Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / PerfectSolutionFallacy

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Happy Fourth!

Added DiffLines:

* In ''WesternAnimation/TheOwlHouse'', Eda's mother Gwendolyn has trouble with this fallacy. She loves Eda, and genuinely wants to help her with her curse, but she wants a 100% cure rather than a treatment like the potions, which she distrusts. As a result, not only has she wasted a lot of time and resources, especially since her drive makes her vulnerable to scam artists, but she's alienated both her daughters, Eda for continually coming around for years with "cures" that don't work, and Lilith for neglecting her in favor of Eda.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* This is the main reason why Mercy in ''VideoGame/{{Overwatch}}'' was completely re-worked. Under her old ability kit, the developers noticed that players would play Mercy too passively and were more than willing to pocket her active ultimate (which resurrected any dead teammates in her vicinity). Instead of "wasting" it on one or two revivals, players would try to wait for a moment for a near-or-full-team revive, and usually wind up not using it and being unhelpful if a perfect scenario did not present itself. Thus, the developers reworked her character where she has a revival ability on a 30-second cooldown and an ultimate that enhanced her abilities, allowing players to be more aggressive in keeping players alive instead of being trapped in the fallacy.[[/folder]]
* A side mission in ''VideoGame/SpiderManPS4'' has Spider-Man try a cloaking device that allows him to become invisible, with the disadvantage that when the cloaking field is active it interferes with his web shooters, so he can't use them while he's invisible. After the mission ends, Spider-Man concludes that the device isn't worth it because he can't shoot web while using it, so he discards it, entirely ignoring all the advantages invisibility allows when he's not fighting (such as easy sneaking, which would prevent a lot of the problems he'll face later in the game) and the fact that he can turn it on and off at any moment, which means even keeping it for an emergency would have been a good idea.

to:

* This is the main reason why Mercy in ''VideoGame/{{Overwatch}}'' was completely re-worked. Under her old ability kit, the developers noticed that players would play Mercy too passively and were more than willing to pocket her active ultimate (which resurrected any dead teammates in her vicinity). Instead of "wasting" it on one or two revivals, players would try to wait for a moment for a near-or-full-team revive, and usually wind up not using it and being unhelpful if a perfect scenario did not present itself. Thus, the developers reworked her character where she has a revival ability on a 30-second cooldown and an ultimate that enhanced her abilities, allowing players to be more aggressive in keeping players alive instead of being trapped in the fallacy.[[/folder]]
fallacy.
* A side mission in ''VideoGame/SpiderManPS4'' has Spider-Man try a cloaking device that allows him to become invisible, with the disadvantage that when the cloaking field is active it interferes with his web shooters, so he can't use them while he's invisible. After the mission ends, Spider-Man concludes that the device isn't worth it because he can't shoot web while using it, so he discards it, entirely ignoring all the advantages invisibility allows when he's not fighting (such as easy sneaking, which would prevent a lot of the problems he'll face later in the game) and the fact that he can turn it on and off at any moment, which means even keeping it for an emergency would have been a good idea.
idea.[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* A side mission in ''VideoGame/SpiderManPS4'' has Spider-Man try a cloaking device that allows him to become invisible, with the disadvantage that when the cloaking field is active it interferes with his web shooters, so he can't use them while he's invisible. After the mission ends, Spider-Man concludes that the device isn't worth it because he can't shoot web while using it, so he discards it, entirely ignoring all the advantages invisibility allows when he's not fighting (such as easy sneaking, which would prevent a lot of the problems he'll face later in the game) and the fact that he can turn it on and off at any moment, which means even keeping it for an emergency would have been a good idea.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Series/HaltAndCatchFire'': In season 3, Cameron argues that they should hold off on taking Mutiny public for a year or two until they make what she considers to be vital improvements to the business. Donna argues that interest has peaked ''now'' and that they shouldn't risk a good thing for a ''chance'' at something better in the future. She explicitly accuses Cameron of making perfect the enemy of good.[[spoiler:However, it seems that Cameron was right in the end. Mutiny's IPO flops, and the company goes under within four years]].

to:

* ''Series/HaltAndCatchFire'': In season 3, Cameron argues that they should hold off on taking Mutiny public for a year or two until they make what she considers to be vital improvements to the business. Donna argues that interest has peaked ''now'' and that they shouldn't risk a good thing for a ''chance'' at something better in the future. She explicitly accuses Cameron of making perfect the enemy of good. [[spoiler:However, it seems that Cameron was right in the end. Mutiny's IPO flops, and the company goes under within four years]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Series/HaltAndCatchFire'': In season 3, Cameron argues that they should hold off on taking Mutiny public for a year or two until they make what she considers to be vital improvements to the business. Donna argues that interest has peaked ''now'' and that they shouldn't risk a good thing for a ''chance'' at something better in the future. She explicitly accuses accuses Cameron of making perfect the enemy of good.

to:

* ''Series/HaltAndCatchFire'': In season 3, Cameron argues that they should hold off on taking Mutiny public for a year or two until they make what she considers to be vital improvements to the business. Donna argues that interest has peaked ''now'' and that they shouldn't risk a good thing for a ''chance'' at something better in the future. She explicitly accuses accuses Cameron of making perfect the enemy of good.[[spoiler:However, it seems that Cameron was right in the end. Mutiny's IPO flops, and the company goes under within four years]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Series/HaltAndCatchFire'': In season 3, Cameron argues that they should hold off on taking Mutiny public for a year or two until they make what she considers to be vital improvements to the business. Donna argues that interest has peaked ''now'' and that they shouldn't risk a good thing for a ''chance'' at something better in the future. She explicitly accuses accuses Cameron of making perfect the enemy of good.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

-->'''Troi:''' Even a ''partial'' recovery may give them some peace.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Series/StarTrekTheNextGeneration'': Discussed in "[[Recap/StarTrekTheNextGenerationS3E11TheHunted The Hunted]]." The Angosians had no idea what to do with their augmented {{Super Soldier}}s because Angosia is NoPlaceForAWarrior. When they failed to figure out a way to ''completely'' remove the soldiers' combat conditioning, they just sent every single soldier to a lunar prison colony. Picard and his bridge crew call out the Angosian government for not even trying to help them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In "[[Recap/StarTrekPicardS1E04AbsoluteCandor Absolute Candor]]", Jean-Luc Picard is called out on this by Zani, having chosen to retire from Starfleet in protest and do nothing afterwards rather than listen to Raffi's suggestion that they find another way, however imperfect, to continue the relocation of Romulans without Starfleet's support.

to:

** In "[[Recap/StarTrekPicardS1E04AbsoluteCandor Absolute Candor]]", Jean-Luc Picard is called out on this by Zani, having chosen to retire ResignInProtest from Starfleet in protest and do nothing afterwards rather than listen to Raffi's suggestion that they find another way, however imperfect, to continue the relocation of Romulans without Starfleet's support.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Solomon David in ''Webcomic/KillSixBillionDemons'' is looking for someone to replace him as ruler of his part of the Multiverse so that he may focus on enlightenment and meditation, but because of his ''immense'' pride, rather than simply appointing a successor or training one of his sons to succeed him, he wants to find someone better than him, which he hasn't been able to in millenia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** By the Final Arc, it's become clear that Redcloak has succumbed to this alongside the SunkCostFallacy. He has virtually everything he could realistically get offered to him and not have to work with Xykon anymore. But the cost would mean saying everything he did was for naught and there would still be the chance for goblins to be killed by the other demihuman races. Redcloak rejects [[spoiler: Durkon's offer]] with an ''implosion'', arguing nothing less but divine recognition would be enough. [[spoiler: Furthermore, he's too caught up in his own plan to notice its failings, such as the lack of gurantee the ''next world'' would have humanoids (including goblinoids) in general. In his defense though, this could be attributed to The Dark One's lack of communication and the mechinations of third-parties.)]]

Changed: 218

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''ComicBook/{{Irredeemable}}'' the FatalFlaw behind the Plutonian's FaceHeelTurn was the criticism he received from the population after all his acts of heroism. It is implied that he has a pathological desire to have everyone love him, and simply couldn't tolerate any criticism whatsoever, no matter how justified.

to:

* In ''ComicBook/{{Irredeemable}}'' the FatalFlaw behind the Plutonian's FaceHeelTurn was the criticism he received from the population after all his acts of heroism. It is implied that he has a pathological desire to have everyone love him, and simply couldn't tolerate any criticism whatsoever, no matter how justified. Though given the nature of his powers, he may have had a self-defeating streak since he couldn't tune out the ''thousands of voices'' coming at him (he had to go to ''The Moon'' so he was far enough not to hear them.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Some people actually argue, [[PoesLaw seemingly being serious]], that since it's impossible to make a completely fair and equal society (due to some people just naturally being bigger, faster, smarter, or otherwise more adept),we shouldn't even bother trying to make society more equitable, even though this make about a much sense as saying "we'll never be able to abolish murder completely, so we might as well not punish murderers at all."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* A curious combination of this and MovingTheGoalposts emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic. When the pandemic first hit big in the U.S., the prevailing wisdom was to "flatten the curve" - i.e., slow the rate of infection by shutting down schools, businesses, and other places where people congregate so that hospitals would not be overwhelmed by a flood of patients. Several months in, however, the discussions on whether to reopen all those shuttered places, [[ThinkOfTheChildren especially schools]], tended to focus around whether it was "safe" to do so, mainly in the context of completely eliminating the risk of infection vs. accepting a manageable risk to mitigate other sorts of harm (economic, social, developmental, etc.) that were exacerbated by keeping them closed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In "Absolute Candor", Jean-Luc Picard is called out on this by Zani, having chosen to retire from Starfleet in protest and do nothing afterwards rather than listen to Raffi's suggestion that they find another way, however imperfect, to continue the relocation of Romulans without Starfleet's support. Picard himself admits to it.

to:

** In "Absolute Candor", "[[Recap/StarTrekPicardS1E04AbsoluteCandor Absolute Candor]]", Jean-Luc Picard is called out on this by Zani, having chosen to retire from Starfleet in protest and do nothing afterwards rather than listen to Raffi's suggestion that they find another way, however imperfect, to continue the relocation of Romulans without Starfleet's support. Picard himself admits to it.support.



** Soundly {{defied}} in "The Impossible Box" when Picard sees the work being done at the Borg Reclamation Project. Having admitted that he "allowed the perfect to become the enemy of the good," he commends Hugh for doing an imperfect job the best way he can.

to:

** Soundly {{defied}} in "The "[[Recap/StarTrekPicardS1E06TheImpossibleBox The Impossible Box" Box]]" when Picard sees the work being done at the Borg Reclamation Project. Having admitted that he "allowed the perfect to become the enemy of the good," he He commends Hugh for doing an imperfect job the best way he can.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The internalization of this fallacy is common in people suffering from anxiety and depression: "whatever I do won't be perfect, therefore it's not worth doing at all". Therapy for both conditions often involves getting over the need to be perfect.

to:

* The internalization of this fallacy is common in people suffering from anxiety and depression: "whatever I do won't be perfect, therefore it's not worth doing at all". Therapy for both conditions often involves getting over the need to be perfect. In an inverse of the above, the line of thought can be "if it's worth doing, it's worth doing ''badly''."

Added: 84

Changed: 90

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--->'''Picard:''' What you're doing is good, Hugh. There's no need for it to be perfect.

to:

--->'''Picard:''' --->'''Hugh:''' The outcomes are far from ideal.\\
'''Picard:'''
What you're doing is good, Hugh. There's no need for it to be perfect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--->'''Picard:''' What you're doing here is good, Hugh. It doesn't have to be perfect.

to:

--->'''Picard:''' What you're doing here is good, Hugh. It doesn't have There's no need for it to be perfect.

Added: 425

Changed: 682

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Series/StarTrekPicard'': In "Absolute Candor", Jean-Luc Picard is called out on this by Zani, having chosen to retire from Starfleet in protest and do nothing afterwards rather than listen to Raffi's suggestion that they find another way, however imperfect, to continue the relocation of Romulans without Starfleet's support. Picard himself admits to it.
-->'''Zani:''' Because you could not save everyone, you chose to save no one.\\

to:

* ''Series/StarTrekPicard'': ''Series/StarTrekPicard'':
**
In "Absolute Candor", Jean-Luc Picard is called out on this by Zani, having chosen to retire from Starfleet in protest and do nothing afterwards rather than listen to Raffi's suggestion that they find another way, however imperfect, to continue the relocation of Romulans without Starfleet's support. Picard himself admits to it.
-->'''Zani:''' --->'''Zani:''' Because you could not save everyone, you chose to save no one.\\


Added DiffLines:

** Soundly {{defied}} in "The Impossible Box" when Picard sees the work being done at the Borg Reclamation Project. Having admitted that he "allowed the perfect to become the enemy of the good," he commends Hugh for doing an imperfect job the best way he can.
--->'''Picard:''' What you're doing here is good, Hugh. It doesn't have to be perfect.

Added: 1019

Removed: 498

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* An episode of ''Series/TheDailyShow'' lampooned a group of Fox News personalities who claimed that a proposed tax increase on the super-rich was worthless in eliminating the federal debt because it would generate "only" an additional $700 billion over 10 years, a small fraction of the overall debt. (Stewart and Co. then went on to show that raising taxes on the lowest-earning 50% of the population could only generate the same amount by claiming HALF of all of their material wealth in taxes.)



* An episode of ''Series/TheDailyShow'' lampooned a group of Fox News personalities who claimed that a proposed tax increase on the super-rich was worthless in eliminating the federal debt because it would generate "only" an additional $700 billion over 10 years, a small fraction of the overall debt. (Stewart and Co. then went on to show that raising taxes on the lowest-earning 50% of the population could only generate the same amount by claiming HALF of all of their material wealth in taxes.)


Added DiffLines:

* ''Series/StarTrekPicard'': In "Absolute Candor", Jean-Luc Picard is called out on this by Zani, having chosen to retire from Starfleet in protest and do nothing afterwards rather than listen to Raffi's suggestion that they find another way, however imperfect, to continue the relocation of Romulans without Starfleet's support. Picard himself admits to it.
-->'''Zani:''' Because you could not save everyone, you chose to save no one.\\
'''Picard:''' ''(nods)'' Yes. I allowed the perfect to become the enemy of the good.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also against the theory of the Big Bang, as it does not explain how the Universe began. Said theory describes the evolution of our Universe from a primordial state, very dense and hot, to its current one and not as has been said by an astronomer what banged, how banged, why it banged, and even if it banged at all --which for now are just speculations.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder:Fanfics]]

to:

[[folder:Fanfics]][[folder:Fanfiction]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* As far as ''Fanfic/KnowledgeIsPower'' is concerned, the fact that Dumbledore's plan to defeat Voldemort had some flaws makes him as evil as Voldemort himself.

to:

* As far as ''Fanfic/KnowledgeIsPower'' (and ''Literature/HarryPotter'' [[SturgeonsLaw badfic]] in general) is concerned, the fact that Dumbledore's plan to defeat Voldemort had some flaws makes him as evil as Voldemort himself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None





* Rejecting something in order to negotiate a more favorable solution when it seems that is seen as viable and there is reason to believe the compromise solution can be taken if negotiations fail. However this can dovetail quite nastily into the SunkCostFallacy. I.E. "We've rejected compromise this long so we better hold out longer to make our efforts worth it."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Rejecting something in order to negotiate a more favorable solution when it seems that is seen as viable and there is reason to believe the compromise solution can be taken if negotiations fail. However this can dovetail quite nastily into the SunkCostFallacy. I.E. "We've rejected compromise this long so we better hold out longer to make our efforts worth it."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Since outside of mathematics a perfect solution to ''anything'' is unlikely in the extreme, this fallacy is usually combined with BeggingTheQuestion; a debater will assume a "perfect" solution is one which fits his argument and ideals, regardless of whether his opponent would view the result as perfect or even desirable.

to:

Since Since, outside of mathematics mathematics, a perfect solution to ''anything'' is unlikely in the extreme, this fallacy is usually combined with BeggingTheQuestion; a debater will assume a "perfect" solution is one which fits his their argument and ideals, regardless of whether his their opponent would view the result as perfect perfect, or even desirable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->--'''Voltaire'''

to:

-->--'''Voltaire'''
-->-- '''Creator/{{Voltaire}}'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Literature]]
* In ''LightNovel/CookingWithWildGame'', Zattsu Tsun argues that because the law is racist in a certain few situations that have ''nothing'' to do with what he's on trial for, he should [[NotHyperbole be allowed to get away with murder]]. His judges/fellow tribesmen, who suffered the same oppression Zattsu did and have been victimized by his sadism for generations, are not impressed.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Voltaire's quote is paraphrased by Ben in ''Webcomic/DocRat'' when talking with Wilbur Fuzz about the latter's cardiac arrest. Wilbur is joking in his usual PungeonMaster way that a bull had to have been involved in his rescue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Western Animation]]
* In ''WesternAnimation/BojackHorseman'', a FatalFlaw of Diane Nguyen is that she refuses to be pragmatic or compromise her position at all. This leads her into all kinds of trouble when she tries to take on the elites of Hollywoo, believing that [[TheIdealist the truth will make itself known]] if she only keeps pushing hard enough. Too bad that Hollywoo is such a CrapsackWorld that things don't work like that.
[[/folder]]

Top