Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / Letterbox

Go To

OR

Changed: 180

Removed: 77

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Compare VisualCompression, WidescreenShot.

Contrast PanAndScan.

See also {{Eyedscreen}} for where letterboxing is used as a temporary effect.

to:

Compare VisualCompression, WidescreenShot.

WidescreenShot. Contrast PanAndScan.

See also {{Eyedscreen}} for where letterboxing is used as a temporary effect. If objects inside the frame enter the letterbox, that counts as FrameBreak.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added a paragraph about how the letterboxing bars aren't always black.

Added DiffLines:

Bear in mind that the bars that letterboxing generates are usually black, but not always. The original widescreen home video release of Creator/WoodyAllen's ''Film/{{Manhattan}}'' used grey bars. TV channels or some Website/YouTube videos showing content recorded in 4:3 or vertical smartphone video would fill the letterbox with a zoomed, cropped and blurred version of the same video played in sync, like [[https://youtu.be/j3jNbroPj8A this]]. Some TV channels would fill the letterbox with their network ID, like [[https://youtu.be/PFIrsitJW5M?t=155 this]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Turner Classic Movies did an excellent explanation [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m1-pP1-5K8 the difference between Letterboxing and Pan And Scan]].

Added: 209

Changed: 368

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This term refers to a method of fitting a widescreen movie to the AspectRatio of a TV screen (usually converting 16:9 to 4:3). This is done by shrinking the original frame until its width matches that of the 4:3 frame; the side effect is that the movie's ''height'' is now considerably less than that of the TV screen, resulting in black bars at the top and bottom, forming a "box" around the film (it's rather like watching the film through a mail slot or "letter box", hence the term). Naturally, this is less of a concern with films that are not very wide to begin with -- say, 1.85:1 -- or on modern TV sets with wider 16:9 screens.

to:

This term refers to a method of fitting an image onto a widescreen movie to the AspectRatio of a TV screen (usually converting 16:9 to 4:3). that is less wide than the image (or more square, if you prefer). This is done by shrinking the original frame image until its width matches that of the 4:3 frame; screen; the side effect is that the movie's ''height'' is now considerably less than that of the TV screen, resulting in black bars at the top and bottom, forming a "box" around the film (it's rather like watching the film through a mail slot or "letter box", hence the term). Naturally, this term).

The two most common letterboxes involve trying to fit a 16:9 image onto a 4:3 screen or a 21:9 image onto a 16:9 screen, although now that 4:3
is essentially replaced by 16:9 the former has become less of a concern with films that are not very wide to begin with -- say, 1.85:1 -- or on modern TV sets with wider 16:9 screens.
common.



Now to get ''really'' fancy: When this is done horizontally (that is, an image created in 4:3-ratio is shown on a wider screen such as 16:9 with black space at the sides), it is known as "pillarboxing", after a type of upright mailbox used in England. And "windowboxing" occurs when an already-letterboxed image is pillarboxed, or vice versa, forming a black "picture frame" around the image. There's even a "smilebox" format for certain [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinerama Cinerama]] titles, which simulates the curvature of the screen with concave lines at the top and bottom of the image.

It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9; movie projectors have a scrim that block the upper and lower parts of the frame. A film that is shot in this manner has two basic options: 1) Simply make sure that nothing plot-relevant ends up in that dead space that will be blocked off, or 2) Make use of that space for lighting rigs or other equipment that will simply be obscured. The latter becomes a problem if said film is shown in 4:3 on television without the aforementioned scrims, because some of the effects are spoiled; for example, ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' infamously has the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container with a false bottom, ''Film/TheBloodWatersOfDrZ'' with the fish creature's visible sneakers, or ''Film/TwelveToTheMoon'' with the visible lighting rigs on the "moonscape". Some films like ''Film/{{Moonstruck}}'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 version is actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed (as long as they go for option 1).

to:

Now to get ''really'' fancy: When this is done horizontally (that is, an image created in 4:3-ratio is shown on a wider screen such as 16:9 with black space at the sides), it is known as "pillarboxing", after a type of upright mailbox used in England. And "windowboxing" occurs when an already-letterboxed image is pillarboxed, or vice versa, forming a black "picture frame" around the image. There's even a "smilebox" format for certain [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinerama Cinerama]] titles, which simulates the curvature of the screen with concave lines at the top and bottom of the image.

It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9; movie projectors have a scrim that block the upper and lower parts of the frame. A film that is shot in this manner has two basic options: 1) Simply make sure that nothing plot-relevant ends up in that dead space that will be blocked off, or 2) Make use of that space for lighting rigs or other equipment that will simply be obscured. The latter becomes a problem if said film is shown in 4:3 on television without the aforementioned scrims, because some of the effects are spoiled; for example, ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' infamously has the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container with a false bottom, ''Film/TheBloodWatersOfDrZ'' with the fish creature's visible sneakers, or ''Film/TwelveToTheMoon'' with the visible lighting rigs on the "moonscape". Some films like ''Film/{{Moonstruck}}'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning that in terms of not losing any part of the image the 4:3 version is actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed (as long as they go for option 1).
Tabs MOD

Changed: 31

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Although letterboxing preserves the entirety of the picture as it was shot, that picture is ([[CaptainObvious obviously]]) much smaller than a pan and scan transfer, which can be somewhat disconcerting on smaller television sets. Further, some viewers claim to be distracted by the empty black bars on the screen, preferring that the screen be filled with picture. Again, modern wide-screened TV sets help diminish this problem somewhat, although films shot in even wider formats (such as vintage [=CinemaScope=], Todd-AO, Ultra Panavision 70, and Cinerama releases from the 1950s and '60s) are usually letterboxed rather than cropped even in the "widescreen" home video releases.

to:

Although letterboxing preserves the entirety of the picture as it was shot, that picture is ([[CaptainObvious obviously]]) much smaller than a pan and scan transfer, which can be somewhat disconcerting on smaller television sets. Further, some viewers claim to be distracted by the empty black bars on the screen, preferring that the screen be filled with picture. Again, modern wide-screened TV sets help diminish this problem somewhat, although films shot in even wider formats (such as vintage [=CinemaScope=], Todd-AO, Ultra Panavision 70, and Cinerama releases from the 1950s and '60s) are usually letterboxed rather than cropped even in the "widescreen" home video releases.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
clarify/add


It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9; movie projectors have a scrim that block the upper and lower parts of the frame. Some films like ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' suffer when shown in 4:3 on television because some of the effects are spoiled, infamously with the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container has a false bottom. ''Film/TheBloodWatersOfDrZ'' had the same problem where the fish creature's sneakers could be seen. Some films like ''Film/{{Moonstruck}}'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 version is actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed.

to:

It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9; movie projectors have a scrim that block the upper and lower parts of the frame. Some films like A film that is shot in this manner has two basic options: 1) Simply make sure that nothing plot-relevant ends up in that dead space that will be blocked off, or 2) Make use of that space for lighting rigs or other equipment that will simply be obscured. The latter becomes a problem if said film is shown in 4:3 on television without the aforementioned scrims, because some of the effects are spoiled; for example, ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' suffer when shown in 4:3 on television because some of the effects are spoiled, infamously with has the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container has with a false bottom. bottom, ''Film/TheBloodWatersOfDrZ'' had the same problem where with the fish creature's sneakers could be seen. visible sneakers, or ''Film/TwelveToTheMoon'' with the visible lighting rigs on the "moonscape". Some films like ''Film/{{Moonstruck}}'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 version is actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed.
needed (as long as they go for option 1).

Removed: 18

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


----
<<|CameraTricks|>>

to:

----
<<|CameraTricks|>>
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Although there was some consumer resistance to the format in the early years, it has now become virtually the norm for home video, and to wish for pan and scan instead is the mark of a rube dumb enough to spend the same amount of money for up to 33% less picture. Many newer movies released on home video actually make use of that dead space, having captions and subtitles appear in the black bars rather than within the frame itself. Even without such considerations, there are a number of commercials and TV shows that are formatted for letterbox presentation because it gives them a classy look like a big-budget feature film.

to:

Although there was some consumer resistance to the format in the early years, it has now become virtually the norm for home video, and to wish for pan and scan instead is the mark of a rube dumb enough to spend the same amount of money for up to 33% less picture. Many newer movies released on home video actually make use of that dead space, having captions and subtitles appear in the black bars rather than within the frame itself. Even without such considerations, there are a number of commercials and TV shows that are formatted for letterbox presentation because it gives them a classy look like a big-budget feature film.
film (most movies are shot in 21:9, and so we associate things shot in that aspect ratio to be all movie-like).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9; movie projectors have a scrim that block the upper and lower parts of the frame. Some films like ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' suffer because some of the effects are spoiled, infamously with the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container has a false bottom. ''Film/TheBloodWatersOfDrZ'' had the same problem where the fish creature's sneakers could be seen. Some films like ''Film/{{Moonstruck}}'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 version is actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed.

to:

It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9; movie projectors have a scrim that block the upper and lower parts of the frame. Some films like ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' suffer when shown in 4:3 on television because some of the effects are spoiled, infamously with the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container has a false bottom. ''Film/TheBloodWatersOfDrZ'' had the same problem where the fish creature's sneakers could be seen. Some films like ''Film/{{Moonstruck}}'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 version is actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9. Some films like ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' suffer because some of the effects are spoiled, infamously with the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container has a false bottom. ''Film/TheBloodWatersOfDrZ'' had the same problem where the fish creature's sneakers could be seen. Some films like ''Film/{{Moonstruck}}'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 version is actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed.

to:

It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9.16:9; movie projectors have a scrim that block the upper and lower parts of the frame. Some films like ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' suffer because some of the effects are spoiled, infamously with the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container has a false bottom. ''Film/TheBloodWatersOfDrZ'' had the same problem where the fish creature's sneakers could be seen. Some films like ''Film/{{Moonstruck}}'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 version is actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9. However, some films like ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' suffer because some of the effects are spoiled, infamously with the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container has a false bottom. ''Film/TheBloodWatersOfDrZ'' had the same problem where the fish creature's sneakers could be seen. Some films like ''Film/{{Moonstruck}}'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 version is actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed.

to:

It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9. However, some Some films like ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' suffer because some of the effects are spoiled, infamously with the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container has a false bottom. ''Film/TheBloodWatersOfDrZ'' had the same problem where the fish creature's sneakers could be seen. Some films like ''Film/{{Moonstruck}}'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 version is actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9. However, some films like ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' suffer because some of the effects are spoiled, infamously with the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container has a false bottom. ''Film/TheBloodWatersOfDrZ'' had the same problem where the fish creature's sneakers could be seen. Some films like ''Film/Moonstruck'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 version is actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed.

to:

It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9. However, some films like ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' suffer because some of the effects are spoiled, infamously with the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container has a false bottom. ''Film/TheBloodWatersOfDrZ'' had the same problem where the fish creature's sneakers could be seen. Some films like ''Film/Moonstruck'' ''Film/{{Moonstruck}}'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 version is actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9. However, some films like ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' suffer because some of the effects are spoiled, infamously with the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container has a false bottom. ''Film/TheBloodWatersOfDrZ'' had the same problem where the fish creature's'sneakers could be seen. Some films like ''Film/Moonstruck'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 version is actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed.

to:

It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9. However, some films like ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' suffer because some of the effects are spoiled, infamously with the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container has a false bottom. ''Film/TheBloodWatersOfDrZ'' had the same problem where the fish creature's'sneakers creature's sneakers could be seen. Some films like ''Film/Moonstruck'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 version is actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9. However, some films like ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' suffer because some of the effects are spoiled, infamously with the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container has a false bottom. ''Film/BloodWatersOfDrZ'' had the same problem where the fish creatures' sneakers could be seen. Some films like ''Film/Moonstruck'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 versions actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed.

to:

It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9. However, some films like ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' suffer because some of the effects are spoiled, infamously with the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container has a false bottom. ''Film/BloodWatersOfDrZ'' ''Film/TheBloodWatersOfDrZ'' had the same problem where the fish creatures' sneakers creature's'sneakers could be seen. Some films like ''Film/Moonstruck'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 versions version is actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

It gets wilder when some films are shot in 4:3 knowing that they'll be exhibited in 16:9. However, some films like ''Film/PeeWeesBigAdventure'' suffer because some of the effects are spoiled, infamously with the "bike chain" visual gag showing the container has a false bottom. ''Film/BloodWatersOfDrZ'' had the same problem where the fish creatures' sneakers could be seen. Some films like ''Film/Moonstruck'' are shot in 4:3 knowing they'll be in letterbox on the screen and 4:3 on television, meaning the 4:3 versions actually superior and no PanAndScan is needed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This term refers to a method of fitting a widescreen movie to the AspectRatio of a TV screen (usually converting 16:9 to 4:3). This is done by shrinking the original frame until its width matches that of the 4:3 frame; the side effect is that the movie's ''height'' is now considerably less than that of the TV screen, resulting in black bars at the top and bottom forming a "box" around the film (it's rather like watching the film through a mail slot or "letter box", hence the term). Naturally, this is less of a concern with films that are not too wide to begin with -- say, 1.85:1 -- or on modern TV sets with wider 16:9 screens.

Some movies came to VHS with letterboxing employed only on the opening and end credits, since presenting those sequences in PanAndScan would have resulted in some actors' or crew members' names becoming obscured from the viewers. The studios occasionally tried to make the shift less distracting by replacing the black bars with patterns similar to the background of the ArtisticTitle or the CreativeClosingCredits.

to:

This term refers to a method of fitting a widescreen movie to the AspectRatio of a TV screen (usually converting 16:9 to 4:3). This is done by shrinking the original frame until its width matches that of the 4:3 frame; the side effect is that the movie's ''height'' is now considerably less than that of the TV screen, resulting in black bars at the top and bottom bottom, forming a "box" around the film (it's rather like watching the film through a mail slot or "letter box", hence the term). Naturally, this is less of a concern with films that are not too very wide to begin with -- say, 1.85:1 -- or on modern TV sets with wider 16:9 screens.

Some movies came to VHS with letterboxing employed only on the opening and end ending credits, since presenting those sequences in PanAndScan would have resulted in some actors' or crew members' names becoming obscured from the viewers. The studios occasionally tried to make the shift less distracting by replacing the black bars with patterns similar to the background of the ArtisticTitle or the CreativeClosingCredits.



Although there was some consumer resistance to the format in the early years, it has now become virtually the norm for home video and to wish for pan and scan instead is the mark of a rube dumb enough to spend the same amount of money for up to 33% less picture. Many newer movies released on home video actually make use of that dead space, having captions and subtitles appear in the black bars rather than within the frame itself. Even without such considerations, there are a number of commercials and TV shows that are formatted for letterbox presentation because it gives them a classy look like a big-budget feature film.

to:

Although there was some consumer resistance to the format in the early years, it has now become virtually the norm for home video video, and to wish for pan and scan instead is the mark of a rube dumb enough to spend the same amount of money for up to 33% less picture. Many newer movies released on home video actually make use of that dead space, having captions and subtitles appear in the black bars rather than within the frame itself. Even without such considerations, there are a number of commercials and TV shows that are formatted for letterbox presentation because it gives them a classy look like a big-budget feature film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This term refers to a method of fitting a widescreen movie to the AspectRatio of a TV screen (formerly 4:3). This is done by shrinking the original frame until its width matches that of the 4:3 frame; the side effect is that the movie's ''height'' is now considerably less than that of the TV screen, resulting in black bars at the top and bottom forming a "box" around the film (it's rather like watching the film through a mail slot or "letter box", hence the term). Naturally, this is less of a concern with films that are not too wide to begin with -- say, 1.85:1 -- or on modern TV sets with wider 16:9 screens.

to:

This term refers to a method of fitting a widescreen movie to the AspectRatio of a TV screen (formerly (usually converting 16:9 to 4:3). This is done by shrinking the original frame until its width matches that of the 4:3 frame; the side effect is that the movie's ''height'' is now considerably less than that of the TV screen, resulting in black bars at the top and bottom forming a "box" around the film (it's rather like watching the film through a mail slot or "letter box", hence the term). Naturally, this is less of a concern with films that are not too wide to begin with -- say, 1.85:1 -- or on modern TV sets with wider 16:9 screens.



Although there was some consumer resistance to the format in the early years, it has now become virtually the norm for home video and to wish for pan and scan instead is the mark of a rube dumb enough to spend the same amount of money for up to 33% less picture. Many newer movies released on home video actually make use of that dead space, having captions and subtitles appear in the black bars rather than within the frame itself. Even without such considerations, there are a number of commercials and TV shows that are formatted for letterbox presentation because it gives them a classy look like a big-budget feature film. (Many of which, amusingly, wound up windowboxed after the switch to widescreen, digital TV.)

to:

Although there was some consumer resistance to the format in the early years, it has now become virtually the norm for home video and to wish for pan and scan instead is the mark of a rube dumb enough to spend the same amount of money for up to 33% less picture. Many newer movies released on home video actually make use of that dead space, having captions and subtitles appear in the black bars rather than within the frame itself. Even without such considerations, there are a number of commercials and TV shows that are formatted for letterbox presentation because it gives them a classy look like a big-budget feature film. (Many of which, amusingly, wound up windowboxed after the switch to widescreen, digital TV.)
film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Although letterboxing preserves the entirety of the picture as it was shot, that picture is ([[CaptainObvious obviously]]) much smaller than a PanAndScan transfer, which can be somewhat disconcerting on smaller television sets. Further, some viewers claim to be distracted by the empty black bars on the screen, preferring that the screen be filled with picture. Again, modern wide-screened TV sets help diminish this problem somewhat, although films shot in even wider formats (such as vintage [=CinemaScope=], Todd-AO, Ultra Panavision 70, and Cinerama releases from the 1950s and '60s) are usually letterboxed rather than cropped even in the "widescreen" home video releases.

Although there was some consumer resistance to the format in the early years, it has now become virtually the norm for home video and to wish PanAndScan instead is the mark of a rube dumb enough to spend the same amount of money for up to 33% less picture. Many newer movies released on home video actually make use of that dead space, having captions and subtitles appear in the black bars rather than within the frame itself. Even without such considerations, there are a number of commercials and TV shows that are formatted for letterbox presentation because it gives them a classy look like a big-budget feature film. (Many of which, amusingly, wound up windowboxed after the switch to widescreen, digital TV.)

to:

Although letterboxing preserves the entirety of the picture as it was shot, that picture is ([[CaptainObvious obviously]]) much smaller than a PanAndScan pan and scan transfer, which can be somewhat disconcerting on smaller television sets. Further, some viewers claim to be distracted by the empty black bars on the screen, preferring that the screen be filled with picture. Again, modern wide-screened TV sets help diminish this problem somewhat, although films shot in even wider formats (such as vintage [=CinemaScope=], Todd-AO, Ultra Panavision 70, and Cinerama releases from the 1950s and '60s) are usually letterboxed rather than cropped even in the "widescreen" home video releases.

Although there was some consumer resistance to the format in the early years, it has now become virtually the norm for home video and to wish PanAndScan for pan and scan instead is the mark of a rube dumb enough to spend the same amount of money for up to 33% less picture. Many newer movies released on home video actually make use of that dead space, having captions and subtitles appear in the black bars rather than within the frame itself. Even without such considerations, there are a number of commercials and TV shows that are formatted for letterbox presentation because it gives them a classy look like a big-budget feature film. (Many of which, amusingly, wound up windowboxed after the switch to widescreen, digital TV.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Now to get ''really'' fancy: When this is done horizontally (that is, a 4:3-ratio image is letterboxed within a wider screen such as 16:9), it is known as "pillarboxing", after a type of upright mailbox used in England. And "windowboxing" occurs when an already-letterboxed image is pillarboxed, or vice versa, forming a black "picture frame" around the image. There's even a "smilebox" format for certain [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinerama Cinerama]] titles, which simulates the curvature of the screen with concave lines at the top and bottom of the image.

to:

Now to get ''really'' fancy: When this is done horizontally (that is, a an image created in 4:3-ratio image is letterboxed within shown on a wider screen such as 16:9), 16:9 with black space at the sides), it is known as "pillarboxing", after a type of upright mailbox used in England. And "windowboxing" occurs when an already-letterboxed image is pillarboxed, or vice versa, forming a black "picture frame" around the image. There's even a "smilebox" format for certain [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinerama Cinerama]] titles, which simulates the curvature of the screen with concave lines at the top and bottom of the image.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
minor correction


This term refers to a method of fitting a widescreen movie to the AspectRatio of a TV screen (commonly 4:3). This is done by shrinking the original frame until its width matches that of the 4:3 frame; the side effect is that the movie's ''height'' is now considerably less than that of the TV screen, resulting in black bars at the top and bottom forming a "box" around the film (it's rather like watching the film through a mail slot or "letter box", hence the term). Naturally, this is less of a concern with films that are not too wide to begin with -- say, 1.85:1 -- or with newer TV sets with wider screens.

to:

This term refers to a method of fitting a widescreen movie to the AspectRatio of a TV screen (commonly (formerly 4:3). This is done by shrinking the original frame until its width matches that of the 4:3 frame; the side effect is that the movie's ''height'' is now considerably less than that of the TV screen, resulting in black bars at the top and bottom forming a "box" around the film (it's rather like watching the film through a mail slot or "letter box", hence the term). Naturally, this is less of a concern with films that are not too wide to begin with -- say, 1.85:1 -- or with newer on modern TV sets with wider 16:9 screens.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Now to get ''really'' fancy: When this is done horizontally (that is, a 4:3-ratio image is letterboxed within a wider screen such as 16:9), it is known as "pillarboxing", after a type of upright mailbox used in England. And "windowboxing" occurs when an already-letterboxed image is pillarboxed, or vice versa, forming a black "picture frame" around the image. There's even a "smilebox" format for [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinerama Cinerama]] titles, which simulates the curvature of the screen with concave lines at the top and bottom of the image.

to:

Now to get ''really'' fancy: When this is done horizontally (that is, a 4:3-ratio image is letterboxed within a wider screen such as 16:9), it is known as "pillarboxing", after a type of upright mailbox used in England. And "windowboxing" occurs when an already-letterboxed image is pillarboxed, or vice versa, forming a black "picture frame" around the image. There's even a "smilebox" format for certain [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinerama Cinerama]] titles, which simulates the curvature of the screen with concave lines at the top and bottom of the image.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Now to get ''really'' fancy: When this is done horizontally (that is, a 4:3-ratio image is letterboxed within a wider screen such as 16:9), it is known as "pillarboxing", after a type of upright mailbox used in England. And "windowboxing" occurs when an already-letterboxed image is pillarboxed, or vice versa, forming a black "picture frame" around the image. There's even a "smilebox" format for [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinerama Cinerama]] titles, which simulates the curvature of the screen with concave shapes at the top and bottom of the image.

to:

Now to get ''really'' fancy: When this is done horizontally (that is, a 4:3-ratio image is letterboxed within a wider screen such as 16:9), it is known as "pillarboxing", after a type of upright mailbox used in England. And "windowboxing" occurs when an already-letterboxed image is pillarboxed, or vice versa, forming a black "picture frame" around the image. There's even a "smilebox" format for [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinerama Cinerama]] titles, which simulates the curvature of the screen with concave shapes lines at the top and bottom of the image.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Now to get ''really'' fancy: When this is done horizontally (that is, a 4:3-ratio image is letterboxed within a wider screen such as 16:9), it is known as "pillarboxing", after a type of upright mailbox used in England. And "windowboxing" occurs when an already-letterboxed image is pillarboxed, or vice versa, forming a black "picture frame" around the image.

to:

Now to get ''really'' fancy: When this is done horizontally (that is, a 4:3-ratio image is letterboxed within a wider screen such as 16:9), it is known as "pillarboxing", after a type of upright mailbox used in England. And "windowboxing" occurs when an already-letterboxed image is pillarboxed, or vice versa, forming a black "picture frame" around the image. There's even a "smilebox" format for [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinerama Cinerama]] titles, which simulates the curvature of the screen with concave shapes at the top and bottom of the image.



<<|CameraTricks|>>

to:

<<|CameraTricks|>>

Added: 415

Changed: 25

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/letterbox.jpg
[[caption-width:267:The black bars at the top and bottom of the screen are normal for this format.]]

to:

http://static.[[quoteright:267:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/letterbox.jpg
[[caption-width:267:The
jpg]]
[[caption-width-right:267:The
black bars at the top and bottom of the screen are normal for this format.]]


Added DiffLines:

Some movies came to VHS with letterboxing employed only on the opening and end credits, since presenting those sequences in PanAndScan would have resulted in some actors' or crew members' names becoming obscured from the viewers. The studios occasionally tried to make the shift less distracting by replacing the black bars with patterns similar to the background of the ArtisticTitle or the CreativeClosingCredits.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Although letterboxing preserves the entirety of the picture as it was shot, that picture is ([[CaptainObvious obviously]]) much smaller than a PanAndScan transfer, which can be somewhat disconcerting on smaller television sets. Further, some viewers claim to be distracted by the empty black bars on the screen, preferring that the screen be filled with picture. Again, modern wide-screened TV sets help diminish this problem somewhat, although films shot in even wider formats (such as [=CinemaScope=], Todd-AO, and Ultra Panavision 70) are usually letterboxed rather than cropped even in the "widescreen" home video releases.

to:

Although letterboxing preserves the entirety of the picture as it was shot, that picture is ([[CaptainObvious obviously]]) much smaller than a PanAndScan transfer, which can be somewhat disconcerting on smaller television sets. Further, some viewers claim to be distracted by the empty black bars on the screen, preferring that the screen be filled with picture. Again, modern wide-screened TV sets help diminish this problem somewhat, although films shot in even wider formats (such as vintage [=CinemaScope=], Todd-AO, and Ultra Panavision 70) 70, and Cinerama releases from the 1950s and '60s) are usually letterboxed rather than cropped even in the "widescreen" home video releases.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Although letterboxing preserves the entirety of the picture as it was shot, that picture is ([[CaptainObvious obviously]]) much smaller than a PanAndScan transfer, which can be somewhat disconcerting on smaller television sets. Further, some viewers claim to be distracted by the empty black bars on the screen, preferring that the screen be filled with picture. Again, modern wide-screened TV sets help diminish this problem somewhat, although films shot in full CinemaScope (an even wider format) are usually letterboxed rather than cropped even in the "widescreen" home video releases.

to:

Although letterboxing preserves the entirety of the picture as it was shot, that picture is ([[CaptainObvious obviously]]) much smaller than a PanAndScan transfer, which can be somewhat disconcerting on smaller television sets. Further, some viewers claim to be distracted by the empty black bars on the screen, preferring that the screen be filled with picture. Again, modern wide-screened TV sets help diminish this problem somewhat, although films shot in full CinemaScope (an even wider format) formats (such as [=CinemaScope=], Todd-AO, and Ultra Panavision 70) are usually letterboxed rather than cropped even in the "widescreen" home video releases.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Many newer movies released on home video actually make use of that dead space, having captions and subtitles appear in the black bars rather than within the frame itself. Even without such considerations, there are a number of commercials and TV shows that are formatted for letterbox presentation because it gives them a classy look like a big-budget feature film. (Many of which, amusingly, wound up windowboxed after the switch to widescreen, digital TV.)

to:

Although there was some consumer resistance to the format in the early years, it has now become virtually the norm for home video and to wish PanAndScan instead is the mark of a rube dumb enough to spend the same amount of money for up to 33% less picture. Many newer movies released on home video actually make use of that dead space, having captions and subtitles appear in the black bars rather than within the frame itself. Even without such considerations, there are a number of commercials and TV shows that are formatted for letterbox presentation because it gives them a classy look like a big-budget feature film. (Many of which, amusingly, wound up windowboxed after the switch to widescreen, digital TV.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


See also {{Eyedscreen}}.

to:

See also {{Eyedscreen}}.{{Eyedscreen}} for where letterboxing is used as a temporary effect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


See also {{Eyedscreen}}.

Added: 20

Changed: 29

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Compare VisualCompression; contrast PanAndScan.

to:

Compare VisualCompression; contrast PanAndScan.
VisualCompression, WidescreenShot.

Contrast PanAndScan.

Top