DC abandoned the Code entirely in favor of its own in-house rating system. After those major departures, Archie Comics remained the Code's sole participant and administrator[[note]]The Code had always been under the supervision of an Archie employee[[/note]], and after concluding that the Code served no purpose in light of its publishing standards - "We aren't about to start [[StuffedIntoTheFridge stuffing bodies into refrigerators]]", said Archie Comics' President Mike Pellerito - Archie abandoned the Code the day after DC did, thus rendering The Comics Code officially defunct.

to:

DC Comics dropped the Code from the majority of their titles shortly after the turn of the 21st century, at about the same time that MarvelComics withdrew from the Code entirely. In January 2011, DC abandoned the Code entirely in favor of its own in-house rating system. After those major departures, Archie Comics remained the Code's sole participant and administrator[[note]]The Code had always been under the supervision of an Archie employee[[/note]], and after concluding that the Code served no purpose in light of its publishing standards - "We aren't about to start [[StuffedIntoTheFridge stuffing bodies into refrigerators]]", said Archie Comics' President Mike Pellerito (although that might have made an interesting plot twist) - Archie abandoned the Code the day after DC did, thus rendering The Comics Code officially defunct.



* "Criminals shall not be presented [[EvilIsSexy so as to be rendered glamorous]] or to occupy a position which creates a desire for emulation."

to:

* "Criminals shall not be presented [[EvilIsSexy [[EvilIsCool so as to be rendered glamorous]] or to occupy a position which creates a desire for emulation."



* "Scenes dealing with, or instruments associated with [[OurZombiesAreDifferent walking dead]], torture, [[OurVampiresAreDifferent vampires and vampirism]], [[OurGhoulsAreDifferent ghouls]], [[IAmAHumanitarian cannibalism]], and [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking werewolfism]] are prohibited."

to:

* "Scenes dealing with, or instruments associated with [[OurZombiesAreDifferent walking dead]], torture, [[OurVampiresAreDifferent vampires and vampirism]], [[OurGhoulsAreDifferent ghouls]], [[IAmAHumanitarian cannibalism]], and [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking [[WolfMan werewolfism]] are prohibited."



** (Basically, limited who the hero could have a romantic relationship with and what kind of relationship it could be. No homosexuality, lesbianism, bisexuality, pedophilia, open relationships, sadomasochistic relationships, incestuous relationships, relationships with transvestites or transsexuals, or [[MalignedMixedMarriage interracial relationships]].)

to:

** (Basically, limited who the hero could have a romantic relationship with and what kind of relationship it could be. No homosexuality, lesbianism, bisexuality, pedophilia, open relationships, sadomasochistic relationships, incestuous relationships, relationships with transvestites or transsexuals, or [[MalignedMixedMarriage interracial relationships]].relationships]], even if it was by the bad guys.)



** (Self-explanatory: Don't use racial or ethnic stereotypes.)

to:

** (Self-explanatory: Don't use racial or ethnic stereotypes.)) *** Ironically, the Code office itself tried to use their power for this exact purpose at least once. One of the last EC stories, a science-fiction piece called ''Judgement Day'', focused on a planet of intelligent robots - who [[FantasticRacism have a strict segregation between orange- and blue-plated robots, despite all being made from the same parts]] - being denied membership in [[TheFederation The Galactic Republic]] by a human diplomat named Tarleton. In the final panel, Tarleton finally removes his space helmet, revealing that he's a black man - and realistically-drawn, without giant lips or googly eyes. The Code authority tried to force EC editor Bill Gaines to change the ending, because, in their exact words: "You can't have a Negro."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Goes without saying, so let\'s not say it.


** (Basically, limited who the hero could have a romantic relationship with and what kind of relationship it could be. No homosexuality, lesbianism, bisexuality, pedophilia[[note]]though that one should be illegal no matter what era[[/note]], open relationships, sadomasochistic relationships, incestuous relationships, relationships with transvestites or transsexuals, or [[MalignedMixedMarriage interracial relationships]].)

to:

** (Basically, limited who the hero could have a romantic relationship with and what kind of relationship it could be. No homosexuality, lesbianism, bisexuality, pedophilia[[note]]though that one should be illegal no matter what era[[/note]], pedophilia, open relationships, sadomasochistic relationships, incestuous relationships, relationships with transvestites or transsexuals, or [[MalignedMixedMarriage interracial relationships]].)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* The wording of prohibitions against "excessive" violence and bloodshed didn't change, but the interpretation apparently did. Under the 1954 Code, pretty much any depiction of blood was considered "excessive." After the 1971 revision, it was possible to show, for example, {{Superman}} bleeding [[http://www.comics.org/issue/25180/cover/4/ on the cover of the June 1972 issue of ''World's Finest'']] (not a major wound, but given his NighInvulnerability, an image that would have surprised readers at the time.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Major publishing houses Franchise/ArchieComics (protecting its image of "wholesome American youth") and Creator/DCComics (which, at the time, made most of its money from kid-friendly romance and science fiction titles) more or less forced the Code onto the comics industry. DC also owned Independent News, then the largest distributor in the Code's governing body, the Comics Magazine Association. Numerous publishing houses folded after the formation of the CCA since their subject matter was too dark, or had the living dead in it, and so couldn't pass the code, which ''[[SarcasmMode conveniently]]'' cut down competition for the big guys.

to:

Major publishing houses Franchise/ArchieComics (protecting its image of "wholesome American youth") and Creator/DCComics (which, at the time, made most of its money from kid-friendly romance and science fiction titles) more or less forced the Code onto the comics industry. DC also owned Independent News, then the largest distributor in the Code's governing body, the Comics Magazine Association. Numerous publishing houses folded after the formation of the CCA since their subject matter was too dark, or had the living dead in it, their most popular comics, and so couldn't pass the code, which ''[[SarcasmMode conveniently]]'' just happened]]'' to cut down competition for the big guys.
on their competition.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** (Corrupt government officials and cops are allowed, but they must always be caught, so they can't be recurring characters. Also they must be depicted as aberrations in a mostly-honest system.)

to:

** (Corrupt government officials and cops are allowed, but they must always be caught, so they can't be recurring characters. Also they must be depicted as isolated aberrations in a mostly-honest system.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** (Corrupt government officials and cops are allowed, but they must always be caught, so they can't be recurring characters.)

to:

** (Corrupt government officials and cops are allowed, but they must always be caught, so they can't be recurring characters. Also they must be depicted as aberrations in a mostly-honest system.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* While there's no specific language about it, the 1971 revision was interpreted as allowing AntiHero or AntiVillain characters up to a point - e.g., the Western AntiHero JonahHex and Marvel's supervillain Sandman, who was often portrayed as a PunchClockVillain.

to:

* While there's no specific language about it, the 1971 revision was interpreted as allowing AntiHero or AntiVillain characters up to a point - e.g., the Western AntiHero JonahHex ComicBook/JonahHex and Marvel's supervillain Sandman, who was often portrayed as a PunchClockVillain.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->''Comics were investigated after a certain Doctor Fredric Wertham brought out a book called '''Seduction of the Innocent''' in 1954, calling for the introduction of a self-regulating body known as the Comic Code Authority, that had such ridiculous rules as, you could not use the word "flick" in a comic for fear that [[TheProblemWithPenIsland the "l" would run into the "i"]] and Spider-Man would be saying, "Look, he's got a fuck knife!"''
-->-- '''Jonathan Ross''' on ''{{QI}}''. The specific alleged rule is [[http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/07/23/comic-book-legends-revealed-217/ just an urban legend]], though comics editors were aware of TheProblemWithPenIsland.

to:

->''Comics ->''"Comics were investigated after a certain Doctor Fredric Wertham brought out a book called '''Seduction of the Innocent''' in 1954, calling for the introduction of a self-regulating body known as the Comic Code Authority, that had such ridiculous rules as, you could not use the word "flick" 'flick' in a comic for fear that [[TheProblemWithPenIsland the "l" 'l' would run into the "i"]] 'i']] and Spider-Man ComicBook/SpiderMan would be saying, "Look, 'Look, he's got a fuck knife!"''
knife!'"''
-->-- '''Jonathan Ross''' on ''{{QI}}''.''Series/{{QI}}''. The specific alleged rule is [[http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/07/23/comic-book-legends-revealed-217/ just an urban legend]], though comics editors were aware of TheProblemWithPenIsland.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[quoteright:204:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/comics_codec____1467.jpg]]
[[caption-width-right:200: Approved by humourless 40-year-olds for concerned parents.]]

->''Comics were investigated after a certain Doctor Fredric Wertham brought out a book called '''Seduction of the Innocent''' in 1954, calling for the introduction of a self-regulating body known as the Comic Code Authority, that had such ridiculous rules as, you could not use the word "flick" in a comic for fear that [[TheProblemWithPenIsland the "l" would run into the "i"]] and Spider-Man would be saying, "Look, he's got a fuck knife!"''
-->-- '''Jonathan Ross''' on ''{{QI}}''. The specific alleged rule is [[http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2009/07/23/comic-book-legends-revealed-217/ just an urban legend]], though comics editors were aware of TheProblemWithPenIsland.

For decades, '''''The Comics Code''''' served as one of America's premier {{Censorship Bureau}}s (this site even named the page after it for a time).

Back in [[TheFifties the 1950s]], a moral panic about the corrupting influence of crime and horror comics swept North America, leading to calls for government regulation. To head it off, the comic book publishers formed the Comics Code Authority as a self-censoring body to prevent the government from stepping in and making a mess of things - which probably led to even tighter censoring in order to get their code approved by the government. Among other things, the CCA - and its governing rules, known as The Comics Code - prohibited characters from questioning public authority figures, the usage of revealing clothing, and ''any'' depiction of narcotics. The Code also regulated what advertising could appear in comic books, though the restrictions are not especially surprising or controversial even now (e.g, no ads for liquor, tobacco, weapons, fireworks or gambling equipment...)

Once in place, The Code killed off adult interest in comic books ''and'' stereotyped the medium as fit only for children. William Gaines' ECComics essentially left the newsstand comics business to focus on ''Magazine/{{MAD}}''. [[note]]The company originally published ''Mad'' as a comic book, but later changed to magazine format. Many people think the company made the change to escape the Code. The change indeed ''did'' allow ''Mad'' to escape the code, [[http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/04/06/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-45/ but in truth, the reason for the change was to keep editor Harvey Kurtzman on board]].[[/note]] Incidentally, Dr. Frederic Wertham, the psychologist who fueled much of the public backlash against the medium with his book, ''Seduction of the Innocent'', actually denounced the code as a whitewash that made comics worse by removing the consequences of violence.

Major publishing houses Franchise/ArchieComics (protecting its image of "wholesome American youth") and Creator/DCComics (which, at the time, made most of its money from kid-friendly romance and science fiction titles) more or less forced the Code onto the comics industry. DC also owned Independent News, then the largest distributor in the Code's governing body, the Comics Magazine Association. Numerous publishing houses folded after the formation of the CCA since their subject matter was too dark, or had the living dead in it, and so couldn't pass the code, which ''[[SarcasmMode conveniently]]'' cut down competition for the big guys.

Creator/DellComics and Gilberton (publisher of ''Classics Illustrated'') stayed out of the CCA; Dell believed that their company brand and reputation was enough to reassure parents, and sold its comics with the slogan "Dell Comics are ''Good'' Comics." Neither publisher's lack of a CCA stamp harmed their profits, as both companies' comics sold well for most of the Comics Code's heyday. This also allowed Dell (and GoldKeyComics, which "spun off" from Dell in 1962) to occasionally publish comics that would not pass muster under the code, such as an adaptation of ''Series/DarkShadows'' featuring vampire Barnabas Collins.[[note]]Even then, Gold Key was careful to show restraint - for example, vampire bites were only implied, never explicitly shown.[[/note]]

The Code began to lose power in [[TheSeventies the 1970s]] when Creator/StanLee wrote a ''[[Comicbook/SpiderMan Spider-Man]]'' story involving narcotics. Even though he portrayed drugs in an ''extremely'' negative light and wrote the story ''on the recommendation of the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare'', the CCA stubbornly refused to place a seal of approval on the story because of the depiction of narcotics being used. In contrast, the CCA approved an earlier ''Comicbook/{{Deadman}}'' story where the superhero fought narcotics smugglers because the story focused on the ''wholesale'' handling of narcotics. Lee defied the CCA by removing the Code Seal from the storyline, which appeared in ''Amazing Spider-Man'' issues #96-98. Lee's story gained considerable public appreciation and critical acclaim, and thanks to all the egg on its face in light of the story's success, the CCA changed the Code to allow negative portrayals of drug abuse -- but even with the change, the CCA would never recover from the damage to its reputation.

Two major revisions - [[http://www.thecomicbooks.com/old/cca2.html one in 1971]] and [[http://www.reocities.com/athens/8580/cca3.html another in 1989]] - relaxed and outright dropped many of The Code's stricter rules. The 1971 revision altered some of the stricter and more outdated provisions of the original Code while maintaining its basic structure, and the 1989 revision combined less restrictive views on old "crime, punishment, and sexuality" issues with PoliticallyCorrect injunctions against stereotyping.

The Code lapsed into true irrelevance during [[TheEighties the 1980s]]. "Direct market" comic book specialty stores (which the Code didn't cover) cut into sales on the newsstands (which the Code ''did'' cover), and as "direct-only" comics from the established publishers became increasingly common, those publishers began to publish more and more comics without the Code Seal. Newer publishers, often producing comics explicitly aimed at older teen and adult readers, ignored the Code entirely.

DC Comics dropped the Code from the majority of their titles shortly after the turn of the 21st century, at about the same time that MarvelComics withdrew from the Code entirely. In January 2011, DC abandoned the Code entirely in favor of its own in-house rating system. After those major departures, Archie Comics remained the Code's sole participant and administrator[[note]]The Code had always been under the supervision of an Archie employee[[/note]], and after concluding that the Code served no purpose in light of its publishing standards - "We aren't about to start [[StuffedIntoTheFridge stuffing bodies into refrigerators]]", said Archie Comics' President Mike Pellerito - Archie abandoned the Code the day after DC did, thus rendering The Comics Code officially defunct.

According to [[http://www.newsarama.com/comics/who-has-been-running-the-comics-code-authority-11012-22.html some sources]], the CMAA barely existed in the final year or so anyway; one person was checking the few DC books, while Archie just assumed that their comics were entitled to bear the stamp because, well, it was Archie, why wouldn't they?

On September 29th 2011, the Comics Magazine Association of America announced it had sold the intellectual property rights of the Comics Code seal to the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund (a U.S-based non-profit organization which helps to protect the First Amendment rights of comic creators, publishers, and retailers by helping cover legal expenses). In a nice little twist, the sale coincided with the annual Banned Books Week campaign.

To learn more about the Code, including its origins, read ''[[http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/145431690 The Ten-Cent Plague: The Great Comic-Book Scare and How It Changed America]]'' by David Hajdu.

-----
!!The Code ([[http://www.comicartville.com/comicscode.htm 1954 version]]):

* "Crimes shall never be presented in such a way as to [[AntiVillain create sympathy for the criminal]], to promote distrust of the forces of law and justice, or to [[DamnItFeelsGoodToBeAGangster inspire others with a desire to imitate criminals]]."
** (Law enforcers were not allowed to appear incompetent or [[CorruptCop corrupt,]] and there was no such thing as an [[PunchClockVillain antagonist who only dabbles in villainy as a hobby]].)
* "If crime is depicted, it shall be as a sordid and unpleasant activity."
** (Villains popped up out of nowhere with little backstory.)
* "Criminals shall not be presented [[EvilIsSexy so as to be rendered glamorous]] or to occupy a position which creates a desire for emulation."
** (Criminals were not allowed to be portrayed as persistently successful, or portrayed as cool or sexually desirable.)
* "In every instance [[TheGoodGuysAlwaysWin good shall triumph over evil]] and the criminal [shall be] punished for his misdeeds."
** (TheGoodGuysAlwaysWin, limiting the potential of story arcs.)
* "[[{{Gorn}} Scenes of excessive violence]] shall be prohibited. Scenes of brutal torture, [[FamilyFriendlyFirearms excessive and unnecessary knife and gunplay]], physical agony, [[TheFamilyForTheWholeFamily gory and gruesome crime]] shall be eliminated."
** (No blood, no gore, and judicious use of guns, placing limits on action scenes and the weapons a hero can use.)
* "[[NotUsingTheZWord No comic magazine shall use the word "horror" or "terror" in its title.]]
** (Possibly the pettiest provision, this was intended, so far as can be determined, wholly and solely to put ECComics - which were known for horror comics - out of business.)
* "All scenes of horror, [[ThePowerOfBlood excessive bloodshed]], gory or gruesome crimes, depravity, [[{{Fanservice}} lust]], sadism, and masochism shall not be permitted."
** (Villains could not torture, murder, or sexually assault their victims, and so had to resort to a lot of gloating and outrageous GlobalDomination schemes. Also, no stories centered on sexual perversion - consensual or otherwise.)
* "All lurid, unsavory, gruesome illustrations shall be eliminated."
* "Inclusion of stories dealing with evil shall be used or shall be published only where the intent is [[{{Anvilicious}} to illustrate a moral issue]] and in no case shall evil be presented alluringly, nor so as to injure the sensibilities of the reader."
** (Forced use of BlackAndWhiteMorality.)
* "Scenes dealing with, or instruments associated with [[OurZombiesAreDifferent walking dead]], torture, [[OurVampiresAreDifferent vampires and vampirism]], [[OurGhoulsAreDifferent ghouls]], [[IAmAHumanitarian cannibalism]], and [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking werewolfism]] are prohibited."
** (No more zombie stories.)
* "[[CurseCutShort Profanity]], obscenity, smut, vulgarity, or [[NoSwastikas words or symbols which have acquired undesirable meanings]] are forbidden."
** (No bad words or offensive imagery.)
* "Nudity in any form is prohibited, as is [[BarbieDollAnatomy indecent or undue exposure]]."
** (No nudity or [[{{stripperiffic}} skimpy]] outfits.)
* "[[{{Fanservice}} Suggestive and salacious illustration or suggestive posture]] is unacceptable."
** (Worth noting that characters weren't even allowed to sit around and look sexy.)
* "Females shall be drawn realistically without [[MostCommonSuperpower exaggeration of any physical qualities]]."
** (No large-breasted female characters were allowed - and of course the CCA decided what was 'large' - nor was any focus on breasts allowed.)
* "Illicit sex relations are neither to be hinted at nor portrayed. Violent love scenes as well as sexual abnormalities are unacceptable."
** (Basically, limited who the hero could have a romantic relationship with and what kind of relationship it could be. No homosexuality, lesbianism, bisexuality, pedophilia[[note]]though that one should be illegal no matter what era[[/note]], open relationships, sadomasochistic relationships, incestuous relationships, relationships with transvestites or transsexuals, or [[MalignedMixedMarriage interracial relationships]].)
* "[[SexualHarassmentAndRapeTropes Seduction and rape shall never be shown or suggested.]]"
** (Also self-explanatory.)
* "[[DepravedBisexual Sex perversion]] or [[HoYay any inference to same]] is strictly forbidden."
** (Gay characters flat-out didn't exist, though the AmbiguouslyGay might occasionally be encountered.)
* "[[{{Fanservice}} Nudity with meretricious purpose and salacious postures]] shall not be permitted in the advertising of any product; clothed figures shall never be presented in such a way as to be offensive or contrary to good taste or morals."
** (Forced aversion of SexSells.)

!!The code ([[http://www.thecomicbooks.com/old/cca2.html 1971 revision]]):
* "Scenes dealing with, or instruments associated with walking dead, or torture, shall not be used. Vampires, ghouls and werewolves shall be permitted to be used when handled in the classic tradition such as {{Frankenstein}}, {{Dracula}}, and other high calibre literary works written by Creator/EdgarAllanPoe, Creator/{{Saki}}, [[Creator/ArthurConanDoyle Conan Doyle]] and other respected authors whose works are read in schools around the world."
** (We can do MonsterMash comics again! [[NotUsingTheZWord But no zombies]], which had no accepted "literary" pedigree. Marvel got around this with [[OurZombiesAreDifferent the Zuvembie]], a voodoo-zombie in all but name.)[[note]]The "zuvembie" name also had a Creator/RobertEHoward pedigree, though apparently that was neither here nor there with regard to the Code administrators, who might or might not have considered Howard's stuff to be "high calibre literary work". "They're zuvembies, not zombies" was a strong enough argument for the Code administrators, apparently.[[/note]]
* "Narcotics or Drug addiction shall not be presented except as a vicious habit."
** (With a list of specified ways it can be presented. The rule boiled down to "The portrayal of drug use is okay, so long as you portray it in a negative light and don't glamorize it.")
* "Seduction may not be shown."
** (But unlike rape, seduction ''can'' be ''suggested'', meaning that FemmeFatale and [[TheCasanova Casanova]] characters are now permissible, to a point.)
* "Policemen, judges, government officials and respected institutions shall not be presented in such a way as to create disrespect for established authority. If any of these is depicted committing an illegal act, it must be declared as an exceptional case and that the culprit pay the legal price."
** (Corrupt government officials and cops are allowed, but they must always be caught, so they can't be recurring characters.)
* "Instances of law enforcement officers dying as a result of a criminal's activities should be discouraged, except when the guilty, because of their crime, live a sordid existence and are brought to justice because of the particular crime."
** (Before, the Code was interpreted as prohibiting the death of any law enforcement officers, ever.)
* While there's no specific language about it, the 1971 revision was interpreted as allowing AntiHero or AntiVillain characters up to a point - e.g., the Western AntiHero JonahHex and Marvel's supervillain Sandman, who was often portrayed as a PunchClockVillain.

!!The code ([[http://www.reocities.com/athens/8580/cca3.html 1989 revision]]):
* "In general recognizable... social, political, cultural... groups will be portrayed in a positive light. These include... social groups identifiable by lifestyle, such as homosexuals...."
** ([[{{Homosexual}} Homosexuality]] is now OK... [[ButNotTooGay up to a point]].)
* "Stereotyped images and activities will be not used to degrade specific [[NationalStereotypes national]], [[EthnicScrappy ethnic]], or [[CulturalStereotypes socioeconomic groups]]."
** (Self-explanatory: Don't use racial or ethnic stereotypes.)
* "Costumes in a comic book will be considered to be acceptable if they fall within the scope of contemporary styles and fashions."
** ({{Stripperific}} looks are OK '''if''' there's a story justification or it just reflects contemporary fashion or culture.)
* Good news, everybody! The language prohibiting "the walking dead," non-literary monsters, and words like "horror" and "terror" is gone now, and it's OK to use that stuff now!
----

Top