Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / TheFateOfThePrincesInTheTower

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Meanwhile, rumors indicate that King UsefulNotes/CharlesIII is far more willing to have the remains interred in Westminster Abbey subjected to modern forensic testing than his late mother was. All of this gives a glimmer of hope that new information might shed light on this 500-year-old ExtremelyColdCase.

to:

Meanwhile, rumors indicate that King UsefulNotes/CharlesIII is far more willing to have the remains interred in Westminster Abbey subjected to modern forensic testing than his late mother was. All of this gives a glimmer of hope has shown that new information might can still shed light on this 500-year-old ExtremelyColdCase.

Added: 306

Changed: 477

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The Richard III Society, inspired by their remarkable success in finding Richard's remains, has launched a new project to discover the fate of the princes, working to prove theory number five, specifically that the boys were sent away by Richard for their own safety. Meanwhile, rumors indicate that King UsefulNotes/CharlesIII is far more willing to have the remains interred in Westminster Abbey subjected to modern forensic testing than his late mother was. All of this gives a glimmer of hope that new information might shed light on this 500-year-old ExtremelyColdCase.

to:

The Richard III Society, inspired by their remarkable success in finding Richard's remains, has launched a new project to discover the fate of the princes, working to prove theory number five, specifically that the boys were sent away by Richard for their own safety. safety on November 18th, 2023, ITV aired a documentary ''The Princes in the Tower: The New Evidence'' claiming, based on uncovered documents, that Richard III sent both boys into exile, and that two pretenders, including Perkin Warbeck, were in fact the real princes.

Meanwhile, rumors indicate that King UsefulNotes/CharlesIII is far more willing to have the remains interred in Westminster Abbey subjected to modern forensic testing than his late mother was. All of this gives a glimmer of hope that new information might shed light on this 500-year-old ExtremelyColdCase.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In Eleanor Fairburn's Literature/TheWarsOfTheRosesQuartet, Richard III plans to send both boys to the North where he can keep an eye on them, but Edward V is ill and can't travel. A young boy, who is one of many illegitimate sons of Edward IV, joins Edward V as a companion, and they quickly bond. However, both of those boys soon die of a mysterious illness that Richard suspects is poison by the Duke of Buckingham. Richard realizes that this puts Richard of York in grave danger, so he sends the boy to his sister in Burgundy. However, the boy is not Perkin Warbuck, as that young boy is yet another illegitimate son of Edward IV.
* In Rosemary Hawley Jarman's novel "We Speak No Treason" Richard has sent the boys to a castle in the North for their own safety.

to:

* In Eleanor Fairburn's Literature/TheWarsOfTheRosesQuartet, ''Literature/TheWarsOfTheRosesQuartet'', Richard III plans to send both boys to the North where he can keep an eye on them, but Edward V is ill and can't travel. A young boy, who is one of many illegitimate sons of Edward IV, joins Edward V as a companion, and they quickly bond. However, both of those boys soon die of a mysterious illness that Richard suspects is poison by the Duke of Buckingham. Richard realizes that this puts Richard of York in grave danger, so he sends the boy to his sister in Burgundy. However, the boy is not Perkin Warbuck, as that young boy is yet another illegitimate son of Edward IV.
* In Rosemary Hawley Jarman's novel "We Speak No Treason" ''Literature/WeSpeakNoTreason'', Richard has sent the boys to a castle in the North for their own safety.



* ''Series/GameOfThrones'': Like their book counterparts, Bran and Rickon Stark are inspired by the princes. They are betrayed by their protector Theon and disappear. Much like lore about the princes that says one was swapped out for a servant boy, Theon does this with Bran and Rickon and the servant boys are killed. [[spoiler: Eventually, Rickon does not survive, but in the show's ending Bran becomes king.]]

to:

* ''Series/GameOfThrones'': Like their book counterparts, Bran and Rickon Stark are inspired by the princes. They are betrayed by their protector Theon and disappear. Much like lore about the princes that says one was swapped out for a servant boy, boy; Theon does this with Bran and Rickon and the servant similarly murders two orphan boys are killed. [[spoiler: Eventually, Rickon does not survive, and burns them unrecognizable to quell resistance to his occupation of Winterfell after failing to catch the Stark brothers after they escape. [[spoiler:Rickon is ultimately betrayed by Smalljon Umber and then murdered by Ramsey Bolton in "[[Recap/GameOfThronesS6E9BattleOfTheBastards Battle of the Bastards]]", but in the show's ending ending, Bran becomes king.is elected King of Westeros.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In Eleanor Fairburn's Literature/TheWarsOfTheRosesQuartet, Richard III plans to send both boys to the North where he can keep an eye on them, but Edward V is ill and can't travel. A young boy, who is one of many illegitimate sons of Edward IV, joins Edward V as a companion, and they quickly bond. However, both of those boys soon die of a mysterious illness that Richard suspects is poison by the Duke of Buckingham. Richard realizes that this puts Ricahrd of York in grave danger, so he sends the boy to his sister in Burgundy. However, the boy is not Perkin Warbuck, as that young boy is yet another illegitimate son of Edward IV.

to:

* In Eleanor Fairburn's Literature/TheWarsOfTheRosesQuartet, Richard III plans to send both boys to the North where he can keep an eye on them, but Edward V is ill and can't travel. A young boy, who is one of many illegitimate sons of Edward IV, joins Edward V as a companion, and they quickly bond. However, both of those boys soon die of a mysterious illness that Richard suspects is poison by the Duke of Buckingham. Richard realizes that this puts Ricahrd Richard of York in grave danger, so he sends the boy to his sister in Burgundy. However, the boy is not Perkin Warbuck, as that young boy is yet another illegitimate son of Edward IV.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In Eleanor Fairburn's Literature/TheWarsOfTheRosesQuartet, Richard III plans to send both boys to the North where he can keep an eye on them, but Edward V is ill and can't travel. A young boy, who is one of many illegitimate sons of Edward IV, joins Edward V as a companion, and they quickly bond. However, both of those boys soon die of a mysterious illness that Richard suspects is poison by the Duke of Buckingham. Richard realizes that this puts Ricahrd of York in grave danger, so he sends the boy to his sister in Burgundy. However, the boy is not Perkin Warbuck, as that young boy is yet another illegitimate son of Edward IV.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Edward V of England and his brother Richard of Shrewsbury were the young sons of [[UsefulNotes/EdwardIV King Edward IV]] and his consort Elizabeth Woodville. Upon the death of their father, their uncle UsefulNotes/RichardIII, who had been appointed Lord Protector, had the boys declared illegitimate and seized the throne for himself. The boys were lodged in The Tower of London and disappeared sometime in 1483. By the time of Richard's defeat at Bosworth Field (1485) and the ascension of [[UsefulNotes/TheHouseOfTudor Henry VII]], most people presumed the princes to be dead.

to:

Edward V of England and his brother Richard of Shrewsbury were the young sons of [[UsefulNotes/EdwardIV King Edward IV]] and his consort Elizabeth Woodville. Upon the death of their father, their uncle UsefulNotes/RichardIII, uncle, [[UsefulNotes/RichardIII Richard, Duke of Gloucester]], who had been appointed Lord Protector, had the boys declared illegitimate and seized the throne for himself.himself as Richard III. The boys were lodged in The Tower of London and disappeared sometime in 1483. By the time of Richard's defeat at Bosworth Field (1485) and the ascension of [[UsefulNotes/TheHouseOfTudor Henry VII]], most people presumed the princes to be dead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The Richard III Society, inspired by their remarkable success in finding Richard's remains, has launched a new project to discover the fate of the princes, working to prove theory number five, specifically that the boys were sent away by Richard for their own safety. Meanwhile, rumors indicate that King Charles III is far more willing to have the remains interred in Westminster Abbey subjected to modern forensic testing than his late mother was. All of this gives a glimmer of hope that new information might shed light on this 500-year-old ExtremelyColdCase.

to:

The Richard III Society, inspired by their remarkable success in finding Richard's remains, has launched a new project to discover the fate of the princes, working to prove theory number five, specifically that the boys were sent away by Richard for their own safety. Meanwhile, rumors indicate that King Charles III UsefulNotes/CharlesIII is far more willing to have the remains interred in Westminster Abbey subjected to modern forensic testing than his late mother was. All of this gives a glimmer of hope that new information might shed light on this 500-year-old ExtremelyColdCase.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Traditionally, in both fiction and history, Richard III is considered the most likely suspect in their disappearance, with the assumption that he ordered their murder to secure his place on the throne. Tudor propaganda, culminating in the classic HistoricalVillainUpgrade in Creator/WilliamShakespeare's ''Theatre/RichardIII'', codified this in the popular imagination. However, Richard had been well-liked in his home region of the North of England, and the image of him as a cartoon villain never completely stuck. As early as the 1600s,[[note]]not coincidently right after the death of the last Tudor monarch[[/note]] his defenders, known as [[FanCommunityNickname Ricardians]], have been disputing that Richard was the culprit. They argue that as the most powerful man in the country, Richard had the means to make the murders look like an accident or natural causes or find a scapegoat, none of which he did. Without proof of the princes' deaths, Richard would have faced imposters the same way Henry VII later did, and he would have known that would be inevitable.

to:

Traditionally, in both fiction and history, Richard III is considered the most likely suspect in their disappearance, with the assumption that he ordered their murder to secure his place on the throne. Tudor propaganda, culminating in the classic HistoricalVillainUpgrade in Creator/WilliamShakespeare's ''Theatre/RichardIII'', codified this in the popular imagination. However, Richard had been well-liked in his home region of the North of England, and the image of him as a cartoon villain never completely stuck. As early as the 1600s,[[note]]not coincidently right after the death of [[UsefulNotes/ElizabethI the last Tudor monarch[[/note]] monarch]][[/note]] his defenders, known as [[FanCommunityNickname Ricardians]], have been disputing that Richard was the culprit. They argue that as the most powerful man in the country, Richard had the means to make the murders look like an accident or natural causes or find a scapegoat, none of which he did. Without proof of the princes' deaths, Richard would have faced imposters the same way Henry VII later did, and he would have known that would be inevitable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


# One or both of the boys [[SentIntoHiding escaped]], and one or more of the Pretenders that dogged Henry VII's reign may have been genuine, which would circle back to suspect number three. Perkin Warbeck, who gained much support in his lifetime and was eventually executed by Henry VII, claimed to be Richard of Shrewsbury and is a favorite candidate for being the real deal.[[note]]Reportedly, King James I, the first post-Tudor monarch, believed this story.[[/note]]

to:

# One or both of the boys [[SentIntoHiding escaped]], and one or more of the Pretenders that dogged Henry VII's reign may have been genuine, which would circle back to suspect number three. Perkin Warbeck, who gained much support in his lifetime (including Richard's sister, UsefulNotes/MargaretOfYork) and was eventually executed by Henry VII, claimed to be Richard of Shrewsbury and is a favorite candidate for being the real deal.[[note]]Reportedly, King James I, the first post-Tudor monarch, believed this story.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In Sandra Worth's "Literature/RoseOfYorkSeries" of novels, Richard's wife Anne suggests he send the boys to Barnard Castle where they can play out of sight. The younger goes, but Edward V is sick and can't. In the meantime, the Duke of Buckingham begins his rebellion and has Edward V and a servant boy he mistakes for Prince Richard killed.

to:

* In Sandra Worth's "Literature/RoseOfYorkSeries" ''Literature/RoseOfYorkSeries'' of novels, Richard's wife Anne suggests he send the boys to Barnard Castle where they can play out of sight. The younger goes, but Edward V is sick and can't. In the meantime, the Duke of Buckingham begins his rebellion and has Edward V and a servant boy he mistakes for Prince Richard killed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In Sandra Worth's "Rose of York" series of novels, Richard's wife Anne suggests he send the boys to Barnard Castle where they can play out of sight. The younger goes, but Edward V is sick and can't. In the meantime, the Duke of Buckingham begins his rebellion and has Edward V and a servant boy he mistakes for Prince Richard killed.

to:

* In Sandra Worth's "Rose of York" series "Literature/RoseOfYorkSeries" of novels, Richard's wife Anne suggests he send the boys to Barnard Castle where they can play out of sight. The younger goes, but Edward V is sick and can't. In the meantime, the Duke of Buckingham begins his rebellion and has Edward V and a servant boy he mistakes for Prince Richard killed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In Sandra Worth's "Rose of York" series of novels, Richard's wife Anne suggests he send the boys to Barnard Castle where they can play out of sight. The younger goes, but Edward V is sick and can't. In the meantime, the Duke of Buckingham begins his rebellion and has Edward V and a servant boy he mistakes for Prince Richard killed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


# One or both of the boys [[SentIntoHiding escaped]], and one or more of the Pretenders that dogged Henry VII's reign may have been genuine, which would circle back to suspect number three. Perkin Warbeck, who gained much support in his lifetime and was eventually executed by Henry VII, claimed to be Richard of Shrewsbury and is a favorite candidate for being the real deal[[note]]Reportedly, King James I, the first post-Tudor monarch, believed this story[[/note]].

to:

# One or both of the boys [[SentIntoHiding escaped]], and one or more of the Pretenders that dogged Henry VII's reign may have been genuine, which would circle back to suspect number three. Perkin Warbeck, who gained much support in his lifetime and was eventually executed by Henry VII, claimed to be Richard of Shrewsbury and is a favorite candidate for being the real deal[[note]]Reportedly, deal.[[note]]Reportedly, King James I, the first post-Tudor monarch, believed this story[[/note]]. story.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The Richard III Society, inspired by their remarkable success in finding Richard's remains, has launched a new project to discover the fate of the princes, working to prove theory number five, that the boys were sent away by Richard for their own safety. Meanwhile, rumors indicate that King Charles III is far more willing to have the remains interred in Westminster Abbey subjected to modern forensic testing than his late mother was. All of this gives a glimmer of hope that new information might shed light on this 500-year-old ExtremelyColdCase.

to:

The Richard III Society, inspired by their remarkable success in finding Richard's remains, has launched a new project to discover the fate of the princes, working to prove theory number five, specifically that the boys were sent away by Richard for their own safety. Meanwhile, rumors indicate that King Charles III is far more willing to have the remains interred in Westminster Abbey subjected to modern forensic testing than his late mother was. All of this gives a glimmer of hope that new information might shed light on this 500-year-old ExtremelyColdCase.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Related tropes include EvilUncle, EvilChancellor, HiddenBackupPrince, LostOrphanedRoyalty, ReallyRoyaltyReveal, SentIntoHiding, WouldHurtAChild and TheWrongfulHeirToTheThrone.

to:

Related tropes include EvilUncle, EvilChancellor, HiddenBackupPrince, LostOrphanedRoyalty, ReallyRoyaltyReveal, SentIntoHiding, WouldHurtAChild WouldHurtAChild, WouldntHurtAChild and TheWrongfulHeirToTheThrone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the RomanceNovel by Rebecca Brandewyne titled ''Literature/RoseOfRapture'' the hero, who secretly supports Henry Tudor, realizes that Richard did not kill the princes and the only one who could have was Tudor's mother, Margaret Beaufort, with an assist from The Duke of Buckingham. He's understandably reticent to tell Henry this, but that very reluctance clues Henry in. The books is a rare case where both Richard III and Henry Tudor are disgusted by the princes' murder. While the hero thinks that whoever wears the crown would eventually have to kill the princes, both Richard and Henry believe that the death of children would taint the crown and both are pious enough not to cross that line.

to:

* In the RomanceNovel by Rebecca Brandewyne titled ''Literature/RoseOfRapture'' the hero, who secretly supports Henry Tudor, realizes that Richard did not kill the princes and the only one who could have was Tudor's mother, Margaret Beaufort, with an assist from The Duke of Buckingham. He's understandably reticent to tell Henry this, but that very reluctance clues Henry in. in to the truth. The books book is a rare case where both Richard III and Henry Tudor are disgusted by the princes' murder. While the hero thinks that whoever wears the crown would eventually have to kill the princes, both Richard and Henry believe that the death of children would taint the crown and both are pious enough not to cross that line.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Related tropes include EvilUncle, EvilChancellor, HiddenBackupPrince, LostOrphanedRoyalty, ReallyRoyaltyReveal, SentIntoHiding and TheWrongfulHeirToTheThrone.

to:

Related tropes include EvilUncle, EvilChancellor, HiddenBackupPrince, LostOrphanedRoyalty, ReallyRoyaltyReveal, SentIntoHiding SentIntoHiding, WouldHurtAChild and TheWrongfulHeirToTheThrone.



* In the RomanceNovel by Rebecca Brandewyne titled ''Literature/RoseOfRapture'' the hero, who secretly supports Henry Tudor, realizes that Richard did not kill the princes and the only one who could have was Tudor's mother, Margaret Beaufort. He's understandably reticent to tell Henry this.

to:

* In the RomanceNovel by Rebecca Brandewyne titled ''Literature/RoseOfRapture'' the hero, who secretly supports Henry Tudor, realizes that Richard did not kill the princes and the only one who could have was Tudor's mother, Margaret Beaufort. Beaufort, with an assist from The Duke of Buckingham. He's understandably reticent to tell Henry this.this, but that very reluctance clues Henry in. The books is a rare case where both Richard III and Henry Tudor are disgusted by the princes' murder. While the hero thinks that whoever wears the crown would eventually have to kill the princes, both Richard and Henry believe that the death of children would taint the crown and both are pious enough not to cross that line.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the RomanceNovel by Rebecca Brandewyne titled ''Rose of Rapture'' the hero, who secretly supports Henry Tudor, realizes that Richard did not kill the princes and the only one who could have was Tudor's mother, Margaret Beaufort. He's understandably reticent to tell Henry this.

to:

* In the RomanceNovel by Rebecca Brandewyne titled ''Rose of Rapture'' ''Literature/RoseOfRapture'' the hero, who secretly supports Henry Tudor, realizes that Richard did not kill the princes and the only one who could have was Tudor's mother, Margaret Beaufort. He's understandably reticent to tell Henry this.

Added: 151

Changed: 6

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the RomanceNovel by Rebecca Brandewyne titled "Rose of Rapture" the hero, who secretly supports Henry Tudor, realizes that Richard did not kill the princes and the only one who could have was Tudor's mother, Margaret Beaufort. He's understandably reticent to tell Henry this.

to:

* In the RomanceNovel by Rebecca Brandewyne titled "Rose ''Rose of Rapture" Rapture'' the hero, who secretly supports Henry Tudor, realizes that Richard did not kill the princes and the only one who could have was Tudor's mother, Margaret Beaufort. He's understandably reticent to tell Henry this.
* Richard and Edward's sister, UsefulNotes/MargaretOfYork is the protagonist of Anne Easter Smith's ''A Rose of York'' and she supports Perkin Warbeck.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Related tropes include EvilUncle, EvilChancellor, HiddenBackupPrince, LostOrphanedRoyalty, ReallyRoyaltyReveal, and TheWrongfulHeirToTheThrone.

to:

Related tropes include EvilUncle, EvilChancellor, HiddenBackupPrince, LostOrphanedRoyalty, ReallyRoyaltyReveal, SentIntoHiding and TheWrongfulHeirToTheThrone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


# One or both of the boys escaped, and one or more of the Pretenders that dogged Henry VII's reign may have been genuine, which would circle back to suspect number three. Perkin Warbeck, who gained much support in his lifetime and was eventually executed by Henry VII, claimed to be Richard of Shrewsbury and is a favorite candidate for being the real deal[[note]]Reportedly, King James I, the first post-Tudor monarch, believed this story[[/note]].

to:

# One or both of the boys escaped, [[SentIntoHiding escaped]], and one or more of the Pretenders that dogged Henry VII's reign may have been genuine, which would circle back to suspect number three. Perkin Warbeck, who gained much support in his lifetime and was eventually executed by Henry VII, claimed to be Richard of Shrewsbury and is a favorite candidate for being the real deal[[note]]Reportedly, King James I, the first post-Tudor monarch, believed this story[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the RomanceNovel by Rebecca Brandewyne titled "Rose of Rapture" the hero, who secretly supports Henry Tudor, realizes that Richard of Gloucester did not kill the princes and the only one who could have was Tudor's mother, Margaret Beaufort. He's understandably reticent to tell Henry this.

to:

* In the RomanceNovel by Rebecca Brandewyne titled "Rose of Rapture" the hero, who secretly supports Henry Tudor, realizes that Richard of Gloucester did not kill the princes and the only one who could have was Tudor's mother, Margaret Beaufort. He's understandably reticent to tell Henry this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In Rosemary Hawley Jarman's novel "We Speak No Treason" Richard has sent the boys to a castle in the North for their own safety.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the RomanceNovel by Rebecca Brandewyne titled "The Rose of Rapture" the hero, who secretly supports Henry Tudor, realizes that Richard of Gloucester did not kill the princes and the only one who could have was Tudor's mother, Margaret Beaufort. He's understandably reticent to tell Henry this.

to:

* In the RomanceNovel by Rebecca Brandewyne titled "The Rose "Rose of Rapture" the hero, who secretly supports Henry Tudor, realizes that Richard of Gloucester did not kill the princes and the only one who could have was Tudor's mother, Margaret Beaufort. He's understandably reticent to tell Henry this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the RomanceNovel by Rebecca Brandewyne titled "The Rose of Rapture" the hero, who secretly supports Henry Tudor, realizes that Richard of Gloucester did not kill the princes and the only one who could have was Tudor's mother, Margaret Beaufort. He's understandably reticent to tell Henry this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Per How To Write An Example Entry: Examples should be self-contained and not refer to elsewhere on the page.


* The premise of the original season of ''Series/TheBlackAdder'' (as summed up in the Page Quote above) is that everything about this story is Tudor propaganda, and that in fact, the princes were never locked up, and Richard, Duke of York, grew up to become Creator/BrianBlessed, who had two sons of his own (the younger of which, Prince Edmund, Duke of Edinburgh, becomes the titular Black Adder) and reigned for several years as Richard IV, following Richard III's death at Bosworth Hill. Henry VII, who managed to survive Bosworth Field, reformed the calendar and pretended none of it had ever happened - after Percy accidentally poisoned the entire royal family in the season finale, leaving Henry the only possible heir left.

to:

* The premise of the original season of ''Series/TheBlackAdder'' (as summed up in the Page Quote above) is that everything about this story is Tudor propaganda, and that in fact, the princes were never locked up, and Richard, Duke of York, grew up to become Creator/BrianBlessed, who had two sons of his own (the younger of which, Prince Edmund, Duke of Edinburgh, becomes the titular Black Adder) and reigned for several years as Richard IV, following Richard III's death at Bosworth Hill. Henry VII, who managed to survive Bosworth Field, reformed the calendar and pretended none of it had ever happened - after Percy accidentally poisoned the entire royal family in the season finale, leaving Henry the only possible heir left.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Series/GameOfThrones'': Like their book counterparts, Bran and Rickon Stark are inspired by the princes. They are betrayed by their protector Theon and disappear. Much like lore about the princes that says one was swapped out for a servant boy, Theon does this with Bran and Rickon and the servant boys are killed. [[spoiler: Eventually, Rickon does not survive, but in the show's ending Bran becomes king.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Show continuity only


* ''Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire'': Bran and Rickon Stark, lost princes betrayed by a former ally and protector, were inspired by the princes. Theon Greyjoy claims to have had them executed, but he actually smuggles them out of the castle, allowing them both to escape; [[spoiler: though Rickon dies later on, Bran ends up being made king.]] House Stark in general has a lot in common with the House of York.

to:

* ''Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire'': Bran and Rickon Stark, lost princes betrayed by a former ally and protector, were inspired by the princes. Theon Greyjoy claims to have had them executed, but he actually smuggles them out of the castle, allowing them both to escape; [[spoiler: though Rickon dies later on, Bran ends up being made king.]] escape. House Stark in general has a lot in common with the House of York.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire'': Bran and Rickon Stark, lost princes betrayed by a former ally and protector, were inspired by the princes.

to:

* ''Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire'': Bran and Rickon Stark, lost princes betrayed by a former ally and protector, were inspired by the princes. Theon Greyjoy claims to have had them executed, but he actually smuggles them out of the castle, allowing them both to escape; [[spoiler: though Rickon dies later on, Bran ends up being made king.]] House Stark in general has a lot in common with the House of York.

Top