Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / TheInternetIsForPorn

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** And later in ''Series/MajorCrimes'', the team is going over the site of a murder, who was killed while he was in his office after midnight. Female detective [[Creator/KearranGiovanni Amy Sykes]] wonders aloud "What would a man be doing at 2 in the morning all alone on his computer?", prompting every male detective in the room to look at her in amazement, such that she then says [[Main/DelayedReaction "Oh"]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Literature/SecretSanta'': Erik uses his expense account to watch lots of pay-per-view porn.

to:

* ''Literature/SecretSanta'': ''Literature/SecretSanta2004'': Erik uses his expense account to watch lots of pay-per-view porn.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Defunct ''a cappella'' group ''[=DaVinci's Notebook=]'' / DVN's-break-up survivor group ''Paul & Storm'' and their number [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxYVBNhJ3pc Internet Porn,]] which contains a number of amusing(ly accurate) allusions to the sort of content one can find ("Girl on girl on girl on girl on ''girl on guy on sheep''").

to:

* Defunct ''a cappella'' group ''[=DaVinci's Notebook=]'' / DVN's-break-up survivor group ''Paul & Storm'' and their number [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxYVBNhJ3pc Internet Porn,]] which contains a number of amusing(ly accurate) allusions to the sort of content one can find ("Girl on girl on girl on girl on ''girl on guy on sheep''").[[BestialityIsDepraved sheep]]''").

Added: 145

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Webcomic/SandraAndWoo'': [[http://www.sandraandwoo.com/2010/02/22/0140-fallout/ Woo uses YouTube to watch videos of raccoons getting it on]].



* [=OnlyFans=] once had an advertising campaign on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors, cooking show hosts, and other non-pornographic content creators to host their videos on the site. In theory, anyone can make use of OF, and the company has never marketed themselves as a host for adult entertainment. But the reality is that OF and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out. It all came to a head in 2021 when OF announced that they would be banning pornographic content from the platform altogether. Since porn constitutes the vast majority of its business, the backlash was as swift as it was predictable, and within a week of the announcement (the ban hadn't even gone into effect yet), OF changed course and announced that porn performers could stay after all. By contrast, OF's biggest competitor [=JustForFans=] has ''always'' been proud of its status as a porn site and announced that they would happily take any performers ditched by OF. [[note]]And for the record, content creators that ''aren't'' in the business of porn but want to be paid for their work are more likely to use Patreon--where they offer perks in exchange for tiered monthly donations--in conjunction with Youtube and other free streaming sites.[[/note]]

to:

* [=OnlyFans=] once had an advertising campaign on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors, cooking show hosts, and other non-pornographic content creators to host their videos on the site. In theory, anyone can make use of OF, and the company has never marketed themselves as a host for adult entertainment. But the reality is that OF and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out. It all came to a head in 2021 when OF announced that they would be banning pornographic content from the platform altogether. Since porn constitutes the vast majority of its business, the backlash was as swift as it was predictable, and within a week of the announcement (the ban hadn't even gone into effect yet), OF changed course and announced that porn performers could stay after all. By contrast, OF's biggest competitor [=JustForFans=] has ''always'' been proud of its status as a porn site and announced that they would happily take any performers ditched by OF. [[note]]And for the record, content creators that ''aren't'' in the business of porn but want to be paid for their work are more likely to use Patreon--where they offer perks in exchange for tiered monthly donations--in conjunction with Youtube and other free streaming sites.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''WebVideo/AtopTheFourthWall'': Linkara has mentioned this trope a few times, notably as a joke reason why he wouldn't want to pay the overpriced online prices and shipping fees for a hardcover of Creator/AlanMoore's ''Comicbook/Lost Girls'', and why he feels Frank Miller's "News in the Nude" and its real-life equivalent, ''Naked News'', hold no appeal.

to:

* ''WebVideo/AtopTheFourthWall'': Linkara has mentioned this trope a few times, notably as a joke reason why he wouldn't want to pay the overpriced online prices and shipping fees for a hardcover of Creator/AlanMoore's ''Comicbook/Lost ''Lost Girls'', and why he feels Frank Miller's "News in the Nude" and its real-life equivalent, ''Naked News'', hold no appeal.



* '''WebVideo/BadCreepypasta'': the riffers mocked the protagonist of ''I HATE YOU'' for using newly acquired computer to pirate pornography, and suggested the protagonist of ''A Chao's Demise'' to watch internet porn for eagerly waiting for his friend to give him a bootleg copy of ''Sonic Adventure 2: Battle''.

to:

* '''WebVideo/BadCreepypasta'': ''WebVideo/BadCreepypasta'': the riffers mocked the protagonist of ''I HATE YOU'' for using newly acquired computer to pirate pornography, and suggested the protagonist of ''A Chao's Demise'' to watch internet porn for eagerly waiting for his friend to give him a bootleg copy of ''Sonic Adventure 2: Battle''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None






* ''WesternAnimation/AmericanDad'': "Tyrannosaurus Rex; real. Babe-osaurus Rex; porn. A symposium on the Pangea theory of the Permian Extin -- WOW, THAT IS SOME NASTY PORN!!!"

to:

\n* ''WesternAnimation/AmericanDad'': Steve tries to do research on fossils, but expects to run into porn in the process.
-->'''Steve:'''
"Tyrannosaurus Rex; real. Babe-osaurus Rex; porn. A symposium on the Pangea theory of the Permian Extin -- WOW, THAT IS SOME NASTY PORN!!!"

Added: 38

Changed: 137

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Series/{{Sherlock}}'': Used in "[[Recap/SherlockS02E01AScandalInBelgravia A Scandal in Belgravia]]": "If I wanted to look at naked women I'd borrow John's laptop."
-->'''John:''' You do borrow my laptop.\\

to:

* ''Series/{{Sherlock}}'': Used in "[[Recap/SherlockS02E01AScandalInBelgravia A Scandal in Belgravia]]": "If Belgravia]]":
-->'''Sherlock:''' [[IfIWantedXIWouldY If
I wanted to look at naked women I'd borrow John's laptop."
-->'''John:'''
]]\\
'''John:'''
You do borrow my laptop.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In fact, many of the internet's innovations — particularly in e-commerce, encryption, and streaming video — originated with porn and the desire to consume it safely and efficiently. Even Website/{{YouTube}} was founded partly in response to Music/JanetJackson's WardrobeMalfunction at the 2004 Super Bowl,[[note]]Ironically, the site doesn't allow most cases of nudity or intercourse, though fetish porn that doesn't include either sneaks in all the time[[/note]] and Google Images was developed in response to people searching for pictures of Creator/JenniferLopez's [[AbsoluteCleavage infamous green dress]] from the 2000 Grammys. Never undervalue the human desire to see scandalized naked flesh.

to:

In fact, many of the internet's innovations — particularly in e-commerce, encryption, and streaming video — originated with porn and the desire to consume it safely and efficiently. Even Website/{{YouTube}} was founded partly in response to Music/JanetJackson's WardrobeMalfunction at the 2004 Super Bowl,[[note]]Ironically, the site doesn't allow most cases of nudity or intercourse, though fetish porn that doesn't include either sneaks in all the time[[/note]] and Google Images was developed in response to people searching the tidal wave of search queries for pictures of Creator/JenniferLopez's [[AbsoluteCleavage infamous green dress]] from the 2000 Grammys. Never undervalue the human desire to see scandalized naked flesh.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In fact, many of the internet's innovations — especially in e-commerce, encryption, and streaming video — originated with porn and the desire to consume it safely and efficiently. Even Website/{{YouTube}} was founded partly in response to Music/JanetJackson's WardrobeMalfunction at the 2004 Super Bowl,[[note]]Ironically, the site doesn't allow most cases of nudity or intercourse, though fetish porn that doesn't include either sneaks in all the time[[/note]], and Google Images was developed in response to people searching for pictures of Creator/JenniferLopez's [[AbsoluteCleavage infamous green dress]] from the 2000 Grammys. Never undervalue the human desire to see scandalized naked flesh.

to:

In fact, many of the internet's innovations — especially particularly in e-commerce, encryption, and streaming video — originated with porn and the desire to consume it safely and efficiently. Even Website/{{YouTube}} was founded partly in response to Music/JanetJackson's WardrobeMalfunction at the 2004 Super Bowl,[[note]]Ironically, the site doesn't allow most cases of nudity or intercourse, though fetish porn that doesn't include either sneaks in all the time[[/note]], time[[/note]] and Google Images was developed in response to people searching for pictures of Creator/JenniferLopez's [[AbsoluteCleavage infamous green dress]] from the 2000 Grammys. Never undervalue the human desire to see scandalized naked flesh.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [=OnlyFans=] once had an advertising campaign on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors, cooking show hosts, and other non-pornographic content creators to host their videos on the site. In theory, anyone can make use of OF, and the company has never marketed themselves as a host for adult entertainment. But the reality is that OF and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out. It all came to a head in 2021 when OF announced that they would be banning pornographic content from the platform altogether. Since porn constitutes the vast majority of its business, the backlash was as swift as it was predictable, and within a week of the announcement (the ban hadn't even gone into effect yet), OF changed course and announced that porn performers could stay after all. By contrast, OF's biggest competitor [=JustForFans=] has ''always'' been proud of its status as a porn site and announced that they would happily take any performers ditched by OF. And for the record, content creators that ''aren't'' in the business of porn but want to be paid for their work are more likely to use Patreon--where they offer perks in exchange for tiered monthly donations--in conjunction with Youtube or some other free streaming site.

to:

* [=OnlyFans=] once had an advertising campaign on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors, cooking show hosts, and other non-pornographic content creators to host their videos on the site. In theory, anyone can make use of OF, and the company has never marketed themselves as a host for adult entertainment. But the reality is that OF and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out. It all came to a head in 2021 when OF announced that they would be banning pornographic content from the platform altogether. Since porn constitutes the vast majority of its business, the backlash was as swift as it was predictable, and within a week of the announcement (the ban hadn't even gone into effect yet), OF changed course and announced that porn performers could stay after all. By contrast, OF's biggest competitor [=JustForFans=] has ''always'' been proud of its status as a porn site and announced that they would happily take any performers ditched by OF. And [[note]]And for the record, content creators that ''aren't'' in the business of porn but want to be paid for their work are more likely to use Patreon--where they offer perks in exchange for tiered monthly donations--in conjunction with Youtube or some and other free streaming site.sites.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [=OnlyFans=] once had an advertising campaign on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors, cooking show hosts, and other non-pornographic content creators to host their videos on the site. In theory, anyone can make use of OF, and the company has never marketed themselves as a host for adult entertainment. But the reality is that OF and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out. It all came to a head in 2021 when OF announced that they would be banning pornographic content from the platform altogether. The backlash was as swift as it was predictable, and within a week of the announcement (the ban hadn't even gone into effect yet), OF changed course and announced that porn performers could stay after all. By contrast, OF's biggest competitor [=JustForFans=] has ''always'' been proud of its status as a porn site and announced that they would happily take any performers ditched by OF.[[note]]Content creators that ''aren't'' in the business of porn but want to be paid for their work are more likely to use Patreon--where they offer perks in exchange for tiered monthly donations--in conjunction with Youtube or some other free streaming site.[[/note]]

to:

* [=OnlyFans=] once had an advertising campaign on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors, cooking show hosts, and other non-pornographic content creators to host their videos on the site. In theory, anyone can make use of OF, and the company has never marketed themselves as a host for adult entertainment. But the reality is that OF and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out. It all came to a head in 2021 when OF announced that they would be banning pornographic content from the platform altogether. The Since porn constitutes the vast majority of its business, the backlash was as swift as it was predictable, and within a week of the announcement (the ban hadn't even gone into effect yet), OF changed course and announced that porn performers could stay after all. By contrast, OF's biggest competitor [=JustForFans=] has ''always'' been proud of its status as a porn site and announced that they would happily take any performers ditched by OF.[[note]]Content And for the record, content creators that ''aren't'' in the business of porn but want to be paid for their work are more likely to use Patreon--where they offer perks in exchange for tiered monthly donations--in conjunction with Youtube or some other free streaming site.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In fact, many of the internet's innovations — especially in e-commerce, encryption, and streaming video — originated with porn and the desire to consume it safely and efficiently. Even Website/{{YouTube}} was founded partly in response to Music/JanetJackson's WardrobeMalfunction at the 2004 Super Bowl[[note]]Ironically, the site doesn't allow most cases of nudity or intercourse, though fetish porn that doesn't include either sneaks in all the time[[/note]]. Never undervalue the human desire to see scandalized naked flesh.

to:

In fact, many of the internet's innovations — especially in e-commerce, encryption, and streaming video — originated with porn and the desire to consume it safely and efficiently. Even Website/{{YouTube}} was founded partly in response to Music/JanetJackson's WardrobeMalfunction at the 2004 Super Bowl[[note]]Ironically, Bowl,[[note]]Ironically, the site doesn't allow most cases of nudity or intercourse, though fetish porn that doesn't include either sneaks in all the time[[/note]].time[[/note]], and Google Images was developed in response to people searching for pictures of Creator/JenniferLopez's [[AbsoluteCleavage infamous green dress]] from the 2000 Grammys. Never undervalue the human desire to see scandalized naked flesh.



* [=OnlyFans=] once had an advertising campaign on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors, cooking show hosts, and other non-pornographic content creators to host their videos on the site. In theory, anyone can make use of OF, and the company has never marketed themselves as a host for adult entertainment. But the reality is that OF and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out. It all came to a head in 2021 when OF announced that they would be banning pornographic content from the platform altogether. The backlash was as swift as it was predictable, and within a week of the announcement (the ban hadn't even gone into effect yet), OF changed course and announced that porn performers could stay after all. By contrast, OF's biggest competitor [=JustForFans=] has ''always'' been proud of its status as a porn site and announced that they would happily take any performers ditched by OF.[[note]]Content creators that ''aren't'' in the business of porn but want to be paid for their work are more likely to use Patreon--where they offer perks in exchange for tiered monthly donations--in conjunction with all the various free streaming sites.[[/note]]
* In [[https://textsfromsuperheroes.com/image/189812089962 this]] ''Blog/TextsFromSuperheroes'' exchange, Vision says that he's picked Christmas gifts for his fellow Avengers by accessing their browser histories. Franchise/CaptainAmerica gets a box set of [[UsefulNotes/{{Baseball}} the 1942 World Series]]; the rest get "sex stuff".

to:

* [=OnlyFans=] once had an advertising campaign on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors, cooking show hosts, and other non-pornographic content creators to host their videos on the site. In theory, anyone can make use of OF, and the company has never marketed themselves as a host for adult entertainment. But the reality is that OF and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out. It all came to a head in 2021 when OF announced that they would be banning pornographic content from the platform altogether. The backlash was as swift as it was predictable, and within a week of the announcement (the ban hadn't even gone into effect yet), OF changed course and announced that porn performers could stay after all. By contrast, OF's biggest competitor [=JustForFans=] has ''always'' been proud of its status as a porn site and announced that they would happily take any performers ditched by OF.[[note]]Content creators that ''aren't'' in the business of porn but want to be paid for their work are more likely to use Patreon--where they offer perks in exchange for tiered monthly donations--in conjunction with all the various Youtube or some other free streaming sites.site.[[/note]]
* In [[https://textsfromsuperheroes.com/image/189812089962 this]] ''Blog/TextsFromSuperheroes'' exchange, Vision says that he's picked Christmas gifts for his fellow Avengers by accessing their browser histories. Franchise/CaptainAmerica gets a box set of [[UsefulNotes/{{Baseball}} the 1942 World Series]]; the rest get "sex stuff".stuff."

Added: 434

Changed: 1448

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
It's bad form to refer to earlier versions of a page.


Partly a result of TheRuleOfFirstAdopters. Ubiquitous enough to result in RuleThirtyFour. For some, the Internet has become such a convenient PornStash that it is [[DoubleEntendre single-handedly]] [[TropeBreaker breaking]] the trope PoorMansPorn, and increasing the mainstream acceptability of "adult entertainment". As noted in [[https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/11/11/republican-party-anti-pornography-politics-222096 this article]] by Tim Alberta for ''Politico'', cracking down on and eventually banning pornography was a key aim of MoralGuardians in the United States as late as the early 2000s, but today, thanks to the internet revolution, even the most diehard anti-porn activists have largely given up on restricting porn, instead favoring PR campaigns designed to dissuade people from watching it and financial services from supporting it. The only people who have to resort to porn substitutes are ones without the Internet.

A former version of this page claimed people with censored Internet (where porn is often illegal) have to resort to porn substitutes, which is not true: the vast majority of Internet censorship-circumventing practices is for porn rather than political purposes. It's even said that if you can't find porn (in places with censored Internet), you are not innovative.

to:

Partly a result of TheRuleOfFirstAdopters. Ubiquitous enough to result in RuleThirtyFour. For some, the Internet has become such a convenient PornStash that it is [[DoubleEntendre single-handedly]] [[TropeBreaker breaking]] the trope PoorMansPorn, and increasing the mainstream acceptability of "adult entertainment". entertainment".

As noted in [[https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/11/11/republican-party-anti-pornography-politics-222096 this article]] by Tim Alberta for ''Politico'', cracking down on and eventually banning pornography was a key aim of MoralGuardians in the United States as late as the early 2000s, but today, thanks to the internet revolution, even the most diehard anti-porn activists have largely given up on restricting porn, it by legal means, instead favoring PR campaigns designed to dissuade people from watching it and financial services from supporting it. The only people who have to resort to porn substitutes are ones without the Internet.

A former version of this page claimed people
it.

Even those
with censored Internet (where porn is often illegal) have of any form (which usually includes pornography in its blacklists) are usually able to resort to porn substitutes, which is not true: find it with a little effort: the vast majority of Internet censorship-circumventing practices is for porn rather than political purposes. It's even said that if you can't find Any such censoring will have cracks, and porn (in places with censored Internet), you is among the first things to fall through. The only people who have to resort to porn substitutes are not innovative.
ones without the Internet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Account is down.


** Pintsize's hard drive has been described as a 'private universe of porn', and [[http://twitter.com/pintsize0101 his Twitter account]] is nothing but hentai and RuleThirtyFour. Which Marigold then rates the artwork of.

to:

** Pintsize's hard drive has been described as a 'private universe of porn', and [[http://twitter.com/pintsize0101 his Twitter account]] account is nothing but hentai and RuleThirtyFour. Which Marigold then rates the artwork of.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A former version of this page claim people with censored Internet (where porn is often illegal) have to resort to porn substitutes, which is not true: the vast majority of Internet censorship-circumventing practices is for porn rather than political purposes. It's even said that if you can't find porn (in places with censored Internet), you are not innovative.

to:

A former version of this page claim claimed people with censored Internet (where porn is often illegal) have to resort to porn substitutes, which is not true: the vast majority of Internet censorship-circumventing practices is for porn rather than political purposes. It's even said that if you can't find porn (in places with censored Internet), you are not innovative.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''LightNovel/{{Oreimo}}'', a mad Kirino confronts her brother Kyousuke about this after finding out that he used her laptop to surf for porn in episode 7; but [[{{Irony}} she gave him the laptop so he could play one of her numerous]] {{eroge}}s, so it's not clear what she's offended about...

to:

* In ''LightNovel/{{Oreimo}}'', a mad Kirino confronts her brother Kyousuke about this after finding out that he used her laptop to surf for porn in episode 7; but [[{{Irony}} [[{{Hypocrite}} she gave him the laptop so he could play one of her numerous]] {{eroge}}s, so it's not clear what she's offended about...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Partly a result of TheRuleOfFirstAdopters. Ubiquitous enough to result in RuleThirtyFour. For some, the Internet has become such a convenient PornStash that it is [[DoubleEntendre single-handedly]] [[TropeBreaker breaking]] the trope PoorMansPorn, and increasing the mainstream acceptability of "adult entertainment". As noted in [[https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/11/11/republican-party-anti-pornography-politics-222096 this article]] by Tim Alberta for ''Politico'', cracking down on and eventually banning pornography was a key aim of MoralGuardians in the United States as late as the early 2000s, but today, thanks to the internet revolution, even the most diehard anti-porn activists have largely given up on restricting porn, instead favoring PR campaigns designed to dissuade people from watching it. The only people who have to resort to porn substitutes are ones without the Internet.

to:

Partly a result of TheRuleOfFirstAdopters. Ubiquitous enough to result in RuleThirtyFour. For some, the Internet has become such a convenient PornStash that it is [[DoubleEntendre single-handedly]] [[TropeBreaker breaking]] the trope PoorMansPorn, and increasing the mainstream acceptability of "adult entertainment". As noted in [[https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/11/11/republican-party-anti-pornography-politics-222096 this article]] by Tim Alberta for ''Politico'', cracking down on and eventually banning pornography was a key aim of MoralGuardians in the United States as late as the early 2000s, but today, thanks to the internet revolution, even the most diehard anti-porn activists have largely given up on restricting porn, instead favoring PR campaigns designed to dissuade people from watching it and financial services from supporting it. The only people who have to resort to porn substitutes are ones without the Internet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Simon and River’s father doesn’t want a Cortex extension in the house because he thinks this on ''{{Series/Firefly}}'' but Simon’s mom already got the extension so he loses the fight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''ComicBook/MicronautsIDW'' at one point has Biotron connect to the Internet to find out information on Earth, leading to him commenting on the abundance of [[TheInternetIsForCats cat videos]] and pictures of nude women there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* A ''WebComic/SaturdayMorningBreakfastCereal'' strip suggests that, if left uncensored, "smart" systems trained on previous internet searches would always assume the customer's search is going to be for pornography, no matter what they start to say.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[-[[caption-width-right:350:[[Website/{{Google}} Search]] [[{{Film/TheEmpireStrikesBack}} your web-history! You know it to be true!]][[note]]Thanks to [[http://www.cracked.com/photoplasty_268_19-things-old-people-suspect-about-modern-culture_p2 Cracked.com's readers]] for this page's current picture.[[/note]]]]-]

to:

[-[[caption-width-right:350:[[Website/{{Google}} Search]] [[{{Film/TheEmpireStrikesBack}} your web-history! You know it to be true!]][[note]]Thanks to [[http://www.[[https://www.cracked.com/photoplasty_268_19-things-old-people-suspect-about-modern-culture_p2 com/photoplasty_268_19-things-old-people-suspect-about-modern-culture Cracked.com's readers]] for this page's current picture.[[/note]]]]-]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [=OnlyFans=] once had an advertising campaign on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors, cooking show hosts, and other non-pornographic content creators to host their videos on the site. In theory, anyone can make use of OF, and the company has never marketed themselves as a host for adult entertainment. But the reality is that OF and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out. It all came to a head in 2021 when OF announced that they would be banning pornographic content from the platform altogether. The backlash was as swift as it was predictable, and within a week of the announcement (the ban hadn't even gone into effect yet), OF changed course and announced that porn performers could stay after all. By contrast, OF's biggest competitor [=JustForFans=] has ''always'' been proud of its status as a porn site and announced that they would happily take any performers ditched by OF[[note]]Content creators that ''aren't'' in the business of porn but want to be paid for their work are more likely to use Patreon--where they offer perks in exchange for tiered monthly donations--in conjunction with all the various free streaming sites.[[/note]]

to:

* [=OnlyFans=] once had an advertising campaign on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors, cooking show hosts, and other non-pornographic content creators to host their videos on the site. In theory, anyone can make use of OF, and the company has never marketed themselves as a host for adult entertainment. But the reality is that OF and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out. It all came to a head in 2021 when OF announced that they would be banning pornographic content from the platform altogether. The backlash was as swift as it was predictable, and within a week of the announcement (the ban hadn't even gone into effect yet), OF changed course and announced that porn performers could stay after all. By contrast, OF's biggest competitor [=JustForFans=] has ''always'' been proud of its status as a porn site and announced that they would happily take any performers ditched by OF[[note]]Content OF.[[note]]Content creators that ''aren't'' in the business of porn but want to be paid for their work are more likely to use Patreon--where they offer perks in exchange for tiered monthly donations--in conjunction with all the various free streaming sites.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [=OnlyFans=] once had an advertising campaign on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors, cooking show hosts, and other non-pornographic content creators to host their videos on the site. In theory, anyone can make use of OF, and the company has never marketed themselves as a host for adult entertainment. But the reality is that OF and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out. It all came to a head in 2021 when OF announced that they would be banning pornographic content from the platform altogether. The backlash was as swift as it was predictable, and within a week of the announcement (the ban hadn't even gone into effect yet), OF changed course and announced that porn performers could stay after all. By contrast, OF's biggest competitor [=JustForFans=] has ''always'' been proud of its status as a porn site and announced that they would happily take any performers ditched by OF[[note]]Content creators that ''aren't'' in the business of porn but want to be paid for their work are more likely to use Patreon--where they offer perks in exchange for tiered monthly donations--in conjunction with all the various free streaming sites.[[note]]

to:

* [=OnlyFans=] once had an advertising campaign on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors, cooking show hosts, and other non-pornographic content creators to host their videos on the site. In theory, anyone can make use of OF, and the company has never marketed themselves as a host for adult entertainment. But the reality is that OF and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out. It all came to a head in 2021 when OF announced that they would be banning pornographic content from the platform altogether. The backlash was as swift as it was predictable, and within a week of the announcement (the ban hadn't even gone into effect yet), OF changed course and announced that porn performers could stay after all. By contrast, OF's biggest competitor [=JustForFans=] has ''always'' been proud of its status as a porn site and announced that they would happily take any performers ditched by OF[[note]]Content creators that ''aren't'' in the business of porn but want to be paid for their work are more likely to use Patreon--where they offer perks in exchange for tiered monthly donations--in conjunction with all the various free streaming sites.[[note]][[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [=OnlyFans=] has been advertising on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors, cooking show hosts, and other non-pornographic performers to host their videos on the site. In theory, all sorts of content creators can make use of OF, and the company has never marketed themselves as a host for adult entertainment. But the reality is that OF and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out. It all came to a head in 2021 when OF announced that they would be banning pornographic content from the platform altogether. The backlash was as swift as it was predictable, and within a week of the announcement (the ban hadn't even gone into effect yet), OF changed course and announced that porn performers could stay. By contrast, OF's biggest competitor [=JustForFans=] has ''always'' been proud of its status as a porn site and announced that they would happily take any performers ditched by OF.

to:

* [=OnlyFans=] has been once had an advertising campaign on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors, cooking show hosts, and other non-pornographic performers content creators to host their videos on the site. In theory, all sorts of content creators anyone can make use of OF, and the company has never marketed themselves as a host for adult entertainment. But the reality is that OF and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out. It all came to a head in 2021 when OF announced that they would be banning pornographic content from the platform altogether. The backlash was as swift as it was predictable, and within a week of the announcement (the ban hadn't even gone into effect yet), OF changed course and announced that porn performers could stay. stay after all. By contrast, OF's biggest competitor [=JustForFans=] has ''always'' been proud of its status as a porn site and announced that they would happily take any performers ditched by OF.OF[[note]]Content creators that ''aren't'' in the business of porn but want to be paid for their work are more likely to use Patreon--where they offer perks in exchange for tiered monthly donations--in conjunction with all the various free streaming sites.[[note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [=OnlyFans=] has been advertising on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors to post their videos on the site. In theory, all sorts of content creators can make use of it, and the company has technically never marketed themselves to porn performers. But the reality is that [=OnlyFans=] and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out.

to:

* [=OnlyFans=] has been advertising on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors instructors, cooking show hosts, and other non-pornographic performers to post host their videos on the site. In theory, all sorts of content creators can make use of it, OF, and the company has technically never marketed themselves to porn performers. as a host for adult entertainment. But the reality is that [=OnlyFans=] OF and sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out.out. It all came to a head in 2021 when OF announced that they would be banning pornographic content from the platform altogether. The backlash was as swift as it was predictable, and within a week of the announcement (the ban hadn't even gone into effect yet), OF changed course and announced that porn performers could stay. By contrast, OF's biggest competitor [=JustForFans=] has ''always'' been proud of its status as a porn site and announced that they would happily take any performers ditched by OF.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
added music example Loser On-Line

Added DiffLines:

* General Patton Vs. The X-Ecutioners's ¡Loser on Line! describes internet porn addiction accompanied by moaning and dial-up tones.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* The situation is commented on in [[http://techfox.comicgenesis.com/d/20090629.html this]] page of ''[[Webcomic/TwentyFirstCenturyFox 21st Century Fox]]''.



* In ''Webcomic/{{Sinfest}}'', Slick, Squigley, and others are often shown surfing for porn. Most porn websites seem to be owned by {{Satan}}.
* In the most recent strip for ''Website/RoninPressComics'' we get that [[http://www.roninpresscomics.com/indoor-recess/the-holy-trinity/ the internet holy trinity is porn, video games, and cats.]]



* Joked about frequently in ''Webcomic/SaturdayMorningBreakfastCereal'' including [[http://www.smbc-comics.com/?id=3248 here.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [=OnlyFans=] has been advertising on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors to post their videos on the site. In theory, all sorts of content creators can make use of [=OnlyFans=], but the reality is that the site and others like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out.

to:

* [=OnlyFans=] has been advertising on Website/{{Facebook}} inviting fitness instructors to post their videos on the site. In theory, all sorts of content creators can make use of [=OnlyFans=], but it, and the company has technically never marketed themselves to porn performers. But the reality is that the site [=OnlyFans=] and others sites like it have a reputation for one specific use, as the snarky comments left on the Facebook ads pointed out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In [[https://textsfromsuperheroes.com/image/189812089962 this]] ''Blog/TextsFromSuperheroes'' exchange, Vision says that he's picked Christmas gifts for his fellow Avengers by accessing their browser histories. Franchise/CaptainAmerica gets a box set of [[UsefulNotes/Baseball the 1942 World Series]]; the rest get "sex stuff".

to:

* In [[https://textsfromsuperheroes.com/image/189812089962 this]] ''Blog/TextsFromSuperheroes'' exchange, Vision says that he's picked Christmas gifts for his fellow Avengers by accessing their browser histories. Franchise/CaptainAmerica gets a box set of [[UsefulNotes/Baseball [[UsefulNotes/{{Baseball}} the 1942 World Series]]; the rest get "sex stuff".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In [[ this]] ''Blog/TextsFromSuperheroes'' exchange, Vision says that he's picked Christmas gifts for his fellow Avengers by accessing their browser histories. Franchise/CaptainAmerica gets a box set of [[UsefulNotes/Baseball the 1942 World Series]]; the rest get "sex stuff".

to:

* In [[ [[https://textsfromsuperheroes.com/image/189812089962 this]] ''Blog/TextsFromSuperheroes'' exchange, Vision says that he's picked Christmas gifts for his fellow Avengers by accessing their browser histories. Franchise/CaptainAmerica gets a box set of [[UsefulNotes/Baseball the 1942 World Series]]; the rest get "sex stuff".

Top